Sei sulla pagina 1di 10

General Electric Medical Systems, 2002

Healthcare systems across the globe


US- Funding comes from government (45%), private insurance (33%), out of pocket (17%) and the rest from private. Japan has universal health coverage, with around 27% population above 65+ France has universal health insurance, with 75% being government sponsored. India has hardly any health insurance with 75% out of pocket expenses 50% urban Chinese has health insurance, with hospitals being government run and underpriced Trends in Healthcare

The industry
Market share-50%, Siemens, Philips & Toshiba- 30% (2002) Siemens- $4bn, with 50% of its sales from USA,20% Germany (leader). Profit margin is 10%. Equipment -3% & Services- 15% Philips- $5bn, with 50% of its sales from USA,30% Europe, 15% Asia. Profit margin is 3%. Equipment 3% & Services- 10% Toshiba- $2.3bn, second largest player in Asia and strong in CT and ultrasound, 5% margin.

General Electric Medical Systems (GEMS)


$8bn dollar division within GE, with operating margin at 18% and growing at around 16% annually, mkt share is 50% Leadership (Exhibit 3 & 4) Immelt bought an initiative called GPC. Manufacturing was handled by COE. 7to 9 % of sales was spent on R&D Sales and marketing were local operation 60% of revenue came from equipment sales, and 40% from services. Used equipment market was at $1bn with 15% growth with GEMS share of around 30%. China imbroglio!!!!

International Structural Stages Model


Foreign Product Diversity

Global Matrix
Worldwide Product Division

Area Division International Division Foreign Sales as Percentage of Total Sales

International Product Life Cycle


Raymond Vernon

Multinational Organization
Decentralized federation Key assets, responsibilities and decisions decentralized

Informal HQ-sub relationships overlaid with financial control

Management regards overseas operation as a portfolio of independent business

Characteristics of mainly European companies that ventured aboard pre World war

International Organization
Assets, resources, decisions decentralized but controlled from HQ

Formal Management planning and control for tighter HQ-Sub Linkage

Management regards overseas operation as a appendages to a central domestic corporation

Characteristics of mainly US companies that ventured aboard post World war

Global Organization Model


Centralized Hub Strategic Assets, resources, responsibilities and decisions centralized Tight Control of Decisions, resources & information

Management treats overseas operations as delivery pipelines to a unified global market

Characteristics of mainly Japanese companies that ventured aboard during 1980s

Learnings from the case


How do MNC create value?

Adapting to the context

Changing the context

Can MNC survive without creating value?

Potrebbero piacerti anche