Tavistock

The Best Kept Secret in America

From Dr. Byron T. Weeks, MD July 31, 2001 http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml [Editor's Note: No one deserves more credit than Dr. John Coleman for bringing to light the history and true purpose of the City of London's Tavistock Institute and its many subdivisional institutions and organizations which was exposed in stunning detail in his 1992 book, Conspirators' Hierachy: The Story of The Cimmittee of 300. Dr Coleman has rightly complained that many NWO expose writers who have followed in his wake, have used his original research without crediting him as the originating source and in fairness to him, it should be observed that the information presented below is a reflection of his pioneering investigations into Tavistock. The article below was sent to John Quinn by Dr. Byron Weeks. The insidious propaganda and public opinion manipulations (including mind control agendas) orchestrated by London's Tavistock Institute is covered at length in the books of David Icke and Dr John Coleman, but this recent article adds fresh insights and historical perspective. Our thanks to Brice Taylor <brice@teleplex.net> for forwarding...Ken Adachi]

Preface from John Quinn (NewsHawk)

This forwarded article was received from Byron Weeks; who in our opinion really has a good firm handle on exactly WHAT is up on many levels with the extraordinarily extensive "control trips" currently being directed against the peoples of the world by elements of the global shadow government. Weeks, whom I quoted at length in the book PHOENIX UNDEAD, has sent us this compelling look at a globally-active British institute which has had it's hands in just about every social and political/governmental movement of note throughout much of the world for the past 50 years. For example, ever wonder who and what is "behind", let's say, the CIA? Well, they don't swear allegiance to America, that's for certain. Try the British royal family. This report is the real stuff--solidly researched and meticulously documented; so for lots more truly concept-bending data, read on. NewsHawk Inc. ------------To John Quinn I believe Tavistock has always had secret ties to British Freemasonry.

Byron T. Weeks, MD Col. AFUS, MC, Ret. -------------------------TAVISTOCK - THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN AMERICA TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE . . . . . . . . . 30 Tabernacle Street, London EC2A 4DD.-Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs, particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new training events alongside the regular program of group relations conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum Press) which is now in its 48th year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal Evaluation. Three elements combine to make the Institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence of being entirely self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action research orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology. The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese. Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, <http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>Hudson Institute, <http://watch.pair.com/heritage.html>Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.

[Editor, Tim Aho's note: See Watch Unto Prayer report on The Heritage Foundation founded by Paul Weyrich with funding from Joseph Coors, who also founded and financed respectively the Moral Majority and Council for National Policy.] Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute. [Editor, Tim Aho: See Watch Unto Prayer report on <http://watch.pair.com/jbs-cnp.html>The John Birch Society & Council for National Policy for information regarding CIA operations on the Christian Right.] Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals of personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family. Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries. Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. The "experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on

Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual's sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government. Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of Finance, at the University of Pennsylvania. A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy---the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like "guinea pigs", resulted in several deaths. The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid [LSD]. Roosevelt's advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html#ips>Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD "counter-culture" of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was financed by $25 million from the CIA. One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association, and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments. One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S. companies who provided the drug for the CIA. All the records of the CIA's drug testing program were ordered destroyed by the head of MK Ultra. Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post August 20, 1984, cites the "squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness". This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protege of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy's personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for Democratic Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture. Today the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with

400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which originate many types of programs to increase the control of the World Order over the American people. The Stanford Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300 employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the behavioral sciences. One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. [Editor, Tim Aho's note: The wife of Winston Lord (CFR, Bilderberg, Skull & Bones), Bette Bao Lord (CFR, Bilderberg), is Chairman of the Board of Freedom House whose manipulation of the Christian Right via the Religious Persecution issue is documented in our report <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html>Freedom House: A CFR Front.] One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the Kulaks. Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE; Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve. To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist. The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American farmer. The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his

small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural trusts. The Brookings Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts. Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction, and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF must make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations. The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do "charitable" work, because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and never denied, that the Heritage-AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of professional intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political economic and social goals which the World Order requires the foundations to achieve through their " bequests ". Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlocking of the foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by the names of its principle incorporators---Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA. They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England.

Tavistock Institutions In The United States

Flow Laboratories Gets contracts from the National Institutes of Health.

Merle Thomas Corporation Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites. Walden Research Does work in the field of pollution control. Planning Research Corporation, Arthur D. Little, G.E. "TEMPO", Operations Research Inc. Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called "a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite." Brookings Institution Dedicates its work to what it calls a "national agenda." Wrote President Hoover's program, President Roosevelt's "New Deal", the Kennedy Administration's "New Frontiers" program (deviation from it may have cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson's "Great Society." Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so. Hudson Institute This institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Hudson may be properly classified as one of the Committee of 300's BRAINWASHING establishments. One of its largest clients is the U.S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control. [Editor, Tim Aho: This is the same <http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>Hudson Institute which gave us GOALS 2000 and authored the Freedom From Religious Persecution Act, which became the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. This law required the creation of a federal commission to monitor religion chaired by a presidentially-appointed Ambassador-at-Large on International Religious Freedom under the mandates of the United Nations' covenants and authority of the International Criminal Court.] National Training Laboratories One of the key institutions established for this purpose in the United States was the National Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of the Tavistock network in the United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine, NTL had as its explicit purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational institutions, and corporate bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these "leaders" to either themselves run Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly trained group leaders to do the job. The "nuts and bolts" of the NTL operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as "group dynamics," developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and whose students founded NTL. In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities, are manipulated by a "group leader" to form a "consensus" of opinion, achieving a new "group identity." The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure. Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is "cracked," and a new

personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place. In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim knowing what has taken place. This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called "sensitivity groups" or "T-groups," or in the more extreme rock-drug-sex counterculture form, "touchy-feely groups," such as the kind popularized from the 1960s onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up with the help of NTL. From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the nation's corporate leaderships through such brainwashing programs, while running similar programs for the State Department, the Navy, the Department of Education, and other sections of the federal bureaucracy. There is no firm estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this process in last 40 years at either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, which is based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training Laboratories in Group Development, or in various satellite institutions. The most reliable estimate is in the several millions. One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States. Thus, the NEA's outlook has been "shaped" by Tavistock, through the NTL. In 1964, the NTL Institute became a direct part of the NEA, with the NTL setting up "group sessions" for all its affiliates. With funding from the Department of Education, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the training of the nation's primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in developing the content of educational "reforms," including OBE. Also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is a brainwashing center in artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher group in the United States. While officially decrying "racism", it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up. University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance & Commerce Founded by Eric Trist One of the "brain trusts" of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock in so far as "Behavioral Research" is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor---which teaches how to produce "cooked" statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method was very much in demand as we came to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than was reflected in USDL statistics. Wharton's ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the World Bank. Institute for Social Research Among its clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S.Department of Defense, U.S.Postal Service and the U.S. Department of Justice. Among its

studies are "The Human Meaning Of Social Change", "Youth in Transition" and "How Americans View Their Mental Health". Institute For The Future This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. So called "DELPHI PANELS" decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to "steer" government in the right direction to head off such groups as "people creating civil disorder." (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.) This institute recommends action such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but most frightening, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas, (concentration camp compounds). As can be observed, many of their goals have already been more than fully realized. INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS) One of the "Big Three", IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States. Its networks in America include the League for Industrial Democracy. Lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy have included Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Irwin Suall of the ADL, Eugene Rostow, Arms control negotiator, Lane Kirkland, Labor Leader, and Albert Shanker. IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly trained Tavistock Institute graduates. The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the Tavistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the "New Left" as a grass roots movement in the U.S. Its been said that Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security Council staff member Halprin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern. No scheme was too big for IFS and its controllers to take on and manage. Through its many powerful lobbing groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its "Big Stick" to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists, In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for "the trend, the way things are going." By using key pointmen on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works. IPS became, and remains to this day, one of the most prestigious "think tanks" controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers. By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as "The Pentagon Papers," besieging the corporate structure, bridging the

credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial policies under the guise of religion, using establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play. [Editor, Tim Aho: See Watch Unto Prayer report on <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html>Freedom House: "Grants (for the IPS) came from the Samuel Rubin Foundation and the Stern Family Fund. Samuel Rubin was himself a member of the elite Comintern of the Communist Party, founded by none other than Lenin himself. Billionaire Armand Hammer assisted Rubin in making the fortunes which helped launch IPS. Philip Stern, an IPS trustee, was the president of Stern Fund. The executive director of the Stern Fund, David R. Hunter, was previously an official of The National Council and the World Council Of Churches. (Dr. James W. Wardner, Unholy Alliances, p.125)] STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the "jewels" in Tavistock's Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WWII, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control research and "future sciences." Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the "Changing Images of Man" upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests. Some of Stanford's major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so, did the diversity of its services: Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research Management Office of Science and Technology SRI Business Intelligence Program U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research Among corporations seeking Stanford's services were Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation, Hewlett Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and TRW Company. One of Stanford's more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons. Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller "think tanks" doing research into every facet of life in America. This is ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanford's computers are linked with 2500 "sister" research consoles which include the CIA, Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), Rand,

MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the "library", cataloging all ARPA documentation. "Other agencies".....one can use one's imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI's "library" for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon uses SRI's master files extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon "command and control" problems are worked out by Stanford. While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not , and will not be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone. [Editor, Tim Aho: See Watch Unto Prayer report <http://watch.pair.com/dolphin.html>Lambert Dolphin & the Great Sphinx, which documents the connections of SRI's Lambert Dolphin with the Edgar Cayce Foundation and The Discernment Ministries.] MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT), ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as being a purely American institution, but that is far from the truth. MIT- Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups: Contemporary Technology Industrial Relations NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology Systems Dynamics Some of MIT's clients are: American Management Association Committee for Economic Development GTE Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) NASA National Academy of Sciences National Council of Churches Sylvania TRW U.S. Army U.S. Department of State U.S. Navy U.S. Treasury Volkswagen Company RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA's most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-ULTRA operation which lasted for 20 years). [Editor, Tim Aho's note: The founder of the Rand Corporation, Herman Kahn, also founded the Hudson Institute in 1961. In Educating for the New World Order, B.K. Eakman tells of a training manual for "change agents" developed for the U.S. government by Rand Corporation: ". . . a how-to manual with a 1971 U.S. Office of Education contract number on it entitled 'Training for Change Agents'; seven volumes of 'change agent studies' commissioned by the U.S. Office of Education to the Rand Corporation in 1973-74; scores of other papers submitted by behaviorist researchers who had obtained grants from the U.S. Office of Education for the purpose of exploring ways to 'freeze' and 'unfreeze' values, 'to implement change,' and to turn potentially hostile groups and committees into acquiescent, rubber-stamp bodies by means of such strategies as the 'Delphi Technique.'" (p. 118)] Some of RAND's clients include: American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) Chase Manhattan Bank International Business Machines (IBM) National Science Foundation Republican Party TRW U.S. Air Force U.S. Department of Health U.S. Department of Energy There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDS's services. To list them all would be impossible. Among RAND's specialities is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAINWASHING remains the primary function of RAND. These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose function is to ensure that the Uniform Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting business in the United States.
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml

Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations

(layer of The Committee of 300) This group was formed at Oxford University, London, by the Royal Institute of Of International Affairs in 1922. Major John Rawlings Reese, a British Army technician, was instructed to set up the largest brainwashing facility in the world at the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations as a part of Sussex University. This became the core of Britain's Psychological Warfare Bureau. It was Tavistock-designed methods that got the United States into the Second World War and which, under the guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin, established the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA. Lewin became the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey, which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to concentrate on bombing German worker housing while leaving military targets, such as munition plants, alone. The munition plants on both sides belonged to the international bankers who had no wish to see their assets destroyed. The idea behind saturation bombing of civilian worker housing was to break the morale of the German worker. It was not designed to affect the war effort against the German military machine. Lewin and his team of actuaries reached a target figure, that if 65% of German worker housing was destroyed by nightly RAF bombing, the morale of the civilian population would collapse. The actual document was prepared by the Pru-dential Assurance Company. The RAF, under the command of "Bomber" Harris, carried out Lewin's plans, culminating in the terror firestorm bombing of Dresden, in which over 125,000, mainly old men, women and children, were killed. The truth of "Bomber" Harris's horror raids on German civilians was a well kept secret until long after the end of WW II. Today its primary mission is to establish a global brainwashing and opinion forming network. This institute is the originator of the Aquarian Conspiracy, designed to weaken the nations of the world by encouraging drug use, free sex, homosexuality and lesbianism. It has been very successful in the United States. It works through many research institutes and think tanks. The principal ones in the United States are the Stanford Research Institute, Rand Research and Development Corporation, the Institute For Policy Studies, the Aspen Institute, the Hudson Institute, and the Brookings Institute. Tavistock runs over 30 research institutions in the United States. These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have in many cases grown into gargantuan monsters, penetrating every aspect of our government agencies and taking command of all policy making. One of Tavistock's chief wreckers of our way of life was Dr. Alexander King, a founder member of NATO and a favorite with the Committee of 300, as well as an outstanding member of the Club of Rome. When it was decided that a super-body would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO. For Five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall Fund. Dr. King was assigned by the Club of Rome to destroy America's education by taking control of the National Teachers Association and working in close conjunction with certain law makers and judges. Scientists engaged in the process of conditioning are called "social engineers" or "new-science social scientists" and they play an integral part in what we see, hear and read. The "old school" social engineers were Kurt K. Lewin, Professor Hadley Cantril, Margaret Meade, Professor Derwin Cartwright and Professor

Lipssitt who, together with John Rawlings Reese, made up the backbone of new-science scientists at Tavistock Institute.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/tavistochumanrelations.htm

Tavistock Institute
From Wikipedia(View original Wikipedia article ) Last modified on 27 January 2012 at 17:34 Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. For the organization which contains the Tavistock Centre for Couple Relationships, see Tavistock Institute of Medical Psychology, and for the current National Health arm see Tavistock Clinic The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is a British charity concerned with group behaviour and organisational behaviour. It was launched in 1946, when it separated from the Tavistock Clinic.

Table of Contents
1 History of the Tavistock 2 Focal point for psychoanalytical theory 3 Current activities 4 Relation to other 'Tavistocks' 5 Notes 6 Further reading

History of the Tavistock

The Institute was founded in 1946 by a group of key figures at the Tavistock Clinic including Elliott Jaques, Henry Dicks, Leonard Browne, Ronald Hargreaves, John Rawlings Rees, Mary Luff and Wilfred Bion, with Tommy Wilson as chairman, funded by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. Other well-known names that joined the group later were John D. Sutherland, John Bowlby, Eric Trist, and Fred Emery. Kurt Lewin, a member of the Frankfurt school in America, was an important influence on the work of the Tavistock, according to Eric Trist, who expresses his admiration for Lewin in his autobiography. Many of these founding members of the Tavistock Institute went on to play major roles in psychology. John Rawlings Rees became first president of the World Federation for Mental Health. [4]

Jock Sutherland became director of the new post-war Tavistock Clinic, when it was incorporated into the newly established British National Health Service in 1946. Ronald Hargreaves became deputy director of the World Health Organization. Tommy Wilson became chairman of the Tavistock Institute. [5] [1]

Focal point for psychoanalytical theory

Many well-known psychologists and psychiatrists have passed through the Tavistock Institute over the years, and it became known as the focal point in Britain for psychoanalysis and the psychodynamic theories of Sigmund Freud and his followers. Other names associated with the Tavistock are Melanie Klein, Carl Gustav Jung, J. A. Hadfield, Beckett, Charles Rycroft, Wilfred Bion, and R. D. Laing. [6] [2]

Current activities
According to its website, the Institute engages in educational, research, and consultancy work in the social sciences and applied psychology. Its clients are chiefly public sector organizations, including the European Union, several British government departments, and some private clients. The Institute owns Human Relations, the international social sciences journal. It also edits the journal Evaluation. It provides two MSc degree courses: Advanced Organisational Consultation, [7], jointly with City University, London[8] Leading Change and Organizational Development, jointly with the National School of Government and the University of Birmingham [9]

Relation to other 'Tavistocks'

The Tavistock Institute shares common roots with other organisations that emerged from the Tavistock Clinic. This is a source of much confusion, though the facts can be ascertained from the historical account of the Tavistock by Eric Trist, one time chairman of the Institute. [10] The Clinic is now part of a National Health Service trust, while the "Tavistock Institute", which once did research in many areas and was funded by many sources, is now a charity. The name "Tavistock Institute of Medical Psychology", which was the name used for the original parent body, is now used to refer to an organization that grew out of that parent body but now specializes in couples relationships under the section name of the "Tavistock Centre for Couple Relationships".

Notes
1. ^ A history of the Institute can be found in The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in three volumes between 1990 and 1997. 2. ^ Laing came to the Tavistock Institute in 1956 at the invitation of Jock Sutherland, who was then director of the Tavistock Clinic, to train on a grant. [1] [2] His training, under Charles Rycroft, was at the Institute of Psychoanalysis. [3] He left in 1965, and went on to develop his own ideas, particularly with regard to schizophrenia, which he suggested might be a natural and understandable curative process, rather than a disease of the mind. His views of schizophrenia, based largely on the concept of family nexus, were explained in a series of famous books such as Sanity, Madness and the Family. Laing is often associated with the Antipsychiatry movement.

Further reading
Tavistock Institute website The Foundation and Development of the Tavistock Institute to 1989 by Eric Trist and Hugh Murray. "The A.K. Rice Institute for the Study of Social Systems". 2008. http://www.akriceinstitute.org/. Retrieved February 13, 2010. Young, Robert M. "The Culture of British Psychoanalysis" Trist, Eric L. et al. The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology : The SocioEcological Perspective (Tavistock Anthology), University of Pennsylvania, May 1997. ISBN 08122-8194-2 Eric Trist - Autobiography online

Retrieved from "http://mediawiki.dp.teoma.com/wiki/Tavistock_Institute" Categories: Organizations established in 1946 | Psychoanalysis | Psychology organizations | Systems psychology | Research institutes in the United Kingdom | History of mental health in the United Kingdom | History of psychiatry

by Dr. John Coleman

from Conspirators Hierarchy - The Story of the Committee of 300

FLOW LABORATORIES
Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.

MERLE THOMAS CORPORATION

Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.

WALDEN RESEARCH
Does work in the field of pollution control.

PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, ARTHUR D. LITTLE, G.E. TEMPO, OPERATIONS RESEARCH INC.
Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite.

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Dedicates its work to what it calls a national agenda. Wrote President Hoovers program, President Roosevelts New Deal, the Kennedy Administrations New Frontiers program (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnsons Great Society. Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee of 300.

HUDSON INSTITUTE
Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was

to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its earlier papers were entitled Stability and Tranquility Among Older Nations, and Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues. Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped to promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the Committee of 300, ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly classified as one of the Committee of 300s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of its nuclear war scenarios make for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I would recommend The 6 Basic Thermonuclear Threats and Possible Outcomes of Thermonuclear War and one of its more frightening papers entitled Israeli-Arab Nuclear War. Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox, General Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big client remains the U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control. To date it has not got into wet NASA, that is to say, the National Oceanographic Agency.

NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES

NTL is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include so-called TGroups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United States. While officially decrying racism, it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WHARTON - SCHOOL OF FINANCE & COMMERCE

Founded by Eric Trist, one of the brain trusts of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock institutions in the U.S. in so far as Behavioral Research is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Laborwhich it teaches how to produce cooked statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than is reflected in USDL statistics. Whartons ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George Schultz and Alan Greenspan.

INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH

This is the institute set up by brain trusters from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin Cartwright and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are: o The Human Meaning of Social Change o Youth in Transition o How Americans View Their Mental Health Among the institutes clients are o The Ford Foundation o U.S. Department of Defense o U.S. Postal Service and the U.S.Department of Justice

INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE

This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. The institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic trends and to blow the whistle on any departures from what it has laid down as normal. Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give decisions for the future. So-called Delphi Panels decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to steer government in the right direction to head off such groups as people creating civil disorder. (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.) The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas. As will be observed, many of the Institute for the Futures goals have already been more than fully realized.

INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)

One of the Big Three, IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its networks in America which include the League for Industrial democracy in which Leonard Woodcock played a leading, if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy included conservative Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall (of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control negotiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader), and Albert Shanker. For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Family, the Stern Family Foundation and the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Communist Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was Jeweler of the Imperial Russian Court) and made a fortune out of the Faberge name. The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table, which agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the New Left as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and unrest and spread chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the ideals of left wing nihilistic socialism, support unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the big stick with which to beat the United States political establishment. Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as, o the Black Panthers o Daniel Ellsberg o National Security Council staff member Halperin o The Weathermen Underground o the Venceramos o the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage. Take the plot to kidnap Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British MI-6 intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through TROTS (Trotskyite terrorists based in

London). The plot was discovered by the FBI so that it could not go too far. Ahmed went on to become the director of one of IPSs most influential agencies, The Transnational Institute which, chameleon-like, changed from its former name, Institute of Race Relations, when intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it was tied directly to Rhodes Scholarship-Harry Oppenheimer and Anglo-American-British mining interests in South Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time. Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its big stick to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for the trend, the way things are going. By using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works. To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point man persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of the House to request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being prepared by President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in 1976, 1977, and 1978 gathering sponsors as it went. Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study. This was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskins budget called for a fifty percent cut in the Defense Budget, a socialist housing program that would compete with and steadily replace private housing and mortgage markets, a national health service, radical changes in the educational system that would disrupt capitalist control over the distribution of knowledge, and several other radical ideas. The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to sign the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually defenseless against ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this day one of the most prestigious think tanks controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers. By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as The Pentagon Papers, besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial politics under the guise of religion, using the establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.

STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the jewels in Tavistocks Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WW II, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control re-search and future sciences. Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the Changing Images of Man upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests. Some of Stanfords major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services: o Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research o Management o Office of Science and Technology o SRI Business Intelligence Program

o U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense o Research and Engineering o U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research Among corporations seeking Stanfords services were o Wells Fargo Bank o Bechtel Corporation o Hewlett Packard o Bank of America o McDonnell-Douglas Corporation o Blyth o Eastman Dillon o TRW Company One of Stanfords more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons. Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller think tanks doing research into every facet of life in America. This is known as ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanfords computers are linked with 2500 sister research consoles which include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), RANI, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the library, cataloging all ARPA documentation. Other agenciesand one can use ones imagination here, are allowed to search through SRIs library for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon, for instance, uses SRIs master files extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon command and control problems are worked out by Stanford. While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not, and will not, be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone, and it is my belief that if ever SRI were to be fully exposed, the hostility which would arise from revelations as to what it actually does would most probably force SRI to close.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as a purely American institution, but that is far from being the case. MIT-Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups: o Contemporary Technology o Industrial Relations o Lewin Group Psychology o NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories o Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology o Systems Dynamics. Forrestor and Meadows wrote The Club of Romes Limits of Growth zero growth study. Some of MITs clients include the following: o American Management Association o American Red Cross o Committee for Economic Development o GTE o Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) o NASA o National Academy of Sciences

o National Council of Churches o Sylvania o TRW o U.S. Army o U.S. Department of State o U.S. Navy o U.S. Treasury o Volkswagen Company So vast is the reach of IDA that it would take hundreds of pages to describe the activities in which it is engaged, and IDA is fully described in my book on the role played by Institutions and Foundations in committing treason against the United States of America, which will be published early in 1992.

RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIAs most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-Ultra operation which lasted for 20 years).

Some of RANDs clients include the following: o American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) o Chase Manhattan Bank o International Business Machines (IBM) o National Science Foundation o Republican Party o TRW o U.S. Air Force o U.S. Department of Energy o U.S. Department of Health There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDs services, and to list them all would be an impossible task. Among RANDs specialities is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to articles of scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAIN WASHING remains the primary function of RAND. To summarize, the major Tavistock institutions in the United States engaged in brainwashing at all levels, including government, the military, business, religious organizations and education are the following: Brookings Institution Hudson Institute Institute for Policy Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology National Training Laboratories Rand Research and Development Corporation Stanford Research Institute Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania It is estimated by sources of mine that the total number of people employed by these institutions is in the region of 50,000 with funding close to $10 billion dollars.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock05.htm

Chapter 7.4: Mont Pelerin, Ford Foundation and Tavistock

The Mont Pelerin Society, Ford Foundation and Tavistock Institute

The Mont Pelerin Society The Ford Foundation The Tavistock Institute Summary Appendix I

The Mont Pelerin Society

The present star of the Hoover Institution is Milton Friedman, who is credited with bringing economic disaster to Chile, Israel, the United States, and other countries in which his "monetarist" theories have been introduced. Friedman's "monetarism" is the same old bankers' swindle of endless creation of more interest bearing debt money, requiring ever increasing taxes merely to meet the interest payments. He and Jack Kemp are now pushing for a "flat tax" to lock Americans into a tax corral from which they can never hope to escape. Friedman came to the Hoover in 1977 as senior research fellow, simultaneously accepting a post as economic consultant to the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He and his consort, Murray Rothbard, dominate a closely interlocked network of "hard money", "conservative" groups, which includes the Heritage Foundation, Mont Pelerin Society, Cato Institute, Ludwig von Mises Institute, and American Enterprise Institute, which hold banquet meetings, always with no visible result. Their mentor is the late Ludwig von Mises, born in Austria, and founder of "the Austrian School of Economics", who taught at New York University from 1946 until his death. The Institute is now run by his widow, Margit Herzfeld, to whom President Reagan said, at a testimonial dinner for her husband, "You don't know how often I consult the books of your husband before making a decision." She still doesn't know. At the age of 16, Milton Friedman became the protege of Arthur Burns at Rutgers and Columbia. Their economic principles stemmed from the "Viennese School" founded by Karl Menger and Eugen von Bauwerk. Merger taught von Hayek, Eric Voegelin and Fritz Machluys. At that time. Vienna was dominated by the House of Rothschild, which had controlled the national debt of Austria since the Congress of Vienna in 1815. Austria's Tyrol silver mines were owned by the Rothschilds, as were her railways. Empress Elizabeth's closest friend was Julie de Rothschild, sister of Baron Albert, head of the Austrian House. Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, who founded the Pan European Union, was named after Richard Wagner, one of whose students was Gustav Mahler. Mahler's studies with Wagner were funded by Baron Albert de Rothschild. Coudenhove-Kalergi's father was a close friend of Theordor Herzl, founder of Zionism. Coudenhove-Kalergi writes in his "Memoirs":

"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg, had read my book and wanted to get to know us. To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks, to tide the movement over for its first three years .... Max Warburg, who was one of the most distinguished and wisest men that I have ever come into contact with, had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch." In Chicago, Jane Adams of Hull House had been for five years a protege of Beatrice Webb, founder of the Fabian Society. In 1892, the University of Chicago was organized as the center of the Fabian Socialist program in America, with J. Laurence Laughlin, spokesman for the Cobden Club's "free trade" program in England. Laughlin later became Paul Warburg's chief propagandist to stump for the passing of the Federal Reserve Act. John Dewey became head of the Sociology Dept. at the Univ. of Chicago; Wesley Clair Mitchell was head of the economics dept. In 1913, they moved to Columbia University. They were later hired by Baruch at the War Industries Board, and prepared all the statistics for American representatives at the Versailles Peace Conference. In Feb. 1920, Mitchell met with the rest of the staff of Baruch's War Industries Board in New York with a Round Table group financed by Kuhn Loeb & Co. and Lazard Freres, to found the Natl Bureau of Economic Research, of which Mitchell became director. His protege was Arthur Burns, later chmn of the Natl Bureau, chmn Federal Reserve Governors, partner of Lazard Freres, and U.S. Ambassador to West Germany. Burns then brought in his protege, Milton Friedman, who has proposed that we legalize the sale of dope to raise $100 billion a year for the GNP. Wesley Clair Mitchell's career was devoted to uniting the Austrian and British schools of economics in a single force to direct the American economy. He achieved success through the careers of his proteges, Burns and Friedman, who offer us the "flat rate" tax to pay interest on their bank-created debt money. It is the ancient European system introduced by the House of Rothschild to loot national economies by the rentier system of national debt. A keystone of the Friedman-Burns network is the Mont Pelerin Society, a secretive group of economists which meets every two years, but issues no findings or recommendations. These supposedly conservative hard money economists first met at Mont Pelerin, Switzerland in 1947 to oppose the leftwing statist economists who had dominated the field for fifty years. They were led by Frederick von Hayek, a graduate of the Viennese school of economics, who became a British citizen in 1938. He was Tooke prof. of economics, Univ. of London 1931-50, prof. of social and moral science at the Univ. of Chicago 195062, and prof. of economics Univ. of Freiburg 1962-69, when he retired to Salzburg. He was a disciple of Ludwig von Mises, who taught Henry Hazlitt, another founder of Mont Pelerin. Hazlitt reported the founding meeting in Newsweek, Sept. 25, 1961, listing among those present: Jacques Rueff, economic director of France Pedro Beltran, president of Peru Sen. Luigi Einaudi, prof. economics at Turin 1901-35, Governor of the Bank of Italy 1945-48, president of Italy 1948-55 Dr. Ludwig Erhard, Economic Minister of Germany, director of World Bank Wilhelm Roepke, Erhard's economic adviser Trygve Hoff, Norway Muller-Armack and William Rappard of Germany

Ludwig von Mises Frank Knight Milton Friedman Henry Hazlitt

In 1962, the Mont Pelerin Society met at Knokke, Belgium, announcing that "The Mont Pelerin Society takes no formal action, passes no resolutions, and seeks no publicity." In 1970, the Society met in Munich, where Milton Friedman was elected president. Present were Wesley Campbell and Martin Anderson from the Hoover Institution. In 1974, 300 members of the Society met at Brussels, where they were addressed by Milton Friedman and his protege Murray Rothbard. Rothbard was sponsored by the Cato Institute, a "conservative" group whose director, Earl C. Ravenel, is also director of the Institute for Policy Studies, the leftwing policy-making organization founded by James Paul Warburg. Cato Institute is funded by Charles Koch of Kansas, head of Koch industries, who amassed a fortune of $700 million. He also funds the Libertarian Party, which calls for opening U.S. borders to all illegal immigrants, legalizing of drugs, and other alarming recommendations. Koch funds these groups through his bank, Morgan Guaranty Trust of N.Y. Cato gave a two year grant to Rothbard to write a book, "For a New Liberty", which says, "Before World War II, so devoted was Stalin to peace that he failed to make adequate provision against Nazi attack." Rothbard should have said, "So devoted was Stalin to murder that he killed most of his Army officers, leaving him vulnerable to Nazi attack." Rothbard asserts that the U.S. is imperialist and war-mongering, while the Soviet Union is peace-loving, rational and misunderstood! The Cato Institute magazine Inquiry lists 9 staff writers, among them Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice, Marcus Raskin, head of the Institute for Policy Studies, and Penny Lernoux, correspondent of the Nation, all of whom would be hurt if they were not described as extreme liberals. In 1975, George Roche III, who had become a member of the Society in 1971, hosted the meeting at Hillsdale College, of which he is president. William Buckley, also a member, addressed the group with a routine encomium for von Hayek. In 1980, the Mont Pelerin Society met at the Hoover Institution, with 600 members and guests present. Ralph Harris was guest speaker. As Margaret Thatcher's director of economics, he had been made Baron Harris of High Cross in 1979. Count Max Thurn, permanent secretary of the Society, also addressed the meeting. He is a member of the wealthy Thurn und Taxis family, closely related to the British royal family. The Encyclopaedia of Associations lists the Mont Pelerin Society, c/o Edwin Feulner, treasurer, Box 7031, Alexandria, Va; secretary Dr. Max Thurn, Elizabethstrasse 4, Vienna. Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation, served as confidential asst. to Secretary of Defense 1969-70; adm asst. Phil Crane 1940-44, public affairs fellow Hoover Institution 1965-67, chmn Institute Europan Strategy and Defense Studies London since 1979. Heritage Foundation, part of the network of "conservative" groups, sponsored Reagan's posthumous award of the Medal of Freedom to Whittaker Chambers in March 1984. Its directors are: Shelby Cullom Davis, director of Hoover Joseph Coors, director of Hoover Midge Decter, exec. director Committee for a Free World, her husband is "neoconservative" Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine

Robert Dee, chmn Smith Kline drug firm, director United Technologies with William Simon William Simon, director Citibank, former Secretary of the Treasury Lewis E. Lehrman, head of the Lehrman Institute John D. Wrather, heir to an oil fortune, head of the entertainment conglomerate Wrather Inc. and director of Hoover.

Feulner claims that Heritage cooperates with more than 400 groups in the U.S. and 100 overseas. Honarary chairman is Frank Shakespeare. Chairman of the editorial board is David Meiselman of the Mont Pelerin Society. Richard Reeves mentions in the N.Y. Times Magazine, July 15, 1984: "Edwin J. Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation, one of the right's most productive idea factories." He failed to cite a single "idea" produced by this factory. The star of Heritage and its closely affiliated American Enterprise Institute is Jeane Kirkpatrick, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. She is routinely mentioned in terms of fulsome praise such as the Communist Party used to reserve for Stalin; National Review gushes over her, and also raves about "the ever gallant, charming, freedom-loving Friedmans" whose "energy, lucidity and patience" awes Buckley's propagandists. Jeane Kirkpatrick has been prof. at Georgetown Univ. since 1967, chief of research American Enterprise Institute since 1977, director of Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown. She is the wife of veteran intelligence operative Evron Kirkpatrick, OSS 1945, intelligence specialist Dept. of State 1946-54 as chief psychological intelligence research staff specializing in behavioural science (people control). He has been head of the American Political Science Association since 1954, and is president of the American Peace Society which publishes a quarterly called World Affairs. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) was founded by William J. Baroody and Milton Friedman in 1943; Baroody left in 1978 to take over the $7 million a year Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown. His son, William Jr. former adviser to President Nixon, took over AEI and its staff of 150. Jr. was adm. asst. to Congressman Melvin Laird 1961-68, who then became Secretary of Defense; Baroody was spec. adviser at Defense 1969-73, spec. adviser to the President of the U.S. 1973-74, and is chairman Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Directors of American Enterprise Institute include: Edward Bernstein James S. Duesenberg, Presidential Council of Economic Advisers 1966-68, prof. at Harvard, director Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Fulbright fellow Cambridge England 1954-55 Frederick A. Praeger, emigre N.Y. publisher who published a number of propaganda works for the CIA Herbert Stein, A. Willis Robertson prof of economics, Univ. of Va., editor AEI publication The Economist since 1977, served on War Production Board 1941-44, Brookings Institution fellow 1967-69, Council of Economic Advisers 1969, chairman 1972-74 Robert H. Bork, prof. law at Yale, former Solicitor General and Acting Atty. Gen. of U.S. 1973-77 Kenneth W. Daum, former partner Cravath Swaine & Moore, Wall Street law firm, now prof. of law, Univ. of Chicago D. Gale Johnson, prof. economics at Univ. of Chicago since 1944, economist with OPA 1942, State Dept. 1946, U.S. Army econ. 1948, adviser to Congress 1974-76, consultant to TVA, Rand Corp. and AID, director William Benton Fndtn Robert Nisbet, John Dewey lecturer at John Dewey Society, Rockefeller Foundation grant 1975-78, scholar at AEI since 1978

James D. Wilson, Shattuck prof. at Harvard Richard B. Madden, chmn exec. committee AEI, chairman Socony Mobil since 1956, director Pacific Gas & Electric, Del Monte and Weyerhauser Willard C. Butcher, former chmn Chase Manhattan Bank Charles T. Fisher III, president Natl Bank of Detroit, director General Motors, Detroit Edison Richard D. Wood, president Eli Lilly drugs since 1961, director Standard Oil of Indiana, and Chemical Bank.

Thus the well-funded "Hard Right" American Enterprises Institute's board of directors reads much like that of the Rockefeller Foundation or the Hoover Institution -- the usual New York banks, Standard Oil, General Motors crowd. The World Order maintains control. Lewis Lehrman, director of Heritage Foundation, and founder of the 1000 store Rite Aid drug chain, set up his own foundation in 1978. After agonizing over a trenchant attentiongetting name, he chose the obvious, Lewis Lehrman Institute. Its president is Robert W. Tucker, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, professor at John Hopkins School of International Studies, which was made famous by the tenure of Owen Lattimore, denounced by Sen. McCarthy as a leading Soviet agent. Director of Lehrman Institute is Barton Biggs of Brookings Institution. Lehrman spent $13.9 million campaigning to be elected Governor of New York, but was easily beaten by Mario Cuomo, who only spent $4.8 million. The New Republic Dec. 5, 1983 featured an article by Sidney Blumenthal, "How Lewis Lehrman Plans to Take Over America."

The Ford Foundation

After examining the lavishly funded network of pseudo-rightwing foundations, it is almost a relief to go back to the forthright Marxist bias of the foundation movement, as exemplified by the Ford Foundation. The Special Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundation reported in 1954: "The Ford Foundation affords a good example of the use of a foundation to solve the death tax problem, and, at the same time, the problem of how to retain control of a great enterprise in the hands of a family. Ninety per cent of the ownership of the Ford Motor Co. was transferred to the Ford Foundation, created for the purpose. Had it not been it was almost certain that the family would have lost control." The Ford family paid a terrible price to save the company. To prevent it from being split up, they had to turn it over to the most leftwing elements in the U.S. Norman Dodd states that while investigating tax exempt foundations, he interviewed H. Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation. Gaither complained about the "bad press" the Ford Foundation was receiving, and explained to Dodd: "Most of us here were, at one time or another, active in either the OSS or the State Dept., or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we operated under directives issued by the White House, the substance of which was to the effect that we should make every effort to alter life in the U.S. as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union." This is still the goal of the foundation movement. In 1953, the Ford Foundation set up the $15 million Fund for the Republic, with Paul Hoffman, former head of ECA, married to Baruch's secretary, Anna Rosenberg. Directors

of the Fund were former Zionist and labor leader Arthur Goldberg, and Henry Luce, of whom H.L. Mencken said, "I know why Henry hires so many Communists on his magazines. It's because they work cheap." The Fund for the Republic hired Earl Browder, head of the Communist Party "to study the influence of Communism in contemporary America". In 1968, the Fund granted $215,000 to "promote in the U.S. the knowledge of contemporary Cuba. The funds will support the expenses of persons invited by the Gastro government to do research in Cuba." The National Guardian Jan. 13, 1968 pointed out that: "The Ford Foundation plays a key part in financing and influencing almost all major civil rights groups including Congress of Racial Equality, Southern Christian Leadership, National Urban League, and NAACP." The Ford Foundation has spent many millions to promote racial agitation and possible civil war in America, completely polarizing the races. In this effort, it is simply carrying on the plan inaugurated by the Rothschilds in 1865 with the Peabody Fund, the Slater Fund, and later the General Education Board, which is now the Rockefeller Foundation. It takes money to promote a civil war. Ford Foundation entered the Hispanic field by giving $600,000 to the openly revolutionary Southwest Council of La Raza in 1968, and an additional $545,717 in 1969. Congressman Henry Gonzalez, himself a Hispanic, denounced La Raza as fomenting "blind, stupid hatred." Ford money has backed many revolutionary groups in the U.S. engaged in dynamiting and burning buildings, inciting riots, kidnaping and assassination. All of these are criminal offenses but no one is ever arrested. The Ford Motor Co. also built the huge Kama River truck factory in Soviet Russia, which provided the trucks for the Red Army to attack Afghanistan. They rolled into the almost defenseless country on a modern highway, which had been built by AID with American taxpayers' money. The Ford Foundation has many capitalist and CIA connections. Stephen Bechtel and Chase lawyer John J. McCloy have been board members for years, also Frank Abram, chmn Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey. The president of the Ford Foundation is Franklin Thomas, a token black; he is also director of the $348 million John Hay Whitney Foundation. Whitney was Ambassador to England 1956-61, Order of the British Empire, chairman Freeport Sulphur, publisher of the N.Y. Tribune; he married Betsy Cushing Roosevelt. His daughter Kate married William Haddad of the New York Post, who set up the Peace Corps for Kennedy in 1961, is governor of American Jewish Congress, Yale Corp. and Museum of Modern Art. Other directors of J.H. Whitney Foundation include Harold Howe, also director Ford Foundation; Vernon Jordan, director of Rockefeller Foundation; and James F. Brownlee, partner of J.H. Whitney Co., and director Chase Manhatten Bank, R.H. Macy Co. & chmn Minute Maid Corp. Other directors of Ford Foundation include its European director, Ralf Dahrendorf, admirer of Marx's "Utopian" policies. In his work, "Marx in Perspective", he claimed that Marx is the greatest factor in the emergence of modern society. Dahrendorf was fellow of Center of Advanced Study 1957-58, prof. sociology Hamburg, 1958-60, Columbia Univ. 1960, Univ. of Tubingen 1960-64, Secretary of State Foreign Office Germany 1969-70. As a professor of sociology, he created the concept of a "new man", whom he dubbed "homo sociologicus", man transformed by Socialism, in which all distinctions of race, and presumably, all other distinctions, have disappeared. Dahrendorf denies there are any differences in the races of mankind, and denounces any idea of "superiority" or differing skills as "ideological distortion". "Homo Sociologicus" is the creature of the social sciences, the socialized man who can be completely controlled by the forces of society.

The Ford Foundation introduced "behaviourism" or people control into the curricula at Harvard Business School through the director, Donald K. David, in 1956. David received a $2 million grant from Ford Foundation for this program, while he was a director of the foundation. In 1970, Ford Foundation established the Police Foundation, headed by Pat Murphy, to train police in behaviourism and "human relations". Other directors of Ford Foundation are Harriet S. Rabb, asst. dean Columbia U. Law School, director of the NAACP Legal Fund since 1978. Her husband Bruce Rabb is partner of the Wall Street law firm, Stroock Stroock & Lavan, organized the Lehrman Institute and has been secretary of it since 1978. His father, Maxwell Rabb is also partner of this law firm; he was adm. asst. Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge 1937-43, Secretary of the Cabinet 1953-58 under Eishenower, joined Stroock Stroock & Lavan 1958, now Ambassador to Italy, chmn U.S. delegation to UNESCO. Other partners of this firm are William J. van den Heuvel, former law partner of Gen. Donovan, and his assistant when he was Ambassador to Thailand, campaign manager Jimmy Garter 1976; Rita Hauser, director Brookings Institution; and Robert B. Anderson former Secretary of Navy and Secretary of Treasury. Stroock Stroock & Lavan specializes in handling the family finances of wealthy old line Jewish families, and is trustee of all three Warburg foundations. Chairman of the Ford Foundation is Alex Heard, who was with the War Dept. 1939-43, spec. adviser President of the U.S. 1970, director Time since 1968. Other directors are: Hedley Donovan, editor in chief of Time, director of Trilateral Commission Walter A. Haas, president of Levi Strauss, director Bank of America, NAACP Legal Fund, chmn United Jewish Appeal, and Alliance Israelite Universelle Donald S. Perkins, of J.P. Morgan Irving S. Shapiro, former chairman DuPont, director of Citicorp and Citibank, IBM, director US-USSR Trade & Economic Council Glen E. Watt, of AFL-CIO, member Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, Aspen Institute.

