Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
University of Illinois Office for Planning and Budgeting 3rd Edition, November 2007
Bryson, John M. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. 2004.
Page 2
Table of Contents
Demographics. 7
U.S. Population Projections, 2000-2020 Illinois Population Ages 18-24 Race/Ethnicity University of Illinois Statewide Presence Undergraduate and Graduate/Professional Enrollments by Race/Ethnic Higher Education Minority Enrollment Data by Campus University of Illinois Full-Time Faculty by Race/Ethnicity University of Illinois Full-Time Faculty by Gender University of Illinois Full-Time Staff by Race/Ethnicity University of Illinois Full-Time Staff by Gender University of Illinois SURS Participants, Tenure-System Faculty Age Distribution University of Illinois SURS Participants, Non-Tenure Faculty and Staff by Age Distribution Health Care and Aging Implications for the University of Illinois International Comparisons: Higher Education Attainment International Comparisons: Higher Education Participation and Completion Projected Percentage Change in Number of High-School Graduates from 2002 to 2009 University of Illinois Degrees Conferred Percentage of Bachelors Degrees Awarded by Gender Mean Income by Quintile in Illinois Faculty Salary Comparisons, IBHE Peers University of Illinois Faculty and Enrollments Enrollment in Online Courses Implications for the University of Illinois 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30-31 32
Higher Education. 21
Page 5
Table of Contents
Economy and Budget... 33
Economic Value of Higher Education U.S. Economic Indicators State of Illinois Economic and Fiscal Indicators State of Illinois General Fund Appropriations by Sector FY 2007 State of Illinois Financial Liabilities Illinois Projected Employment Growth, 2002-2012 University of Illinois Share of State Tax Appropriations FY 1980 to FY 2007 University of Illinois Budget by Source of Funds University of Illinois All Sources of Duns FY 1990 FY 2007 The Center: The Top American Research Universities Big Ten University and Foundation Endowments Public Higher Education Capital Appropriation History FY 1999 to FY 2007 Implications for the University of Illinois
Trends in Federal R&D Funding Total R&D Expenditures of Carnegie Research I Institutions, FY 2004 University of Illinois Rank among AAU Institutions on Selected Quality Indicators International Comparison: Production of Undergraduate Degrees in Natural Sciences & Engineering International Comparison: Doctoral Degrees Granted in Natural Sciences & Engineering (1993-2003) University of Illinois Technology Transfer: U.S. Patents University Technology Transfer and Commercialization Performance Index Energy Costs and Use Renewable Energy Implications for the University of Illinois
34 35-36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
Political Landscape... 59
Illinois House and Senate Memberships Illinoisans Support for State Higher Education Spending Increases Implications for the University of Illinois 60 61 62
Sources... 63
Page 6
Demographics
Page 7
Millions
White
Asian
Black
Hispanic
Other*
Millions
Female
Male
80
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2005 2010
Year
60
40
20
0 2000
2015
2020
2000
2005
2010
Year
2015
2020
