Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
BACKGROUND
Great Depression: economic crisis of the capitalist and underdeveloped countries
Latin American economy was decimated by the Depression Worst economic crisis in USA history
MEANINGS
For LA:
No American direct interventions in LA affairs
Hemispheric solidarity
HOOVERS GNP
Herbert Hoovers Latin American policy
Advocate of non-intervention
He rejected TRs Big Stick policy
American withdraw the Marines from Nicaragua
When Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) became President (1933) his main concerns were in the domestic sphere: face the consequences of the Great Depression He proposed a foreign policy base on friendly relations with other countries; a good neighbor policy
Great influence of Sumner Wells, Under Secretary of State and personal friend of FDR
Cooperation with LA Multilateral understanding of the Monroe Doctrine: group action, not unilateral enforcement of the MD
FDR believed in reciprocity: the LA countries will maintain order for promises of nonintervention
FDR preferred the carrot than the stick, but he would protect American interests
Cuba was under the dictatorship of Gerardo Machado and he became the target of Cuban dissidents
Because of the growing opposition and political instability, American investors became nervous and asked protection from their government Hoover did not intervene helping Machado to stay in power
Gerardo Machado
1871-1939
FDRs approach
Non intervention, but diplomacy
Sumner Wells mission: FDR sent Wells to mediate and find a solution to the Cuban situation
Wells realized that Machado was a liability and proposed his resignation as the only way stop the political turmoil
Machado resisted but without the support of the Cuban Army he resigned in August 1933 Carlos Manuel de Cspedes three weeks presidency
Sumner Welles
1892-1961
Historical conflict: Latin American nationalist reformism vs. American and local, economics, ideological and geopolitics interests
Communist threat
Wells became afraid of the communist influence behind Grau San Martn and asked for an intervention, but FDR did not approve it
Defense of American economic interests in Cuba that were under San Martin menace The US sent clear signs to Batista and Wells encouraged him to deposed Grau San Martn In January 1934, Grau San Martn was deposed and a new government under Carlos Mendieta was organized with the US government approval and official recognition
In 1934, the US government abrogated the Platt Amendment, passed a favorable tariff concessions, and provided loans to the Cuban government
Although the way the US dealt with the problems with Cuba was a victory for the GNP, the defeat of Grau San Martin and his reforms laid the basis for challenges to American dominance almost twenty years later
The Cuban interpretation of what happened with the Revolution of 1933 was completely different from the American interpretation
Cuban nationalism Fidel Castro: Cuban Revolution
Gross Domestic Produtc (GDP) Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia Mxico Per Venezuela Latin America USA World
-28.5 -4-4
Latin American economic problems: reliance on exportations and the Great Depression, dependency in external markets
Reduction of international demand of Latin American products and fell of the exportation Tariffs and barriers: Hawley-Smoot Tariff, 1930 Financial and credit problems: no capital surplus, no loans
1934-1942: reciprocal trade agreements with 15 LA countries Quotas of importation: sugar Export-Import Bank, 1934
Credits to LA countries to buy US goods
Consequences
Strengthen US-Latin American economic relations
American exports to LA:
$363 million in 1933 $548 in 1939
American trade deficit with LA: from $142,000,000 (1931) to $13,000,000 (1939)
World War Two (WWII) would continue strengthening US-LA economic relations
On march 18, 1938, President of Mexico Lzaro Crdenas expropriated the Dutch, British, and US petroleum companies
$500 million $260 American investment
Expropriation
Mexican oil workers strike, May 1937, demanding better wages and better working conditions, etc. The oil companies lost an arbitration decision and a Mexican Supreme Court decision, and rejected the outcome challenging Mexican sovereignty Cardenas could not allow the companies to that and expropriated the oil companies on March 18, 1938
After four years of negotiation, the Mexican and US government get an agreement in 1942: American companies get $42 million compensation from Mexico
Good timing for Mexico: European turmoil and WWII
US used economic and diplomatic pressure against Mexico, but avoid damage US-Mexican relations American strategic interests and hemispheric defense over oil companies property rights
3/9/2013