The Tavistock Institute

The purpose of the Pan-European Union, founded by Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, and funded by the Rothschilds and Warburgs, was to restore the oligarchic control over Europe. To accomplish this goal, it was necessary to emasculate and defeat the powerful republican currents which had their origin in the 14th century Renaissance, which, with its emphasis on the freedom of the human spirit, produced the greatest cultural outpouring in the history of mankind. This individualism was immediately expressed in nationalism; its republican spirit was dedicated to ending hereditary and arbitrary control and dictatorship over the lives of the people, reaching its greatest expression in the Constitution of the United States, which was the result of rebellion. Because the ruling families of Europe are the direct descendants of William of Orange, who chartered the Bank of England in 1694, the movement to destroy nationalism and individualism has been directed from England, but expressed in the Communist movement. The World Order has planned and executed two World Wars to restore world rule by the oligarchy, a world rule variously called Bolshevism, the League of Nations, or the United Nations, but never the World Order. The English control of this world movement is demonstrated by the ideology of American foundations, which is created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its

purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John RawlingsReese. Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London, because its prophet, Sigmund Freud, settled here in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioural science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown where State Dept. personnel are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the foundations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network. Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behaviour through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. polices. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent Gen. Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute. Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal -- to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behaviour, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals of personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family. Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioural science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries. Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. Paul Mellon's Old Dominion Foundation gave Tavistock $97,000 in 1956, and $12,000 during each of the three following years. Old Dominion also gave the Anna Freud Foundation $8000 a year. Tavistock maintains two

schools at Frankfort, birthplace of the Rothschilds: the Frankfurt School, and the Sigmund Freud Institute. The "experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual's sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the Natl Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government. Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of Finance. A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy -- the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, directed by Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like guinea pigs, resulted in several deaths. The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed lycergic acid. Roosevelt's advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD "counter-culture" of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was financed by $25 million from the CIA. [For more on the drug culture, see "The Aquarian Conspiracy" --ed] One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Assn., and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep, and then given electric shock treatments. One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S. companies who provided the drug for the CIA. In his biography of Helms, Powers states that in his last days of office, Helms ordered Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, head of MK Ultra, to destroy all records of the CIA's drug-testing program, and that by Jan. 14, 1973, Helms had destroyed five thousand pages of notes taken in his office during his six and a half years as director of the CIA! Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post Aug. 20, 1984, cites the "squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness". This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protege of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy's personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for Democratic Society (SDS), through which the CIA operated the drug culture. Today, the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 billion a year network of foundations in the U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which

originate many types of programs to increase the control of the World Order over the American people. Typical is the Hudson Institute, a $5 million a year operation with 120 employees, founded in 1965 by Herman Kahn of the Rand Corp. and the Stanford Research Institute; its directors include: Alexander Haig, president of United Technologies Frank Carlucci, deputy secretary of Defense, and now chairman Sears World Trade Corp. Daniel C. Searle, chmn G.D. Searle Drug Co. Gov. Pierre du Pont of Delaware.

The principal architect of Hudson was Frank Altschul, director of Ford Foundation, partner of Lazard Freres, who married into the Lehman family, president General American Investors, director U.S. Leather, International Bank te Amsterdam, American Eagle Fire Insurance, the Yale Corp., Institute of International Studies, China Institute in America, whose Times obituary in 1981 called him "a Renaissance Man" who endowed the Yale Library and the Overbrook Press. Other Hudson associates are Leo Cherne of the Foreign Advisory Intelligence Board, and Sidney Hook of the Hoover Institution. Stanford Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300 employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the behavioural sciences. One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957 by Sir Philip Adams. A long time Foreign Service officer, Adams was Minister to Khartoum 1959, Ambassador to Jordan 1966-70, and Egypt 197375; he married the daughter of Baron Trevethin (the Lawrence family, which includes several lord chief justices of Britain.) The Ditchley Foundation is headquartered at Ditchley Park, near Oxford, in a castle built for the Earl of Lichfield in the 16th century; the present Earl of Lichfield is a cousin of Queen Elizabeth, and is known as a photographer of beautiful women. Ditchley Park was given to the foundation by Ronald and Marietta Tree. Ronald Tree, a godson of Marshall Field, was for many years a high official in British intelligence. He was appointed Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Minister of Pensions, the Minister of Information, and the Minister of Planning. He was first married to Nancy Moncure Perkins, of an old Virginia family. They divorced, and he married Marietta Peabody, granddaughter of Endicott Peabody, headmaster of Groton, where the American elite was trained. Her career gave rise to the term "beautiful people", the glittering international set devoted to leftwing causes. She began her career as a beautiful young "hostess" for Nelson Rockefeller in 1942, became a shop steward for the Newspaper Guild at Life Magazine, Fair Housing Practices Committee for New York, 1958 Volunteer for Stevenson, Commission on Human Rights at the U.N. 1959-61, Human Rights Commission U.N. 1961-64, Ambassador to the U.N. 1961-64. Magazine articles gave glowing reports of a "beautiful person's" life in New York, her townhouse at 123 E. 79th St. filled with antique furnishings and art treasures from Ditchley Park, the house run faultlessly by an English butler, as well as their summer home at Barbados, where they entertained Winston Churchill in 1960. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Alan Pifer, president of the Carnegie Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. Lord was

political and military officer at the Dept. of State 1961-64, international security officer Defense Dept. 1969-73, spec. asst. to the President of the U.S. 1970-73, director of policy planning at Dept. of State 1973-77, member of Atlantic Council and Atlantic Institute. Other Ditchley members have been Wallace Sterling, president of Stanford University, Richard Steadman of the German Marshall Fund, and Donald Perkins of Brookings Institution. Perkins is a director of Time, Thyssen-Bornemitza, ATT, Corning, Cummins Engine, Freeport Moran, G.D. Searle, and Morgan Guaranty Trust Bank, and chairman of Jewel Tea Co. One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the kulaks. Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American Feb. 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, "SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE: Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve". To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist. The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American farmer. The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural soviets or trusts. The Brookings Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with the one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts. Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction, and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FIB, IRS, CIA, and BATF must make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations.

Summary
We have seen the close interlocking of the foundations with international banks and corporations, all stemming from the Peabody Fund of 1865, and the War Industries Board of Bernard Baruch in World War I. The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do "charitable" work, because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and never denied, that the HeritageAEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of professional intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political, economic and social goals which the World Order requires the foundations to achieve through their "bequests". Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlocking of the foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by the names of its principal incorporators - Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation). Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA. They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, is the daughter of the 14th Earl of Sirathmore. When William of Orange invaded England in 1688, the Scottish lords, who had been loyal to James II, were the last to capitulate. Patrick Lyon took the oath of fealty to William in 1690, and became the first Earl of Strathmore. The family resides at Glamis Castle, which was made famous by Shakespeare's play, "Macbeth". The present Lord Glamis is Michael Fergus Bowes-Lyon, heir of the 17th Earl of Strathmore, who holds additional titles of Earl of Kinghorne, Viscount Lyon, Farnedyce, Sydlaw, and Strathdichtie.

Appendix I
After gaining control of the national government, the Rockefeller Foundation moved to seize control of the state legislatures. The move began in Colorado, where the Rockefellers had perpetrated the infamous "Ludlow Massacre" of workers at their Colorado Fuel & Iron plant. State Senator Henry Wolcott Toll, a Denver lawyer and graduate of Harvard Law School, spearheaded the organization of the American

Legislators Association in 1925. Time, April 27, 1936, noted that Toll in 1930 got financial aid from the Spelman Rockefeller Fund and moved the organization to the campus of Rockefeller's University of Chicago. Time noted: "Today the Capitol of the U.S. is still in Washington, but so far as the states individually have any point of contact, it is Mr. Toll's office building in Chicago. Presently Rockefeller money is to erect a $500,000 building on Chicago's Midway to house these secretariats, a sort of League of Nations Palace for the local governments of the 48 states." This became the Council of State Governments at 1313 60th St. Chicago, from which address the Rockefeller Foundation controlled the state legislatures and ramrodded their programs through mostly unsuspecting state bodies. Time also noted that Toll's plans were approved by a principal character in this story, Frederick A. Delano: "His sentiments were echoed with approval by Franklin Roosevelt's uncle, Frederick A. Delano, who, as chairman of the President's Committee on National Resources, was there to lend his advice." Thus we have the founder of the Brookings Institution guiding foundation control of the state legislatures. The Council of State Governments has now moved to Lexington, Kentucky, where it at present comprises the Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State Court Administrators, and the National Associations of Attorney Generals, Secretaries of State and State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors, and State Legislators. The governors of the 50 states comprise the membership of the Council of State Governments.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/world_order/WorldCh07-4.htm

by Brian Desborough
1999 from Whale Website

Contents
Introduction Social Engineering Global warming Wicca The Illuminati Who killed President Kennedy Mind Control

 Future Illuminati Plans Notes and References Return to Tavistock Return to Mind Control

Introduction
With considerable media fanfare, ABC television news anchor Peter Jennings is promoting his new (1) book, which is co-authored by ABC staff producer Todd Brewster. Entitled "The Century for Young People", the lavishly-illustrated book, oriented toward children, purports th to present a realistic overview of 20 century history.

In actuality, the book imparts the same misleading political spin on historical events as we have come to expect from our Illuminati overlords, via their London-based command center known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, whose membership is composed of major media luminaries, bankers, politicians, captains of industry, etc.. Thus, in placing the blame solely on the Japanese for the Pearl Harbour attack, the book, which claims to have been extensively researched, fails to inform the readers of the causal factors which led up to the attack. These included the British-engineered downfall of Prime Minister Okuma and the Rockefellerinstigated expulsion of Japan from her Chinese oilfield concessions. As a congressional hearing chaired by then Senator Harry Truman revealed, the Pearl Harbor attack was planned at the New England office of the Rockefeller-funded Institute of Pacific Relations, not in Japan as is popularly believed. As a British cabinet minister stated before Parliament in 1944: "Japan was provoked into attacking America at Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty on history to say that America was forced into the war." If the book authors had presented the true facts, perhaps Americas next generation would realize that the Pearl Harbor attack was a payback episode for the egregious intervention into Japans internal affairs of state perpetrated by the Rockefeller oil dynasty and its corrupt (2) puppet Franklin D. Roosevelt. In a similar manner, the book portrays photographs of Nazi atrocities, yet fails to mention that the Nazi Party was created and funded by the City of London and Wall Street financiers, using George Bushs father as the bagman. It does not comment on the fact that U.S. taxpayers unwittingly funded the establishment of Hitlers military, or that Dr. Josef Mengele, the Auschwitz "Angel of Death" was covertly brought to America at the conclusion of W.W.II in order to implement technologically-advanced mind-control techniques (3) upon many hapless Americans. Books such as the one written by Jennings and Brewster serve only to foster successive generations of politically ill-informed cannon fodder, who mindlessly engage in wars planned years in advance, aggrandizement of the Illuminati-controlled military-

fought to enhance the industrial complex. NATO "peacekeepers" are active in more than one At the present time hundred countries. True peace will not break out globally unless the next generation of children are

made aware of the false dogma ranging from geopolitics to the New Age movement, which deliberately has been promulgated by Illuminati social engineers and media personnel. As we are about to enter a new millennium, it is, perhaps, an opportune time to debunk many misconceptions foisted upon us by a controlled media. This article is therefore oriented toward teenagers, not adults, many of whom possess too rigid a belief structure to accept reality. It also will not be viewed favorably by the majority of New Agers, who tend to ignore negative subjects. Such denial is not only a sickness, it can also create negative karma. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi women and children have died because NATO forces destroyed that nations infrastructure during the contrived Desert Storm war. This war would not have happened if people had learned to become (4) politically aware and to say no to Illuminati political hacks. The following are some of the subjects which young people need to be informed about: Back to Top

Social Engineering
When American evangelist E. Grandison (Charles) Finney (1792-1875) became a minister, his sermons were delivered in a calm, unemotional manner. Unfortunately for the good shepherd, most of his flock abandoned his ministry, never to return. Realizing that he had to find a way to attract and maintain an enthusiastic congregation, Finney discovered that if normal brain function is disturbed through major fear, shock or emotion, heightened suggestibility and impaired judgment occur temporarily. This facilitates the implanting of a new belief structure. Instead of appealing to the intellect, Finney began to deliver sermons replete with copious amounts of fire and brimstone, spoken in a loud, emotion-filled manner. Cognizant that Finney had discovered a technique which turned previouslyrational people into mindless robots, other pastors adopted Finneys evangelical methods, which became known as the Boston Movement - the foundation of todays Fundamentalist Christian Church, exemplified in the hysterical rantings and ravings of television evangelists, more intent upon making a buck than in saving souls. A classic example of the effectiveness of Finneys behaviour-modification techniques was the Children of God Church of the 1960s, The church pamphlets promoted paedophilia and sex between children. A granddaughter of the cults founder alleges that she was made to have sex with important government officials and had "met presidents from around the world." The cult was protected by powerful political figures, including Chilean dictator Pinochet. The late movie actor River Phoenix revealed that as a child, he had been forced to have sex at the time that his father was an archbishop of the Children of God Church. Shortly after some 170 children were taken into protective following a police raid on a Children of God compound, River Phoenix died from a purported drug overdose on Halloween night. His body bore no needle marks. Was his death accidental, or was this a ritual murder perpetrated in order to prevent him from revealing what he knew? Finneys method was adopted by the Tavistock Institute. Founded in London in 1922 as a psychological warfare research center, it has developed into the central body responsible for the oversight of a global mind-control network. The Institute realized that by means of repeated psychological shocks, or stressful events, entire populations could be psychologically-controlled. This is achievable by providing a controlled psychological environment. Through its control of the Army psychiatric directorate, Tavistock effectively controlled the British army during W.W.II. At the conclusion of W.W.II, Tavistock began to

establish a global network of psychiatric centers, in order to influence the ideologies of mass populations. This subversive network, which was funded primarily by the Rockefeller Foundation and large corporations, included such establishments as the Stanford Research Institute, the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Science Policy Research Unit in England, the latter becoming a major force in the development of social manipulation techniques, and has engaged in classified contract studies for NATO. It has become an accepted practice for high level NATO military personnel to be implanted with mindcontrol programs. It was JFKs space program which sounded the economic death-knell for the Western nations. Until that time, the geopolitical clout of Western nations primarily had been derived from the profits of the narcotics trade and industrial growth. In 1963, NASA placed a contract with Tavistock to determine the effects of the aerospace industry on Western society. The Institute found that the space program had so ignited the imagination of the public, that the Western world was in danger of becoming a technological society, replete with many free-thinkers. If allowed to continue, this trend would cause the Illuminati to lose its dominance over the populace. So alarmed were the Illuminati that they convened a conference in France; the conference concluded that in order for the Illuminati movers and shakers to continue their dominion over the masses, the populace of Western nations must be brainwashed into accepting the de-industrialization of their countries. Deindustrialization was accomplished by culturally shocking the masses into accepting the formation of vast environmental agencies staffed with parasitic bureaucrats. Admittedly, some anti-pollution legislation is necessary, but the mountains of nebulous paper and draconian penalties issuing forth from environmental agencies, has thrust the Western world into a nearly-insolvent post-industrial era. Most of the global pollution arising from transportation and industry readily could be eradicated through the implementation of proven over-unity (free-energy) devices, while polluted rivers can be cleansed through the application of Schauberger vortexian technology. Not surprisingly, environmental bureaucrats have repeatedly blocked the implementation of such devices for fear of losing political clout. The Tavistock Institute published a report in 1974 which revealed that environmentalist, New Age and religious organizations are, in actuality, all part of a unified, planned social engineering conspiracy. At the request of the Institutes director, Dr. Willis Harmon, key elements of the report were published in book form as The Aquarian Conspiracy by Harmon protg Marilyn Ferguson. The last thing that the Illuminati wants is a populace which thinks for itself, something most New Agers fail to do, relying instead upon books and lectures promulgated by disinformers and kooks. The recent New Age emphasis on angels, for instance, has only occurred because New Agers have failed to (5) determine the earthly origins of the angel myth. In short, social engineering is an organized attempt by Illuminati front organizations to brain-wash the global populace into accepting the destruction of national sovereignty, as a precursor to the establishment of a global totalitarian government. Back to Top

Global warming
According to the Chicken Little climatologists at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and various environmental activists, carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources are causing major global warming, which in turn is causing a massive breakup of the Antarctic ice shelves. To make matters worse, state these doomsayers, the year 2000 will usher in major solar activity, resulting in failure of satellites and leaving cities without electrical power. These dire predictions are merely another social engineering ploy aimed at further de-industrialization, in order to achieve the Illuminati goal of reducing the global populace to mediaeval serfdom. This is why it is incumbent upon you, dear reader, to conduct your own research, instead of leaving the task

to experts whose livelihood is in the hands of their Illuminati overlords. These doomsayers are primarily basing their claims upon computer models, not upon empirical data. In actuality, carbon dioxide is merely a secondary greenhouse gas - water vapor possessing twice the greenhouse effect, even though it is being ignored in environmental studies. Water vapor and other primary greenhouse gasses such as ozone, cause greenhouse warming when acted upon by solar radiation. Since solar radiation is a variable, so global temperatures vary accordingly. Another variable is the amount of water vapor present in the atmosphere; every minute, approximately 20 ice comets weighing about 100 tons apiece enter the earths atmosphere and vaporize, continually adding to our planets water content. Claims that we are in a global warming period are primarily based upon temperatures recorded by small boxes known as Stevenson Screens; the majority of these are located in cities, where thermal radiation from large expanses of asphalt and concrete result in temperatures higher than those encountered in sparsely-populated areas. The system does not record oceanic temperatures. Since 75% of the planets surface is covered by water and ice, a false impression is created from such recorded data. A much more accurate depiction of global temperatures is provided by NOAA weather satellites, which record temperatures of the lower atmosphere in a uniform planetary sweep. Nineteen years of data recorded by NOAA reveals that little, or no global warming has occurred during this time period. Solar activity occurs in approximately 11 year cycles. The present cycle began in May, 1996 and is predicted to peak in the year 2000. Contrary to media reports, the present cycle has exhibited far less solar activity than the two previous cycles. The environmental doomsayers had a field day when a large iceberg broke away from the Antarctic ice shelf and was attributed to global warming. A perusal of The American Navigator, which has recorded iceberg activity since 1799, reveals that that particular iceberg was much smaller than ones sighted in the past. In 1854, an iceberg was observed which was much larger; in 1927, an iceberg covered an area of some 10,000 square miles, while an iceberg spotted in 1956 by an American icebreaker was 208 miles long by 60 miles wide. The notion that CFCs are responsible for the hole in the ozone layer at the South Pole is ludicrous, since the hole was observed prior to the introduction of CFCs. Moreover, CFC molecules are so heavy that they sink into the soil, where they are consumed by anaerobic bacteria. Studies conducted at Chinas Changchun University suggest that solar high energy particles consume ozone over the Antarctic. CFC patents held by Dupont were about to expire, which would have permitted third world nations to manufacture their own CFCS, Dupont accordingly developed the flammable and toxic HCFC as a replacement product and enlisted United Nations aid in imposing a global ban on the more efficient and safe CFCS, thereby providing Dupont with a new monopoly market and multi-billion dollar windfall profits. Back to Top

Wicca
Contrary to public belief, modern witchcraft is not of Celtic derivation, and is not associated with the Old English word witan meaning "to know", or any word meaning "craft of the wise". Wiccan covens are covertly controlled on behalf of the Illuminati by means of a United Nations organization called Womens International Collectives (WICCE); it interfaces with the Russian-directed Womens International League for Peace and Freedom and is associated in America with the Revolutionary Communist Party, which was involved in precursor activities that culminated in the last Los Angeles riot. The Wicca tradition began with the Khwajagan-associated Bedouin tribe known as the Aniza.

