Sei sulla pagina 1di 24

Dynamic Interconnection Networks

CEG 4131 Computer Architecture III Miodrag Bolic

Quiz 1
NIOS II processor basics FPGA basics Caches
Performance Size, number of bits Block placement Block identification Block replacement Write strategy

Quiz 1 (Cont.)
Key terms: Flynns taxonomy Shared memory architectures
Cache coherence NUMA, UMA, COMA Symmetric Multiprocessors

Distributed memory systems Classification based on communication Classification based on type of parallelism Chapter 1 from the textbook

Quiz 1 (Cont.)
Amdahl law Speedup, Efficiency Parallelism profile, average parallelism, MIPS Scalability Understanding of performance of the program for parallel addition

Chapters 3.1, 3.2.2, 3.4, 3.5

Overview
Network properties Switches Single and multistage Interconnection networks Crossbar

Network properties
Node degree d - the number of edges incident on a node.
In degree Out degree

Diameter D of a network is the maximum shortest path between any two nodes. The network is symmetric if it looks the same from any node. The network is scalable if it expandable with scalable performance when the machine resources are increased.

Bisection width
Bisection width is the minimum number of wires that must be cut to divide the network into two equal halves. Small bisection width -> low bandwidth A large bisection width -> a lot of extra wires
A cut of a network C(N1,N2) is a set of channels that partition the set of all nodes into two disjoint sets N1 and N2. Each element of C(N1,N2) is a channel with a source in N1 and destination in N2 or vice versa. A bisection of a network is a cut that partitions the entire network nearly in half, such that |N2||N1||N2+1|. Here |N2| means the number of nodes that belong to the partition N2. The channel bisection of a network is the minimum channel count over all bisections of the network:

Bc min | C ( N1, N 2) |
bi sec tions

Factors Affecting Performance


Functionality how the network supports data routing, interrupt handling, synchronization, request/message combining, and coherence Network latency worst-case time for a unit message to be transferred Bandwidth maximum data rate Hardware complexity implementation costs for wire, logic, switches, connectors, etc.

2 2 Switches

*From Advanced Computer Architectures, K. Hwang, 1993.

Switches
Module size 22 44 88 NN Legitimate states 4 256 16,777,216 NN Permutation connection 2 24 40,320 N!

Permutation function: each input can only be connected a single output. Legitimate state: Each input can be connected to multiple outputs, but each output can only be connected to a single input

10

Single-stage networks

Single stage Shuffle-Exchange IN (left) Perfect shuffle mapping function (right) Perfect shuffle operation: cyclic shift 1 place left, eg 101 --> 011 Exchange operation: invert least significant bit, e.g. 101 --> 100

*From Ben Macey at http://www.ee.uwa.edu.au/~maceyb/aca319-2003

11

Multistage Interconnection Networks


The capability of single stage networks are limited but if we cascade enough of them together, they form a completely connected MIN (Multistage Interconnection Network). Switches can perform their own routing or can be controlled by a central router This type of networks can be classified into the following four categories: Nonblocking
A network is called strictly nonblocking if it can connect any idle input to any idle output regardless of what other connections are currently in process

Rearrangeable nonblocking
In this case a network should be able to establish all possible connections between inputs and outputs by rearranging its existing connections.

Blocking interconnection
A network is said to be blocking if it can perform many, but not all, possible connections between terminals. Example: the Omega network

12

Omega networks
A multi-stage IN using 2 2 switch boxes and a perfect shuffle interconnect pattern between the stages In the Omega MIN there is one unique path from each input to each output. No redundant paths no fault tolerance and the possibility of blocking

Example: Connect input 101 to output 001 Use the bits of the destination address, 001, for dynamically selecting a path Routing: - 0 means use upper output - 1 means use lower output
13

*From Ben Macey at http://www.ee.uwa.edu.au/~maceyb/aca319-2003

Omega networks
log2N stages of 2 2 switches N/2 switches per stage S=(N/2) log2(N) switches Number of permutations in a omega network 2S

14

Baseline networks
The network can be generated recursively The first stage N N, the second (N/2) (N/2) Networks are topologically equivalent if one network can be easily reproduced from the other networks by simply rearranging nodes at each stage.

*From Advanced Computer Architectures, K. Hwang, 1993.

15

Crossbar Network
Each junction is a switching component connecting the row to the column. Can only have one connection in each column

*From Advanced Computer Architectures, K. Hwang, 1993.

16

Crossbar Network
The major advantage of the cross-bar switch is its potential for speed. In one clock, a connection can be made between source and destination. The diameter of the cross-bar is one. Blocking if the destination is in use Because of its complexity, the cost of the cross-bar switch can become the dominant factor for a large multiprocessor system. Crossbars can be used to implement the ab switches used in MINs. In this case each crossbar is small so costs are kept down.

17

Problem
A) Use two-input AND and OR gates to construct NxN crossbar switch network between N processors and N memory modules. Use cij signal as the enable signal for the switch in ith row and jth column. Let the width of each crosspoint be w bits. B) Estimate the total number of AND and OR gates needed as a function of N and w.

18

Problem (cont.)
M1 M2

...

Mn

Crosspoint

C11 P1

C12

C1n

P2

C21

C22

C2n

...
Cn1 Pn Cn2 Cnn

19

Problem (cont.)
M1 M2

...

Mn

Crosspoint

M1
C12 C1n

C11 P1

P2

C21

C22

C2n

Crosspoint

...
Cn1 Pn

C11
Cn2 Cnn

P1

20

Problem (cont.)
P1 Address P2 Address

Decoder

Decoder

1 C11 C12

C21 C22

21

Performance Comparison
Network Latency Switching Wiring Blocking complexity complexity
O(1) O(w) yes

Bus

Constant O(N) O(log2N)

MIN

O(Nlog2N) O(Nw log2 N) O(N2) O(N2w)

yes

Crossbar

O(1)

no

22

Some Commercial Solutions [3]


System-on-chip crossbar networks:
Nexus from Fulcrum Microsystems
The core is used in PMC-Sierra dual MIPS processor RM9000

23

References
1. Advanced Computer Architecture and Parallel Processing, by Hesham El-Rewini and Mostafa Abd-ElBarr, John Wiley and Sons, 2005. 2. Advanced Computer Architecture Parallelism, Scalability, Programmability, by K. Hwang, McGraw-Hill 1993. 3. A. Lines, Nexus: an asynchronous crossbar interconnect for synchronous system-on-chip designs, Proc. of High Performance Interconnects, pp 2-7, 2003.

24

Potrebbero piacerti anche