Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2013/6/18
Outline
2013/6/18
Upgrade Path
Interoperability & service migration Split ratios, maximum reach, & traffic management Users Forecast
2013/6/18
PON Framing
ITU-TGPON
125 sec 125 sec 125 sec
ATM
GEM
ATM
GEM
ATM
GEM
ATM
ATM
ATM
GPON Lite
GEM GPON is evolving GEM to look like EPON! GEM
IEEE EPON
2013/6/18
PSync 4 Bytes
Ident 4 Bytes
PLOAMd 13 Bytes
BIP 1 Byte
PLend 4 Bytes
Plend 4 Bytes
Upstream
125 us Frame n 125 us Frame n+1 Rate 1.244G 2.488G Frame Size 19440 38880
ONT 1
Gap
ONT 2
Gap
ONT n
Gap
Guard Time
PLOu
DBRu 1 Alloc #a
Payload 1 Alloc #a
DBRu 1 Alloc #b
Payload 1 Alloc #b 5
2013/6/18
Protocol QoS
DBA (Out-of-Scope) OAM (In-Scope)
Framing (In-Scope) Physical Layer (In-Scope) Neither the EPON nor the GPON specification defines the QoS mechanism (DBA algorithm); it is out-of-scope, meaning it is up to the system/chip vendor. EPON and GPON have identical service requirements.
High-performance, QoS-capable systems can be built with either protocol. Evaluate PON systems on performance and price, not protocol.
2013/6/18 Fiberhome Proprietary and Confidential 6
PSTN
C I S C O
SY
S T E M S
Core Network
Home Network
Soft Switch
OLT Triple-Play FTTH ONT
Video / IP STB
PON System: A L2/L3/L4 Ethernet Switch Connects the Core & Home Networks Multi-service Strict enforcement of service contracts Designed to reduce end-to-end cost VoD Server
2013/6/18
E1
ONT ONT
GbE
Business
E1
GbE
ONT
GPON
Classification
GPON ONU
Q0
GPON OLT
100s to 1000s of SAR buffers Frame from ONU must wait until all bytes are received upstream from ONU before it can be processed
Scheduling
NNI Port
Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
Frame Processing
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
Classification Classification
9
Q1
Scheduling
PON-IF
PON-IF
EPON OLT
EPON
EPON ONU
Q0
Scheduling
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
Scheduling
NNI Port
PON-IF
PON-IF
Q1
Frame Processing
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
2013/6/18
Port 2
Port 1
GPON ONU
Q0
Port 2
Port 1
* Short laser on/off times in GPON require high-speed laser drivers * Short AGC intervals in GPON require optical power leveling Additional protocol to negotiate power level Digital interface to transceiver to set the values * Relaxed optical specification parameters in EPON less expensive devices
2013/6/18 Fiberhome Proprietary and Confidential 10
10 Gb/s EPON
?
No roadmap beyond 2.5G for GPON.
X
ATM BPON
622 Mb/s
New Protocol Forklift Upgrade?
ITU-T GPON
2.5 Gb/s Speed 10Gb/s
1.25 Gb/s
2013/6/18
11
64 bits of Preamble
1518 Byte Packet PRE 1518 Byte Packet PRE
64 bits of Preamble
1518 Byte P 1518 Byte P 1518 Byte P 1518 Byte P
2013/6/18
12
2.5G 1.25G
1.25G
1.25G 1.25G
1.25G 1.25G
1.25G 2.5G
1.25G
1.25G 1.25G
2.5G 2.5G
2.5G
2.5G 2.5G
1.25G
2.5G 2.5G
1.25G
1.25G
13
2013/6/18
ONU
PS
OLT
Providing more downstream bandwidth to support advanced digital TV services CATV replacement
PS
OLT
IPTV (5 Gbps), On-Demand (2.5 Gbps), Internet, Gaming, etc. (2.5 Gbps)
HTTP, FTP, Gaming, Video Telephony (1 Gbps)
ONU
Support for advanced, bandwidth-intensive upstream and downstream services Support for more subscribers / dense deployments / MDU markets
IPTV (5 Gbps), On-Demand (2.5 Gbps), Internet, Gaming, etc. (2.5 Gbps) Massively Multiplayer Gaming, Video Surveillance, Video Telephony (10 Gbps)
PS
ONU
OLT
2013/6/18
14
Open Specification (IEEE EPON) Management Management Layer Layer (Out-of-Scope) (Out-of-Scope) Services Layer (Out-of-Scope)
Allows Telcos & OEMs to differentiate products
DBA Algorithm, etc.