All Race-Ethnic Groups, by Age Group Projected Total Number of High-School Graduates
Millions
18 - 35
36 - 49
50 & over
2002 2,894,429* 2003 2,952536
120 100 80 60 40
2004 2,958,908
2005 2,983,477 2006 3,042,003 2007 3,107,931
2008 3,186,940 2009 3,195,259 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2
*Actual Figure
Page 8
2000
White 65.8%
2020
Black 17.2%
American Indian 0.2% Asian 3.5% White 58.2%
Hispanic 13.3%
Hispanic 18.7%
N = 1.200M
N = 1.358M
Page 9
Additional Facilities
UIC
UIUC
UIS
Page 10
UIS
Black 13.2 Asian 3.2%
UIUC
Black 6.7% Asian 12.8% International 1.2%
Asian 23.2%
Hispanic 2.8%
International 5.6%
UIS
Black 8.4%
UIUC
Asian 1.8% Black 5.7%
Asian 10.1%
International 16.6%
Hispanic 7.1%
Hispanic 5.6%
Page 11
Campus Total
Black
12%
Hispanic
10%
Black
Hispanic
10%
8% 8%
Undergraduate
14%
12% 10% 8% 6% 4%
UIS
12%
Campus Total
10%
8%
Black
Hispanic
6%
Black
4% 2% 0%
Hispanic
2% 0%
Undergraduate
8%
UIUC
7%
Campus Total
7%
6% 6% 5% 5%
Black
4%
Hispanic
4%
Black
Hispanic
Page 12
University of Illinois Full-Time Faculty by Race/Ethnicity Fall 2005 All Fund Sources
Chicago Campus White Black Hispanic Asian Other* Springfield Campus 4% 7% 3%
8%
4%
5%
15%
10%
77% 69%
N = 1,923
N = 196
75%
N = 2,258
Page 13
University of Illinois Full-Time Faculty by Gender Fall 2005 All Fund Sources
Chicago Campus Male 38% Female 56% Springfield Campus
62%
44%
N = 1,923
N = 196
Urbana-Champaign Campus
31%
69%
N = 2,258
Page 14
University of Illinois Full-Time Staff by Race and Ethnicity Fall 2005 All Fund Sources
White Chicago Campus
2%
Black
Hispanic
Asian
30%
1%
N = 451
N = 8,229
Urbana-Champaign Campus 2% 9% 2% 3%
University Administration 1%
11% 4% 3%
83% N = 7,712
81%
N = 1,181
* Includes Native Americans, Aleutians, persons of two or more races, and non -resident aliens.
Page 15
University of Illinois Full-Time Staff by Gender Fall 2005 All Fund Sources
59%
46%
Page 16
University of Illinois SURS Participants, Tenure-System Faculty Age Distribution October 10, 2006
Chicago Campus w/ UIH Springfield Campus
FTE
FTE
FTE
Page 17
University of Illinois SURS Participants, Non-Tenure Faculty and Staff Age Distribution October 10, 2006
Chicago Campus w/ UIH Springfield Campus
FTE
FTE
University Administration
FTE
FTE
Page 18
17%
15%
13%
11%
9%
4%
K or e Po a la n Sl ov M d ak ex ico Cz Re ec pu h R blic ep ub Fi lic nl an Ir d ela T nd Lu ur xe key m bo ur g Ja H pan un ga ry Un it e Sp d K ain in gd om Ne w Ital Ze y a De lan nm d a No rk rw S ay Ne w ed th e er n la Au n ds str al Ic ia ela n Ca d na d G a re ec Au e st Po ria rt u Be gal lg i G um er m an F y Sw ran ce it Un zer it e lan d d St at es
2020
Source: OECD www.oecd.org, Health Data Statistics October 2007. *Private and public. Adjusted for purchasing-power parity.
30,000,000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Projected 2040 2050
Tu rk e M y ex ico Sl ov P ak ola Re nd pu bl i K c o H rea Cz un ec g h R ary ep ub Po lic rt ug al Ne Sp ai w Ze n al a Fi nd nl an d Ja pa Un n it e d Ita l K in y gd Sw om ed e Ir n ela n G d re De ece nm G ark e Ne rm th an er y la nd Ca s na d Fr a a Au nce str a Be lia lg iu m Ic ela Au nd Sw st it z ria er la n N d Lu o r xe wa y Un mb it e our g d St at es
Source: OECD www.oecd.org, Health Data Statistics October 2007. *Private and public. Adjusted for purchasing-power parity.
