Sei sulla pagina 1di 39

EEE381B Aerospace Systems & Avionics

Radar
Part 2 The radar range equation
Ref: Moir & Seabridge 2006, Chapter 3,4 Dr Ron Smith

Outline
1.
2. 3.

4.
5. 6. 7.

Basic radar range equation Developing the radar range equation Design impacts Receiver sensitivity Radar cross-section Low observability Exercises
EEE381B Radar range equation - 2

Winter 2009

1. Basic radar range equation


There are many different versions of the radar range equation. We will use, and fully derive, the one presented below.

RMax
Winter 2009

Pt G 4 3 (4 ) S min
2 2
EEE381B Radar range equation - 3

1.1 Components of the equation


Rmax the maximum range of the radar Pt average power of the transmitter G gain of the transmit/receive antenna wavelength of the operating frequency radar cross-section of the target Smin minimum detectable signal power

Winter 2009 EEE381B Radar range equation - 4

1.2 Units of the equation

RMax

Pt G 4 3 (4 ) S min
2 2

units of RMax

Wm m m W
4

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 5

2. Developing radar range equation

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 6

2.1 Transmitted power

Recall from the previous lecture that the average transmitted power is a function of peak pulse power and the pulse duration:

Pt Pave
Winter 2009

Ppeak Tp

1 , where Tp PRF
EEE381B Radar range equation - 7

2.2 Power density at target [4]

Recall that power density decreases as a function of distance traveled:

Pt G power density at range R 2 4R


Winter 2009 EEE381B Radar range equation - 8

2.3 Reflected power

The amount of power reflected back from a target is a function of the power density at the target and the targets radar cross-section, :

Pt G power density reflected 2 4R


Winter 2009 EEE381B Radar range equation - 9

2.4 Power density of echo at antenna

The power density of the returned signal, echo, again spreads as it travels back towards the radar receive antenna.

Pt G power density received at antenna 2 4R 4R 2

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 10

2.5 Power of echo at receiver*

The antenna captures only a portion of the echoed power density as a function of the receive antennas effective aperture:

Pt G Pt G 22 power at receiver, Pr Ae , 2 4 3 4 (4 ) R (4 ) R

2G recalling that Ae 4
* In this equation the receiver is assumed to be all radar receive chain components except the antenna.
Winter 2009 EEE381B Radar range equation - 11

2.5.1 Relative power received range

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 12

2.6 Minimum detectable signal power

Therefore a radar system is capable of detecting targets as long as the received echo power is greater than or equal to the minimum detectable signal power of the receive chain:

Pt G 22 for Pr S min , Rmax 4 3 (4 ) S min


Winter 2009 EEE381B Radar range equation - 13

3. Radar design impacts

A careful study of the radar range equation provides further insight as to the effect of several radar design decisions. In general the equation tells us that for a radar to have a long range, the transmitter must be high power, the antenna must be large and have high gain, and the receiver must be very sensitive.

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 14

3.1 Power, Pt

Increases in transmitter power yield a surprisingly small increase in radar range, since range increases by the inverse fourth power.
For

example, a doubling of transmitter peak power results increases radar range by only 19%,

2 1.19

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 15

3.2 Time-on-target, /Tp

The average power transmitted can also be increased by increasing the pulse duty cycle, sometimes referred to as the time-on-target. A combined doubling of the pulse width and doubling of the transmitter peak power will give a fourfold increase in average transmitted power, and ~41% increase in radar range.
4

4 1.41
EEE381B Radar range equation - 16

Winter 2009

3.3 Gain, G

Antenna gain is a major consideration in the design of the radar system.


For

a parabolic dish, doubling the antenna size (diameter) will yield a fourfold increase in gain and a doubling of radar range.

For a dish G Ap or ( D / 2) 2 and Rm ax 4 G 2 or


Winter 2009

D4
Radar range equation - 17

EEE381B

3.4 Receiver sensitivity, Smin

Similar to that of transmitter power, increases in receiver sensitivity yield relatively small increases in radar range.
Only

19% range increase for a halving of sensitivity, and at the expense of false alarms.

