Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
- a tangent about purpose - how to choose a question - treating the question - developing an argument / presenting a thesis - writing introductions - working a paragraph - proving yourself - sustaining a vision - a conclusion that does something
24/02/2012
The Question
Succeeding in question choice is important. Figuring out what suits the text and what doesnt can make or break your essay. Consider: Techniques used by short story writers allow them to say more with less. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Which of the two topics do you see as lending itself better to Rock Springs?
Developing an argument
Once youve dealt with the topic and figured out how youre defining the key terms, then you can construct an argument.
This means being able to say I am going to argue that (something that connects to the topic)...because (something that connects to a key argument)...
e.g. I am going to argue that Fords literature is never shy, instead it confronts the difficult complexity of existence, while exposing its dark, bleak nature, because he wants to create work that represents the truth of the modern human condition.
e.g. I am going to argue that Fords literature is never shy, instead it confronts the difficult complexity of existence, while exposing its dark, bleak nature, because he wants to create work that represents the truth of the modern human condition.
Prove through simile/metaphor
The introduction
The introduction presents all of the work that has been done so far and then goes on to suggest the methods youll use to prove your point. This means an introduction must: - outline the treatment of the topic - Are you agreeing/disagreeing with it? How are you defining the key terms? - present the thesis - present the system of argument you have decided on order of paragraphs and what to focus on in each paragraph - a final connection to the thesis.
Example
Short story writers shy away from presenting works that are difficult and dark. To what extent do you agree with this view? The short story is a potent form that tends to express striking images of human truth. I see human nature as dark and so I strongly disagree with what is being suggested in this statement. Difficulty in text suggests complexity of meaning or texts that deal with the most difficult aspects of existence, which tend to be dark. Darkness is something we shy away from because it tends to connect to the bleaker truths about our lives and our existences. I would argue that Pulitzer Prize winning author Richard Ford never shies away from either of these representations of difficulty and darkness in his short fiction. Instead it confronts the difficult complexity of existence, while exposing its dark, bleak nature, because he
The Paragraph
This is no longer the key to success as it has been in past year. Previously, three/four good paragraphs would make up for lack lustre introductions and conclusions. At Level Three, they need to feed on what you offer in the introduction. To continue the metaphor, they need to give meat to the thesis that you offer in the beginning.
This means that technique is no longer central, however, every paragraph must still have a technique focus.
The Paragraph
Think of the shape as an hour glass: - Wide at the opening the wider thesis - Narrowing to specifics from the text - technique - Widen back out to making judgements based on the evidence, drawing back to the topic and the thesis.
Thesis
Judgements/conclusions thesis
Structure
Start wide Connect back into the thesis statement and offer the direction youre heading. This ensures that youre argument remains consistent and keeps your essay cohesive, while giving direction to the paragraph.
Reference to technique
Modern philosophy tends to offer the human condition as bleak, suggesting we are isolated and alienated beings. In line with this, Ford offers up to the reader the character of Earl. His place in the story seems to be to represent all of that alienation, allowing Ford to confront the reader with the stark bleakness of modern existence.