Symbolic Interactionism

SOC250 By Lauren Webb Jones and Jessica Pyers

Overview
Introduction: Microsociology Core Aspects of Symbolic Interactionism Examples of Interactionism and Symbolic Interactionism

Body: Development of Symbolic Interactionism Qualitative research and Interactionism Herbert Blumer Criticisms New Developments

Conclusion

Microsociology
Microsociology address small scale interactions. It looks at what we do and how we do it.

Symbolic Interactionism relates to microsociology, as it looks at the local reproduction of the social order.

Class Discussion

What is Symbolic Interactionism?

-Provide some examples

We would like to know what the class thought of the Symbolic Interactionism 2 reading.

The core aspects of Symbolic Interactionism

Humans act toward things based on internalised meanings. These meanings eventuate from socialisation. These meanings are handled, modified and interpreted. (Roberts, 2006:50) The three core aspects can be broken down further to: Meaning Language Thought

The theory developed mainly from the work of G.H Mead, and his interpreter Herbert Blumer.

Case Study

A member of the Mafia (lets call him Joe) receives word from his boss to take out a guy. Being one to follow orders, he did so without question and took the guy out to a five star restaurant, then for ice-cream. He returns from work satisfied that he has done what his boss has asked. Unfortunately, the next morning the boss isnt pleased with him and demands to know why the guy isnt dead. Joe had assumed take out meant to go out for dinner. In the real world, he would probably be killed for this, but lets just say that he felt rather silly and the boss forgave him.

(Lindsey Nelson used an example similar to this in her paperHerbert Blumers Symbolic Interactionism, 1998).

Application of Symbolic Interactionism to the case study

Meaning: The man didnt question his boss because he was acting on the meaning he had assigned to this title, the boss the same, assuming Joe would know exactly what to do, this is ultimately redefined when he fails to do what he asks. Language: Take [him] out has more than one interpretation. From previous social interactions with his friends, Joe has linked take out with dine. Thought: In Joes internal dialogue, the words take out were interpreted through Joes thought process based on his naming system. From previous interaction with friends, and taking out girls and men and allsorts (not liquorice), he had assigned meaning to the language through symbolic interaction. Based on that meaning from language, Joe had an internal dialogue, and ended up coming to the conclusion that he was going on a dinner date.

Lets break up Symbolic Interactionism even further with pictures. (because were cool like that, and thats just how its going to go down today).

Interactionism

 Speech acts between people lead to naming systems, the identification and discussion of symbols and, of course, discourse eventuates. Naming can assign meaning. Symbols are socialised understandings of shapes/forms, as all symbolism is widely discussed. From this, an understanding of the self emerges, this is where the idea of self identity would come into it. But this is week 5s subject, and will be covered by Connie and Alexandra. D D D d

And then you have interaction with symbols and other humans.
So, well take a dandelion.

Symbolism

10

What we can take from this

Symbols are socialised understandings of shapes/forms, as all symbolism is widely discussed. X X X X x

Symbolic Interactionism
Direct perception of the flower tells us that its a shape by receiving sense data. It has got funny little coloured things on a green thing, etc. However, once meaning is attributed, shapes will become symbols (think of Apple, or a Giant Yellow M). Humans are able to make an assessment of the shape and realise what it is, and what it means to them. Here, the flower could mean a multitude of things. Further examples: peace sign, burka
11

Symbolic- Cartoon 2

12

Application of Symbolic Interactionism

Interactionist research has been used most prominently in deviance, workplace and education but also in regards to self identity but has since developed beyond this. (pg 54) Many micro interactions make up an independent culture. This might be a dominant entity. This segregation is most notable with African American culture and Western society. Through interaction (usually within ones segregated entity), a perspective forms and reality is accepted. This perspective defines the other, including reasons for differences as well as justification for the inequality. This perspective can become engrained in culture, as can be seen in Kenneth and Mamie Klarks Doll Experiment.

