Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Sharma Kolluri, IEEE Fellow Manager of Transmission Planning Entergy Services Inc Presentation at 2012 Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) October 26, 2012 New Orleans, Louisiana
Outline
Background/Introduction VAR Basics Voltage Stability FIDVR Technology Summary
Recommendation#23
Strengthen Reactive Power and Control Practices in all NERC Regions Reactive power problem was a significant factor in the August 14 outage, and they were also important elements in the several of the earlier outages -Quote form the outage report
System Losses
Ploss = IT2 R (Watts) Qloss = IT2 X (VARs)
North American Electric Reliability Corporation
VAR loss
Increases in proportion to the square of the total current. Is approximately 2 to 25 times larger than Watt loss.
Transmission Line Real and Reactive Power Losses vs. Line Loading
Source: B. Kirby and E. Hirst 1997, Ancillary-Service Details: Voltage Control, ORNL/CON-453, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., December 1997.
Benefits
Improves efficiency of power delivery. Improves utilization of transmission assets. Reduces congestion and increases power transfer capability. Enhances grid security.
VARs flow from High voltage to Low voltage; import of VARs indicate reactive power deficit
Voltage Stability
Main factor causing voltage instability is the inability of the power systems to maintain a proper balance of reactive power and voltage control
Voltage Instability/Collapse
The driving force for voltage instability is usually the load. The possible outcome of voltage instability:
loss of loads loss of integrity of the power system
Key Concerns
Voltage (pu)
P-V Curve
Q-V Curve
Q-V Curve with Detailed Load Model
Peak Load with Fixed Taps
120 100 80 60 40
Mvars
200
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Voltage (volts)
Time (seconds)
North American Electric Reliability Council, System Disturbances, Review of Selected 1995 Electric System Disturbances in North America, March 1996.
Porter SVC
Cs Vdc
Natchez DVAR
138 kV
Metro
34.5 kV
T M
25.2 MVAR
34.5 kV FDR
34.5 kV 480 V
D-VAR
Summary
The increasing need to operate the transmission system at its maximum safe transfer limit has become a primary concern at most utilities Reactive power supply or VAR management is an important ingredient in maintaining healthy power system voltages and facilitating power transfers Inadequate reactive power supply was a major factor in most of the recent blackouts
Questions?