Receiver design is a complex subject beyond the scope of this course, see 3.5.3. Simplistically, the smaller the radar pulse width, the larger the required receiver bandwidth and the larger the receiver noise floor.
EEE381B Radar range equation - 18

Winter 2009

3.4.1 Receiver bandwidth

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 19

3.4.2 Signal-to-noise

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 20

3.4.3 Receiver threshold

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 21

4. Radar cross-section,

The radar cross-section of a target is a measure of its size as seen by a radar, expressed as an area, m2. It is a complex function of the geometric crosssection of the target at the incident angle of the radar signal, as well as the directivity and reflectivity of the target. The RCS is a characteristic of the target, not the radar.
EEE381B Radar range equation - 22

Winter 2009

4.1.1 RCS of a metal plate

Large RCS, but decreases rapidly as the incident angle deviates from the normal.

4a b
2

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 23

4.1.2 RCS of a metal sphere

Small RCS, but is independent of incident angle.

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 24

4.1.3 RCS of a metal cylinder

RCS can be quite small or fairly large depending on orientation.

2ra 2

4 r
3 4 2

, as viewed

Winter 2009

, from the end


EEE381B Radar range equation - 25

4.1.4 RCS of a trihedral corner reflector

The RCS of a trihedral (corner) is both large and relatively independent of incident angle.

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 26

5. Low Observability

From the previous discussion on the radar cross-section of targets, it should be obvious that determining the radar cross-section of an airplane is a complicated task. The art of designing an aircraft to specifically have a low RCS is known as low observability, or more commonly known as stealth. Stealth is a relatively new technology,
even

full RCS prediction is only 2 decades old.

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 27

5.1 History* of stealth aircraft [1]

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 28

5.2 Aircraft high RCS areas [1]

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 29

5.3 Low observability design areas [1]

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 30

5.3.1 Low observability design example[1]

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 31

5.3.2 Low observability design example[1]

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 32

5.4 Comparative RCS [1]

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 33

6. In-class exercises

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 34

6.1 Quick response exercise # 1

Think carefully about the derivation of the radar range equation just presented. Is there a potentially significant loss component missing?
Hint:

recall the simple link equation from your very early lectures.

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 35

6.2 Quick response exercise # 2

Why have designers of stealth aircraft sought to blend the physical transitions / features of the aircraft?
Will reduction in your aircraft RCS alone make you invisible to the enemy?
How

else might they find you?


EEE381B Radar range equation - 36

Winter 2009

6.3 Radar range equation calculation

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 37

6.3 Radar range equation calculation

The US Navy AN/SPS-48 Air Search Radar is a medium-range, three-dimensional (height, range, and bearing) air search radar. Published technical specifications include:

Operating frequency 2900-3100 MHz Transmitter peak power 60-2200 kW PRF 161-1366 Hz, and pulse widths of 9 / 3 sec Phased array antenna with a gain of 38.5 dB

For its published maximum range of 250 miles for a nominal target such as the F-18, what is the receiver chain sensitivity in bBm?
EEE381B Radar range equation - 38

Winter 2009

References
1) 2) 3) 4) 5)

6)

Moir & Seabridge, Military Avionics Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2006. [Sections 2.6 & 2.7] David Adamy, EW101 - A First Course in Electronic Warfare, Artech House, 2000. [Chapters 3,4 & 6] George W. Stimson, Introduction to Airborne Radar, Second Edition, SciTch Publishing, 1998. Principles of Radar Systems, student laboratory manual, 38542-00, LabVolt (Quebec) Ltd, 2006. John C. Vaquer, US Navy Surface Officer Warfare School Documents, Combat Systems Engineering : Radar, http://www.fas.org/man/dod101/navy/docs/swos/cmd/fun12/12-1/sld001.htm Mark A. Hicks, "Clip art licensed from the Clip Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com"

Winter 2009

EEE381B

Radar range equation - 39

Potrebbero piacerti anche