Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
org
977
ISSN- 2277-1956
D1 to Dn represents the delay cells, which provide the gain and phase shift. They construct a close loop by cascading all stages.
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983
IJECSE,Volume1,Number3
Mrs. Devendra Rani and Prof. Sanjeev M. Ranjan
The differential ring oscillator is widely used, since it has a differential output to reject common-mode noise, power supply noise and so on. In this VCO a differential type is used. As from figure2, if it has N stage than N stage ring oscillator realized using differential cells (which have complementary output).A source coupled pair (SCL) inverter will be a typical implementation. Assume that at time t0 the output of stage 1 changes to logic 1.when this logic 1 propagates to the end, it creates a logic 1 at the Nth stage, which, when feedback to the input of the first stage, creates a logic 0 in the first stage output. When this logic 0 is propagating through the chain, it toggles the output of stage 1 trigger next stage. It takes two passes through the chain to complete a period. Denoting tp as the propagation delay through each stage, then period T=2Ntp.for a single ended output cell, N has to be odd, but for a differential cell N can be odd/even, to start an oscillation.
Phase noise: The ideal VCO will provide only one pure sinusoidal wave, but in reality, the periodic signal from the VCO would contain other frequency signals that can be random or not. As figure: 3 shows [2]
From slow Slow-slewing Saturated Delay Cell, we assume that the noise is dominated by thermal noise in transistor M1 and M2. II. DESIGN CONSIDERATION A. Delay cells: There are many features that differentiate the delay cell used in ring oscillator. The most important is slew time that determines the overall phase noise performance. There are three categories of delay cell. [5]First is fast-
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983
slewing saturated delay cell. This delay cell has fast rise and fall time. It also performs full switching and therefore belongs to the saturated class of delay cell. The second type of delay cell is a slow slewing saturated delay cell. Here the inverter consists of a source of a source coupled pair (SCP) and hence this is a current based inverter. It is called slow slewing because it has a longer gate delay. The third type of delay cell is non saturated delay cell. This is also a voltage inverter based delay cell. In this delay cell some transistors are never on/off as a result output waveform never reach Vdd or ground, which is why this type of delay cell is called non saturated. In this paper a slow slewing saturated delay cell is used which is shown in figure 4[3] The overall architecture consisting of the bias circuitry, delay cell and a tuning circuit
A. Design of Delay cell: Following the steps from section 8.4.2 of VLSI for Wireless Communications written by Professor Bosco Leung, we chose N = 3 to minimize the number of components used. We will design the VCO to consume 5mW. Using the formula for power specification, [5] Power = N x Ibias x Vdd = 3 x Ibias x 2.5V = 5mW, We obtain Ibias = 0.666mA The equivalent resistance for M3 is given by,
Now, we can determine the size ratio (W/L)3 of M3.since M3 is to be biased in triode, we use the triode equation:
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983
IJECSE,Volume1,Number3
Mrs. Devendra Rani and Prof. Sanjeev M. Ranjan
VGS3 must be high to bias M3 in deep triode, hence, an initial value of | | = 2V is chosen. When M3 is biased at the midpoint of the VDS3 vs. ID3 curve, |VDS3| = Vswing/2 =0.75V. Substituting all values in the above equation, we obtain (W/L)3 = (5113.25nm/250nm) The frequency of the VCO depends on the width of the source coupled pair, M1 and M2 of the delay cell. In general, , Where tp=RCl ln2 Cl is the loading capacitance, its value depends on the size of the source coupled pair in the current delay cell, the size of the SC pair in the next delay cell, and the size of the triode biased PMOS, M3. =0.04PF Cl Cgs(M1) = Hence, (W1/L1) = (32.116m/250nm) = Cgs (M1) (assumption) =
B. Design of Bias circuitry: A replica bias scheme is implemented to maintain a constant Vswing. Although the design of a replica bias is more complicated than a constant bias scheme, the use of a replica bias allows the VCO to be less susceptible to process variations, noise on the power supply, and temperature variations. This is accomplished by designing PBIAS to fluctuate correspondingly with Id of M3, and NBIAS to fluctuate correspondingly with Ibias. In other words, a replica bias ensures the voltage drop across M3 and M4, and the voltage drop across the current source to remain at a constant, despite fluctuations in Itail. Since the VCO is designed to operate at a high frequency within a narrow frequency range, a replica bias is essential for a robust design. Since a low voltage rail of 1V is used, we are unable to design a cascoded NMOS current source in the delay cell. Hence, we have only used one NMOS to create a current source. The approximations and hand calculations used in designing the bias circuitry are as follows: Referring to Figure 8.18 of VLSI for Wireless Communications, and applying a simple KVL in the bias circuitry, we obtain Vdd Vgs9- Vgs14 = RIbias/2 Since we know M3 must be in deep triode, we set Vgs9 = 1.6V much larger than Vgs14=0.8V, which is just enough to turn M14 on. Hence, R = 9609.60 Vov9 = Vgs9 Vtp = 1.6v-0.43V=1.17V
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983
Vov14 = Vgs14 Vtn = 0.8V-0.64V=0.16V=Vov6 M14, M9, and M6 must be in saturation. Hence, we can use the following formulas to determine the size of all three transistors.
