Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Background
Largest, most powerful tendon in body Formed by gastrocnemius and soleus Incidence of rupture 18:100,000
Incidence is increasing
As demonstrated by population based studies in Finland, Canada, Scotland and Sweden
Presentation
Adults 40-50 y.o. primarily affected (M>F) Athletic activities, usually with sudden starting or stopping Snap in heel with pain, which may subside quickly
Factors to consider
25% of patients have previous symptoms of Achilles inflammation
Leppilahti et al. Clin Orthop 1998
Associated conditions:
Ochronosis Steroid use Quinolones Inflammatory arthritis
Diagnosis
Weakness in plantarflexion Gap in tendon Positive Thompson test
Imaging
X-rays
Indicated if fracture or avulsion fracture suspected
Ultrasound or MRI
Reveal tendon degeneration, if present
Treatment
Non-operative versus operative treatment controversial
Several methods described for each
Non-operative
Cast immobilization
Traditional recommendation is 8 weeks of immobilization Wallace recommended patellar tendon bearing orthosis for weeks 4-8 Functional brace with semirigid tape and polypropylene orthoses for duration of treatment also described
Operative
Open repair
Locking stitch, +/augmentation with plantaris or mesh Post-op care = Casting for 6-8 weeks Risks: Infection (421%), Rerupture (15%)
Operative
Percutaneous
Bunnell stitch Weaker than open repair (Rerupture 017%) Risk of sural nerve injury (0-13%) Decreased infection risk
Op vs. Non-op
Wong et al Am J Sports Med 2002
Metanalysis 125 articles, 5370 patients Wound complication (14.6 vs 0.5%) Rerupture (1.5 perc,1.4 open vs 10.7%) Complication rates lowest in open repair and early mobilization, highest in percutaneous repair and early mobilization
Op vs. Non-op
Bhandari et al. Clin Orthop 2002
More stringent inclusion criteria than Wong 6 studies, 448 patients Wound infection (5% vs 0%) Rerupture (3% vs 13%)
Summary
Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture increasing Operative repair associated with lower rerupture rate, but higher wound complication rate compared to non-op Percutaneous repair has risk of nerve injury Review risk factors before deciding treatment plan
References
Bhandari, M et al. Treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and metaanalysis. Clin Orthop 400:190-200, 2002. Bruggeman, NB et al. Wound complications after open Achilles tendon repair: an analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop 427:63-66, 2004 Chiodo, CP and MG Wilson. Current Concepts Review: Acute Ruptures of the Achilles Tendon. Foot Ank Int 27:305-13, 2006 Leppilahti J et al. Outcome and prognostic factors of Achilles rupture using a new scoring method. Clin Orthop 346:152-61, 2001. Pajala, A et al. Rerupture and deep infection following treatment of total Achilles rupture. JBJS 84-A:2016-21, 2002. Wong, J et al. Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J. Sports Med. 30:565-75, 2002.