Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ABSTRACT OF RESEARCH PAPER In order to improve the strength of soil many methods are incorporated Including fiber reinforcement, cementious material or mixing other soil. All of the above mentioned method need research related to the test of Soil strength and its behavior under high stress.
Unfortunately there are limited number of test conducted on mechanically improved soil under low confining pressure and the soil
The aim of this research paper is to test fiber reinforced cementious soil under high confining pressure of 20 MPa using GDS triaxial test system and study its mechanical behavior .
Material and Equipment Portaway sand was fiber reinforced and cemented and test using GDS High pressure triaxial testing system under confining pressure of 1,4,10, 20MPa both un drained and drained test have been conducted.
Discrete monofilament polypropylene fibres were used to strengthen soil along with ordinary Portland cement. Their characteristics were 22 mm in length, 0.023 mm in diameter, specic gravity of 0.91, tensile strength and elastic modulus of 120 and 3,000 MN/m2 respectively, and linear strain of 80% at failure.
a) Effect of fibre and cement on sand b) Effect of confining pressure c) Effect of fibre and cement on shear strength parameters
0.4
12 0
s '3 = 4 MPa
8 5
1. Addition of fiber has increased peak deviator stress for both clean sand and cemented sand
(MPa) q v (%)
4 10
(a)
2. Cement also plays important roll since it also increases deviator stress more than fiber effect.
(c)
0 15
Sand, Cement & Fibre Sand & Cement Sand & Fibre Sand only
0
1.6
10
20
30
a (%) %
1.2
q/p'
0.8
0.4
(b)
q( q/p'
0.8 4
0 12 12 0 1.6 0
(b)
Sand, Cement & Fibre Sand & Cement Sand & Fibre Sand only
s '3 s ='4 MPa 4 MPa 3=
88 1.2
5
1. At 4MPa confining pressure graph lines tends to converge on unique stress ratio of 1.3.
4 0.8 4
10 0.4
0
(a) (a)
(b) (c)
Sand, Cement & Fibre Sand, Cement & Fibre Sand & Cement Sand & Cement Sand & Fibre Sand & Sand only Fibre Sand only
2. Cement also plays important roll since it also increases deviator stress more than fiber effect.
0 15 1.6 1.6 0 0
1.2 1.2
10
20
30
a (%) %
0.8 0.8
0.4 10 0.4
(b)
(b) (c)
015
0
10
20
30
q/p'
0.8
(b)
0
12 12
8
5
1. Fiber also reduces volumetric strain and graph lines gets more flatter. 2. Cement also plays important roll since it also reduces volumetric strain more than fiber effect.
q (MPa)
q (MPa) v (%)
4
4
10
(a)
(a)
(c)
0 1.6
0
15 0
Sand, Cement & Fibre Sand, Cement & Fibre Sand & Cement Sand & Sand & Fibre Cement Sand & Fibre Sand only Sand only
10 20 30
1.6
a (%) %
1.2
1.2
0.8
q/p'
0.8
q/p'
0.4
0.4
(b)
(b)
A) Effect of fibre and cement on sand The Graph is between increase in qmax(%) and confining pressure.
increase qmax (%)
250
200 150
% increase in sand with fibre & cement % increase in sand with fibre
1. The effect of fiber decreases with increase in the confining pressure. At low confining press the effect of fiber is more prominent.
