Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Roland Bergh
Tel: Fax: Cell: e-mail: +27-12-991-3727 +27-12-991-3807 +27-82-653-2397 rbergh@global.co.za
Programme
Introduction
Problems with Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Performance factors
Craftsmen Utilisation
Maintenance Downtime
Maintenance Cost-Effectiveness
Melbourne
Conclusion
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
What is the role of the craftsman? What is realistic craftsman utilisation? How should craftsman utilsation be measured?
Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
Available Time
9h
Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
Potential Utilisation Available Time
15 min
83% 9h
15 min
Tea break
30 min
Lunch break
30 min Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
Achievable Utilisation Potential Utilisation Available Time
15 min
83% 74% 9h
15 min
30 min
30 min
10 min
10 min
Continuous Improvement
30 min Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
Achievable Utilisation
15 min
30 min
30 min
74%
15 min
30 min
15 min
Travel
30 min
10 min
15 min
30 min
10 min
30 min Melbourne
February 2004
Craftsman Utilisation
AchievableUtilisation Achieved Utilisation
15 min
30 min
30 min
46% 74%
15 min
30 min
15 min
Tool Time!
30 min
10 min
15 min
30 min
10 min
30 min Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Downtime
What causes maintenance downtime?
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Downtime
Calendar Time
Working Time
Non-working Time
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Downtime
What causes maintenance downtime?
Unexpected Failures Routine maintenance Planned Repair maintenance
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Downtime
Reduce downtime: Unplanned Maintenance Downtime
Eliminate causes of failure (through RM or DOM)
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Workload
What is your real maintenance workload?
Melbourne
February 2004
Routine Maintenance
Proposed Routine Maintenance Equipment Number M 00 00 00 1
Proposed Interval Weekly Weekly Monthly Daily 2 monthly 2 weekly Monthly Monthly Shift start 3 monthly 3 monthly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Responsible Operator Operator Operator Operator Fitter Operator Fitter Fitter Operator Operator Operator Fitter Fitter Fitter Fitter
Manroni Moulder
Proposed Task Check V-belt tension Check bearings for abnormal noise Stop equipment with emergency stop Check in-feed roller gap to be 2.6 mm 0.05 mm Check gearbox oil level on dipstick Check slat-belt wear strips thickness > 1 mm Check apex of slat-belt spur wheels > 3 mm Check mandrel spindle for lateral play < 0.5 mm Set drip lubricator to 5 drops per min during running Open access door by 10 mm and check that door micro-switch turns off equipment during running Run machine at 10% speed and visually check all cam rollers for free rotation Check play of spindle in top bush < 0.2 mm Replace turret assembly Replace oil feed pump Replace mandrel
Melbourne
February 2004
Routine Maintenance
Packaging Routine Maintenance Tasks
Distinguish between on-line and off-line tasks Group by each Trade/discipline
High Frequency HF Schedules Standing WOs Low Frequency LF Schedules Specific WOs
High Frequency
SOP
Low Frequency
LF Schedules
Ops schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Corrective Maintenance
Some failure modes cannot be prevented
Condition based maintenance reveals potential failures. Potential failures lead to failures and failures will:
require corrective maintenance
Failure finding tasks identify failures to protective devices. Failed protective devices will:
require corrective maintenance
So what do we do, schedule Routine maintenance and wait for failures to occur?
Melbourne
February 2004
Corrective Maintenance
What are the known factors about failures?
Failure modes
What to do to repair Support equipment needed Skill required Estimated duration of the job
Melbourne
February 2004
Corrective Maintenance
What are the unknown factors about failures?
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Workload
Planned work
Routine maintenance
Routine inspections Failure finding tasks Condition monitoring tasks Scheduled services
25 - 35%
40 - 50%
Unplanned work
Breakdown work
Emergency work
< 25%
Melbourne
February 2004
Manufacturers recommendations
Maintenance analysis
Maintenance Task
RCM
Resource Planning
Type
Fitter Press Crane
Experience
Documentation
Task Description
Qty
1 1 1
Hrs
4 2 2
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Workload
Planned work
Routine maintenance
Routine inspections Failure finding tasks Condition monitoring tasks Scheduled services
25 - 35%
40 - 50%
Unplanned work
Breakdown work
Emergency work
< 25%
Melbourne
February 2004
Maintenance Workload
Planned work
Routine maintenance
Routine inspections Failure finding tasks Condition monitoring tasks Scheduled services
65 - 75%
Unplanned work
Breakdown work
Emergency work
< 25%
Melbourne
February 2004
Long-term Scheduling
Detail planning and scheduling provides a deterministic forecast of requirements.