The word "coven" is derived from their practice of performing rituals wearing winding sheets known as a Kafan; their meetings were called an Az Zabat, from which we get "sabat". The cults sacrificial knife was an Adh-dhamme, which gave rise to the wiccan "athame". Robin is a traditional wiccan name, presumably derived from the name of the Aniza cult leader - Rabbans. The Aniza camel brand later became known as the witches foot (the peace sign). The tribal totem was the goat. Some of the cult migrated to Spain circa 1460, where some cult members came under the influence of the malevolent Rabbi Isshaq Toledano, who persuaded them to cast spells against his enemies and engage in blood rituals. Back to Top

The Illuminati
The Illuminati is a very covert satanic cult which dominates global commerce and the military / industrial complex. Its hierarchy is composed of thirteen bloodline families whose ancestry is traceable back to the Babylonian era. All American presidents are bloodline (George W. Bush and Vice-President Gore are the presidential candidates with the strongest Illuminati bloodlines). The creature at the apex of the Illuminati pyramidal structure is a French Marquis, who bears the rank Pin dAr. He attends two human sacrifices in Orange County, California, each year; heads of state, politicians, and law enforcement personnel have been observed at

celebrities, military these rituals. Lesser Illuminati organizational bodies include, the Octagon the Grand Druid Council of Thirteen the Committee of Three Hundred At the bottom of the pyramid are satanic lodges and covens, e.g. the British Pickengill coven and the Wessex Lodge, the latter being the directors of the American Skull and Bones Society. An Illuminati sub-group is the Sovereign Order of the Dragon, which controlled the evil Egyptian priesthood and whose later members included Dracul, the father of Vlad the lmpaler (Dracula). A 19 century letter which used to be displayed in the British Museum, was written by the Illuminist Albert Pike. It details three world wars planned by the Illuminati. It accurately described the last two World Wars and claims the next one will be initiated by provoking religious differences between Jew and Arab (probably through destruction of the Islamic mosque situated adjacent to Jerusalems Dome of the Rock). The remaining global powers will choose sides and fight themselves to a standstill, and destroy each others economic and religious institutions. Out of the chaos will arise a totalitarian New World Order and a new religion which embraces Lucifer (the new global religion is currently being composed under the direction of industrialist Maurice Strong, at a remote retreat in Crestone County, Colorado). Back to Top
th

Who killed President Kennedy

Jenningss book claims that Lee Harvey Oswald was the perpetrator and ignores evidence to the contrary. The person charged with the crime was two inches shorter than the Oswald who went to Russia: he was probably a Latvian Oswald double named Al Hidell. It is not possible to fire a rifle without receiving powder residue on the cheek, yet "Oswalds" paraffin test proved negative - case closed. The assassination was directed by British Intelligence operative Major Louis Bloomfield, c.e.o. of the Permindex Corporation. Clay Shaw and Roy Cohn were directors of Permindex. The actual assassination was perpetrated by members of the Defense Industrial Security Command (the military / industrial complex security arm) and FBI sharpshooters, the supervisor of the FBI team posing as treasurer of a Pasadena church. According to intelligence sources, Kennedys head wound was caused by a radio-controlled shaped charge of explosive located under John Connallys jump seat (the explosion was visible in the original uncut version of the Zapruder film). At least one member of a psy-ops team was present in order to momentarily mentally misdirect the attention of the Presidents wife away from the blast source, It is a matter of record that the limos interior was removed and replaced by a new one within 24 hours, presumably in order to dispose of the explosives firing mechanism. In a private communication with the writer, a crewmember of Kennedys Air Force One aircraft claimed that the mortally-wounded president was covertly transported to Bethesda Naval Hospital, and died the following spring. The autopsy photographs are of slain police officer and Kennedy look-alike J.D. Tippet. Prime motives for the assassination were the presidents intent to federalize the Federal Reserve and his planned cessation of the Vietnam war, which would have meant cancellation of an $11 billion contract to the Bechtel Corporation for the construction of a naval base (Lady Byrd Johnson was allegedly a major Bechtel stockholder). Back to Top

Mind Control
In its coverage of "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski, the Jenningss book omits the most important aspect of the case: Kaczynski had been a volunteer for a CIA-funded MK-ULTRA mind-control project at Harvard University. The writer, who has assisted in the de-programming of mind-control survivors, invariably finds that (6) persons charged in bombings or multiple shootings, are victims of mind-control projects. It has been customary for the offspring of Illuminati initiates to be programmed in order to perpetuate the organization. Mind-control techniques were elevated to a new scientific level during W.W.II by the Auschwitz "Angel of Death" Joseph Mengele, who subjected infants to prolonged intense torture, in order to force the minds of the hapless children to split into several thousand alter personalities. At the conclusion of W.W. II, Mengele was covertly brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip, and established mind-control facilities at various Federal facilities, including China Lake Naval Weapons Facility and later at Area 51. Typical trauma induced in infants at these facilities included limb dislocation, sexual abuse and forced observation of the execution of "expendable" children. Many mind-control victims are the offspring of multi-generational satanic cult families, while others are the children of military fathers who knowingly permit their children to become mind-control victims in order to further their own careers. Numerous child-care centers are involved in satanic cult and mind-control activity. Sadly, such evil activity is protected by the Illuminati-controlled media, which declines to expose it, yet highlights the disinformation spewed forth from the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. This insidious foundation was established to discredit claims of ritual sexual abuse and mind control, insisting that such claims are the result of false memories.

Significantly, prominent members of this organization have included CIA-funded mind-control researchers such as the late Dr. Jolyon West, and supporters of pedophilia, including self-admitted pedophile Harold Merksey. Foundation member Dr. Ralph Underwager was forced to resign after it was publicly revealed that he advocated sex between adults and children, claiming that it was "An acceptable expression of Gods will for love", during an interview with the Danish pedophile magazine Paedika. Membership of the foundation is interlocked with that of the Committee for the Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), an organization which debunks the proven free-energy research of such luminaries as Nobel Prize nominee Nikola Tesla. A board member of CSICOP is Professor Paul Kurtz, chairman of Prometheus Books, which publishes books describing pedophile encounters. Its human sexuality editor is CSICOP member Professor Vern Bullough, who is also a board member of Paedika. Typical media suppression of the truth concerning ritual sexual abuse and mind control (sexual abuse provides the trauma which causes the mind to dissociate) occurred during press coverage of the McMartin Preschool trial. Claims of false memories were highlighted, yet key evidence suggestive that ritual sexual abuse had, indeed occurred, was downplayed or ignored. One day in 1976, the unconscious body of rape victim Karen Klass was discovered in her Huntington Beach home. She was the ex-wife of Righteous Brothers vocalist Bill Medley; she died from her injuries five days later. Her young son attended the McMartin Preschool. Her death was investigated by Hermosa Beach Chief Detective Paul Bynum, whose investigative records later mysteriously disappeared. He later became a private detective. In 1984, members of the McMartin Preschool staff received indictments after a grand jury heard allegations from preschoolers that they had been taken from the school by means of tunnels, sexually molested, then forced to watch as school staff killed turtles and animals, informing the children as they did so that the same fate would happen to them and their families if they spoke about the sexual abuse. Shortly after the indictments had been handed down, Gerald Klass, the husband of the slain Karen Klass, was killed when he drove his car over a cliff. The Hermosa police allegedly made no attempt to determine whether the Klass deaths and the McMartin indictments were interrelated. The attorney for indicted McMartin staff member Raymond Buckey retained the services of the previously-mentioned Paul Bynum. After viewing the videotaped interviews of the preschoolers, Bynum concluded that the children had indeed been sexually abused at the school. Curiously, when police arrested Buckey, Bynums missing investigative records were discovered on Buckeys desk. Bynum was ordered to testify at Buckeys trial. On the morning he was scheduled to testify, Bynum was found dead from a gunshot wound. Although his death was ruled a suicide, the Manhattan Beach weekly newspaper the Easy Reader stated that Bynums close friends couldnt think of any reason why he would commit suicide. Could it be that he was murdered because it became known that he had unearthed animal bones and turtle shelf fragments on a vacant lot adjacent to the preschool, thus corroborating the childrens claims of seeing the killing of turtles and animals? The first parent to question the possibility of sexual molestation at the McMartin Preschool was Judy Johnson, who alleged that her son returned home from the preschool with a bleeding anus. After going public with her suspicions she purportedly received threats and believed that she was being poisoned. The writer is personally aware of several instances in which offices of therapists involved in the treatment of victims of sexual abuse and mind-control have been broken into and sprayed with pesticide. He is also cognizant of one mind-control survivor who was hospitalized for ten days after her apartment was unlawfully entered in her absence and sprayed with diazinon pesticide.

Judy Johnson was allergic to alcohol. After becoming the target of ridicule, she began drinking and died from alcoholic poisoning. Other preschool parents filed complaints after their infants not only spoke of sexual abuse, but also contracted the sexually-transmitted disease known as Chlamydia. The tunnels beneath the school through which the children claimed to have been taken, were not in evidence at the commencement of the police investigation. Fearing that they had been filled in to conceal evidence of criminal activity, the parents engaged the services of Ted Gunderson, the former FBI Chief of Station, Los Angeles, to search for traces of tunnels. Realizing that a hostile press might criticize him for a lack of an archaeological background, Mr. Gunderson wisely enlisted the aid of five earth scientists and forensic geologists from major universities. The McMartin case had become the butt of media ridicule after District Attorney Ira Reiner, without bothering to have the area beneath the school excavated, declared that the childrens accounts of tunnels were false (Reiner allegedly was the protg of then State Attorney General John Van de Camp. According to the Executive Intelligence Revue, much of the State Attorneys campaign funding had been provided by the pornography industry). As Gundersons team of professionals commenced excavations at the spot that a former preschooler claimed had been a tunnel entrance, the Los Angeles Times began a series of articles ridiculing the effort. When the excavation team did, in fact, not only discover a tunnel, but also turtle shells and the bones of more than two hundred animals, the newspaper ended its snide articles with a singleparagraph statement which tersely stated that "evidence" of tunnels had been revealed. Why did the Times not report on further excavations of the tunnel system? In a private conversation with this writer, Mr. Gunderson stated that one tunnel terminated beneath a trapdoor in the bathroom floor of an adjacent triplex. As excavations proceeded, facilitated by a survey conducted by geophysicist Robert Beer with the aid of an electromagnetic scanner, it was found that the roots of an avocado tree had been cut with a saw in order to clear a path for the tunnel. This disproves the media claim that the tunnel system, which extended for approximately sixty feet, was the work of a large animal. Initially, seven members of the McMartin staff had been indicted in 1984 by a grand jury which had been ordered by Reiners predecessor, Robert Philobosian, following an intensive investigation which included interviews with about four hundred children. The children alleged that Satanic rituals, which involved sexual molestation, occurred in the tunnels and at other locations. Commonality in the description of the alleged rituals given by the interviewed children was noted by the investigators, who concluded that at least forty-one of the children had been sexually molested. The McMartin defendants were charged with the sexual molestation of not less than eighteen infants over a period of ten years, accompanied by the making of death threats in order to prevent the children from talking. In January, 1986, newly-elected District Attorney Reiner declared that the evidence was insufficient to try five of the defendants and charges against them were dropped. Only Peggy McMartin Buckey and her son Raymond were brought to trial. The trial began in 1987 and ended in 1990 with the acquittal of Mrs. Buckey, which is surprising since she testified that she was only employed by the preschool for a few weeks; this is contradicted by payroll records which indicate that she worked at the school for several years. The judge declared a mistrial in the case involving Raymond Buckey. At a press conference held at the conclusion of the second trial, the jury members were unanimous in agreeing that sexual molestation had taken place at the school, but could not prove that Raymond Buckey was the perpetrator. Raymond Buckey was tried for a second time in 1990, and again acquitted due to a hung jury. Thus ended the longest and costliest criminal proceedings in American history. Perhaps the outcome would (7) have been different had Ira Reiner introduced as evidence the discovery of the tunnel System. Not surprisingly, the news media, which initially gave massive coverage to debunking the childrens allegations, suddenly found the affair not newsworthy upon discovery of the tunnels, and pulled their

reporters off the case. Was this because the children had claimed that many of their sexual perpetrators were famous politicians, film stars and sports figures? If this sounds improbable, the readers attention is drawn to the fact that the writer is aware of mind-controlled survivors who claim that they were used in kiddieporn movies made at the ranch of a well-known movie director. The media (including the New York Times) gave considerable coverage to the pernicious debunking of the preschoolers credibility delivered by Debbie Nathan, an advocate for the pedophile-associated False Memory Syndrome Institute. She claimed that there is no evidence that ritual sexual abuse ever occurred at the McMartin Preschool and that the tunnel excavation was a hoax.

In view of the fact that the tunnels entrance and route were exactly where the children claimed it would be found, the presence of turtle and animal bones, clinical evidence of trauma to the genital area caused by a blunt object, and an outbreak of sexually-transmitted Chlamydia, it would appear that Ms. Nathan is either suffering from an acute case of myopic vision, or is a disinformer for the intelligence community. For decades, the Illuminati-controlled intelligence agencies have inflicted satanic ritual abuse on infants for the purpose of creating mind-controlled sex slaves. The hapless children (known in the intelligence community as Black Widows) are then used to entrap and blackmail heads of state, politicians, bureaucrats and entertainment celebrities. Until 1960, mind-control programming of children was primarily conducted within facilities owned by the intelligence agencies. Fearing exposure, a network of preschools and orphanages was established by the intelligence agencies as a cover, throughout the United States and Europe. This network includes numerous religious daycare centers, administrated by Satanists posing as pillars of the religious community. If parents reading this article believe that satanic practices could never occur at the preschool attended by their infants, think again. Space does not permit an in-depth expose of the pervasiveness of this diabolical state of affairs, but one case intensively researched by the writer may serve to exemplify the problem. It involved a mother who had been born into a multi-generational family of Satanists; she was genetically-bred to possess outstanding psychic abilities, in order to officiate at high-level Illuminati rituals and also to become a member of the Janus psy-ops assassination group. Because of her background, she was subjected to appalling trauma and mind-control programming at the hands of Joseph Mengele, for the first nineteen years of her life. Her mind-control programming began to break down after the death of Mengele in 1989, and began recovering memories of attending Illuminati rituals involving dignitaries and members of the European nobility. This writer has personally observed many hours of video-taped interviews of her conducted by a psychiatrist while she was under the influence of sodium amytol. During these sessions, she named perpetrators who had sexually abused her as a child. One of the names was of a person known by the writer to be the head of the Illuminati High Council of the United States. Upon recovering her memories she realized that if Mengele had taken her to observe numerous Illuminati rituals in Europe as part of her training, there would have been major lapses in her school attendance. Seeking verification, she found that all her grade-school records were missing. Suspecting that her daughter, aged six, had been sexually abused, she had her interviewed separately by a psychiatrist, a psychologist and a therapist. All concluded and signed statements that she had been sexually abused. The child informed the psychiatrist that her father was the perpetrator. The child was then interviewed by a policewoman, who then informed the mother that the daughter had disclosed that her father was sexually-abusing her. The detective (a freemason) assigned to the case refused to press charges, claiming that it is wrong to imprison a man for sixteen years on a childs testimony.

When the mother protested, she received a threatening letter from the police chief. She then attempted to place the matters in the hands of Child Protective Services, who declined to take appropriate action in spite of the therapists affidavits. The writer has heard several claims by sexual abuse victims that a national satanic network exists within the Child Protective Services system. The father filed for divorce following his wifes memory recall of satanic rituals and family involvement in them; years of intense torture and trauma had taken its toll and she was hospitalized before the divorce became final. While in hospital, her husband served her with an eviction notice and she was given twelve hours to remove her personal effects from her own home. To make matters worse, a family court commissioner ignored the sworn affidavits of the therapists, which had been entered into the court records under oath, and awarded, sole legal custody of her children to her husband. He also ordered her to pay $12,000 to her husbands attorney, curiously, this was the exact sum she had received in her divorce settlement, thus rendering her penniless and homeless. This is not an isolated case. Every mind-control survivor that the writer has encountered, has been made penniless as soon as they recovered memories and severed contact with their handler. Presumably this is an Illuminati ploy to force the hapless victim back into the system. A recent perusal of the court records appertaining to the above case revealed that the commissioner unlawfully omitted to enter the therapists affidavits into the case file. Considering her elevated Illuminati status, could it be that he was in collusion with the Illuminati, who ordered him to deprive her of her beloved children, in an attempt to force her to return to the fold? She claims that her ex-husband has told her that she can see her daughter again if she does the Illuminatis bidding. Significantly, he works for a person who attends gatherings at the notorious Bohemian Grove. Shortly prior to the custody hearing, the office of the psychiatrist who had examined the womans daughter was burgled. The only item stolen was this womans case file. The psychiatrist, Dr. Daniel Scheile, who was conducting a study of mind-control survivors was then incarcerated in a psychiatric facility for two weeks. On the day of his release, he was found hanged in his garage; his death was ruled a suicide. Presumably in an attempt to terrorize the woman into returning to the Illuminati, she was shown a video of Dr. Scheile being suffocated, then hanged by three men and a women. She identified one of the perpetrators as her husbands attorney; the other three had attended the custody hearing and had later been observed in the company of her husband. According to Dr. Scheiles autopsy report, he weighed more than two hundred pounds and was hanged with a ligature measuring 3/8 ths. inches in diameter. No tracheal damage was sustained. The writer recently showed the report to a doctor who was experienced in forensic pathology. He concluded that it was impossible for such a heavy person to be hanged with such a thin ligature without resultant tracheal damage. Prior to losing custody, her daughter told the woman about a "bad room" in the upper floor of the Christian daycare center which she attended in Anaheim, California. The chaplain at the school is also a police chaplain. The woman remembers seeing him, accompanied by his police chief, at Illuminati satanic rituals held in the crypt of a church at nearby Longbeach. The chaplain was also a close friend of the music teacher at a school attended by her then ninth-grade son. Upon her son joining the school band, the teacher took the band on a weekend trip to a camp in the San Bernardino mountains. The boy claims that he was awakened in the middle of the night and forced to attend an initiation ritual, in which he was made to sit in the middle of a circle, together with other new band members. They were surrounded by band members clad in hooded black robes, who were chanting and holding candles. This practice, which smacks of occultism, was terminated following the mothers formal complaint to the school principal. Awarding custody of the mothers children to the father despite the findings of three professional

therapists and a policewoman is not simply aberrant behaviour - it is an act of the most diabolical evil, and exemplifies the foul stench which pervades the judicial system throughout America and Western Europe. Therefore let us conclude this brief overview of a typical mind-control survivors life with an verbatim excerpt from the psychologists report on her three interviews she had with the mothers daughter: "Dont let me go back to my Daddy. He hurts me. Daddy touches me between the legs. Daddy touches my private parts. Dont let me go back there. Im not safe with Daddy... [crying]... It isnt safe with Daddy. He hurts me. I want my Mommy. I want to be safe." The psychologist diagnosed dissociative personality disorder and all three therapists referred the case to the Child Protective Services, who refused to take action. During the period when she was conducting the interviews, the psychologist received threatening phone calls, underwent vehicular harassment and discovered that her office had been broken into, sprayed with pesticide and the rug smeared with animal excrement. She no longer handles cases involving sexual abuse or mind control. On April 7 , 1997, a friend of the writer attended a banquet in Washington, D.C., hosted by members of the Eastern Establishment. He overheard the daughter of a well-known New York banking family speaking about the woman referred to in the above case. She told her friends that they had to punish the woman by taking away her children, because she was refusing to do their bidding. And this is the land of the free? The woman has not been able to see her daughter since the custody hearing six years ago, and was unable to meet her son again until he was nineteen years old. She now has an excellent rapport with him and he visits her regularly. After a child has developed a multiple personality following induced trauma, the programmer assigns an access code to each alter personality, which is then programmed for a specific task, e.g. to be a sex slave, assassin or drug courier. A network of microchip implants is often embedded in the victim. Many of these are powerful microprocessors composed of synthetic protein, rendering them undetectable by means of X-rays. Programs are reinforced by means of "triggers" inserted into television programs. A major trauma-based mind-control program is known as Monarch; Monarch programmed multiples are often used as assassins or to perform tasks for the Illuminati. Many children are programmed to serve as sex slaves for pedophile politicians and heads of state; as the JonBenet Ramsey investigative team is well aware, the case includes aspects of possible mindcontrol and cult activity. The name "JonBenet" is very similar to an Illuminati term for the Devil - "Jonbet".
th

As usual, the corporate media has gone to great lengths to divert public awareness in the Ramsey case away from the possibility that this was a satanic ritual sacrifice, not the work of a lone intruder. There are anomalies in the case which have been ignored by the media establishment: forensic evidence of regular sexual penetration by a male adult, failure to notify the public the nature of the biological fluid found on and near JonBenets body, and the remarkable similarity between the ransom note and the handwriting of John Ramsey.

