Last time design tools from Positioning School (Porter) Trying to Answer - IF: there are particular structural factors that are shaping profit potential in a given industry how attractive are they for a given firm? (i.e. this SCP/ IOE paradigm)
This means determining industry attractiveness (to help aid domain selection and corporate positioning) we are not neglecting the impact
Remember 2/17/13
We can extend our understanding of the industry dynamics by applying Simple PEST and Porters 5 forces analysis: This contributes to the FOUNDATION of your Analysis: The national/ international economy The natural environment
Technology
Demographic structure
The Industry Environment lies at the core of the Macro Environment. The Macro Environment impacts the firm through its effect on the Industry Environment.
The value of the product to customers (e.g.the consumer surplus) The intensity of competition (concentration, geographical concentration, scale, scope) Relative bargaining power at different levels within the value chain.
1.
1.
A few firms
Two firms
Significant barriers
Restaurant: Location If we can forecast changes in industry structure we can (increase) vs comp. predict likely impact on competition and profitability. Concentration(decre ase)
Strategic Positioning
Once we know which structural features of the industry support profitability and which depress profitability, we can choose a favorable position(ing) within the industry.
Which of the structural variables that are depressing profitability can we change by individual or collective strategies? Example working with other buyers to increase purchasing power of a firm (typical of Italian SMEs)
Organisations sell in markets (i.e. this is where they implement their business strategies) -not in industries- and they sell by different methods (or business strategies). We therefore need to understand how markets work:
2/17/13
The Automobile industry (SIC 3712) DISCRETE VARIABLES luxury car industry? The
Is its industry global, regional (Europe) or national (UK)? Key criterion: PRODUCT SUBSTITUTABILITY
On the demand side : are buyers willing to substitute between types of cars and across countries On the supply side : are manufacturers able to switch production between types of cars and across countries
We may need to draw industry boundaries differently for different types of decision (see later example of tins)
2/17/13
Demand/Customer analysis
2)
These are all distinct markets that comprise the TIN Industry in France/Germany 2/17/13
2/17/13
5 Forces
Analysis of demand
Analysis of competition What drives competition? What drives competition? What are the main What are the main dimensions of competition? dimensions ofis competition? How intense competition? How intense is competition? How can we obtain a superior competitive position? How can we obtain a superior competitive position?
CSFs a label/expression that communicates the areas of activity, which have/could have corresponding metric(s) Early (1980) strategic use of CSFs from an MIS perspective (Munro 2/17/13 & Wheeler,1980)
Thought example: Market Segmentation and new product development for Tesco (UK) Assume a corporate goal Market Development in A
From your structural analysis you determine As attractiveness Product in the industry: type Customer Scho Prof. Prescho Mass Colle Type ol Books ol Market ge
<1 8 Student> 18 18-35
(Non student)
3654 >5 5 2/17/13 What are relevant resources and operational / dynamic capabilities? (i.e. what are the elements
Analysis
Internal Rivalry HIGH Growth in online provision market saturation? Cost competition? Key Profitable Medium segment????
2/17/13
growing?
Market awareness (buyer price sensitivity) KPI? Product Range (buyers choice in substitutes) KPI? Inventory avoiding stock outs KPI? Sales and Service Environment - KPI?
then ask- What resources and capabilities are needed and/or can be leveraged into segment A from other occupied markets? 2/17/13
1) Acquiring knowledge 2) Behaviour - The key purpose of this information and its analysis is to try to forecast the direction of strategic change what is the competitors likely intent? (i.e. consideration of their dynamic capabilities (or how can they change?) Signalling and credible threats are used to hide this understanding! (remember the Power School?)
2/17/13
This allows us a greater understanding of the positioning of an organisation in relation to the corporate and business strategies of other organisations. Hence it builds upon our competitor and demand analysis findings KEY remember your focus is to filter information to derive the important strategic insights
2/17/13
First
2/17/13
Firms in strategic groups have one or more competitive characteristics in common. For example:
firms firms firms
that sell in same price / quality range which cover same geographic area
which have vertical integration to the same degree which have similar product line breadth
firms firms
which emphasize the same types of distribution channel which offer buyers similar services
firms
2/17/13
firms
1) Identify competitive characteristics that differentiate firms from one another in a market or industry use your PESTLE , OLI, 5 Forces, Impact Wheels etc (CSFs) 2) Plot these firms on a two variable graph using pairs of these differentiating characteristics 3) Assign firms that fall in/around the same strategy space the same strategic group.