20,000,000
Source: Bureau of Census
$0
Page 19
Higher Education
Page 21
Ages 25-64
60.3%
56.6% Canada
49.5%
40.1%
Japan
Korea Norway
United States
Finland Japan
51.1%
48.4% 47.1%
39.4%
38.4% 36.2%
Finland
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
45.5%
45.3%
35.5%
34.4%
Ireland Spain
Denmark
Sweden Iceland
Australia
44.6%
44.4% 43.5%
33.9%
33.1% 32.2%
France
United States Australia
Belgium
Ireland New Zealand
42.8%
42.4%
30.6%
30.0%
Sweden
Iceland
42.4% 41.9%
38.7%
United Kingdom
Spain
29.5% 28.3%
27.5%
Luxembourg
Netherlands United Kingdom
Netherlands
Korea France
36.6%
36.0%
26.2%
25.9%
New Zealand
Poland
34.2% 30.9%
28.2%
Luxembourg
Germany
24.1% 20.3%
20.1%
Greece
Switzerland Portugal
Switzerland
Greece Poland
25.0%
24.2% 22.7%
19.9%
19.0% 18.2%
Hungary
Germany
Hungary
Austria
22.1%
20.6%
15.2%
15.0%
Austria
Italy Mexico
Portugal
Slovak Republic Italy
19.2%
16.9% 16.9%
12.9%
12.8% 12.2%
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Mexico
Czech Republic
14.6%
10.4%
11.6%
7.7%
Turkey
Turkey
Source: Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Data represent the percentage of adults with an associates degree or higher in 2005. Page 22
College Completion
Japan
Portugal 26%
43%
25%
23%
Switzerland
Denmark
Finland
Ireland
23%
23%
Australia
New Zealand Ireland
United States
Poland
21%
21%
34%
31%
Hungary
France Australia Spain New Zealand
France
Iceland
20%
19%
31%
31%
Slovak Republic
Sweden
18%
18% 18%
30%
29% 27%
Korea
United States
Netherlands
Portugal
17%
17%
25%
25%
Spain
Poland
Norway
Czech Republic
17%
16%
24%
24%
Netherlands
Hungary
Sweden
Austria Germany
16%
15%
23%
23%
Czech Republic
Mexico
14%
14%
Slovak Republic
Denmark
20%
20% 19%
Norway
Turkey Austria
13%
13%
Iceland
Switzerland
18%
13%
Germany
Finland
13%
13%
Mexico
Turkey
11%
Italy
12%
Source: Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Data are for 2003.
United States
Gain of more than 20% Gain of 11% to 20% Gain of 1% to 10% Gain or loss of less than 1% Loss of 1% to 9% Loss of 10% or more
Source: WICHE
11 147 16
24
55 22 12 199
270 282
107 52 8
3
135 53
24 58
551 75 87 345 82
162
12
133
77
68 45
64
30
22 93
26
14
250
29
32
154
13
United States (AK & HI Inset) 400 to 56,337 (3) 300 to 400 (4) 200 to 300 (5) 100 to 200 (10) 0 to 100 (28)
21
Illinois 56,337 (82%) Other U.S. 5,185 (7%) District of Columbia - 20 U.S. Territories - 50 U. S. Residents with Foreign Address 221 Non-Resident Aliens - 7,287 (11%)
Page 24
10,000 8,000
6,000
4,000
5,919
Other, 5.4%
2,000
0
1,045
UIC
Bachelor's Master's
UIS
Doctorate
UIUC
Professional Black Hispanic Asian White
Asian 25.9%
White 70.7%
3,286
7,040
Black
Hispanic
Asian
White
Other
Black
Hispanic
Asian
White
Other
Page 25
UIC
UIS
UIUC
National
Female 57%
FY 2005
Page 26
In Current Dollars
$160,000
$120,000
$75,000
$80,000
$50,000
$40,000
$25,000
$0
$0
Quintile 1
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5
Quintile 1
Lowest Income
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5
Highest Income
UIUC
1st
12th
22nd
1st
19th
21st
115
Privates
UIS
105 95
Publics
85
$40 $20 $0
75
65
1st
10th
14th
55 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 $7,700 Gap in 1982 Year
$25,300 Gap in 2007
* Constant (FY 2007) dollars calculated using CPI -U (not seasonally adjusted).