 And what about the claims of investigative journalists that John Ramseys company, Access Graphics (now owned by Lockheed Martin) was linked to the kiddieporn industry, and had alleged connections with Amsterdams red light area? Was it just a coincidence that the Ramseys much publicized press conference was held on May st 1 , which is Beltaine in the occult calendar? Or that the childs death occurred on a night that the Illuminati conduct their sacrificial ritual known as The Last Bulb on the Christmas Tree? The close relationship between the Boulder District Attorney and the law firm hired by the Ramseys, eventually forced the Boulder police to withhold evidence from the D.A.s office. Shortly afterwards, the police computers were hacked into. It is commonplace for the Illuminati to create mother / daughter mind-controlled teams of sex slaves for the purpose of entrapping public figures. Patsy Ramsey appears to exhibit symptoms of alter personality switching during media interviews. Could it possibly be that Mrs. Ramsey and her daughter were both mind-controlled sex slaves? If so, Mrs. Ramseys front alter genuinely would have no knowledge of the crime. In her book, mind-controlled sex slave Cathy OBrien describes how she and her infant daughter were sexually abused by American presidents and congressional members (other mind-control survivors also name the same alleged perpetrators). She alleges that one of her mind-control handlers was one of congresss most powerful (8) political figures - West Virginia senator Robert Byrd (left). Senator Byrd has also been named as a driving force behind the creation of admitted satanist Lt. Colonel Michael Aquinos Temple of Set. Aquino has been a member of the Psychological Warfare Division of the Defense Intelligence Agency. An advocate of mind-control, Aquino wrote an article published in the Military Review, in which he stated: " ...we shall create MindWar. The term is harsh and fear-inspiring, and so it should be: It is a term of attack and victory... ". Aquino (right) was also the focus of alleged child molestation at San Franciscos Presidio Child Development Center; he was not charged following military intervention in the case, despite the fact that children accurately described his bedroom. On the night of August 9 1991, investigative journalist Danny Casolaro purportedly committed suicide by performing the miraculous feat of slashing his wrists after severing the tendons in both arms. Casolaro had been in the process of writing a book about government corruption and had informed colleagues that one chapter involved Senator Byrd. Allegedly, he had arranged a clandestine meeting with one of Byrds staff members that evening. Irresponsible journalism is reprehensible, but in view of the botched Ramsey case, the above-described allegations of possible misconduct by Byrd, and the fact that Patsy Ramsey is a former Miss West Virginia, has anyone investigated whether a mind-control connection exists between Mrs. Ramsey and the senator, and whether any public figures were at the Ramsey residence at the time of the murder? Operation Greenstar is a mind-control program in which the victim is given a screen memory to create the impression of being abducted by extraterrestrials. This is accomplished by placing on the victims head a helmet containing electromagnetic solenoids tuned to a 4 Hz. frequency. The solenoids are connected to a computer which projects into the percipients mind a graphics program depicting an alien abduction scenario. Such victims are subjected to Janus end times programming, and will be activated to create civil unrest shortly prior to declaration of a state of national emergency. Hypnotic regression as practiced by UFO support groups, only serves to reinforce the mind-control programs. A number of day-care centers are used for both mind-control programming and satanic ritual abuse purposes, while a major religious organization serves as a
th

front for the programming of schoolyard shooters. Some children of Illuminati parents are genetically-bred to be outstanding psychics. These victims are trained to perform as psychic assassins, possessing the capability of causing cardiac arrest or neural dysfunction. Former Soviet Premier Yuri Andropov was assassinated in this manner. A major psy-ops team is known as Janus; it is directed from the NATO headquarters in Belgium. Another high-level psyops assassination team is composed of very intelligent African-American women, known as the Black Angels. It is estimated that there are between two and ten million mind-controlled victims in the United States. Victims are usually programmed to slash their arms if their front alter personality begins to recover memories of the programming; this inhibits further memory recovery (victims occasionally begin to recover memories if their programmer or handler dies). Buford Furrow, recently arrested for the shooting at the Jewish Community Center, in Granada Hills, California, was admitted to a psychiatric institution last year after slashing his arm in several places, consistent with mind control activity. Significantly, a National Security Council E. Mail address for a Buford Furrow at McChord Air Force base was deleted the day after his arrest. His father is a retired career Air Force Master-Sergeant. Federal prosecutors have announced that they will seek the death penalty against Mr. Furrow. "Based on the facts as we know them to be, it is our view that the death penalty is warranted in this case," remarked U.S. Attorney Alejandro N. Mayorkas. The facts, Mr. Mayorkas, are that Buford Furrow has exhibited the classic symptoms of a mindcontrolled victim. If you havent bothered to ascertain that this is so, or if you subjected the accused to a psychiatric exam by a person possessing a high security clearance (usually the case in such shootings or bombings) then you and your cohorts are incompetent, and should resign. If, as the writer believes, the accused is indeed a mind-controlled assassin, and you are cognizant of the fact, then you are an accessory to murder. The more than one million people who will read this article in the newspaper and on the internet will be observing your actions. For the enlightenment of Mayorkas, and others of his bureaucratic ilk, perhaps it is timely to point out that the Illuminati has remained the overlords of humankind for millennia by virtue of the veil of extreme secrecy with which they surround themselves. Any person who incurs public exposure while performing an unlawful act on behalf of the dragon, invariably discover themselves experiencing the last day of the rest of their life. In order to condition the public into supporting stricter gun-control measures, mind-controlled children have been programmed to shoot classmates. One of the Columbine High-School shooters, Eric Harris, used to live at Plattsburg Air Force Base, in New York State, with his Air force officer father. At the age of ten, Harris allegedly used to complain to his friends that he was being drugged at the base. This base, although officially closed, is known to possess an enormous underground facility, which allegedly is still being used as a mind-control programming center. One Columbine teacher has publicly stated that she was wounded by an adult male, not a student (intelligence information received by the writer claims that four adult gunmen were involved). One wonders why a contingent of Federal personnel purportedly visited the school the day prior to the massacre. Mind-control victims often display symptoms of obsessive compulsive disorder, resulting from prolonged trauma abuse, as is the case with Harris, which should have served as a red flag to members of the investigative team. Prosecutors who secure convictions in such cases, where evidence of mind-control exists, are either incompetent researchers or complicit members of a conspiracy; the principal function of a prosecutor is to insure that justice is served, not to obtain a guilty verdict at any cost. Since space is limited, perhaps an overview of the Jonestown massacre will serve to depict the massive extent to which mind-control is used by corrupt Federal agencies.

Jonestown was a CIA experiment to determine whether it was possible to establish a large mindcontrolled slave labor force. Jim Jones was a CIA operative and former Housing Commissioner for San Francisco. Ukiah District Attorney Tim Stone was assigned the task of procuring state mental patients and transferring their guardianship to the Peoples Temple. Assisting Jones was former police chief Dan Mitrioni, a contract CIA operative, who previously had instructed Brazilian and Bolivian security personnel in advanced torture interrogation techniques. In 1973, CIA operative George Blakey made the initial $650,000 deposit for the Guyana Peoples Temple property. Blakeys father-in law, Dr. Lawrence Layton, was the director of an U.S. Army Chemical Warfare research laboratory, which received a contract to conduct research appertaining to the MK-ULTRA mind-control project. Contrary to media reports, very few of the Jonestown victims died from poisoned Kool-Aid. The majority of the victims were allegedly sprayed with a sleeping gas discharged from helicopters, prior to being shot or strangled (reminiscent of the Arab / Israeli Six Days War, in which Arab troops were subjected to aerial spraying of L.S.D. by Israeli aircraft, prior to being bombed). Prior to the purchase of the Guyana property, the entire staff of the Mendocino State Mental Hospital were dismissed and replaced by Jim Joness personnel. According to mind-control survivors, Josef Mengele programmed inmates there, at that time period. One member of Joness staff at Mendocino was allegedly the mother of O.J. Simpson. Perhaps this explains why one psychologist, very experienced in observing mind-control survivors, noted that during Simpsons trial, he displayed symptoms of alter-personality switching. Simpsons trial, which served to polarize the races, left more questions than answers. Why wasnt the name of Al Cowlings employer, the notorious drug dealer Joey Ippolito, not mentioned during the trial, particularly since he was an associate of a known CIA and Guatemalan death squad hit-man, whose M.O. is to torture his victims with a stiletto prior to slashing their throats? Ippolito "escaped" from a minimum security prison only three weeks prior to the murder of Simpsons exwife. A Loyola-Marymount University law professor has publicly claimed that in addition to having a Simpson blood sample on his person for three hours, a detective also obtained a sample of Nicole Brown-Simpsons blood from the morgue and had it in his possession for 24 hours. Why was blood not observed on Simpsons socks until several days after the murder? Was the cut on Simpsons left index finger the result of mind-control memories? If the cut was incurred during the slayings, why did his lefthand bloody glove not have a corresponding cut? Former Florida State Attorney Dick Gerstein was investigated for allegedly laundering drug money (Ippolitos?). He was a partner in Centrust Savings and Loan; his partners were BCCI (a CIA moneylaundering facility) and Simpson attorney F. Lee Bailey. Curiously, when Ippolito was charged with cocaine distribution, his attorney was Edward Medvene - the same attorney retained by Fred Goldman in his wrongful-death suit against Simpson (Fred Goldman apparently was unaware that Simpson allegedly had transferred much of his wealth to an offshore bank on the island of Sark).

Centrust S&L made a multi-million dollar loan to a felon associated with the Kemper Marley crime syndicate. Marley, a former crony of Al Capone (above), employed the legal services of the current Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William Rendquist (below). In 1948, fifty two employees of Marleys Arizona liquor monopoly, United Liquor, were jailed for liquor violations, including Uniteds general manager Jim Hensley - the father-in-law of presidential candidate Senator John McCain, who inherited Hensleys beer distributorship.

After the Simpson trial, jurors claimed that juror Tracy Hampton had sat for hours staring at a blank television screen and claiming to hear voices. This could well have resulted from directed-energy mind-control equipment placed inside of a TV set located in the jurors sequestered living quarters - a perfect way to rig a trial outcome in order to foment racial polarization. After her jury dismissal, Ms. Hampton allegedly tried to commit suicide by eating broken glass. If Mr. Simpson is a mind-control victim, presumably he would have been programmed in his youth after displaying potential as a ball player. Determining the outcome of football games for gambling purposes is easy, if some of the players are programmed multiples. Back to Top

Future Illuminati Plans

Symbology plays a major role in the mindset of the Illuminati. Hence the great emphasis placed upon Jerusalem, even though the Illuminati membership is Luciferian, not Islamic, Jewish or Christian. It is the Illuminati intent to destroy the al Aqsa Mosque - the third holiest structure in Islam, which sits atop the Temple Mount, by using scalar technology to activate the seismic fault which traverses the Mount of Olives. According to Judaic holy law, it is forbidden for Jews to set foot on the Temple Mount until it has been purified by sprinkling the ashes of a pure-bred red heifer over the site. Such an heifer has been genetically-bred for the purpose and was born four years ago. It has to be ritually sacrificed no later than October, 2000. Contrary to public knowledge, construction of the new Jerusalem Temple was commenced two decades ago. For those who have ears to hear with, do not seek it on the Temple Mount. After the Dome of the Rock has been destroyed and the red heifers ashes sprinkled, the Ark of the Covenant will be placed in the Holy of Holies of the new temple. It is currently kept at a subterranean location in Egypt. It does not contain Mosaic Tablets, but rather an object not of this world (the ark at Aksum, in Ethiopia, is a fake). British and American Illuminati factions have trained Islamic terrorists in Britain and placed them under the control of Osama bin Laden, prior to sending them to the Russian province of Chechnya and proclaiming independence of the province from Russia. This is in order for Britain and America to exploit the vast oil and mineral wealth of the Caspian region. Russia is scheduled to retaliate by launching a nuclear first strike upon America, thus facilitating the Illuminati goal of depopulating America.

Vladimir Putin, who has terminal cancer, according to an informed Russian military medical source, was appointed Head of State in order to serve as a scapegoat if the nuclear attack plan goes awry. Prior to the planned nuclear attack, the Illuminati plans to foment widespread civil unrest against governmental corruption in the American midwest, as a pretext for imposing a state of national emergency. Since Asian and Hispanic Americans are considered the most malleable, most Blacks and Caucasians are to be incarcerated in concentration camps or executed. Those members of the military, law enforcement and intelligence communities who treasonously have assisted the Illuminati in the aim of establishing a global government are to be summarily executed for disloyalty, just as Saddam Hussein executed the army officers who assisted his coup detat, for who feels secure when surrounded by people who have committed treason? The Illuminati plan also calls for the execution of major political figures who have assisted them, also the Kolob-worshipping Navoo Prophets, the latter being known in high Illuminati circles as the Council of Twelve plus One. This scenario is intended to culminate in the establishment of a totalitarian global government circa 2010, after which time, the surviving members of humanity are to be reduced to a life of mediaeval serfdom. There are some wild cards in this scenario: The writer believes that Russia will double-cross the Illuminati and attempt to become the dominant world power by virtue of its supremacy in geophysical warfare technology. There is a powerful anti-Illuminati faction in Japan which might result in a Japan / China military alliance. Also we must not overlook the fact that within the private sector exists the technology to manufacture endothermic beam weaponry and radio-frequency weaponry (the Illuminati has no meaningful defense against radio-frequency weapons, which have the capability of destroying computer circuitry from a considerable distance). Mind-control programming has an unfortunate tendency to fail at inopportune moments; we must therefore consider the 24,000 mind-controlled United Nations troops, who are currently stationed at a (10) covert moon base, as another possible wild card. In concluding this article, it is well to remember that we are all to some extent brainwashed, thanks to Illuminati-controlled social engineering projects, which employ the media to implant belief structures (11) which serve the interests of the military / industrial complex. The omissions evident, in Peter Jenningss book, unwitting or not, go to serve this purpose. Our Illuminati overlords regard us as sheep who deserve to be fleeced; perhaps this is as it should be, since most adult members of the populace are too politically-indifferent, or spineless, to rectify matters. English Common Law used to demand that members of the public were required to raise a hue and cry, if they had knowledge of criminal activity. What are you going to do about it, dear reader? Back to Top

NOTES & REFERENCES

1. Random House, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1999. 2. FDR and his cabinet were Standard Oil puppets, Nelson Rockefeller even being appointed as Coordinator of Strategic Defense. Wanting Japan to abort its intention of declaring war upon the Soviets (where the Rockefellers had vested oil and lumber interests) J.P. Morgans nephew was appointed Ambassador to Japan in order to induce Japanese warlords to attack the USA instead. Most of the Japanese weaponry and munitions were supplied by American companies. In November 1941, correspondent Joe Lieb was notified by his friend, Secretary of State Cordell Hull, that Pearl Harbor would be attacked on December 7th. Lieb leaked the news to the U. P. news service. Only the Honolulu Advertiser bothered to publish the

news. Deliberately kept in the dark about the planned attack, Admiral Kimmel and General Short later were made patsies and relieved of their commands. In fairness to surviving family relatives, this disgrace should be expunged from the military records of these two gentlemen. The treasonous FDR died earlier than is generally known and was replaced by doubles, including a movie actor named Captain Jack Young (Winthrop Rutherfurd may have been another double). No autopsy was performed and the honor guard was ordered to shoot anyone attempting to open the sealed casket. In his memoirs, Roosevelts son, Elliott, stated that Stalin had informed him that his father had been assassinated by "the Churchill gang". 3. In 1933, three American Nazis - Helen and E. Clifton Barton and Lawrence Echevarria, incorporated the Internal Revenue Tax and Audit service as a private Delaware corporation, for the purpose of establishing a monopoly tax collection agency on behalf of the government. Tax money was covertly conduited to Germany to fund the Nazi military build-up. In 1936, the treasonous company became unincorporated, in order to disguise its private ownership, and changed its name to the Internal Revenue Service. The Bureau of Internal Revenue, created in 1862 to collect excise taxes, was abolished in 1953. 4. The controlling stockholder in the French multi-media giant Hachette Industries, is Saddam Hussein. By providing a buffer between Iran and Syria, he is regarded as an asset by NATO, which is why he is permitted to remain in power. More than 100 Iraqi terrorist cells armed with anthrax are known to exist in the USA, awaiting payback time. Most of the cell members are women who lost loved ones in the war. Pentagon researchers have determined that olive leaf extract is the best anthrax antidote. John Kennedy Jr.s magazine George is owned by Saddam Hussein. 5. The leader of the civilized group of global flood survivors who introduced the plough to the Sumerian hunter-gatherers became known as Tas Mikigal, meaning "Lord of Agriculture". With the passage of time, he became deified by the superstitious populous as "Lord of the Air". To them, it implied that he must have possessed the capability of flight, which suggested that he had wings. He was depicted in this form th on Phoenician coins of the 5 century B.C., and on early pre-Roman era British coins. We know him as Archangel Michael, celebrating Harvest Festival on Michaelmas Sunday. The Jews remained unacquainted with angelology until they were taken into captivity by the Babylonians. 6. Blue plasma was observed emanating from the top of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City immediately prior to the blast. Simultaneously, computer wiring in adjacent buildings burned out. This suggests that a Tesla-type geophysical device was used to momentarily lift the building off its foundations, in order to detonate containers of an unstable mercuric explosive attached to structural columns. Timothy McVeigh is almost certainly a mind-controlled patsy, which explains why he failed to resist arrest, despite being armed. 7. Investigative journalist Alex Constantine has performed a sterling service by exposing the role of intelligence agencies in mind-control activities. Virtual Government, Feral House, Venice, California, 1997. 8. OBrien, C. and Phillips, M., Trance Formation of America, Reality Marketing, Inc., Las Vegas, California, 1995. 9. Springmeier, F. and Wheeler, C., Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula, 916, Unn Ave., Oregon City, Oregon, USA. These two volumes are requisite reading for any serious investigator of mind-control activity and ritual sexual abuse, and should be read by every member of law enforcement. 10. Endothermic beam weapons generate an implosion at a quarter wavelength distance and possess the capability of flash-freezing entire cities with power supplied by a dArsonval resonant over-unity system. 11. The manner in which the Illuminati social engineers use the media, in order to implant a favorable opinion of the military / industrial complex into the consciousness of the public, is exemplified by the Bob Hope Christmas Show. Performed at military facilities several weeks prior to Christmas, so that Hope

was able to be home for Christmas, the show was aired by NBC television. NBC is owned by General Electric - one of the nations largest manufacturers of military weapons. It is the writers understanding that Mr. Hope is a major NBC stockholder and an asset of British Intelligence. He allegedly has an office at NBCs Burbank studio. According to mind-control survivor Brice Taylor, who claims to have been used as a sex slave by various prominent politicians, her slave handier was Bob Hope. Another mind-controlled sex slave survivor who has never heard of Brice Taylor, recently told this writer that her handler was Bob Hope. Ms. Taylors book "Thanks for the Memories", contains a wealth of mind-control information; it is obtainable from the Brice Taylor Trust, P.O.Box 655, Landrum, S.C. 29356. Price: $34.95, inc. s&h. Additional information appertaining to mind-control and Illuminati activities (including the assassination of Princess Diana) is available on the video An Interview with a Mother Goddess, and the book The Biggest Secret, by David lcke, both obtainable from Bookworld, ph.: 1 800 444 2524. The social mores of the public are significantly influenced by the content of movies (e.g. desensitization to violence). Always opportunistic, the Illuminati has a designated "A" list of major movie producers, actors, directors and agents. In order to remain at the pinnacle of their profession, these people attend mandatory seminars, at which a panel of Illuminati hacks reveal the type of movie content desired by the Illuminati social engineers. At a recent "A" list gathering held at an exclusive estate in Wyoming, the panel included several generals, a former Army Chief of Staff and two of Hollywoods best known directors - one Jewish , the other of Scottish descent, whose career has attained titanic proportions. Many cults are used in order to ensnare potential mind-control victims for use as ritual murder subjects. This was typified by the Solar Temple cult, which experienced 69 murders and suicides at its locations in Switzerland, France and Canada. A neo-templar cult, members included the head of the French Secret Service; its high priestess was Princess Grace of Monaco. Her death was not due to brake failure, as claimed by the media, and may have been a ritual murder (Princess Dianas murder occurred in the Pont dAlma tunnel - an ancient Illuminati sacrificial site, hence the Illuminati flaming torch symbol above the tunnel entrance). Princess Graces death may have been ordered because she knew too much about the fact that Monaco is a major heroin refining center. Significantly, her death occurred at a time known to Illuminati initiates as the "Feast of the Beast".

