AuC1lCn Cl SuL8C8l1lCAL 1LCPnCLCC?

BY
VINAY KUMAR
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
NTPC LTD
ACLnuA
-SHARE OF VARIOUS SOURCES OF ENERGY IN
POWER GENERATION
- THERMAL PROCESS AND SUPERCRITICAL
TECHNOLOGY
-DRIVERS FOR SUPERCRITICAL TECHNOLOGY
- ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN ADOPTION OF
SUPERCRITICAL TECHNOLOGY
- TRENDS
- CONCLUSION
World LlecLrlclLy CeneraLlon ls uomlnaLed by
Coal
Source: IEA
Coal has been and shall remain the main fuel for power generation in near
future
Effecis of supeiciiiical paiameieis
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
C
)
Enthalpy
538
Expansion Line
170 kg/cm
2
240 kg/cm
2
Critical Point 225 kg/cm
2
Condensation
5
MS Pressure Kg/cm
2
97
THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT THERMAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT
169 246 310
STEAM PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
Base
%
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.2
538
0
C/538
0
C
538
0
C/566
0
C
566
0
C/566
0
C
566
0
C/593
0
C
600
0
C/600
0
C
Advantages
of SC]USC
Fuel
Savings
Lower
CO2
Low Sox &
NOx
Comparable
Reliability
Efficiency
Smaller BOP
Reduction in
APC
2
5
6
K
g
/
c
m
2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
SULk CkI1ICAL
8CILLk CCLL
WI1n Sn, kn &
kegenerat|on
660 MW
540C
568C
Steam flow :2225 T/Hr
Steam temp : 540 c
Steam Pres : 256 kg/cm2
RH pre : 51.6 Kg/cm2
RH Temp : 568c
Feed water Temp : 291c
ENTROPY
TEMP
nA1lCnAL AM8lLn1 Al8 CuALl1?
CC2 8educLlon by lncreaslng Lfflclency
CO2 Emmisions, Kg/MWh
%CO2 reductionfrom
subcritical
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
Plant Efficiency (Gross on Gross)
C
O
2
E
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
K
g
/
0
5
10
15
20
25
%
C
O
2
r
e
d
u
c
t
sub critical plant efficiency
Efficiencyat steam parameters 310/600/600
Based on Barh Coal (3300 Kcal/Kg, 31.37 % Carbon)
Lfflclency lmprovemenL/ CC2 MlLlgaLlon
LfforLs ln n1C
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
%
Gros s L ff|c |enc y nnV
38
38.26
39.14
39.96
8 lhand - ll S lmhadrl-ll S lpaL - l 8arh - ll
Sub - cvitica! units Supcv - cvitica! units
Unii Size oo MW oo MW 66o MW 66o MW
MS Piessuie lg]cm
:
iyo iyo :(y :(y
MS Sieam Temp(
O
C) y y y 6
RH Sieam Temp (
O
C) y 6 6 q
CAACI1 CI SC CWLk LAN1S
WCkLDWIDL
Super CrlLlcal 1echnology ln n1C
PLANTS IN ADVANCE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION
3 x 660 MW Sipat STPP Stage-I
3 x 660 MW Barh STPP Stage-I
Barh-II, Bihar 2x660 MW
UPCOMING PLANTS
Meja, Uttar Pradesh - 2x660 MW
Sholapur 2x660 MW
New Nabinagar-3x660 MW
Mauda-2x660 MW
Kudgi-3X800MW
North Karnapura, Jharkhand 3x660 MW
Darlipali, Orissa 4x800 MW
Lara, Chattisgarh 5x800 MW
Marakanam, Tamilnadu 4x800 MW
Tanda-II, Uttar Pradesh - 2x660 MW
WC8LuWluL SC SC
SuLlL8S/MAnulAC1u8L8S
MHI
BABCOCK HITACHI
ANSALDO
ALSTOM
DOOSAN
IHI
lndlan Suppllers
BHEL-ALSTOM
Collaboiaiion beiween BHEL 8 Alsiom foi supei
ciiiical boilei ieclnology
Oideis ai pieseni
Bail -II (:X66o MW) |:]6S]q6j
Kiislnapaiiam (APGENCO) - (:XSoo MW) |:]6S]q6j
L8T-MHI
Will pioduce supei ciiiical boileis in ile iange oo io
iooo MW
Tiansfei io }V Company includes coal Pulveiiseis
WC8LuWluL S1C SuLlL8S
TOSHIBA
MHI
HITACHI
SIEMENS
ALSTOM
GE
lnulAn CCMAnlLS CAA8lLl1? lC8
SuL8 C8l1lCAL S1C SuL?
BHEL REGULAR SUPPLIER OF 210 MW/250
MW/ 500 MW SUBCRITICAL STG
SUPPLIER.
ORDER OF BARH-II(2X660 MW)
SUPER CRITICAL PLACED.
COLLEBERATION WITH SIEMENS
L&T COLLEBERATION WITH MHI
ORDER OF APGENCO FOR 2X800
MW
BHARAT
FORGE
IN PROCESS OF TIE-UP WITH
ALSTOM
JSW IN PROCESS OF TIE UP WITH
TOSHIBA
Sub-Cr|t|ca| Vs Supercr|t|ca|
bo||ers
Sub-Cr|t|ca| Vs Supercr|t|ca|
bo||ers
FURNACE WATER WALL ARRANGEMENT
IN BOILERS
Des|gn Advantages of SC
1echno|ogy
Higlei cycle efficiency means
Piimaiily,
Less fuel consumpiion
Insialled capaciiy addiiion ai liglei speed
Less emission
Less auxiliaiy powei consumpiion
Less waiei consumpiion
Incieased vaiiaiion in coal qualiiy accepiable
Opeiaiional flexibiliiy
Beiiei iempeiaiuie coniiol and load clange flexibiliiy
Sloiiei siaii-up iime
Suiiable foi vaiiable piessuie opeiaiion
Plgh LemperaLure maLerlals appllcaLlon record
Ava||ab|||ty of supercr|t|ca|
bo||ers
Growth of unit sizes in India
Rating Year of Introduction
60/70MW 1965
110/120MW 1966
200/210MW 1972
250MW 1991
500MW 1979
660MW 2004
800MW 2008
1960s
1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
Mature
Technology
R&D-
Advance
USC
Subcritical
170
K/540
o
C/540
o
Super critical 245/540/540
245/540/565
245-580/600
285-600-620
285-630/650
382-700/720
ULTRA SUPERCRITICAL
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
Year
SUPERCRITICAL SUB-
CRITICAL
U
n
d
e
r
I
n
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
A
l
r
e
a
d
y
I
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
International Scenario of Supercritical Technology
NTPC Studying Induction of Ultra
Supercritical technology
Iuture 1rends |n U|tra Super
Cr|t|ca| 1echno|ogy
Concluslons
Eleciiiciiy geneiaiion in ile woild]India will coniinue io be
dominaied by Coal
As clallenge of counieiing climaie clange issues will be ile
main focus in :i
si
ceniuiy, liglly efficieni SC ieclnology wiil
advanced paiameieis will be iequiied io ensuie susiainable
developmeni wiil lowei caibon fooipiinis.
As ile SC ieclnology calls foi eniiiely diffeieni aiiangemenis,
maieiials and design ile SC powei planis slould be piocuied
fiom esiablisled supplieis only.
Lois of R 8 D effoiis aie pui in woildwide (USA, Euiope 8
}apan) especially io develop Supei-alloys wlicl can susiain ile
iempeiaiuie of yoo deg C.
Tlanl You