Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Canada Denmark
UK PR of China
Germany
Italy Bulgaria
USA Egypt
HO:India
Mexico Middle East Thailand
Brazil Kenya
Indonesia
Argentina
New Zealand
10
0
Disappointed Excited
0 10
Neither
% Retention
key drivers of
satisfaction
nor
the derived
relationships between
levels of satisfaction
and Satisfaction score
Buyer behavior are
reliable.*
* Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit Chain,
By Eugene W. Anderson University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Vikas Mittal, University of Pittsburgh
Being able to make call to centre after office hours 6.4 15.4
?
Standard CSI Study Our Approach
Delight
Must be Attribute :
Lower performance on
these attributes causes 0 100
dissatisfaction to the Performance
customers
Must be attributes
For example:
Geographic Coverage in Metro Dissatisfaction
cities
Delight
A Delight Attribute :
For Example:
SMS on topic of interest
Dissatisfaction
( Sensex / When Tendulakar
starts batting ! )
Voice mail service
Measuring Modeling Mentoring
Theoretical basis of MOSTER system - 4
Delight
Linear Attribute :
improved performance.
For example:
Call charges
Dissatisfaction
Customers
expectations and
responses change
over time.
What is delight
generating today
Becomes
The minimum
expected tomorrow.
Measuring Modeling Mentoring
Nature of Service Expectations
Performance
Level Customers
Believe Can and Should Be
Delivered
Minimum Level
Customers Are Willing
to
to Accept
Desired Delighted
Service
Satisfied
Minimum
Expected
Dissatisfied
that is :
Delight
Zone
Dissatisfaction Zone
Satisfaction
zone
Satisfaction Zone
For each
attribute we Distance
measure the Delighted
from
Dissatisfacti
% who are on
Threshold
Delighted
Satisfied Satisfied
Dissatisfied Dissatisfied
Delighted
Distance
from
Dissatisfacti
on Marginally Delighted
Threshold
Marginally below
delight
(Upper threshold of
delight)
Dissatisfied Satisfied
Marginally Dissatisfied
(Lower threshold of satisfaction)
31
Dissatisfied Satisfied
30
Improvement Potential = 18 % + 12 % = 30 %
Improvement Potential
A3
A6
A12
A7
A9
A9
A1
A5 Improvement Potential
A8
o Dissatisfied
Satisfied
for each attribute
Dissatisfied
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
% Delighted % Promoters
2
R =0.60
Source : 16 projects, Total sample size 14,600
Dissatisfacti
on
Threshold
METRIC
METRIC Consultancy (UK) Limited
211, Tollgate Road, Beckton, New Ham, London E6 5XW