100
50 0
10 p' (MPa)
15
20
0.8 0.4
0 -8 30 -4
0.8
0.8
(b)
(b)
0
Fibre reinforced cemented sand 30 -8
0 30 -8
-4
qv(Mpa) (%)
20 0
v (%) (Mpa) q
q v(Mpa) (%)
20 0
20 0
4
10 8
10 8
12
(c) (a)
10 8
12
(c)
12
0 16 2 0
0 16 2 0
1.6 1.2
10
20 a (%)
30
40
0 16 2 0
1.6
10
10
1.6 1.2
20 30 a (%) a (%)
20
30
40
40
0.8 0.4
1. Both graphs show that addition of fiber in cemented soil sample 0.8 increase the peak deviator stress 0.8 and delays axial strain. Similar 0.4 can also be observed. effect of cement addition in soil samples
q/p'
0.4
(b)
(b)
1.2
q/p'
q/p'
(b)
0 -8 -4
0 -8 -4
-8 -4
10
0.4
0 0 -8 2
10
0.4
10
1MPa
B)
30
0.4
(b)
(b)
of confining pressure
0
0
30
Fibre reinforced sand
(a)
2 -8
30
2 -8
30
20
10
10
0.4 12
0 16
q (Mpa)
q (Mpa)
0 1.2 4 0.8 8
20
30 -4 -4 1.6 Fibre reinforced sand (a) 1.6 20 Fibre reinforced sand 20 0 (a) 0 10MPa (a) 1.2 1.2 20 4 4MPa 20 4 10 0.8 10MPa 1MPa 0.8 8 10 4MPa 8 0.4 1MPa 10 12 0.4 10 (c) 12 (c) 0 (c) (a) (b)
q (Mpa)
q (Mpa)
q/p' v (%)
q/p' v (%)
0 2
1.6 1.2
0 2
1.6
-8 0 -4
10
20 a (%)
(a)
16 0
0 2
1.6
16 0
30
40
0 2
-8 0 -4 0
0 0 -8 10
2
-4
20 1.6 (%) a
1.2
10
20 30 a (%)
30
40
40
v (%)
1.2
q/p'
v (%)
1.6
q/p'
0.8
1.6 0
q/p'
v (%)
1.2
4
8
0.8
12
0.4
16
0 -8
4 fiber in cemented soil sample 1.0.8 Both graphs show that addition of 1.2 8 0.8 0.4 0.8 increase the peak deviator stress8and delays axial strain. Similar 12 0.8 0.4 0.4 can (c) effect of cement addition in soil samples also 0 be observed. For 0.4 12 (b) (c) (b) (c) to 16 intersect fiber reinforced soil the graph lines tend at unique (b) -8 0.4 0 0 0 10 20 30 16 (b) stress ratio of 1.3. 0 (b)a (%)
q/p'
q/p'
q/p'
1.2
(b)
40
0 -8
-4
10
20 a (%)
30
40
0 -8 -8 10
-4
(%)
-8
-4 -4
0 4
20 a (%)
30
40
0.8 0.4
0 -8 -4
0.8
0.8
30
Fibre reinforced sand
(a)
0.4
30
0
Fibre reinforced cemented sand
q (Mpa)
30
-8 -4
0 20 30 -8
(b)
(b)
q (Mpa)
q (Mpa)
30
q (Mpa)
v (%)
4
8
10
10MPa 4MPa 1MPa
10
(a)
20
q (Mpa)
4 0 10 2 8
v (%)
v (%)
12
0
16 0
1.6 1.2
(c)
(a)
12
16
2
20 a (%) 30 40
2
0
1.6
q/p'
10
(c)
10
20 a (%)
30
20 a (%)
30
40
40
0 2
1.2
q/p'
(b)
q/p'
v (%)
0.8 1. Both graphs show that addition of fiber in cemented soil sample 1.6 -8 0.8 0.8 delays axial strain and reduces volumetric strain. Similar effect of 0.4 -4 cement addition in1.2 soil samples can also be observed. For fiber 0.4 0.4 0 unique stress reinforced soil the graph lines (b) tend to intersect0at (b) 0.8 -8 ratio of 1.3. 0 0
q/p'
(b)
q/p'
-8 -4
(b)
0.4
-8 -4
4 -4 8 (b) 0
75 65
55 45 35 25 0 5
Sand with cement & fibre Sand with cement Sand with fibre Sand only
max
65
Sand with cement & fibre sand with cement Sand with fibre Sand only
55
max
45
35
25
10
15
20
200
p' (kPa)
400
600
p' (MPa)
1. Graph on left shows that increase in confining pressure diminishes the effect of fiber on friction angle .It can be observed on right graph that cement in clean soil show more shift in graph then fiber addition.
2000
Poly. (Sand with fibre & cement) Poly. (Sand with fibre) Poly. (Sand only)
1500
q (MPa)
q (kPa)
1000
10
0
500
10
20
p' (MPa)
30
40
1. Graph on left shows that failure envelops of all sample follows same path .It can be observed on right graph that at low confining pressure fiber addition shifts the graph line upwards to form cohesion intercept. This cohesion in soil is due to cement addition.
16
12
12
q (MPa)
12
q (MPa)
q (MPa)
4
0
0 0 16
0 16
10
10
20 a (%)
20 30 a (%)
30
40
40 0
0 16
16
Sand with cement & fibre Sand with cement & fibre Sand with cement Sand with cement Sand with fibre Sand with fibre Sand only Sand only 10 20 30 10 20 (%) 30 a (%) a
40
40
1. 12
q (MPa)
8
12 12 Graph on left shows that at low confining pressure effect of fiber is 12 prominent and cement addition effect the graph more then fiber 8 8 pressure fiber effect does. On right graph at high confining 8 diminishes where as cement plays its roll with out any major 4 4 changes. Also the graph does not4follow the same path as graph on right. 0
q (MPa)
q (MPa)
q (MPa)
0 0
8 0
10
10
12
12
8 (a)
6
q (MPa)
q (MPa)
8 4 0 0 20
(b)
10MPa 1MPa
1MPa 4MPa
10MPa
0
40
30
0 10 (b)
10
20
30
40
a (%)
16
12
Du (MPa)
8
4 0
-4
2 2. At high confining pressure the soil sample shows brittle 0 behavior is effect by behavior by delaying axial strain. This addition of fiber30 and cement -2 0 10 20 40
a (%)
Du (MPa)
1. At low confining pressure the soil sample shows gradual 6 behavior. This behavior is effect by addition of fiber and 4 cement.