The calculated sizes are (W/L)14 = (29.06um/250nm), (W/L)9= (2.29um/250nm), and (W/L)6 = (54.65um/250nm). Note that the sizes of M14 and M6 are especially large in order to keep both transistors in saturation with a low Vgs of 0.8V. Hence, the PBIAS = Vdd Vgs9 = 2.5V 1.6V = 0.9V and NBIAS = Vgs14 = 0.8V.
C .Design of tuning circuitry: We chose Vtune_max = 1V and Vtune_min = 0V for ease of use. The corresponding gain of the VCO is given by
-516MHz/V The size of M7 and M8 can be determined by the following relation = Hence, Itune_max =78.355A/V 1V = 78.355A Since Itune_bias must be larger than Itune_max, we set Itune_bias = 82A. Finally, to determine the size of M7 and M8,
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983
IJECSE,Volume1,Number3
Mrs. Devendra Rani and Prof. Sanjeev M. Ranjan
(W/L)7=0.0976 = (706.33nm/250nm) However, the minimum width allowed for 250nm technology is 0.3um. Hence, we will scale W7 up by a factor of 10, and adjust the gain of the current mirror M11 to M12 to obtain the correct Itune_bias. Since M7 and M8 were scaled by a factor of 10, we must scale Itune_bias also by a factor of 10, and design 10(W/L)11= (W/L)11 to obtain the appropriate Itune. The size of the PMOS current source of the tuning circuit is obtained by:
Where Itune_bias = 10 x 82A = 820A, |Vgs| = |PBIAS-Vdd| = |0.9V 2.5V| = 1.6V. Therefore, (W/L)Ptune_bias = (11.302um /250nm). For M11 and M12, we arbitrarily choose (W/L)11 = 0.3m and (W/L)12 = 3.0m.
IV. CIRCUIT IMPLEMENTATION However, we made significant modifications based on parametric simulation results. The modifications made and the actual implementation of the VCO is discussed in this section of the report.. According to the previous section, the VCO is composed of three delay cells, a bias block, and a tuning block.
Tuningng Biasin g
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983
V.
SIMULATION OUTPUT
Figure 10 shows the single ended Vout+ and Vout- waveform of VCOwhich produces the frequency of range 1.884GHz to 2.4GHz. The frequency of oscillation and the performance of the tuning circuit was thoroughly described
V. CONCLUSION The design of our Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) was implemented using a three stage ring oscillator. A slow-slewing saturated topology was used for all three delay cells of the ring oscillator. From circuit simulations, the oscillating voltage swing is close to 2V. The output frequency varies from 1.884GHz to 2.4GHz by adjusting the tuning voltage from 0.6-1.0V.Therefore; we have met or exceeded all project specifications. VI. REFERENCES
[1]. Design of low-voltage wide tuning range cmos multipass voltage-controlled ring oscillator by jie ren, dalhousie university halifax, nova scotia march 2011 [2]. Jitter in Phase-Locked Loops by John McNeill, Worcester Polytechnic Institute [3]. Leung, Bosco, VLSI for Wireless Communication Prentice Hall, 2002. [4]. Paper of Han-Woong Son A Fully Integrated Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer for Wireless communications . Georgia Institute of Technology April 2004 [5]. Design of ring oscillator based VCOwritten by George Lee, Professor Leung March 29, 2005 [6]. B. Razavi, Monolithic Phase-locked Loops and Clock Recovery Circuits: Theory and Design, IEEE Press, 1996 [7]. B. Razavi, RF Microelectronics, Upper Saddle River, NJ (USA): Prentice Hall, 1998. [8]. DESIGN OF CMOS RING OSCILLATORS WITH REDUCED PHASE NOISE by JIAWEI REN. University of Guelph, 2010 [9]. T. Lee, The design of CMOS radio-frequency integrated circuits. Cambridge University Press, 1998. [10]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL. 31, NO. 3, MARCH 1996 331 A Study of Phase Noise in CMOS Oscillators Behzad Razavi, Member, IEEE.
ISSN 2277-1956/V1N3-977-983