Logical Link Control Application MAC Control Media Access Control (MAC) Reconciliation Session Gigabit Media Independent Interface (GMII) Physical Coding Sublayer (PCS) Network Physical Medium Attachment (PMA) Physical Medium Dependent (PMD) Medium Dependent Interface (MDI) Medium
Presentation
Transport
Data Link
Physical
IEEE 802.3 covers only the Physical Layer & part of the Data Link Layer
2013/6/18 Fiberhome Proprietary and Confidential 16
World View 1: PON equipment that complies with a complete specification, such as ITU-T GPON, is mandatory. Aspiration: A complete specification leads to interoperable equipment from multiple suppliers, leading in turn to lower cost.
World View 2: PON equipment that allows transparent re-use of existing IP-based services is mandatory.
Aspiration: Interoperability at the service and management layers with other access systems (e.g., DSL).
2013/6/18
17
Split-Ratio Myths
Logical vs physical split-ratio limits Logical One BPON OLT can address 253 BPON ONUs; One GPON OLT can address 4k GPON ONUs; One EPON OLT can address 32k EPON ONUs. Physical In real deployments, all technologies are limited to 1x32 or 1x64, depending on reach, condition of the fiber plant, service mix, optical performance. There is no practical split-ratio limit for any of the PON protocols; all have ample ONU address space. Myth: EPON is only a 1x16 solution, while GPON supports 1x128 Statements like this combine willful mis-reading of the EPON spec, which specifies a minimum split-ratio of 1x16, not a maximum split-ratio, with some very simplistic BW utilization calculations. Myth: GPON has twice the split-ratio because its downstream is twice as fast as EPONs 2.5G EPON is here and 10G EPON is coming soon this issue will disappear. Latency requirements, bandwidth guarantees, and fairness requirements are more important than raw bandwidth. Stated another way, if solution A has more raw bandwidth than solution B, but cannot distribute that bandwidth with enough precision and accuracy to meet the SLAs, then solution A, and its higher bandwidth, are useless.
2013/6/18 Fiberhome Proprietary and Confidential 18
2013/6/18
19
Japan: 300k+ lines/month. NTT, KDDI, Tepco, K-Opticom, Chubu Electric, Energia, Kintetsu, & many others. Korea: Now in mass deployment, KT and others, 1M+ new subscribers in 2007. China: 50+ EPON deployments currently underway, 400k+ new subscribers in 2007. Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, etc. 6 EPON deployments currently underway (including 3 PTTs). Cost is key. Since IEEE 802.3ah approval in 2004, EPON equipment costs have decreased by 60+% and optics costs have decreased by 80+%.
2013/6/18
20
25 20 15
Subscribers (M)
EP
N O N PO BP N O
6.8 2.5
10 5
CY04
CY05
CY06
CY07
CY08
0 CY09
Calendar Year
Source: HEAVY READING | VOL. 4, NO. 9, JUNE 2006 | FTTH WORLDWIDE MARKET & TECHNOLOGY FORECAST
2013/6/18 Fiberhome Proprietary and Confidential 22
2013/6/18
24
Outline
2013/6/18
25
2013/6/18
26
2013/6/18
27
2013/6/18
28
EPON is mature and suitable for mass deployment in CTC Simple, easy to develop Sufficient chip and system vendors Large-scale, all-around, chip-level and system-level IOP Mass deployment in east Asia Stable operation in the field trial of CTC for one and a half years Decreasing cost
2013/6/18
29
After improved by CTC spec, EPON has no distinctive and essential difference in technical capability compared with GPON -Transport capability
2013/6/18
30
Two types of giga-bit PON systems have been standardized: G-PON by ITU-T and GE-PON by IEEE. Now the question is which one is more promising? ... In Japan, we have seen a drastic price reduction of media converters which could be realized by sharing the technology and products of the LAN market. For services, high quality IP Telephone and IP video are becoming critical basic FTTH services. And for the core network, in NTT we have a full IP backbone network for the FLETs service. Switches and routers in the network employ Ethernet interfaces. Given these factors, we decided to develop GE-PON as the next-generation FTTH system. ----Hiromichi Shinohara, Director of NTT Access Labs (IEEE Communications Magazine, September 2005)
2013/6/18
31
Outline
2013/6/18
32
Summary
1. EPON is more mature & cost-effective than GPON. 2. Both GPON & EPON will coexist in a long time.
2013/6/18
33
2013/6/18
34