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04.htm

DIPLOMACY BY DECEPTION

6 - Tavistock and "Operation Research" - Undeclared War

The founder for the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, John Rawlings Reese, was to perfect a system that would subvert and then control the thinking of human beings so that they could be channeled in any direction so desired by the Committee of 300, also known as the Olympians. It must be said that to do this, one must introduce an automated mentality into the bulk of the targeted population. This is an objective with very far-reaching implications nationally and internationally. The end result of Reese's objectives were and remain, control of all human life; its destruction when deemed desirable, whether it be through mass genocide or mass slavery. We are witnessing both today. One is the Global 2000 genocidal plan, which calls for the deaths of more of 500 million people by the year 2010; the other is slavery by an economic means. Both systems are fully operational and working

side-by-side in today's America. Reese began his Tavistock experiments in 1921; it soon became clear to him that his system could be applied both domestically and militarily. Reese said that the solution to the problems he foresaw needed a ruthless approach, without concern for religious or moral values. He later added another area to his list that of nationalism. Reese is known to have studied the work of the Nine Unkown Men, as referred to in 1860 by the French writer Jacolliot. Among Jacolliot's remarks were that the Nine Unknown Men knew about the liberation of energy, sterilization by radiation, propaganda and psychological warfare, all of which were absolutely unheard of in that century. Jacolliot said that the technique of psychological warfare was "the When it became obvious that British politicians were bent on solving the country's economic problems by means of another war, Reese was given 80,000 British Army recruits to use as guinea pigs. Operation Research was the name given to his project, and basically, it was designed to develop a methodology (logistics) in military management that would make the best use of limited military resources sea, air and land defense systems against Britain's foreign enemies. Thus, the original program was a military-management one, but by 1946, Reese had developed Operation Research to the point that it could be applied as a civilian management program. Reese had "arrived," insofar as social engineering was concerned, but his work is concealed in top secret files at Tavistock. Technically, the Reese Tavistock manual, of which I have a copy, is a full declaration of war against the civilian population of any targeted country. Reese said that it had to be understood that "whenever any government, groups, persons in positions of power" use his methods without the consent of the people, it is understood by these governments or groups of people that conquest is the motive, and that domestic warfare exists between them and the public. Reese discovered that with social engineering comes the greater need for information that can be rapidly collected and correlated. One of the earlier statements attributed to Reese was the necessity to stay ahead of society and predict its moves by engineering situations. A big breakthrough for Reese and his social tinkerers came with the discovery of linear programming by George B. Danzig in 1947. This came at a time when Reese was engaged in a war with the American nation, a war which is still ongoing, and which was greatly facilitated by the invention of the transistor by Bardeen, Brittain and Shockley in 1948. Enter the Rockefellers, who gave a huge grant to Tavistock to enable Reese to press ahead with a study of the American economy, using Operation Research methods. Simultaneously, the Rockefeller Foundation gave Harvard University a four-year grant to create its own American economy model. The year was 1949, and Harvard pressed ahead with its own economic model, based on Tavistock's. The only stipulation Reese made as a condition of his cooperation with Harvard, was that Tavistock methods be followed throughout. These were based upon the Prudential Assurance Bombing Survey Study, which led to saturation bombing of German worker housing as a means of bringing about the capitulation of the German war machine. These methods were now ready to be applied in a civilian context. Reese made a detailed study of America's entry into WWI, which he deemed to be the beginning of the 20th century. Reese realized that for America to be seduced away from so-called "isolationism," American thinking would have to be drastically changed. Woodrow Wilson had dragged America into European affairs in 1916 with corruption and corrupting policies. Wilson sent American forces to fight on Europe's battlefields, in spite of the warnings issued by the Founding Fathers, to stay out of foreign entanglements. The Committee of 300, was determined to keep the United States entangled in European and indeed world affairs forever after. Wilson did not change Europe, but Europe changed America. The banishing of power politics, which is what Wilson thought he could do, was not possible, because power is politics and politics is economic

power. This has been so since the earliest recorded history of politics: those of the city-states of the Sumer and Akkad of 5,000 years ago, right down to Hitler and the USSR. Economics is only an extension of a natural energy system, but that system, the elitists have always said, belongs under their control. In order for an economy to be under the control of elite body, it has to be an economy that is predictable and totally manipulatable. This is what the Harvard model set out to accomplish, backed by the social dynamics of the Reese Operation Research. Reese had discovered that to achieve total predictability in population groups, the elements of society had to be brought under control under a yoke of slavery, and dispossessed of the means of discovering their predicament, so that not knowing how to unite or a joint defense, they would not know where to turn to for help. That Tavistock methodology is at work can be found everywhere in the United States. People, not knowing where to turn to understand the predicament they find themselves in, turn to the worst place of all for supposed help: the government. The Harvard Economic Research Project, which began in 1948, embodied all the Reese principles, which, in turn, came out of the Prudential Bombing Survey and Operations Research. By joining forces, the elite felt that a means of controlling a nation's economy and the population was now available with the coming of the computer age both a blessing and a terrible curse for mankind. All science is only a means to an end, and man is knowledge (information), which ends in control. Who the beneficiaries of that control are was decided by the Committee of 300 and its antecedents 300 years ago. The war waged against the American people by Tavistock is now 47 years old and shows no signs of letting up. As energy is the key to all life on this planet, through diplomacy by deception and outright strong-arm methods, the Committee has gained control of most energy resources. The Committee, by deception and dissembling, has also gained control of social energy, which is expressed in economic terms. Provided that the ordinary citizen could be kept ignorant of the real economic methods of bookkeeping, then the citizens would be doomed to lead a life of economic slavery. This is what has happened. We, the people, gave our consent to the economic controllers of our lives and became slaves of the elite. As Reese once said, people who will not use their intelligence have no better rights than dumb animals who have no intelligence at all. Economic slavery is essential if good order is to be maintained, and the ruling class may enjoy the fruits produced by slave labor. Reese and his team of social scientists and social engineers went to work on the American public by learning first, then understanding, and then attacking, the social energy (economics) and the mental and physical weaknesses of the nation. Earlier, I said that the computer is both a blessing and a curse for mankind. On the positive side, there are many emerging economists who, through the use of computers, are starting to wake up to the fact that the Harvard model is a blueprint for economic slavery. If this new breed of economic programmers can get its message out to the American people fast enough, the New World Order (of slavery) can still be stopped. This is where diplomacy by deception plays such a vast role in subverting through the media, education and influencing the way we think by distracting us with issues of absolutely no importance, while the truly important issues are glossed over. In a major policy study meeting ordered by the Committee of 300 in 1954, it was made clear to economic experts, high-ranking government officials, bankers, and leaders of commerce and industry, that the war against the American people was to be stepped up. Robert McNamara was one of those who said that, because peace and good order was being threatened by an out-of-control population, the wealth of the nation had to be moved away from the undisciplined masses and into the control of the self-disciplined few. McNamara savagely attacked overpopulation, which he said threatened to change the world in which we live and make it ungovernable: "We can begin with the most critical problems of population growth. As I have pointed out elsewhere, short of nuclear war itself, it is the gravest issue that the world faces in the decades ahead. If current trends continue, the world as a whole will not reach replacement level fertility - in effect an average of

two children per family - until about the year 2020. That means that the world's population would finally stabilize at about 10 billion, compared with today's 4.3 billion. "We call it stabilized, but what kind of stability would be possible? Can we assume that the levels of poverty, hunger, stress, crowding and frustration that such a situation could cause in the developing nations which by then would contain 9 out of 10 human beings on earth would be likely to assure social stability? Or, for that matter, military stability? "It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not but there are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birthrate must come down more quickly, or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way. "There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, war can accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are nature's ancient checks on population growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene." In 1979 McNamara repeated his message to the leading bankers from around the world, and Thomas Enders, a high-ranking State Department official, made the following statement: "There is a single theme behind all of our work. We must reduce population growth. Either they do it our way, through nice, clean methods, or they will get the kind of a mess that we have in El Salvador, or Iran, or Beirut. Once population growth is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. Civil war can help things, but it would have to be greatly expanded. To reduce population quickly, you have to pull all males into the fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearingage females." The solution to the problem of a world in which the elite would not want to live is mass genocide. The Club of Rome was ordered to produce a blueprint that would wipe out 500 million of excess population. The plan was called Global 2000, and it was activated by spreading the AIDS virus throughout Africa and Brazil. Global 2000 was officially accepted as U.S. policy by President James Carter. The conference members agreed that the, "low-class element of society must be brought under total control, trained and assigned to duties at an early age, which can be accomplished by the quality of education, which must be the poorest of the poor. The lower-classes must be trained to accept their position, long before they have an opportunity to query it." "Technically, children must be 'orphaned' in day care centers under government control. With such an initial handicap, the lower-classes will have little hope of upward mobility away from their assigned positions in life. The form of slavery we have in mind is essential for good social order, peace and tranquility. "We have the resources to attack the vitality, options and mobility of the individuals in society by knowing through our social scientist, understanding and manipulating and attacking their sources of social energy (income), and therefore, their physical, mental and emotional strengths and weaknesses. The general public refuses to improve its own mentality. It has become a herd of proliferating barbarians, and a blight on the face of the earth. "By measuring the economic habits by which the sheep try to run from their problems and escape from reality via the medium of 'entertainment', it is absolutely possible, applying Operation Research methods, to predict the probable combination shocks (created events) which are necessary to bring about complete control and subjugation of the population by subverting the economy. The strategy includes the use of amplifiers (advertising), and when we speak on television in the manner that a ten year old can relate to, then because of the suggestions made, that person will purchase that production impulse, the next time he comes across it in a store. "The balance of power will provide the stability that the world of the 21st century is likely to achieve, rent as it will be, by passionate tribalism and by such seemingly insoluble issues like that posed by mass migration from the South to the North, and from farm to city. There may be mass transfers of population,

such as those between Greece and Turkey in the aftermath of the First World War; really mass murders. It will be a time of troubles, in need of a unifier; an Alexander or Mohammed. "A great change that will come about as a result of emerging conflicts between peoples who live side by side and which will, by their intensity, take primacy over their other conflicts is that political rivalry will be within regions, rather than between them. This will bring about a turning back from global politics. After a decade in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union dueled across oceans, the powers will focus on protecting themselves against forces on their frontiers or within them. "The American people do not know economic science and care little about it, hence, they are always ripe for war. They cannot avoid war, notwithstanding their religious morality, nor can they find in religion the solution to their earthly problems. They are knocked out of shape by economic experts who cause Shockwaves that wreck budgets and buying habits. The American public is yet to realize that we control their buying habits." There we have it. Split up nations into tribal factions, keep the populace struggling to make a living and concerned with regional conflicts so that they will never have an opportunity to get a clear view of what is going on, let alone challenge it, and at the same time, bring about a drastic lowering of the world's population. We see this happening in the former Yugoslavia, where the country is being forced into small, tribal entities, and we see it in America, where the average family has both parents working, and yet cannot make ends meet. These parents do not have time to pay careful attention to how they are being deceived and led into economic slavery. It is all a set-up. Today, we observe if we have the time that the United States stand at the threshold of progressive dissolution as the result of Tavistock's silent "control" war against the American nation. The Bush presidency was a total disaster, and the Clinton presidency will be even more of a shock. This is the way the blueprint is drawn, and we, the people, are fast losing faith in our institutions and our ability to remake America into what it was intended to be a very far cry from what it is now overrun by foreign people who threaten to engulf the nation a South-North invasion right here in our own country. We have surrendered our real wealth for a promise of greater wealth, instead of compensation in real terms. We have fallen into the toils of the Babylonian system of "capitalism," which isn't capitalism at all, but an appearance of capital, as typified by currency which is in fact negative capital. This is deceptive and destructive. The U.S. dollar has the appearance of currency, but it is in fact a token of debt and indebtedness. Currency as we know it will be balanced by war and genocidewhich is what is happening in front of our very eyes. Total goods and services is real capital, and currency can be printed up to this level, but not beyond it. Once currency is printed beyond the level of goods and services, it becomes a destructive, subtractive force. War is the only way to "balance" the system by killing those creditors, which the people docilely gave up true value in exchange for inflated currency. Energy (economics) is the key to all earthly activities. Hence the often repeated statement I have made that all wars are economic in origin. The thrust of the One World Government-New World Order must, of necessity, be to obtain a monopoly of all goods and services, raw materials, and control over the manner in which economics is taught. Only in this framework can the New World Order gain full control. In the United States, we are constantly helping the One World Government to obtain control of the world's natural resources by being tricked into giving part of our income for this purpose. It is called "foreign aid." Tavistock's Operation Research project states as follows: "Our research has established that the simplest mode of gaining control of people is to keep them undisciplined and in the dark of basic systems and principles while at the same time keeping them disorganized, confused and distracted by issues which are of relatively little import "In addition to our less direct long-range penetration methods, this can be accomplished by a

disengagement of mental activities and providing low quality programs of public education in mathematics, logic, system designs and economics and by discouraging technical creativity. "Our mode calls for emotional stimulus, increased use of amplifiers which induce self-indulgence, whether direct (television programs) or advertising. We at Tavistock have found that the best way to accomplish the goal is through an unremitting and unrelenting emotional affrontation and attack (mental rape) through a constant barrage of sex, violence, wars, racial strife both in the electronic and print media. This steady diet could be called 'mental junk food'. "Of primary importance is the revision of history and law and subjecting the populace to the deviant creation, thus shifting thinking from personal needs to constructed, fabricated outside priorities. The general rule is that there is profit in confusion, the greater the confusion, the greater the profit. One of the ways in which this can be accomplished is to create problems and then offer solutions. "It is essential to divide the people, keep the adults' attention away from real issues and overcome their thinking with matters of relatively little importance. The young must be kept ignorant of mathematics; the proper teaching of economics and history must never be made available. Keep all groups so occupied with an endless round of issues and problems that they have no time to think clearly, and here, we rely on entertainment which should not reach beyond the mental capacity of a child in the sixth grade. "When government is able to seize private property without just compensation, it is certain that people are ripe for surrender and consenting to slavery and legal encroachment. Energy sources which support a primitive economy are a supply of raw materials, the consent of people to labor, and assume a certain place, position, level in the social structure viz., provide labor at various levels of the structure. "Each class, therefore, guarantees its level of income and hence controls the class immediately below it, thereby preserving the class structure. One of the best examples of this was found in the caste system in India, in which rigid control was exercised, ensuring that upward mobility which could threaten the elite at the top, was constrained. In this method is security and stability attained, and also a government from the top. "The sovereignty of the elite is threatened when the lower classes, through communications and education become informed and envious of the power and possessions of the class above them. As some of them become better educated, they seek to rise higher through a real knowledge of economicsenergy. This presents a real threat to the sovereignty of the elite class. "It follows that the rise of the lower classes must be postponed long enough for the elite class to achieve energy (economic) dominance, labor by consent becoming a lesser economic source. Until such economic dominance is achieved to the fullest extent possible, the consent of people to labor and let others handle their affairs has to be taken into account. Failure to achieve this goal would result in interference in the final transfer of energy sources (economic wealth) to the control of the elite. "Until such times, it is essential to recognize that public consent is still the essential key to the release of energy in the process of economic amplification. A consent of energy release system is therefore vital. Artificial security must be provided in the absence of the mother's womb, which can take the form of withdrawal, protective devices and shelters. Such shells will provide a stable environment for stable and unstable activity, and provide a shelter for the evolutionary processes of growth, that is to say, survival in a shelter that gives defensive protection against offensive activities. "It applies equally to the elite and the lower classes, but there is a definite difference in the manner in which both these classes approach the solution of the problem. Our social science scientists have made out a very compelling case that the reason why individuals create a political structure is because they have a subconscious desire to perpetuate their childhood-dependency relationship. "In the simplest of terms, what the subconscious longing demands is an earthly god to eliminate risks from their lives, put food on the table and pat them on the back in a comforting way when things don't go

well. The demand for an earthly problem-solver-risk-eliminator is insatiable, which has given rise to a substitute earthly god: the politician. The insatiable public demand for 'protection' is met by promises, but the politician actually delivers little or nothing on his promises. "Ever present in humans is a desire to control or subdue others who disturb their daily existence. However, they are unable to cope with the moral and religious issues such actions would raise, so they give the task to professional 'hit men', which we collectively call politicians. "The services of politicians are engaged for a number of reasons, which, in the main are listed in the following order: 1) To obtain the longed-for security without managing it. 2) To obtain action without the need to act, and without having to give the desired action thought. 3) To avoid responsibility for their intentions. 4) To obtain the benefits of reality without exerting the necessary discipline of learning. "We can readily divide a nation into two sub-categories, the Political Sub Nation and the Docile SubNation. The politicians hold quasi-military jobs, of which the lowest is the police force, next come attorneys. The presidential level is run by the international bankers. The docile sub-nation finances the political machine by consent, that is to say, through taxation. The sub nation remains attached to the political sub-nation, the latter feeding off it and growing stronger, until the day comes when it is strong enough to devour its creator, the people." When read in conjunction with the systems outlined in my book, the "Committee of 300", it is relatively easy to see just how far Tavistock's Operation Research project has succeeded, and nowhere more so than in the United States. Recent statistics show that 75 percent of sixth grade school children were unable to pass what was called "the maths test." The maths test consisted of elementary simple arithmetic, which ought to tell us something. Mathematics did not come into the test at all. Cause for alarm? You be the judge.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/diplomacy_deception/diplomacy_deception06.htm

from Whale Website

To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, the report envisages demoralized and discouraged workers resorting to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard, the Committee commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as the "Aquarian Conspiracy". ---Targets of the Illuminati and the Committee of 300 by Dr. John Coleman.

Tavistock, England --This has been the primary programming center for England. The Rothschild programmers work out of Tavistock. A large number of slaves in America have been programmed there. Tavistock has been doing mind-control since before W.W.ll. Under the supervision of Londons W Board & 20 Committee MI6 and MISs Section BIA ran double agents and mind-controlled spies/couriers during W.W. II. MI6 has had an office at Century House, No. 100, Westminster Bridge Road. MI5 offices have been in part

on Curzon St. MI5 has operated behind a number of fronts, incl. their fake travel agency Casuro Holidays. MI-5s address for mail is Room 055, The War Office, London. Special Intelligence Service (SIS) dealt with all types of mind control. Tavistock was under SIS. The British government has had their own telephone exchange with a 222 prefix, which was later linked to another secret exchange YTAN. Outsiders could dial 222 8080 to get into the secret govt. exchange. The Royal Free Hospital at the University of London works with Tavistock Clinic, as well as the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) of Sussex University. A large number of Britians psychologist, social workers and police get their training at Tavistock. Tavistock has set themselves up as the authority on ritual abuse and MPD (DID). In other words, the primary programming site, is pretending to be the leading institution trying to solve the problem! Thats a good cover. The Illuminati Formula Appendix I: The Programmers

Because of the intensive artillery barrages of World War I, many soldiers were permanently impaired by th shell shock. In 1921, the Marquees of Tavistock, 11 Duke of Bedford, gave a building to a group which planned to conduct rehabilitation programs for shell shocked British soldiers. The group took the name of "Tavistock Institute" after its benefactor. The General Staff of the British Army decided it was crucial that they determine the breaking point of the soldier under combat conditions. The Tavistock Institute was taken over by Sir John Rawlings Reese, head of the British Army Psychological Warfare Bureau. A cadre of highly trained specialists in psychological warfare was built up in total secrecy. In fifty years, the name "Tavistock Institute appears only twice in the Index of the New York Times, yet this group, according to LaRouche and other authorities, organized and trained the entire staffs of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the Strategic Bombing Survey, Supreme Headquarters of the Allied Expeditionary Forces, and other key American military groups during World War II. During World War II, the Tavistock Institute combined with the medical sciences division of the Rockefeller Foundation for esoteric experiments with mind-altering drugs. The present drug culture of the United States is traced in its entirety to this Institute, which supervised the Central Intelligence Agencys training programs. The "LSD counter culture" originated when Sandoz A.G., a Swiss pharmaceutical house owned by S.G. Warburg & Co., developed a new drug from lysergic acid, called LSD. James Paul Warburg (son of Paul Warburg who had written the Federal Reserve Act in 1910), financed a subsidiary of the Tavistock Institute in the United States called the Institute for Policy Studies, whose director, Marcus Raskin, was appointed to the National Security Council. James Paul Warburg set up a CIA program to experiment with LSD on CIA agents, some of whom later committed suicide. This program, MK-Ultra, supervised by Dr. Gottlieb, resulted in huge lawsuits against the United States Government by the families of the victims. The English Tavistock Institute has not restricted its activities to left-wing groups, but has also directed the programs of such supposedly "conservative" American think tanks as the: Herbert Hoover Institute at Stanford University Heritage Foundation Wharton Hudson Massachusetts Institute of Technology Rand The "sensitivity training" and "sexual encounter" programs of the most radical California groups such as Esalen Institute and its many imitators were all developed and implemented by Tavistock Institute psychologists. One of the rare items concerning the Tavistock Institute appears in Business Week, Oct. 26, 1963, with a photograph of its building in the most expensive medical offices area of London. The story mentions "the Freudian bias" of the Institute, and comments that it is amply financed by British blue-chip corporations, including Unilever, British Petroleum, and Baldwin Steel. According to Business Week, the

psychological testing programs and group relations training programs of the Institute were implemented in the United States by the University of Michigan and the University of California, which are hotbeds of radicalism and the drug network. It was the Marquees of Tavistock, 12 Duke of Bedford, whom Rudolf Hess flew to England to contact about ending World War II. Tavistock was said to be worth $40 million in 1942. In 1945, his wife committed suicide by taking an overdose of pills. APPENDIX I - SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE By Eustace Mullins
th

Research into the use of microwave weapons and their use for mind control began in 1950s at the Tavistock Institute, one of Britain's leading psychiatric research establishments. The UK institute was researching into ways of mind controlling the British population without them knowing. The monkey submission response, whereby the dominant monkey caused submissive behaviour in the underlings, was the brain state of most interest to the British scientists. Having found this specific brain rhythm for docile submissive, zombie-like behaviour, it was then recorded and used as the template for the ELF signal beamed on UK microwave transmitters. Britain was the first discoverer of microwave technology, used for radar, in the 1940s and therefore had a commanding lead over everyone else in this field. MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL by Tim Rifat

Tavistock, England --Men like mind-control expert/hypnotist Eric Trist worked for Tavistock. A six-man team which wore black berets also helped w/ mind control at Tavistock. Two people who became terrorists after their visits to Tavistock are Angela Davis and Stockley Carmichael who went to a conference at Tavistock entitled Dialectics of Liberation in 1967. Its main building is a bland 6-story building. The address is The Training Office, The Tavistock Clinic, 120 Belsize Lane, London, UK NWs SBA. Tel. no. 071-435 7111. The chief exec. is Anton Obholzer. The Chair of Prof. Comm. is Nicholas Temple. Both are skilled in psychology. The Tavistock Clinic was founded in 1920, and in 1946 the Tavistock Institute was created as an independent body to assist the Tavistock Clinic. The Institute does more of the research. The Royal Free Hospital at the University of London works with Tavistock Clinic, as well as the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) of Sussex University. A large number of Britians psychologist, social workers and police get their training at Tavistock. Tavistock has set themselves up as the authority on ritual abuse and MPD (DID). In other words, the primary programming site, is pretending to be the leading institution trying to solve the problem! Thats a good cover. APPENDIX B. THE PROGRAMMING SITES Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock02.htm

by Dr. John Coleman

from Conspirators Hierarchy - The Story of the Committee of 300

FLOW LABORATORIES

Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.

MERLE THOMAS CORPORATION

Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.

WALDEN RESEARCH
Does work in the field of pollution control.

PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, ARTHUR D. LITTLE, G.E. TEMPO, OPERATIONS RESEARCH INC.
Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite.

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Dedicates its work to what it calls a national agenda. Wrote President Hoovers program, President Roosevelts New Deal, the Kennedy Administrations New Frontiers program (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnsons Great Society. Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee of 300.