Source: American Association of University Professors; Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Page 28
FTE On-Campus Enrollment per FTE Tenure-System Faculty Fall 1996 to Fall 2006 UIS
17
16.2
19.5 19.5
16
Students per Faculty
17.2
17.5 17.6
15.5
15.7
15 14
14.4
16
14 12
13 12 11
12.7
10
83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
Year
10
96 97 98 99 00 01
Year
02
03
04
05
06
FTE On-Campus Enrollment per FTE Tenure-System Faculty Fall 1983 to Fall 2006 UIUC
24 22
20.2 20.4 20.8 20.6 20.8
22.0 22.2 22.2
FTE On Campus Enrollment per FTE Tenure System Faculty Fall 1983 to Fall 2006
21.5
20
18
16.8 16.8
17.1
18.0
18.4
16
14
12 10 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
Year
19.0 19.2
Year
Page 29
10,000
8,000
2,500,000
2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
500,000 0
Fall 2002
Fall 2003
Fall 2004
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
Fall 1999
Fall 2000
Fall 2001
Fall 2002
Fall 2003
Fall 2004
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
Source: www.Sloan-c.org : Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning, October 2007
120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Fall 1999 Fall 2000 Fall 2001 Fall 2002 Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Fall 2005 Fall 2006
UIUC 1.7%
UIC 48.4%
127,383 Enrollments
10,201 Enrollments
Page 30
Improving student access is the most often cited objective for online courses and programs. Cost reduction is not seen as important. Approximately one-third of higher education institutions account for three-quarters of all online enrolments. Future growth will come predominately from these and similar institutions as they add new programs and grow existing ones.
Much of the past growth in online enrollments has been fueled by new institutions entering the online learning arena. This transition is now nearing its end; most institutions that plan to offer online education are already doing so. Future growth in online enrollments will most likely come from those institutions that are currently the most engaged; they enroll the most online learning students and have the highest expectations for growth.
Page 31
Source: Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning. The Sloan Consortium. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/index.asp
Page 32
Page 33
2006
Men
Women
Bachelor's Premium
High School
Females
$4.50 $4.00 $3.50
$3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00
Masters Bachelors Associates H.S. Graduate Doctorate Professional
$0.50 $0.00 74 24 34 44 54 64 74
Page 34
135%
120% 105% 90% 75% CPI HEPI
60%
30% 15% 0%
-15% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis and the US Office of Management and Budget
Page 35
$30
$25
$22.50 $22.10 $20.20 $19.40 $18.60
$20
$15
$10
$8.40 $5.20
$5
$2.70 $0.90
$0 Germany U.S. France Japan Canada U.K. South Korea Taiwan Mexico China
Source: U.S. Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, WSJ 6/10/04.
Increase in U.S. Health Insurance Premiums Compared to Other Indicators 1988 - 2006
20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10%
8.5% 8.2% 12.0% 14.0%
12.9%
18.0%
13.9%
10.9%
11.2%
9.2%
7.7%
8% 6% 4% 2% 0%
0.8% 5.3%
Workers' Earnings
Overall Inflation
Source: The Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Benefits 2006 Annual Survey.
Page 36
153.6%
150% 135% 120% 105% 90% 75% 60% 45% 30% 15% 0% -15%
Public Univ. GRF 26.7% CPI 65.1% State GRF 128.8%
FY02 to FY08 exclude $45 million in payments to CMS from Universities for Health Insurance Source: Illinois State Budgets (FY08 is based on the Governors Proposed Budget)
Growth
No Growth
$1,400
Values above 100 represents Economic Growth
$1,200 $1,000
$851.5 $973.4
$790.5
$800
$674.7 $621.7
$686.2
$690.8
$717.2
$600
$400
94
$0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007* 2008*
* The FY 2007 and FY 2008 debt service are GOMB Budget estimates.
Source: IGPA, U of I
Page 37
State By Sector
Public Safety 5.5% Other 5.1%
Human Services
60%
45% 30%
15%
0% -15% -30%
Healthcare and Family Services 29.7% Elementary/ Secondary 31.4%
Source: Illinois State Budget, FY 2008 as introduced.
-45%
FY02 - FY08 exclude $45 M from Higher Education for Health Insurance payment to CMS.