Events can be:
firm, e.g. routine maintenance uncertain, e.g. corrective maintenance.
Melbourne
February 2004
Forecasting
Maintenance Requirements
Spares Skilled labour Facilities Special tools Downtime Costs
Melbourne
February 2004
Forecasting
Tot Jan Feb 8450 600 550 5550 350 300 2885 220 250 3970 350 230 20855 1520 1330
Mar Apr May Jun Jul 590 1200 900 650 700 320 800 700 500 550 235 440 350 210 190 210 600 450 290 300 1355 3040 2400 1650 1740
Aug Sep 750 800 660 450 250 150 360 320 2020 1720
Oct Nov 600 660 350 320 230 260 450 220 1630 1460
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Work Origination
Originator Maintenance Supervisor
Assess notification, priority, required action and logistics
Planning
Assess notification and supervisor response. Assign planning priority
Record notification
Authorise notification
If
Immediate
Plan
If
Melbourne
February 2004
Characteristics
It contains RM and corrective maintenance work It contains only work for which task detail and logistics planning has been completed It contains sufficient work to ensure a high level of labour utilisation Work is allocated to the schedule in consideration of priorities It has the commitment of senior maintenance and operations management
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Material Commitments Approved Master Schedule Resource Commitments Master Schedule Implementation
Maintenance windows
Operations Schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Plannable Hours
Material Commitments Approved Master Schedule Resource Commitments Master Schedule Implementation
Maintenance windows
Operations Schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Calendar Time
Available Hours
Tool Time
Un-recovered hours
Plannable hours
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Material Commitments Approved Master Schedule Resource Commitments Master Schedule Implementation
Maintenance windows
Maintenance Windows
Operations Schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Working Time
Non-Working Time
Maintenance
Planned Unplanned Routine operations maintenance maintenance available time downtime windows
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Material Commitments Approved Master Schedule Resource Commitments Master Schedule Implementation
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Material Requirements
Material Commitments Approved Master Schedule Resource Commitments Master Schedule Implementation
Maintenance windows
Operations Schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Planners
Maintenance supervisor/s Operations representatives
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Outstanding workload
Man-hours available for planned work
Melbourne
February 2004
Backlog
Priority 3 & 4
2 - 4 crew weeks
Outstanding workload
RM due
Master Schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Backlog
Priority 1 and 2 work:
influence current plant and equipment performance
Melbourne
February 2004
Backlog
Is a prerequisite for effective planning and scheduling of work Ensures asset care tasks are identified and managed Ensures optimal resource utilisation Justifies resource levels Justifies overtime
Melbourne
February 2004
Plannable Hours
Material Commitments Approved Master Schedule Resource Commitments Master Schedule Implementation
Maintenance windows
Operations Schedule
Melbourne
February 2004
Principles
All Planned priority 1 and 2 jobs must be loaded All plannable hours must be allocated to planned work
Melbourne
February 2004
Performance Measures
Planning % RM schedule compliance % weekly schedule compliance Labour utilisation Delays to artisans Stores service level Workload Level of planned work RM as % of total workload Backlog control Work order return rate Overtime: unplanned Costs Engineering budget: % deviation Maintenance charge-out rate Value of RTS as % of total requisitions Spares holding costs Effectiveness Planning effectiveness Production delays due to unavailable services Target
100% 95% 60% < 5% 90%
Range
> 95% 90 - 95% 50 - 60% 5 - 10% 80 - 90%
Actual 96% 94% 44% 8% 86% Actual 88% 35% 1.1 2.5 4%
Target
Range
Performance
100% 100% 11% 100%
> 75% 60 - 75% 25 - 35% 20 - 40% 2 - 4 crew 1 - 5 crew weeks weeks 2 - 4 jobs/man 1 - 5 jobs/man per day per day < 5% 5 - 10%
100%
Target
0% R250/h 0% 0.2%
Actual Performance 10% -5% 50% R250 - R280/h R 253.85 87% 10% 13% 0% 0.2 - 0.25% 89% 0.21% Range
25% 3- 5h
Range
Target
100% < 5h
Performance 40%
40%
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
Melbourne
February 2004
In summary
Maximise TOOL TIME by:
Defining the workload (RM and Planned Corrective) Develop full logistics requirement per task and load on CMMS Long-term workload, downtime and logistics forecasting Short-term maintenance workload scheduling Master Schedule
Backlog Management
Measuring planning and scheduling performance Clear roles for maintenance supervisor, planner and craftsmen
Melbourne
February 2004