4) Draw circles around each strategic group where the circles are proportional to the size of the groups 2/17/13
?
Le as k( 2 0 0 2)
?
2/17/13
2/17/13
2/17/13
Eastern United
Delta
Geographic Scope
Nationa l
Continental Western Republic Ozark Piedmont AirCal PSA Southwest America West
USAir Southwest
Frontier
Regional
Texas Intl
Others
No Frills
No Frills
Quality of
Quality of
Full Service
NOW
2/17/13 Evaluate
You can recognize groups strengths and weaknesses You can identify the strategic group that represents the greatest opportunity and / or threat
Next step? Your strategic analysis could recommend for your organisation that it:
Seeks to create a new group (with new product/market combinations?) Seeks to move to a better group (and what is better? / changes in corporate and /or business strategies)
Seeks to strengthen the existing group (increase the entry barriers? (mergers? 2/17/13 Acquisitions? JVs?))
THE FIRM
Positioning School/Design) MATCHING firms potential to opportunities in markets. we need to focus on strategic evaluation and choices - and the internal environment of the firm (RBT Culture)
Now
2/17/13
Fine Optics
Plain-paper copier Color copier Color laser copier Laser copier Binoculars
MicroElectron ics
Compact fashion camera EOS autofocus camera Digital camera Video still camera Video security systems Basic fax Camcorders Laser fax Mask aligners Excimer laser Scanners aligners Stepper alignersCalculator Notebook computer
Inkjet printer Laser printer Color video printer Digital commercial printer Possessing and deploying relevant
Previously discussed!
RESOURCES
TANGIBLE
Financial Physical
2/17/13
are organisational capabilities which are resource combinations (and of course this can bring rigidities (KODAK!))
BUT - Its important to consider what are the relative capabilities that can aid sustainable advantage (i.e. consider them wrt competitors (so you need your competitor analysis!)) at both a static and dynamic level
Seek to identify those particular capabilities as they are likely to offer a 2/17/13 better foundation for a business strategy
Appropria te
Rival firm
RELATIVELY STATIC+
RELATIVELY DYNAMIC+
Your firm
STATIC+
DYNAMIC+
VRI O
Pa st 2/17/13
Competitive Time
Futur e
Appraising Resources
RESOURCE Financial Tangible Resources CHARACTERISTICS
Borrowing capacity Internal funds generation
INDICATORS
Debt/Equity ratio Credit rating Net cash flow Market value of fixed assets. Scale of plants Alternative uses for fixed assets
Physical
Plant and equipment: Size, location, technology flexibility. Land and buildings Raw materials
Patent, copyrights, know how, R&D No. Of patents owned facilities Royalty income Technical and scientific employees R&D expenditure R&D staff Brands. Customer loyalty, company Brand equity reputation (with suppliers, Customer retention customers, government) Supplier loyalty Training, experience,adaptability, commitment and loyalty of employees Employee qualifications, Pay rates, turnover
Human Resources
(V)Resources and capabilities need to be valuable (R)Resources and capabilities need to be rare (I)Resources and capabilities need to be imperfectly non-imitable
Resources & Capabilities owned/accessible to an organisation that have these 2/17/13 attributes are MORE likely to be able to
Resource / Capability
Valuable?
Rare?
N O YE S
Imperfectly Imitable?
Implementable by Organisation?
Physical
(e.g. plant) Reputation (e.g brand)
YE S YE S
YE S YE S
Organizational
(e.g. structure)
Financial
(e.g. cash)
Intellectual
(e.g IPR)
Technological
(e.g. innovation) From Tescos Segment A key structural success factors were: Being price sensitive, (BRAND) appropriate range of texts, accessibility (PLANT), being prompt in delivery and working with 2/17/13 suppliers for recommendations (marketing knowledge)
Resources and their effective use (singular / combined/ relative /static/dynamic) results in a market relevant and profitable task being completed
We can view this (i.e. the achievement of a relevant market task) as a functional chain or a value chain (using Porters terminology) as the resources are LINKED together This allows the identification of areas of strength / weakness within the organisation relative to the competition 2/17/13 and market needs.