$28.4 Billion
65%
Elem/Sec
45%
62.9%
25%
5%
-15%
-35%
Corporate Income Tax 5.5% Sales Tax 24.0%
FY02 - FY08 exclude $45 M from Higher Education for Health Insurance payment to CMS.
Page 38
Page 39
4.5%
4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5%
2.4%
$1,291.1M
6% 5%
$594.5M
4% 3% 2% 1.3%
3.3% 2.8%
3.6%
$696.6M
2.0%
FY02 FY08 excludes $45 million reduction to Universities for Health Insurance
CPI
U of I 31.5%
$2.2 Billion
Sources: IBHE tables for Higher Education - final budget as signed by Governor. Note: Health Insurance redirection of $45 million has been moved from Public Universities to All Other.
Page 40
University of Illinois Budget by Source of Funds FY 1980, FY 2008 and Projected FY 2018
FY 1980
Auxiliaries 13.9% Hospital/ Medical 10.9% State Taxes 44.5%
FY 2008
Auxiliaries 13.4% Hospital/ Medical 14.0% State Taxes 18.6%
Projected FY 2018
Auxiliaries 10.9% Hospital/ Medical 15.8% State Taxes 11.0% Payments on Behalf 15.3%
AFMFA 0.5%
Tuition 15.4%
AFMFA 0.7%
Tuition 21.4%
$641.7 Million
$3,899.8 Million
$7,499.5 Million
Based on FY 1996-2008 Trends.
Page 41
Hospital $3,000 Gifts/Grants/Contracts AFMFA $2,000 Self Supporting Institutional Funds Income Fund $1,000
35%
30%
Gifts/Grants/Contracts
25%
State Funds
20%
Self Supporting
Income Fund
15%
Payments on Behalf
Payments on Behalf
GRF/EAF $0
10%
Institutional Funds
5%
Hospital AFMFA
Sources: Budget Summary for Operations, state payments on behalf, and RAMP. Waivers excluded.
FY90-FY95 state funds adjusted to include UIS. GRF for FY02 FY08 exclude $24.9 million for Health Insurance, Payments on Behalf adjusted to include the $24.9 million.
0% FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08
Sources: Budget Summary for Operations, state payments on behalf, and RAMP. Waivers excluded. FY90-FY95 state funds adjusted to include UIS. GRF for FY02 - FY08 exclude $24.9 million for Health Insurance, Payments on Behalf adjusted to include the $24.9 million.
State & Tuition Pay for Instructional Function Expenditures by Function FY 2006
$600
(Dollars in Millions)
Non-State
$500
$17.6
525%
450%
$400
Income Fund
375%
Hospital
$300
$484.2
$509.4 $501.4
300%
Institutional Funds
225%
Gifts/Grants/Contracts
$200
$40.6
$74.9
$18.6
$254.3
$239.2
150%
Self Supporting
$100
75%
State Funds
$0
0% FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08
Sources: Budget Summary for Operations, state payments on behalf, and RAMP. Waivers excluded.
FY90-FY95 state funds adjusted to include UIS. GRF for FY02 FY08 exclude $24.9 million for Health Insurance, Payments on Behalf adjusted to include the $24.9 million.
