Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ABSTRACT
we start by first characterizing the most important and distinguishing features of wavelet-based watermarking schemes. Application scenario,copyright protection is considered and building on the experience that was gained, implemented two distinguishing watermarking schemes. Detailed comparison and obtained results are presented and discussed.
Overview
Water marking
Water marking
Advantages of DWT Allows good localization both in time and spatial frequency domain. Better identification of which data is relevant to human perception higher compression ratio Higher flexibility: Wavelet function can be freely chosen
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a) Original Image256x256Pixels, 24-BitRGB (b) JPEG (DCT) Compressed with compression ratio 10:1 (c) JPEG2000 (DWT) Compressed with compression ratio 10:1
The cost of computing DWT as compared to DCT is higher. Longer compression time
Future scope
The work presented in this project is not user friendly i.e. one can provide a graphical user interface for the work that has been presented. Also the effective retrieving of the image when passed through a lossy channel can be considered for further work. The compression of the watermarked image can also be considered in this process
Conclusion
Watermarking has been used as a tool for embedding image for copyright protection. It is also used for transmission of the data securely and also provided assistance to management of information.
Applications
Broadcast Monitoring (Television news often contains watermarked video from international agencies) Copyright protection Fingerprinting (Different recipients get differently watermarked content)
THANK YOU !
Q&A