HUDSON INSTITUTE
Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its earlier papers were entitled Stability and Tranquility Among Older Nations, and Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues. Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped to promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the Committee of 300, ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly classified as one of the Committee of 300s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of its nuclear war scenarios make for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I would recommend The 6 Basic Thermonuclear Threats and Possible Outcomes of Thermonuclear War and one of its more frightening papers entitled Israeli-Arab Nuclear War. Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox, General Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big client remains the U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control. To date it has not got into wet NASA, that is to say, the National Oceanographic Agency.

NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES

NTL is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include so-called TGroups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United States. While officially decrying racism, it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WHARTON - SCHOOL OF FINANCE & COMMERCE

Founded by Eric Trist, one of the brain trusts of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock institutions in the U.S. in so far as Behavioral Research is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Laborwhich it teaches how to produce cooked statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than is reflected in USDL statistics. Whartons ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George Schultz and Alan Greenspan.

INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH

This is the institute set up by brain trusters from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin Cartwright and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are: o The Human Meaning of Social Change o Youth in Transition o How Americans View Their Mental Health Among the institutes clients are o The Ford Foundation o U.S. Department of Defense o U.S. Postal Service and the U.S.Department of Justice

INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE

This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. The institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic trends and to blow the whistle on any departures from what it has laid down as normal. Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give decisions for the future. So-called Delphi Panels decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to steer government in the right direction to head off such groups as people creating civil disorder. (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.) The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas. As will be observed, many of the Institute for the Futures goals have already been more than fully realized.

INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)

One of the Big Three, IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its networks in America which include the League for Industrial democracy in which Leonard Woodcock played a leading, if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy included conservative Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall (of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control negotiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader), and Albert Shanker.

For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Family, the Stern Family Foundation and the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Communist Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was Jeweler of the Imperial Russian Court) and made a fortune out of the Faberge name. The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table, which agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the New Left as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and unrest and spread chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the ideals of left wing nihilistic socialism, support unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the big stick with which to beat the United States political establishment. Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as, o the Black Panthers o Daniel Ellsberg o National Security Council staff member Halperin o The Weathermen Underground o the Venceramos o the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage. Take the plot to kidnap Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British MI-6 intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through TROTS (Trotskyite terrorists based in London). The plot was discovered by the FBI so that it could not go too far. Ahmed went on to become the director of one of IPSs most influential agencies, The Transnational Institute which, chameleon-like, changed from its former name, Institute of Race Relations, when intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it was tied directly to Rhodes Scholarship-Harry Oppenheimer and Anglo-American-British mining interests in South Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time. Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its big stick to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for the trend, the way things are going. By using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works. To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point man persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of the House to request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being prepared by President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in 1976, 1977, and 1978 gathering sponsors as it went. Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study. This was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskins budget called for a fifty percent cut in the Defense Budget, a socialist housing program that would compete with and steadily replace private housing and mortgage markets, a national health service, radical changes in the educational system that would disrupt capitalist control over the distribution of knowledge, and several other radical ideas. The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to sign the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually defenseless against

ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this day one of the most prestigious think tanks controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers. By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as The Pentagon Papers, besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial politics under the guise of religion, using the establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.

STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the jewels in Tavistocks Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WW II, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control re-search and future sciences. Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the Changing Images of Man upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests. Some of Stanfords major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services: o Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research o Management o Office of Science and Technology o SRI Business Intelligence Program o U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense o Research and Engineering o U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research Among corporations seeking Stanfords services were o Wells Fargo Bank o Bechtel Corporation o Hewlett Packard o Bank of America o McDonnell-Douglas Corporation o Blyth o Eastman Dillon o TRW Company One of Stanfords more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons. Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller think tanks doing research into every facet of life in America. This is known as ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanfords computers are linked with 2500 sister research consoles which include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), RANI, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the library, cataloging all ARPA documentation. Other agenciesand one can use ones imagination here, are allowed to search through SRIs library for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon, for instance, uses SRIs master files extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon command and control problems are worked out by Stanford. While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that

the same research could not, and will not, be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone, and it is my belief that if ever SRI were to be fully exposed, the hostility which would arise from revelations as to what it actually does would most probably force SRI to close.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as a purely American institution, but that is far from being the case. MIT-Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups: o Contemporary Technology o Industrial Relations o Lewin Group Psychology o NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories o Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology o Systems Dynamics. Forrestor and Meadows wrote The Club of Romes Limits of Growth zero growth study. Some of MITs clients include the following: o American Management Association o American Red Cross o Committee for Economic Development o GTE o Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) o NASA o National Academy of Sciences o National Council of Churches o Sylvania o TRW o U.S. Army o U.S. Department of State o U.S. Navy o U.S. Treasury o Volkswagen Company So vast is the reach of IDA that it would take hundreds of pages to describe the activities in which it is engaged, and IDA is fully described in my book on the role played by Institutions and Foundations in committing treason against the United States of America, which will be published early in 1992.

RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIAs most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-Ultra operation which lasted for 20 years). Some of RANDs clients include the following: o American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) o Chase Manhattan Bank o International Business Machines (IBM) o National Science Foundation o Republican Party o TRW

o U.S. Air Force o U.S. Department of Energy o U.S. Department of Health There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDs services, and to list them all would be an impossible task. Among RANDs specialities is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to articles of scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAIN WASHING remains the primary function of RAND. To summarize, the major Tavistock institutions in the United States engaged in brainwashing at all levels, including government, the military, business, religious organizations and education are the following: Brookings Institution Hudson Institute Institute for Policy Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology National Training Laboratories Rand Research and Development Corporation Stanford Research Institute Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania It is estimated by sources of mine that the total number of people employed by these institutions is in the region of 50,000 with funding close to $10 billion dollars.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock05.htm

by Dr. Byron T. Weeks, MD

July 31, 2001 Spanish version from EducateYourself Website Editor's Note: No one deserves more credit than Dr. John Coleman for bringing to light the history and true purpose of the City of London's Tavistock Institute and its many subdivisional institutions and organizations which was exposed in stunning detail in his 1992 book, Conspirators' Hierachy - The Story of The Committee of 300. Dr Coleman has rightly complained that many NWO expose writers who have followed in his wake, have used his original research without crediting him as the originating source and in fairness to him, it should be observed that the information presented below is a reflection of his pioneering investigations into Tavistock. The article below was sent to John Quinn by Dr. Byron Weeks. The insidious propaganda and public opinion manipulations (including mind control agendas) orchestrated by London's Tavistock Institute is covered at length in the books of David Icke and Dr John Coleman, but this recent article adds fresh insights and historical perspective. Our thanks to Brice Taylor <> for forwarding... Ken Adachi

TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE
30 Tabernacle Street London EC2A 4DD

Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Preface from John Quinn The Best Kept Secret In America Tavistock Institutions In The United States Institute For Policy Studies (IPS) Stanford Research Institute (SRI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Alfred P. Sloan School of Management RAND Research And Development Corporation Return to Tavistock Institute

Preface from John Quinn (NewsHawk)

This forwarded article was received from Byron Weeks; who in our opinion really has a good firm handle on exactly WHAT is up on many levels with the extraordinarily extensive "control trips" currently being directed against the peoples of the world by elements of the global shadow government. Weeks, whom I quoted at length in the book PHOENIX UNDEAD, has sent us this compelling look at a globally-active British institute which has had it's hands in just about every social and political/governmental movement of note throughout much of the world for the past 50 years. For example, ever wonder who and what is "behind", let's say, the CIA? Well, they don't swear allegiance to America, that's for certain. Try the British royal family. This report is the real stuff-solidly researched and meticulously documented; so for lots more truly concept-bending data, read on. NewsHawk Inc.

To John Quinn I believe Tavistock has always had secret ties to British Freemasonry. Byron T. Weeks, MD Col. AFUS, MC, Ret. Back to Top

The Best Kept Secret In America

Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors - government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. - nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programmes, particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new training events alongside the regular programme of group relations conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum th Press) which is now in its 48 year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal Evaluation.

Three elements combine to make the Institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence of being entirely self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action research orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology. So reads the opening paragraphs of the Tavistock Institute home page at www.tavinstitute.org The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in th London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11 Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese. Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute Esalen MIT Hudson Institute Heritage Foundation Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.

Statue Of *Sigmund Freud* in front of The Tavistock Institute of mind control

Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute. Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory conditions". All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish new rituals of personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family. Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries. Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. The "experiment" in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual's sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government. Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of Finance, at the University of Pennsylvania. A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy---the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like "guinea pigs", resulted in several deaths. The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid. Roosevelt's advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD "counter-culture" of the 1960s, the "student revolution", which was financed by $25 million from the CIA. One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association,

and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments. One victim, the wife of a member of the Canadian Parliament, is now suing the U.S. companies who provided the drug for the CIA. All the records of the CIA's drug testing program were ordered destroyed by the head of MK Ultra. Because all efforts of the Tavistock Institute are directed toward producing cyclical collapse, the effect of the CIA programs are tragically apparent. R. Emmett Tyrell Jr., writing in the Washington Post August 20, 1984, cites the "squalid consequences of the 60s radicals in SDS" as resulting in "the growing rate of illegitimacy, petty lawlessness, drug addiction, welfare, VD, and mental illness". This is the legacy of the Warburgs and the CIA. Their principal agency, the Institute for Policy Studies, was funded by James Paul Warburg; its co-founder was Marcus Raskin, protg of McGeorge Bundy, president of the Ford Foundation. Bundy had Raskin appointed to the post of President Kennedy's personal representative on the National Security Council, and in 1963 funded Students for Democratic Society, through which the CIA operated the drug culture. Today the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which originate many types of programs to increase the control of the World Order over the American people. The Stanford Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300 employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the behavioral sciences. One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the Kulaks. Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE Peasants' Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist. The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American farmer. The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer's need for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order's manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of

land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural trusts. The Brookings Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts. Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction, and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF must make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations. The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do "charitable" work, because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and never denied, that the Heritage-AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of professional intelligence operatives as "charitable" workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political economic and social goals which the World Order requires the foundations to achieve through their " bequests ". Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlocking of the foundation "syndicate" has been revealed by the names of its principle incorporators---Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA. They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England. Back to Top

Tavistock Institutions In The United States

Flow Laboratories Gets contracts from the National Institutes of Health. Merle Thomas Corporation Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites. Walden Research Does work in the field of pollution control. Planning Research Corporation, Arthur D. Little, G.E. "TEMPO", Operations Research Inc. Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called "a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite." Brookings Institution (1) Dedicates its work to what it calls a "national agenda." Wrote President Hoover's program, President Roosevelt's "New Deal", the Kennedy Administration's "New Frontiers" program (deviation from it may have cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson's "Great

Society." Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so. Hudson Institute This institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Hudson may be properly classified as one of the Committee of 300's BRAINWASHING establishments. One of its largest clients is the U.S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control. National Training Laboratories One of the key institutions established for this purpose in the United States was the National Training Laboratories (NTL). Founded in 1947 by members of the Tavistock network in the United States and located originally on an estate in Bethel, Maine, NTL had as its explicit purpose the brainwashing of leaders of the government, educational institutions, and corporate bureaucracies in the Tavistock method, and then using these "leaders" to either themselves run Tavistock group sessions in their organizations or to hire other similarly trained group leaders to do the job. The "nuts and bolts" of the NTL operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as "group dynamics," developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin, who emigrated to the United States in the 1930s and whose students founded NTL. In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities, are manipulated by a "group leader" to form a "consensus" of opinion, achieving a new "group identity." The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure. Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is "cracked," and a new personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place. In that way, an individual is brainwashed without the victim knowing what has taken place. This method is the same, with some minor modification, used in all so-called "sensitivity groups" or "T-groups," or in the more extreme rock-drug-sex counterculture form, "touchy-feely groups," such as the kind popularized from the 1960s onward by the Esalen Institute, which was set up with the help of NTL. From the mid-1950s onward, NTL put the majority of the nation's corporate leaderships through such brainwashing programs, while running similar programs for the State Department, the Navy, the Department of Education, and other sections of the federal bureaucracy. There is no firm estimate of the number of Americans who have been put through this process in last 40 years at either NTL, or as it is now known the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, which is based in Rosslyn, Virginia, or its West Coast base of operations, the Western Training Laboratories in Group Development, or in various satellite institutions. The most reliable estimate is in the several millions. One of the groups that went through the NTL mill in the 1950s was the leadership of the National Education Association, the largest organization of teachers in the United States. Thus, the NEA's outlook has been "shaped" by Tavistock, through the NTL. In 1964, the NTL Institute became a direct part of the NEA, with the NTL setting up "group sessions" for all its affiliates. With funding from the Department of Education, the NTL Institute drafted the programs for the training of the nation's primary and secondary school teachers, and has a hand as well in developing the content of educational "reforms," including OBE. Also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is a brainwashing center in artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association (1), the largest teacher group in the United States. While officially

decrying "racism", it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up. University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Finance & Commerce Founded by Eric Trist One of the "brain trusts" of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock in so far as "Behavioral Research" is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor---which teaches how to produce "cooked" statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method was very much in demand as we came to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than was reflected in USDL statistics. Wharton's ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the World Bank. Institute for Social Research Among its clients are The Ford Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Postal Service and the U.S. Department of Justice. Among its studies are "The Human Meaning Of Social Change", "Youth in Transition" and "How Americans View Their Mental Health". Institute For The Future This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. So called "DELPHI PANELS" decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to "steer" government in the right direction to head off such groups as "people creating civil disorder." (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.) This institute recommends action such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but most frightening, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas, (concentration camp compounds). As can be observed, many of their goals have already been more than fully realized.
1.- These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose function is to ensure that the Uniform Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting business in the United States.

Back to Top

INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)

One of the "Big Three", IFS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States. Its networks in America include the League for Industrial Democracy. Lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy have included Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Irwin Suall of the ADL, Eugene Rostow, Arms control negotiator, Lane Kirkland, Labor Leader, and Albert Shanker. IFS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly trained Tavistock Institute graduates. The objectives of IFS came from an agenda laid down for it by the Tavistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the "New Left" as a grass roots movement in the U.S. Its been said that Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as the Black Panthers, Daniel Ellsberg, National Security Council staff member Halprin, The Weathermen Underground, the Venceramos and the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern. No scheme was too big for IFS and its controllers to take on and manage. Through its many powerful lobbing groups on Capitol Hill, IFS relentlessly used its "Big Stick" to beat Congress. IFS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied

lobbyists, In this way, IFS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for "the trend, the way things are going." By using key point-men on Capitol Hill, IFS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works. IFS became, and remains to this day, one of the most prestigious "think tanks" controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers. By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as "The Pentagon Papers," besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial policies under the guise of religion, using establishment media to spread IFS ideas, and then supporting them, IFS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play. Back to Top

STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow. Stanford can be described as one of the "jewels" in Tavistock's Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WWII, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control research and "future sciences." Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the "Changing Images of Man" upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests. Some of Stanford's major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so, did the diversity of its services: Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research Management, Office of Science and Technology SRI Business Intelligence Program U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research Among corporations seeking Stanford's services were Wells Fargo Bank, Bechtel Corporation, Hewlett Packard, Bank of America, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Blyth, Eastman Dillon and TRW Company. One of Stanford's more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons. Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller "think tanks" doing research into every facet of life in America. This is ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanford's computers are linked with 2500 "sister" research consoles which include: the CIA Bell Telephone Laboratories U.S. Army Intelligence The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Rand MIT Harvard UCLA Stanford plays a key role in that it is the "library", cataloging all ARPA documentation. "Other agencies".....one can use one's imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI's "library" for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon uses SRI's master files extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon "command and control" problems are worked out by Stanford.

While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not , and will not be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone. Back to Top

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
. This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as being a purely American institution, but that is far from the truth. MIT- Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups: Contemporary Technology Industrial Relations NASA-ERC Computer Research Lavatories Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology Systems Dynamics Some of MIT's clients are: American Management Association Committee for Economic Development (1) GTE Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) NASA National Academy of Sciences National Council of Churches Sylvania TRW U.S. Army U.S. Department of State U.S. Navy U.S. Treasury Volkswagen Company
1.- These institutions are among those that fund The UNIFORM LAW FOUNDATION, whose function is to ensure that the Uniform Commercial Code remains the instrument for conducting business in the United States.

Back to Top

RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA's most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level. Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-ULTRA operation which lasted for 20 years). Some of RAND's clients include: American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) Chase Manhattan Bank International Business Machines (IBM) National Science Foundation Republican Party TRW U.S. Air Force U.S. Department of Health U.S. Department of Energy

There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDS's services. To list them all would be impossible. Among RAND's specialties is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings. RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAINWASHING remains the primary function of RAND.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock01.htm

by John Quinn
NewsHawk inc. October 10, 1999 from Whale Website

Today is the birthday of Beatle John Lennon. In honor of the man and his wonderful music NewsHawk Inc. has decided to take a look at what was going on "behind the scenes" of the 1960's "countercultural revolution"; to explore a bit how the world's most popular and undeniably talented rock band was without ANY doubt "used" by New World Order social manipulators (as were MANY other pop music groups) in an ongoing project designed to control the development of human society in the most fundamental ways. There are direct links which tie these activities to certain covert scientific projects of an extremely advanced, esoteric nature which were exploring the realms of (manipulation of) consciousness, time, thought and indeed "reality" itself, which were being conducted during the same period of time on Long Island, N.Y.: activities which were part of the Phoenix/Montauk Project. In fact we are talking about two sides of the same coin here. On one side, the covert, subtle manipulation and control of not only thought and human consciousness but of the most fundamental, subatomic, electromagnetic matrix of (perceived) reality itself, using newly-developed electromagnetic/radio frequency technologies of extraordinary, unheard-of power and potential. On the other side, directly and overtly shifting the paradigm, changing the basic concepts, widening the parameters--the envelope, changing the playing field and all the rules of play by which society defines itself within an exceptionally short period of time. Factor in what was happening on more political levels such as the civil rights and anti-war movements, stir briskly while at full boil, and STAND BACK! What's rather amazing in fact is that society did NOT disintegrate/implode/explode in the way the social manipulators had apparently hoped. The higher qualities of human nature seemed to consistently float to the surface--with some notable exceptions--and certainly began to acquire a significant, if not

nearly irresistible momentum of it's own; pulling in larger and larger segments, of "straight"', conventional, "moral majority" type elements of society. Obviously, the big plan was backfiring severely and something "needed to be done." The Beatles were also part of the mass experimentation that contemporary society was being subjected to by the CIA, Britain's MI6 and the Tavistock Institute utilizing extraordinarily powerful mind-altering psychedelic/psychotropic drugs. More than most of the other boys in the band, John Lennon became increasingly aware not only of the extent of corruption, co-opting and infiltration of the counterculture -- most CERTAINLY including the rock music scene -- by these same covert government intelligence elements. Lennon was also aware than one of the "big guns" in the CIA/Tavistock/MI6 arsenal, LSD, had been having effect upon the population groups to which it had been funneled so extensively that was most unexpected on the part of the social manipulators--and to a large extent the effect was rather positive and beneficial. Shortly before Lennon's death at the hands of what beyond the faintest glimmer of a shadow a doubt was a mind-controlled, "Manchurian Candidate" type assassin deployed by Tavistock/CIA/MI6, Mark Chapman to terminate a "loose cannon", Lennon had the audacity to massively and blatantly "out" the aforementioned consortium in a Playboy interview -- in which he made note of LSD's completely unforeseen liberating impact upon human society and civilization--pretty much thumbing his nose at the whole bunch and their whole trip; AND indicating as well that he was aware of the extent to which he and other pop musicians had been set up--to be used as dupes in massive social manipulation schemes. Shortly afterward, New World Order head honcho and Satanist, globalist, CIA chief and Tavistock underling vice-president George Bush had Lennon slaughtered on the streets of new York; where he died in the arms of someone that a number of sources claim was the monarch agent deployed by MI6/CIA to keep the exceptionally intelligent Lennon constantly gravitating toward the social fringe; thereby keeping his potential influence at least minimized -- Yoko Ono. That's NOT to say that even IF this last supposition is true, that genuine love and a fulfilling relationship did not exist between the two and that Yoko's "programming", just like John's, broke up and fell apart. And what about those Beatles, anyway? Anyone who has heard the Beatles' live tapes recorded in 1961 and 1962 on the "Reeperbahn" in Hamburg, Germany realizes that this was an incredibly talented and energetic bunch of rockers who no matter what would have undoubtedly had a significant impact upon popular music and thus upon society itself, regardless of things which occurred subsequently in their saga. And without any doubt being given access to state-of-the art audio and recording technologies and facilities stimulated their creativity quite a bit--for the benefit of all; "MR. KITE" included. Personally I think the Beatles were definitely "the greatest"--or damn close to it.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock03.htm

A Brief Overview Of The Founding Members Of

The False Memory Syndrome Foundation

from MindControlForum Website

F.M.S.F. EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS: Peter and Pamela Freyd (psychiatrists) The Freyds were publicly exposed by their own daughter Jennifer Freyd (professor of psychology) of child abuse and rape. F.M.S.F. FOUNDER: Ralph Underwager (psychiatrist) The worlds foremost authority on false memory, but in the courtroom is repeatedly exposed as a charlatan. He is a self confessed paedophile who quotes: It is "Gods Will" adults engage in sex with children. F.M.S.F. ORIGINAL BOARD MEMBERS: Martin Orn (psychiatrist) Senior CIA Mind Control Researcher: Experimenting in hypnotic programming, dissolving memory and other mind subduing techniques. F.M.S.F. BOARD MEMBER: Dr Harold Lief (psychiatrist) CIA Mind Control Researcher. Experimenting in behavioural modification and hypnotic programming.
REFERENCE FROM: The False Memory Hoax Psychic Dictatorship in the USA By Alex Constantine

The CIA, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation & the Politics of Ritual Abuse
The Devil Denuded The CIA, in fact, has several designates on the FMSF advisory board. They have in common backgrounds in mind control experimentation. Their very presence on the board, and their peculiar backgrounds, reveal some heavily obscured facts about ritual child abuse. Martin T. Orne, a senior CIA researcher, is an original board members of the Foundation, and a psychiatrist at the University of Pennsylvanias Experimental Psychiatry Lab in Philadelphia. In 1962 his forays into hypno-programming (the elicitation of "anti-social" behaviour, dissolving memory and other mind-subduing techniques) were financed by a CIA front at Cornell University. He was also funded by Bostons Scientific Engineering Institute, another front, and a clearinghouse for the Agencys investigation of the occult. The CIA and Pentagon have formed a partnership in the creation of cults. To be sure, the Association of National Security Alumni, a public interest veterans group opposed to clandestine ops, considers it a "primary issue of concern" that the Department of Defense has a "perceived role in satanic cult activities, which qualify in and of themselves as very damaging exercises in mind control." The smoothing over of the national security states cult connections is handled by academic "experts". A forerunner of the Foundation is based in Buffalo, New York, the Committee for Scientific Examination of Religion, best known for the publication of Satanism in America: How the Devil Got More Than His Due, widely considered to be a legitimate study. The authors turn up their noses to ritual abuse, dismissing the hundreds of reports around the country as mass "hysteria". Cult researcher Carl Raschke reported in a March, 1991 article that he coincidentally met Hudson Frew, a Satanism in America co-author at a Berkeley bookstore. "Frew was wearing a five-pointed star, or pentagram, the symbol of witchcraft and earth magic," Raschke says.