Page 42
An Annual Report from The Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance Intended to assess the relative economic strength of research universities Evaluated universities based on the market value of their endowments and an endowment equivalent calculation for other revenue streams
Endowment equivalent is the amount of endowment that would be required to generate the revenue stream (assuming a 4.5% growth) Revenue streams included annual giving, tuition and fees, and state appropriations Adjusted for size based on student enrollment Used FY 1999 data
Berkeley
Chicago
$8 $6 $4 $2
12 Private 12 Private
UIUCTexas
Iowa
UIC
Public institutions can compete with private institutions because of the significant state support received
12 Private
12 Private
12 Private
12 Private
8 Public
8 Public
8 Public
8 Public
8 Public
8 Public
$0
0 20 40 60
Rank Among All 119 Research Universities
80
100
120
2005 Adjusted Total Endowment-Equivalent Based on The Centers Methodology UIUC Peer Institutions (in billions)
$25.0
Endow Asset Market Value Endow-Equiv State Appn Endow-Equiv Annual Giving Endow-Equiv Tuition and Fees
2005 Adjusted Total Endowment-Equivalent Based on The Centers Methodology UIC IBHE Peer Institutions (in billions)
$12
Endow Asset Market Value Endow-Equiv State Appn Endow-Equiv Annual Giving Endow-Equiv Tuition and Fees
$10
$20.0
UIC
$8
$15.0
UIUC
$6
$10.0
$4
$5.0
$2 $0
Da vi hi yl s ga an n d, St C at ol e leg eP ar k Ar iz on a G eo rg ia Te m pl e Fl
C Te as hi xa ng s to n Un iv . UC SD Br ow n Ro ch es te r LA bi a US C Be rk el W ey as hi ng Jo to hn n sH op No ki rt ns h C ar No ol in rt a he we ste rn nn sy lv an ia isc on sin e hi ga n Du ke Ya l Ch ica UC um UI U NY
M ic
Pe
Co l
M ar
M ic
UC
go
or id
Ut ah
$0.0
2005 annual giving data was not available for Wayne State. We used 2001 data as a proxy for 2004.
AS VP U Ia nd M St as at sa e ch us et ts De la w ar e UC Ir vi Fl ne or id aS ta te UC Sa UI nt C a Ba rb W ar ay a ne Vi St at rg e in ia H ,C aw om ai i m on we at h O re go n Ve r UC mo nt Ri ve rs id e
Page 43
$5
$4 $3
$2.2
$2 $1 $0
$1.3
$1.3
$1.0
$0.8
20%
$3
$2 $1 $0
5%
0%
-5%
Source: NACUBO Endowment Study FY 2006.
Page 44
Public Higher Education Capital Appropriation History FY 1999 to FY 2007 (Dollars in Thousands)
$180 $160
U of I FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 $ 37,310.10 80,685.60 46,821.90 165,949.40 126,335.00 12,735.00
Other Public
ICCB
$140.1
$ 33,877.40 $ 52,041.90 99,474.90 96,189.30 52,231.50 63,532.50 104,957.00 75,736.40 45,311.30 80,679.20 34,137.40 59,107.60 NO APPROPRIATIONS NO APPROPRIATIONS NO APPROPRIATIONS
Regular Capital
Designated Projects
$1,322.2
$1,131.0
$803.1
$803.1
$692.4
$692.4
$387.0
$385.5
$422.2
$387.0
$385.5
$422.2
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
15%
10%
10% 5%
5%
0% 0% -5% -10%
-5%
15%
10%
5%
0%
-5%
FY 2006 Actual $ 73,043 26,695 7,529 1,156 3,707 1,779 8,886 $ 122,795
FY 2007 Estimate $ 75,481 26,974 9,174 1,241 3,943 1,795 9,533 $ 128,141
FY 2008 Estimate $ 72,935 27,580 10,114 1,409 3,894 1,734 9,345 $ 127,011
% Change 2007-2008 -3.4% 2.2% 10.2% 13.5% -1.2% -3.4% -2.0% -0.9%
Page 48
$1,443,792
24
$510,943
2
3
$808,887
$798,099
25
26
$499,711
$447,196
4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
$785,625
$754,444 $721,035 $714,897 $707,519 $654,982 $630,752 $625,764 $608,923 $606,804 $580,742 $554,551 $552,897 $548,873 $546,978 $535,424 $531,846 $530,734 $530,233 $517,067
27
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
$445,036
$441,033 $431,618 $425,386 $410,981 $387,242 $364,986 $356,828 $350,433 $345,337 $338,648 $334,144 $333,735 $333,665 $333,126 $323,618 $318,536 $318,279 $316,806 $309,531
.