13

Doll Experiment

14

Summary

Social problems can be understood by focusing on interaction, cooperation, communication, culture, and definition. As such, Symbolic Interactionism can be applied to all racial groups, classes and between nations. As it is in the absence of interaction that segregation occurs and the acts of each other and lack of shared symbols make it difficult to understand one another. Habitual responses replace cooperative symbolic interactionism. (J.M, Charon, 2007, pg209)
15

Development of Symbolic Interactionism

Weber Tendency to be an anti-positivist of Verstehen . He tried to get a subjective sense about what it is that people do. Georg Simmel Discussed social and cultural phenomena in terms of forms and contents. He coined the term formalism- the idea that there might be certain kinds of patterns and ways of doing things that are routinised. American Pragmatism (William James, John Dewey, Charles Peirce and G.H. Mead) A Philosophical movement. Pragmatists hold things to be true if it works.

G.H. Mead and Herbert Blumer Symbolic Interactionism arose from the work of Mead and his interpreter Blumer. It was actually Blumer that coined the term symbolic Interactionism in 1937.

16

Qualitative Research
The three core aspects provide a starting point for understanding Symbolic Interactionism, but there are other assumptions which inform its philosophical basis. The passive observer allows the researcher to watch and record the subject in their environment. They are able to question how features of the environment affect the subjects interpretation of symbols. In the wider context of Interactionism, in which symbolic Interactionism is related, researchers have used participant observation to gather data. Much of interactionist research focused on deviance, the work place and schools (Roberts, 2006:54).

17

Herbert Blumer
It was Blumer who was responsible for making Meads ideas more pronounced.

He challenged the core assumptions of quantitative research, such as the survey.

The central aspect of Blumers work is the individual as an active, creative being and society as encompassing the interpretations of acting individuals (Roberts, 2006:51).
18

Criticisms of Blumer
He concentrated more on the problems of methodology and theorisation than on actual research. He did not pay attention to the impact social structures have on individual behaviour. Blumer insists that meaning arises out of the interaction between people, while some critics point out that meaning is already established in a persons psychological make-up (Nelson, 1998).

19

Criticisms of Symbolic Interactionism

Symbolic Interactionism suffered a lack of clarity, due to its key idea being passed down and distributed through word of mouth A concentration of everyday interaction led to an over-concern of minor aspects of social life. It relied too much on qualitative methodology. Given its micro-level focus, some have even argued that symbolic interactionism is not microscopic enough, as it tended to ignore psychological factors. (Ritzer, 1996)

20

New Developments
Since the mid-1980s, Symbolic Interactionists have struggled to show the vitality of symbolic interactionism- as a lively, developing body of work. They have tried to answer criticisms by integrating micro- and macro level theories and broadening their approach across other fields of study. Symbolic Interactionism has expanded beyond its concerns with micro-level relations, incorporated ideas from other theories and been adopted by sociologists who would not define themselves as Symbolic Interactionists. Postmodernist writings have affected interpretive work of symbolic interaction.

21

Conclusion
Symbolic interactionism has majorly contributed to micro social theory and it continues to develop new areas for investigation and conceptualisation. Much of the traditional focus was on the self, but in recent years the field has fragmented, resulting in greater diversity.

It has contributed to our understanding of connections in micro settings.

22

References

Charon, J.M. 2007, Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integration, Minnesota State University Moorhead. Davis, K. Black doll, White doll, accessed on 14/8/2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybDa0gSuAcg. Nelson, L.D, 1998, Herbert Blumers Symbolic Interactionism, in Comm 3210: Human Communication Theory, University of Colarado: Boulder, accessed on 14/8/2012, http://www.colorado.edu/communication/metadiscourses/Papers/App_Papers/Nelson.htm.

Ritzer, G. 1996, Sociological theory, New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

Roberts, B. 2006, Symbolic Interactionism 2, in Micro Social Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.46-61.

23