Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Owen Perkins
June 25, 2013
Context Evaluation
Determine needs to define objectives of the program Asks what should we do? Collect data to determine goals of program Example: A standardized test is given to every student in 6th grade across a state. What are the objectives of this program? Raise level of education, standard to evaluate teacher performance, etc.
4
Input Evaluation
Determine resources, alternative strategies, and determine plan that has best potential to meet the needs of the program Asks how should we do it? Involves determining the steps and resources needed to accomplish goal or objective
Process Evaluation
To evaluate how well the plan has been implemented Asks are we doing it as planned? Continuously monitor the program, allows decision maker to see conflicts, strengths and weaknesses of program and materials, how well it is following the established plan, etc.
Product Evaluation
Determine program attainments What results were obtained? How well were needs reduced? How did the program work? Compare actual outcomes to anticipated outcomes Should the program being evaluated be continued, modified or dropped?
Stufflebeam suggested evaluators follow these general steps: 1. Focus the evaluation 2. Collection of Information 3. Organization of Information 4. Analysis of Information 5. Reporting of Information 6. Administration of the Evaluation
8
Collecting Information
Specify the source of information to be collected Specify the instruments and methods for collecting the needed information Specify the sampling procedure to be used Specify the conditions and schedule for information to be collected
10
Organization of Information
Provide a format for the information that is to be collected Designate a means for performing the analysis
11
Analysis of Information
Select the analytical procedures to be used Designate a means for performing the analysis
12
Reporting of Information
Define the audiences for the evaluation reports Specify a way to present information to audiences Develop format for evaluation reports Schedule the reporting of information
13
14
16
Article Abstract
This study describes the evaluation results of PORO; a three level occupational guidance program Designed to improve offenders job finding possibilities and to reduce reoffending after imprisonment Used Stufflebeams CIPP model, considering the efficiency, effectiveness and impact of the program Evaluation outcomes and practical suggestions for career development applications addressed to prison populations are reported
17
PORO Definition
The Guidance Program for Job Search (PORO)
Go figure?
18
Program Description
All internees (prisoners) are categorized by their individual judicial situation PORO comprises three levels of guidance to internees:
1. Internees given professional and occupational training in prison 2. Internees given ordinary parole permits 3. Has two distinct sections:
Internees go into community on daily basis Probation and freed internees in community
19
Context Evaluation
What should we do? Collect data to determine goals of program
21
22
The accomplishment of these specific aims is as fundamental for enabling ex-convicts to adjust to the job market and the community on a long-term basis
23
Input Evaluation
How should we do it? Determine resources, alternative strategies, and determine plan that has best potential to meet the needs of the program
24
Input Evaluation: Determine plan that has best potential to meet the needs of the program
The contribution of an expert group was requested to assess the design and methodological validity of PORO in order to achieve the best possible adaptation to a confinement context The potential benefits that might be obtained were rewarding enough considering the assignment of operational, material and human resources
= Cheap Program
25
Process Evaluation
Are we doing it as planned? To evaluate how well the plan has been implemented
26
Product Evaluation
What results were obtained? How well were needs reduced? How did the program work? Determine program attainments
28
29
Conclusion
The resultsgive further support to the idea that career intervention addressed at imprisoned people in adverse social and economic circumstancesis of paramount importance for improving the employment possibilities of people whose [behavior] and lack of skills are troublesome to them and to society
30
Conclusion, contd
This case study is an excellent example of the CIPP evaluation approach Each step of the approach was carefully considered
31
The End
GO HOKIES!
June 25, 2013