Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Denburys Focus
Note:
Currently
~350,000
b/d
of
oil
by
CO2-EOR
are
produced
in
the
US.
Occidental Denbury Kinder Morgan Chevron Hess 31 (4) 85 (30)
43 (15)
24 (7)
20 (4)
20 (5) 14 (7)
13 (6)
Texas
Wyoming Mississippi
Colorado
New Mexico Other states
Source:
Oil
&
Gas
Journal
2010,
Bloomberg
New
Energy
Finance.
12 (2)
Note: Denbury acquired Encore on 1 November 2009, doubling their poten4al CO2-EOR recoverable reserves with Encores assets in the mountain states, not shown in this gure
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
An important revenue stream accrues to the capturers of CO2 emissions, helping lower the overall cost of conduc4ng CCS. In this report, we assume a price for CO2 of $40/metric ton, delivered to the oil eld at pressure. At 0.3 metric tons of purchased (net) CO2 per barrel of recovered oil, this results in a transfer of $12 of the $85 per barrel oil to en44es selling the CO2 to the oil industry. Power and other industries involved with CO2 capture would need to provide nearly 90% of the future CO2 demand, gaining $730 billion dollars of revenues.
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
A second revenue stream accrues to local and state governments and the Federal Treasury from royal4es, severance and ad valorem taxes and income taxes. Our analysis shows that, at an oil price of $85 per barrel, $21.20 of this oil price is transferred directly to state and local governments and the Federal Treasury. With 67.2 billion barrels of economically recoverable oil from applying Next Genera4on CO2-EOR, this equals $1,420 billion of revenues transferred to domes4c public treasuries rather than to foreign treasuries. These revenues, in states such as Texas, Wyoming and others, are a primary source of funds for school systems and other valuable public services.
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
A third revenue stream accrues to the general domes4c economy from successful applica4on of CO2-EOR technology. With $25.80 of the $85 barrel oil price being spent on domes4c wages and purchases, this provides $1.7 trillion dollars of gross revenues to the domes4c economy.
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
A fourth revenue stream accrues to a variety of en44es holding private mineral rights from royalty payments ($7.70 per barrel) and to the U.S. oil industry ($19.50 per barrel) for return of and return on capital investment. The Texas economic model shows that every dollar of direct investment in oil development has a mul4plier of 4 in terms of suppor4ng economic ac4vity.
Finally, the domes4c trade balance (foreign debt) from producing 67.2 billion barrels of domes4c oil rather than impor4ng this oil would be reduced by $5.7 trillion.
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
Oil elds provide CO2 storage op4ons that can be permiFed under exis4ng (or slightly modied) regulatory guidelines, thereby avoiding the large delays inherent when wai4ng on new regula4ons and perminng for large-scale storage of CO2 in saline forma4ons. The pore space, mineral rights and long-term liability issues of oil elds are already well established and thus would not be impediments to an integrated CO2 storage and CO2-EOR project. Oil elds generally have exis4ng subsurface data and ooen possess usable infrastructure such as injec4on wells and gathering systems, enabling more accurate assessment of CO2 storage capacity and substan4al cost savings.
Source: hFp://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/storing%20co2%20w%20eor_nal.pdf
Also a number of other condi4ons favor the use of oil elds for injec4ng and storing CO2. First, oil elds are located in areas with an accepted history of subsurface eld ac4vi4es contribu4ng to public acceptance for storing CO2. Second, oil elds provide an exis4ng brown eld storage site versus having to establish a new green eld site when preparing a saline forma4on for CO2 storage. Third, the footprint of the CO2 plume within an oil eld would be several 4mes smaller than within a saline forma4on. Finally, the early reliance on EOR for storing CO2 would help build the regional pipeline infrastructure for future CO2 storage projects in saline forma4ons.
Current
Developments/Drivers
CCUS
Methodology
Released
January
2012
by
C2ES
NEORI
February
2012,
Phase
I
work
done
on
incen4ves
for
CCUS/CO2- EOR
NRAP
Developing
subsurface
technical
playbook
45(Q)
modica4ons
eorts
underway
has
prompted
numerous
studies
on
size
and
scope
of
EOR
opportunity
from
industrial
sources
MWGA
with
the
Clinton
Ini4a4ve
developing
ac4on
plan
for
CO2
infrastructure
and
opportunity
in
the
mid-central
states
Californias
AB
32
Cap
&
Trade
program
ins4gated
current
interests
and
developments
for
CCUS
and
CO2-EOR
Storage
u4liza4on
in
that
state
EPAs
GHG
Rule
Implementa4on
has
ins4gated
a
closer
look
at
CO2-EOR- Storage
as
rst
storage
pathway
for
CCS
implementa4on
DOEs
shio
from
CCS
to
CCUS,
making
CO2-EOR-Storage
a
preferred
pathway
Crude
oil
(WTI)
pricing
now
in
the
$80-$110/bbl
range
ROZ
is
crea4ng
strong
interest
in
large
volume/long
term
CO2
sources
GS/CO2-EOR-Storage
protocols
for
Registry
use
underway
Forma4on
of
the
Gulf
Coast
CO2-EOR
Ini4a4ve-June
4th,
2012
Source: hFp://www.pewclimate.org/sites/default/modules/usmap/pdf.php?le=5907
27