Page 50
- Actual -
Rank (N = 61)
10
10 20 30 40 50 60 61 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01
Year Rank (N = 61)
10
10 20 30 40 50 60 61 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01
Year
'02
'03
'04
'05
'06
Chicago Campus
Rank (N = 61)
- Actual -
10
10 20 30 40 50 60 61 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01
Year
10
10 20 30 40 50 60 61
'02 '03 '04 '05 '06
'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06
Year
Page 50
Sources: National Science FoundationUSDA Obligations, State/Local and Federal R & D spending, No. Post doctorates; IPEDSNo. Doctorates; Thomson ISINo. Faculty Citations.
Number of Degrees Per 100 24-Year-Olds Oceania (Australia, NZ) Europe U.S. North/Central America All Regions Asia South America Middle East Sub-Saharan Africa 0.7 2.2 1.9 1.8 3 5 5.7 7.7 11.8
Note: Natural sciences include physical, biological, earth, atmospheric, ocean, agricultural, and computer sciences, and mathematics. Data include terminal undergraduate degrees only (e.g., bachelors degrees). Source: National Science Foundation (NSF), Science and Engineering Indicators 2006.
Page 51
International Comparison: Doctoral Degrees Granted in Natural Sciences and Engineering (1993 2003)
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0 1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
China Taiwan
Japan
Notes: Natural sciences include physical, biological, earth, atmospheric, ocean, agricultural, and computer sciences, and mathematics. Data for China ends in 2001. Data for all countries include degrees granted to both native and foreign national students. Source: National Science Foundation (NSF), Science and Engineering Indicators 2006.
Page 52
Total
Total
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0 FY99 FY00 FY01 UIC FY02 FY03 UIUC FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
0 FY99 FY00 FY01 UIC FY02 FY03 UIUC FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
Total
Total
Page 53
Brief Methodology Description The purpose of this index is to show performance in the overall commercialization pipeline, including all research fields. The four criteria (outcome measures) that factor into the overall score are Patents Issued, Licenses Executed, Licensing Income, and Startups. A weighted average of the scores in these areas was computed. The Licensing Income and Startups scores received the highest weights since they are the most direct outcome measures. The overall scores have been re-benchmarked to 100 in order to form an index.
Page 54 SOURCE: Milken Institute. Mind to Market: A Global Analysis of University Biotechnology Transfer and Commercialization. September 2006.
Page 55
Figure 1: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption in the Nations Energy Supply, 2006
Source: Department of Energy. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/prelim_trends/rea_prereport.html
Wind is the worlds fastest growing energy technology. Illinois currently has 6 ethanol plants in operation and 1 under construction. Illinois corn is used to produce 40% of the ethanol consumed in the U.S. Investment by the ethanol industry in Illinois exceeds $1 billion, generating 800 jobs in plant operations and 4,000 jobs in the industry-related service sector. ADM is the largest producer of fuel ethanol in the U.S. UIs Renewable Energy Efforts: UIUC will build 3 wind turbines on the South Farms to provide electricity and serve as a demonstration to farmers (2007). UIUCs new business building will be its first sustainable building, utilizing solar panels and other clean technologies.
OECD Renewable Energy Supply Growth
Illinois Nuclear Presence Illinois has 6 nuclear power plants, the largest family of nuclear facilities in the Nation. Over half of Illinois power is derived from nuclear. Illinois nuclear generation capacity is greater than any other state and all but seven world nations. Illinois is also home to the Department of Energys Argonne National Laboratory and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Argonne has a long history of research and development in nuclear reactor technology. Fermilab conducts research on the frontier of high energy physics and related disciplines. University of Illinois faculty have a history of collaboration with researchers at both facilities.