10
20
30
40
20
16
(c)
a (%) 8
(c)
FL
20
4
16
0
12
10
q (MPa)
20
q (MPa)
20 a (%)
0 10
8
16
(a) 4
(b)
16 12
Du (MPa)
q (MPa)
4 12
Du (MPa)
20MPa 4MPa
10MPa 1MPa 30 40
2
4
6
4
1MPa 4MPa
q (MPa)
10MPa
10 20 30 1MPa
4MPa
4 0
10
20 0
-4 16 0
4 (b) 0 0 10 20
(c)
(b)
20 a (%)
2
10MPa 1MPa
0 2 10
40
20MPa 4MPa
0
10 20 a (%) 20 30 a (%) 30 40 40
0
Du (MPa)
8 6
0 (b) -2
10 0
a (%)
10MPa
20 10 a (%) 30 20 40 30
40
12
Du (MPa)
20
10
a (%)
8
16
16
(b) 4
(c)
FL
8 6
4
Du (MPa)
12
2
Du (MPa)
6
q (MPa)
q (MPa)
12 0
1. At low confining pressure the pore water pressure decreases 0 8 and fiber addition is effective. 4 4
4
-4 8
4
-2
20
0
0 10 20 increases 30 0 10 20 30 40 the pore water 2. At high confining pressure pressure a (%) 0 2 a (%) and fiber addition is effective. 0 8
-4 (c) 0
5
40
16 0
20
30
20 25
40
-2 0
(c)
FL
6
(c)
10 0
20
a (%)
30 6 p' (MPa)
40
10
12
(c)
8
)
Du (
Du (
8 (a)
4 0
2 0
40
-2
q (MPa)
-4
0 (a)
10
40
20
16 12
16
(c)
a (%)
4 0
10MPa
q (MPa)
6 8
2 (c)
FL
1MPa 4MPa
12 8 4 0 0 10 12
1MPa 30
q (MPa)
4 6 40
q (MPa)
10MPa
0 0 10 (b) 10 20 30
1MPa 4MPa
q (MPa)
40
20
8 4
0 0
2 4
a (%)
16
8
0 2 0
Du (MPa)
10MPa
20 30 40
6 10
4
20
(b) 5
Du (MPa)
8
4 0
10
16
12
15 p' (MPa)
20
25
10 0
a (%)
(b) 0
8 6
Du (MPa)
2 0
-2
6 p' (MPa)
10
12
Du (MPa)
4 0
1. Fiber increases 0 10 of soil 20 and 0 addition 10 to sample 20 30 40 the strength 2 a (%) a (%) shifts the failure envelop graph upwards.
20
0 10 16
-4
30
40
(c)
20 a (%) 30 40
0
-2 0
(c)
FL
-4
6
MPa)
10
20
30
40
20
Pa)
(c)
12
a (%)
(c)
Du (
30
30
30
30
50
q (Mpa)
q (Mpa)
q (MPa)
40 30 20
q (MPa)
20
sand with fibre & cement Sand with fibre 20 Sand only
Consolidated undrained tests 10MPa 10MPa 20 4MPa 4MPa (c) 20 1MPa 2010MPa 1MPa
4MPa 1MPa
10
16 12
q (MPa)
q (MPa)
10
10
10
0
0 10 10 0 20 10 a (%) 30
0 40 10
4 0 20
0
20 a (%)
40
30 0
a (%)
0
1030
40 20 a (%)
5 10
30
40
10
20
p' (MPa)
30
40
15 p' (MPa)
20
25
1. Both drained and un drained test shows that stress path of drained test is crossed by soil test in un drained conditions proving that soil can attain more strength in un drained conditions.
Conclusion 1. Both drained and un drained test shows that addition of fiber increases the strength and increases the friction angle. 2. Both test shows that cement plays an important role in producing cohesion in soil and its strength. 3. More research is recommended for this field as complete behavior of soil fiber interaction is not understood well. 4. Arrangement of fibers in soil structure also plays an important roll. 5. Also other soil of good strength can be mix in proportion to improve the target soil. 6. It was observed that at confining pressure of 10MPa the effectiveness of fiber was lost where as the cement plays its roll with minor effects.