Comprehensive, integrated MIS network linked to Wal-Mart, Capital One, Dell Computer managerial decision making Research Innovative new product development Fast-cycle new product development Efficiency in volume manufacturing Continuous improvements in operations Flexibility and speed of response Design capability Brand management Building reputation for quality Responsiveness to market trends IBM, Merk 3M, Apple Canon, Inditex (Zara) Briggs & Stratton, YKK Toyota, Harley-Davidson Four Season Hotels Nokia, Apple Procter & Gamble, Altria Johnson & Johnson MTV, LOreal PepsiCo, Pfizer L. L. bean, Dell Computer Amazon.com Singapore Airlines, Caterpillar
OPERATIONS
SALES AND DISTRIBUTIONEffective sales promotion and execution Efficiency and speed of order processing Speed of distribution Customer service
38
Operations Capability
MIS capability
HR management capability
ACTIVITY RELATED CAPABILITIES (Operations related only) SPECIALIZED CAPABILITIES (Manufacturing related only) SINGLE-TASK CAPABILITIES (Only those related to PCB assembly)
Manufacturing capability
Telset assembly
System assembly
Wave soldering
SUPPOR T ACTIVITI ES
INBOUND LOGISTICS
PRIMARY ACTIVITI ES
Having identified a potential basis for matching competitive advantage can the organisation SUSTAIN this? Hence extracting the profit potential of resources and capabilities means:
For Porter and IOE this means identifying an attractive market (and profitability drivers)
can gap analysis to determine the fit of a firms resources and capabilities in light of industrial / market development and corporate goals
This We In
other words we are seeking to develop a Dynamic Resource fit (sometimes called GAP analysis)
2/17/13
Corpora te Strategy
Strateg ic 'Plan'
al Analys is
G ap
Busines s Strategi es
Devel op (HR)
Acqui re
Al ly
Incub ate
2/17/13
Developing Organizational
Helpful references:
http://people.westminstercollege.edu/faculty/bray/webpage
Stanley Han (2004), http://www.csus.edu/indiv/h/hany/Teaching/Slides/Resources Oct 2004 Grant R (2004), Chapter 5 L Hellstrom and L Bennet (2000), http://web.hhs.se/cic/courses/underthebridge/portal.pdf Oct 2004 Sveiby, K. E. (2001). A Knowledge based theory of the firm to guide strategy formulation. Sveiby Knowledge Associates, http://www.sveiby.com/articles/Knowledgetheoryoffirm.htm Accessed April 2003
10
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
2/17/13
3 0
Which of the following defines a continuous variable for which strategic tool? 10 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 1. Price, Strategic Groups
2. 3.
Price, FAR Geographical market served, Strategic Groups Quality, Market 0 Segmentation
4.
2/17/13
3 0
What is the difference between idiosyncratic and contestable markets/resources 20% 20% 20% 20% 1. They are the same
2.
10
20%
They categorise the ease to which competitors can imitate products/servic es 0 categorise
1 2 3 4 5
2/17/13 3. They
10
1.
To identify attractive market segments To identify clusters of similarly competitive organisations 0 identify new /
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
2.
2/17/13 3. To
10
20%
1.
20%
20%
20%
20%
2.
3.
10
20%
1.
The competitive structure of the organisation The competitive structure of the market environment
20%
20%
20%
20%
2.
3.
Which SoT originated the Value Chain and what is its purpose?
3 0
10
20%
1.
20%
20%
20%
20%
2.
3 0
10
Fully (100%) Most of it (7599%) A majority of it (50-74%) Some of it (2549%) Almost none of it (0-24% 0
1
3.
20% 20%
4.
5.
2/17/13
Molto più che documenti.
Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.
Annulla in qualsiasi momento.