Million tons of oil equivalent (Mtoe)
Hydro 350
Geothermal
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Source: Department of Energy. http://www.energy.gov/illinois.htm
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
Page 56
Research, Technology, & Economic Development Implications for the University of Illinois
Federal R&D spending has slowed significantly in recent years and this pattern is likely to continue in the near term due to the slowing economy and other significant pressures on the federal budget (e.g., defense, homeland security). The bedrock of economic development through research and technology commercialization are top quality science and engineering faculty and students. Intense competition for science and faculty and students nationally and internationally coupled with stagnant state and federal funding will create serious challenges for major research institutions such at the University of Illinois as they attempt to maintain and enhance the quality and competitiveness of their research programs and technology commercialization endeavors. Land grant and other major research universities are increasingly expected to have technology transfer as a key part of their overall economic development mission. The Universitys efforts in this area have grown considerably in recent years although many technical and competitive opportunities (and challenges) remain. Global interest in renewable energy sources will continue to grow in the future due to the overall increase in demand and continued concerns about the cost and supply of fossil fuels and other traditional energy sources. The University has an opportunity to take a leadership role in energy research and development given its proximity to traditional (e.g., coal, nuclear) and renewable (e.g., biomass, wind) energy sources and its fundamental strengths in science and engineering disciplines.
Page 57
Political Landscape
Page 58
Republican Democrat
51 67
Republican
200
Democrat
233
20
40
60
80
50
100
150
200
250
* Excludes two vacancies. Source: Office of the Clerk, U.S House of Representatives Web site.
Independent
22 37
Independent
Republican Democrat
Republican Democrat
49 49
10
20
30
40
20
40
60
Page 59
Illinoisans Support for State Higher Education Spending Increases, 2005 -2006
Public schools K-12 Financial Aid for IL College Students
Medical care Higher education Public health Job training for unemployed
67%
78% 75%
Economic development Job training Higher education Preschool Public safety 2006
2005
0%
Region Statewide Chicago Suburban Cook
25%
50%
75%
Age 18 - 24 25 - 34
100%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
64% 75%
$21,000 - $34,999
62%
$35,000 - $55,999
60%
56% 61%
35 - 44 45 - 54
55 - 64 65 + 0% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 25%
47%
60%
Collar Counties
Northern IL Central IL
$56,000 - $99,999
57%
$100,000 - $149,999
Over $150,000
48%
56%
Southern IL
50% 75% 100%
0%
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic
57%
Race
Other
88%
Hispanic
Asian
72%
88%
Gender
Black
69%
0%
25%
50%
61%
75%
50%
62%
75%
100%
Female Male
75% 100%
White
55%
58%
Democrat
0% Source: Northern Illinois University, 2005 and 2007 Illinois Policy Survey
0% 25% 50%
70%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Page 60
Higher education issues have traditionally been state concerns, but Congress also has become much more interested in issues related to higher educations affordability and public accountability. Growing public concern over affordability and recent legislation (e.g., Truth in Tuition) will make major increases in tuition challenging to achieve. Congress is also interested in an array of issues concerned with Homeland Security, which will have implications for privacy and student issues. The P-16 education continuum has been truncated in the minds of many state policymakers and no longer includes higher education; there is, however, a significant focus on issues related to K-12 education and its financing. While the University enjoys a broad base of support within the General Assembly, the dominance of other issues facing the state legislature (e.g., health care, pensions, K-12 education) make it difficult to advance the Universitys (or higher educations) interests. There is growing interest at both the state and national levels in creating complex data systems that would provide policy makers and the general public with detailed information on student progress through the P-16 educational pipeline and beyond to the work place.
Page 61
Sources
External Sources U.S. Bureau of the Census WICHE Enrollment Projections 2006 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Post Secondary Education Opportunity Newsletter National Science Foundation Science and Engineering Indicators 2007 National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) U.S. Office of Trade and Economic Analysis U.S. Office of Management and Budget TIAA-CREF Institute Quarterly Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission Milken Institute Governors State Budget Recommendations for FY 2008 House Democratic Budget Summit Document FY 2008 Northern Illinois University 2007 Illinois Policy Survey U of I Reports Profile of Students, Faculty and Staff by Race/Ethnic Group, Gender and Disability Financial Aid Survey University Office for Planning and Budgeting Employment Statistics FY 2008 Budget Request for Operating and Capital Funds Institute for Government and Public Affairs Budget Summary for Operations Annual Report Technology Commercialization Activities
Page 62