Shawn Carlson, a contributor to the book, is identified by the media as a "physicist". Yet he runs the Gaia Press in El Cerrito, California, a New Age publishing house with a and occult lore. Carlson is also a "scientific and technical consultant" to the Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (a promoter of the "false memory" theory of ritual abuse and UFO abductions), publisher of the Skeptical Inquirer. The FMS Foundation is no less eccentric. Within two years of its founding, it was clear that the Foundation leadership was far from disinterested on witchcraft On the workings of childhood memory, and concealed a secret sexual and political agenda. FMSF Founder Ralph Underwager (left), director of the Institute of Psychological Therapies in Minnesota, was forced to resign in 1993. Underwager (a former Lutheran pastor) and his wife Hollida Wakefield publish a journal, Issues in Child Abuse Allegations, written by and for child abuse "skeptics". His departure from the False Memory Syndrome Foundation was hastened by a remark in an interview, appearing in an Amsterdam journal for paedophiles, that it was "Gods Will" adults engage in sex with children. (His wife Hollida remained on the Foundations board after he left). As it happens, holy dispensation for paedophiles is the exact credo of the Children of God cult. It was fitting, then, when Underwager filed an affidavit on behalf of cult members tried in France in 1992, insisting that the accused were positively "not guilty of abuse upon children". In the interview, he prevailed upon paedophiles everywhere to shed stigmatization as "wicked and reprehensible" users of children. In keeping with the Foundations creative use of statistics, Dr Underwager widely considered, or group of British reporters in 1994 that "scientific evidence" proved that 60% of all women molested as children believed the experience was "good for them". Dr Underwager invariably sides with the defense. His grandiloquent orations have graced courtrooms around the world, often by satellite. Defense lawyers for Woody Allen turned to him, he boasts, when Mia Farrow accused her estranged husband of molesting their seven year-old daughter. Underwager is a virtual icon to the Irish Catholic lobby in Dublin, which raised its hoary hackles against a child abuse prevention program in the Irish Republic. He was, until his advocacy of paedophila tarnished an otherwise glittering reputation, widely quoted in the press, dismissing ritual child abuse as a hysterical aberration. He is the worlds foremost authority on false memory, but I the courtroom he is repeatedly exposed as a charlatan. In 1988, a trial court decision in New York State held that Dr Underwager was, "not qualified to render opinion as to where or not (the victim) was sexually molested". In 1990 his testimony on memory was ruled improper, "in the absence of any evidence that the results of Underwagers work had been accepted in the scientific community". And in Minnesota a judge ruled that Underwagers theories on, "learned memory" were the same as "having an expert tell the jury that (the victim) was not telling the truth". Peter and Pamela Freyd, executive directors of the Foundation, joined forces with Underwager in 1991, and their story is equally wretched. Jennifer Freyd, their daughter, a professor or psychology at the University of Oregon, openly leveled accusations of abuse against her parents at an August 1993 mental health conference in Ann Arbor, Michigan. "My family of origin was troubled in many observable ways," she said. "I refer to the things that were never forgotten and recovered, but to things that we all knew about". She gave her fathers alcoholism as an example.

"During my childhood, my father sometimes discussed his own experiences of being sexually abused as an 11 year-old boy, and called himself a kept boy". Peter Freyd graduated to male prostitution as an adolescent. At the age of 13, Jennifer Freyd composed a poem about her fathers nocturnal visits: I am caught in a web A web of deep, deep terror she wrote. The diaries of her youth chronicle the, "reactions and feelings (guilt, shame and terror) of a troubled girl and young woman. My parents oscillated between denying these symptoms and feelings.. to using knowledge of these same symptoms and feelings to discredit me". "My father," she says, "told various people that I was brain damaged". The accusation was unlikely. At the time, Jennifer Freyd was a graduate student on a National Science Foundation fellowship. She has taught at Cornell and received numerous research awards. The "brain damage" apologia did not wash. Her mother suggested that Jennifers memories were "confabulations" and faulted therapeutic intervention. Pamela Freyd turned to her own psychiatrist, Dr Harold Lief, currently and advisory board member of the Foundation, to diagnose Jennifer. "He explained to me that he did not believe I was abused," Jennifer recalls. Dr Liefs diagnosis was based on his belief that Peter Freyds fantasies were strictly "homoerotic". Of course, his daughter furrows a brow at the assumption that homoerotic fantasies or a heterosexual marriage exclude the possibility of child molestation. Liefs skewed logic is a trademark of the Foundation. He is a close colleague of the CIAs Martin Orne. Dr Lief, a former major in the Army medical corps, joined the University of Pennsylvania faculty in 1968, the peak of federally-funded behavioural modification experiments at Holmesburg Prison. Dr Orne consulted with him on several studies in hypnotic programming. His academic writing reveals a peculiar range of professional interests, including "Orgasm in the Postoperative Transsexual" for Archives of Sexual Behaviour, and an exploration of the possibility of life after death for a journal on mental diseased edited by Foundation fellow Paul McHugh. Lief is a director of the Centre for Sexuality and Religion, past president of the Sex Information and Education Council. And an original board member of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. Two others, Jon Baron from Penn U. and Ray Hyman (an executive editor of the aforementioned Sceptical Inquirer), a professor of psychology at the University of Oregon, resigned from the board after Jennifer Freyd went public with her account of childhood abuse and the facetious attempts of her parents and their therapist to discredit her. They were replaced by David Dinges, co-director with the ubiquitous Martin Orne of the Unit for Experimental Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania. "At times I am flabbergasted that my memory is considered false", Jennifer says, "and my alcoholic fathers memory is considered rational and sane". She does not, after all, remember impossible abuses: "I was at home a few hours after my second session with my therapist, a licensed clinical psychologist working within an established group in a large and respected medical clinic. "During that second visit to my therapists office, I expressed great anxiety about the upcoming holiday visit with my parents. My therapist asked about half way into the session, whether I had ever been sexually abused. I was immediately thrown into a strange state. No one had ever asked me such a question. I responded, no, but. I went home and within a few hours I was shaking uncontrollably, overwhelmed with intense and terrible flashbacks". Jennifer asks herself why her parents are believed. "In the end, is it precisely because I was abused that I am to be discredited despite my personal and professional success?" Pamela Freyd published an open letter defending her husband in Ralph Underwagers Issues in Child Abuse Accusations in 1991. It was reprinted in Confabulations, a book published a year later. Laced with lubricious sentiment, the book bemoans the "destruction of families" brought on by false child abuse accusations, and maligns "cult-like" support groups and feminists, or "lesbian cults". Executive director

Freyd often refers to the feminist groups that have taken up the cause of child abuse survivors as "lesbians", after the bizarre Dr Underwager, who claims, "these women may be jealous that males are able to love each other, be comrades, friends, be close, intimate". Pamela Freyds account of the family history, Jennifer insists, is patently false. In an electronic message from her father, he openly acknowledges that in his version of the story "fictional elements were deliberately inserted". "Fictional is rather an astounding choice of words," Jennifer observed at the Ann Arbor Conference. The article written by her parents contends that Jennifer was denied tenure at another university due to a lack of published research. "In fact," Jennifer counters, "I moved to the University of Oregon in 1987, just four years after receiving my Ph.D. to accept a tenured position as associate professor in the psychology department, one of the worlds best psychology departments. My mother sent the Jane Doe article to my colleagues during my promotion year that is, the year my case for promotion to full professor was being considered. I was absolutely mortified to learn of this violation of my privacy and this violation of the truth". Manipulative tactics are another Foundation imprimatur. Lana Alexander, editor of a newsletter for survivors of child sexual abuse, observes that, "many people view the false memory syndrome theory as a calculated defence strategy developed by perpetrators and the lawyers and expert witnesses who defend them". A legitimizing barrage of stories in the press has shaped public opinion and warmed the clime for defence attorneys. The concept of false memory serves the same purpose as Holocaust denial. It shapes opinion. Unconscionable crimes are obstructed, the accused is endowed with the status of martyr, the victim is reviled. The emphasis on image is obvious in "How Do We Know We are Not Representing Paedophiles", an article written for the February 29, 1992 FMS Foundation Newsletter, by Pamela Freyd. In it, she derides the suggestion that many members of the group could be molesters because, "we are a good-looking bunch of people, greying hair, well dressed, healthy, smiling; just about every person who has attended is someone you would surely find interesting and want to count as a friend".

People forget things. Horrible things. Here at the Foundation someone had a repressed memory, or what would be called a repressed memory, that she had been sexually abused. Pamela Freyd, FMS Foundation Founder

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04a.htm

TARGETS OF THE ILLUMINATI AND THE

COMMITTEE OF 300
Extracted from "Conspirators Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300" by John Coleman
from AmericanPatriotFriendsNetwork Website

1. To establish a One World Government/New World Order with a unified church and monetary system under their direction. The One World Government began to set up its church in the 1920:s and 30:s, for they realized the need for a religious belief inherent in mankind must have an outlet and, therefore, set up a "church" body to channel that belief in the direction they desired. 2. To bring about the utter destruction of all national identity and national pride, which was a primary consideration if the concept of a One World Government was to work.

3. To engineer and bring about the destruction of religion, and more especially, the Christian Religion, with the one exception, their own creation, as mentioned above. 4. To establish the ability to control of each and every person through means of mind control and what Zbignew Brzezinski called techonotronics, which would create human-like robots and a system of terror which would make Felix Dzerzinhskis Red Terror look like children at play. 5. To bring about the end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power in what they call "the post-industrial zero-growth society". Excepted are the computer- and service industries. US industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labor is available. As we saw in 1993, this has become a fact through the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement, known as NAFTA. Unemployables in the US, in the wake of industrial destruction, will either become opium-heroin and/or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in the elimination of the "excess population" process we know of today as Global 2000 Report. 6. To encourage, and eventually legalize the use of drugs and make pornography an "art-form", which will be widely accepted and, eventually, become quite commonplace. 7. To bring about depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. It is interesting to note that Pol Pots genocidal plans were drawn up in the US by one of the Club of Romes research foundations, and overseen by Thomas Enders, a high-ranking State Department official. It is also interesting that the committee is currently seeking to reinstate the Pol Pot butchers in Cambodia. 8. To suppress all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Illuminati. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments currently being scorned and ridiculed by the Illuminati and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would blow the Illuminatis conception of "limited natural resources" right out of the window. A fusion torch, properly used, could create unlimited and as yet untapped natural resources, even from the most ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion, and would benefit mankind in a manner which, as yet, is not even remotely comprehended by the public. 9. To cause. by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, by means of starvation and diseases in the Third World countries, the death of three billion people by the year 2050, people they call "useless eaters". The Committee of 300 (Illuminati) commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how to bring about such genocide. The paper was produced under the title "Global 2000 Report" and was accepted and approved for action by former President James Earl Carter, and Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of States, for and on behalf of the US Government. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the population of the US is to be reduced by 100 million by the year of 2050. 10. To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, the report envisages demoralized and discouraged workers resorting to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard, the Committee commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as the "Aquarian Conspiracy". 11. To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then "managing" such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the US, an agency for Crisis Management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first enclosed in 1980. 12. To introduce new cults and continue to boost those already functioning which include rock music

gangsters such as the Rolling Stones (a gangster group much favored by European Black Nobility), and all of the Tavistock-created rock groups which began with the Beatles. 13. To continue to build up the cult of Christian Fundamentalism begun by the British East India Companys servant Darby, which will be misused to strengthen the Zionist State of Israel by identifying with the Jews through the myth of "Gods chosen people", and by donating very substantial amounts of money to what they mistakenly believe is a religious cause in the furtherance of Christianity. 14. To press for the spread of religious cults such as the Moslem Brotherhood, Moslem Fundamentalism, the Sikhs, and to carry out mind control experiments of the Jim Jones and "Son of Sam" type. It is worth noting that the late Khomeini was a creation of British Military Intelligence Div. 6, MI6. This detailed work spelled out the step-by-step process which the US Government implemented to put Khomeini in power. 15. To export "religious liberation" ideas around the world so as to undermine all existing religions, but more especially the Christian religion. This began with the "Jesuit Liberation Theology", that brought an end to the Somoza Family rule in Nicaragua, and which today is destroying El Salvador, now 25 years into a "civil war". Costa Rica and Honduras are also embroiled in revolutionary activities, instigated by the Jesuits. One very active entity engaged in the so-called liberation theology, is the Communistoriented Mary Knoll Mission. This accounts for the extensive media attention to the murder of four of Mary Knolls so-called nuns in El Salvador a few years ago. The four nuns were Communist subversive agents and their activities were widely documented by the Government of El Salvador. The US press and the new media refused to give any space or coverage to the mass of documentation possessed by the Salvadorian Government, which proved what the Mary Knoll Mission nuns were doing in the country. Mary Knoll is in service in many countries, and placed a leading role in bringing Communism to Rhodesia, Moambique, Angola and South Africa. 16. To cause a total collapse of the worlds economies and engender total political chaos. 17. To take control of all foreign and domestic policies of the US. 18. To give the fullest support to supranational institutions such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of International Settlements, the World Court and, as far as possible, make local institutions less effective, by gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of the UN. 19. To penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within them to destroy the sovereign integrity of the nations represented by them. 20. To organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and to negotiate with terrorists whenever terrorist activities take place. It will be recalled that it was Bettino Craxi, who persuaded the Italian and US Governments to negotiate with the Red Brigades kidnapers of Prime Minister Moro and General Dozier. As an aside, Dozier was placed under strict orders not to talk what happened to him. Should he ever break that silence, he will no doubt be mad "a horrible example of", in the manner in which Henry Kissinger dealt with Aldo Moro, Ali Bhutto and General Zia ul Haq. 21. To take control of education in America with the intent and purpose of utterly and completely destroying it. By 1993, the full force effect of this policy is becoming apparent, and will be even more destructive as primary and secondary schools begin to teach "Outcome Based Education" (OBE).

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_12c.htm

WHO IS MAURICE STRONG?

The adventures of Maurice Strong & Co. illustrate the fact that nowadays you dont have to be a household name to wield global power.
by Ronald Bailey
Published in The National Review September 1, 1997 from Resist Website

Mr. Bailey is a freelance journalist and television producer in Washington, D.C. He is author of Eco-Scam: The False Prophets of Ecological Apocalypse and The True State of the Planet (Free Press). "The survival of civilization in something like its present form might depend significantly on the efforts of a single man," declared The New Yorker. The New York Times hailed that man as the "Custodian of the Planet." He is perpetually on the short list of candidates for Secretary General of the United Nations. This lofty eminence? Maurice Strong, of course. Never heard of him? Well, you should have. Militia members are famously worried that black helicopters are practicing maneuvers with blue-helmeted UN troops in a plot to take over America. But the actual peril is more subtle. A small cadre of obscure international bureaucrats are hard at work devising a system of "global governance" that is slowly gaining control over ordinary Americans lives. Maurice Strong, a 68year-old Canadian, is the "indispensable man" at the center of this creeping UN power grab. Not that Mr. Strong looks particularly indispensable. Indeed, he exudes a kind of negative charisma. He is a grey, short, soft-voiced man with a salt-andpepper toothbrush mustache who wouldnt rate a second glance if you passed him on the street. Yet his remarkable career has led him from boyhood poverty in Manitoba to the highest councils of international government. Among the hats he currently wears are: Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan Senior Advisor to World Bank President James Wolfensohn Chairman of the Earth Council Chairman of the World Resources Institute Co-Chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum member of Toyotas International Advisory Board As advisor to Kofi Annan, he is overseeing the new UN reforms. Yet his most prominent and influential role to date was as Secretary General of the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development - the so-called Earth Summit - held in Rio de Janeiro, which gave a significant push to global economic and environmental regulation. "Hes dangerous because hes a much smarter and shrewder man [than many in the UN system]," comments Charles Lichenstein, deputy ambassador to the UN under President Reagan. "I think he is a very dangerous ideologue, way over to the Left." "This guy is kind of the global Ira Magaziner," says Ted Galen Carpenter, vice president for defense and foreign-policy studies at the Cato Institute. "If he is whispering in Kofi Annans ear this is no good at all." Strong attracts such mystified suspicion because he is difficult to pin down. He told Macleans in 1976 that he was "a socialist in ideology, a capitalist in methodology." And his career combines oil deals with the likes of Adnan Khashoggi with links to the environmentalist Left. He is in fact one of a new political breed: the bi-sectoral entrepreneur who uses business success

for leverage in politics, and vice versa. Strong started in the oil business in the 1950s. He took over and turned around some small ailing energy companies in the 1960s, and he was president of a major holding company -- the Power Corporation of Canada -- by the age of 35. This was success by any standard. Yet on more than one occasion (including once in Whos Who), Strong has been caught exaggerating. He claimed, for instance, to have forfeited a $200,000 salary when he left Power. The real figure, said a company officer, was $35,000. Why this myth-making? Well, a CEO is just a CEO -- but a whiz-kid is a potential cabinet officer. And it is in politics that Strongs talents really shine. He is the Michelangelo of networking. He early made friends in high places in Canadas Liberal Party -- including Paul Martin Sr., Canadas externalaffairs minister in the Sixties -- and kept them as business partners in oil and real-estate ventures. He cultivated bright well-connected young people -- like Paul Martin Jr., Canadas present finance minister and the smart moneys bet to succeed Jean Chretien as prime minister -- and salted them throughout his various political and business networks to form a virtual private intelligence service. And he always seemed to know what the next political trend would be -- foreign aid, Canadian economic nationalism, environmentalism. In 1966, by now a Liberal favorite, Strong became head of the Canadian International Development Agency and thus was launched internationally. Impressed by his work at CIDA, UN Secretary General U Thant asked him to organize what became the first Earth Summit - the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment in 1972. The next year, Strong became first director of the new UN Environment Program, created as a result of Stockholm. And in 1975, he was invited back to Canada to run the semi-national Petro-Canada, created by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau in the wake of OPECs oil shocks. Petro-Canada was a sop to Canadas anti-American Left, then denouncing American ownership of the countrys oil companies. Strong talked a good economic-nationalist game -- but he himself was a major reason why Canadas oil companies were U.S.-owned. Ten years before, while at Power Corporation, he had enabled Shell to take over the only remaining all-Canadian oil company by throwing a controlling block of shares in its direction. As Macleans wrote, he now returned "amid fanfares" to rectify this. After a couple of years, Strong left Petro-Canada for various business deals, including one with Adnan Khashoggi through which he ended up owning the 200,000-acre Baca ranch in Colorado, now a "New Age" center run by his wife, Hanne. (Among the seekers at Baca are Zen and Tibetan Buddhist monks, a breakaway order of Carmelite nuns, and followers of a Hindu guru called Babaji.) Not for long the joys of contemplation, however. In 1985, he was back as executive coordinator of the UN Office for Emergency Operations in Africa, in charge of running the $3.5-billion famine-relief effort in Somalia and Ethiopia. And in 1989, he was appointed Secretary General of the Earth Summit -- shortly thereafter flying down to Rio. Strongs flexibility, however, must not be mistaken for open-mindedness. His friends, his allies among Canadian Liberals, his networks in the UN and the Third World, even his long-term business partners (like the late Paul Nathanson, wartime treasurer of the Canadian-Soviet Friendship Committee) all lean Left. He has said the Depression left him "frankly very radical." And given his ability to get things done, the consistency of his support for a world managed by bureaucrats is alarming. As Elaine Dewar wrote in Torontos Saturday Night magazine: It is instructive to read Strongs 1972 Stockholm speech and compare it with the issues of Earth Summit 1992. Strong warned urgently about global warming, the devastation of forests, the loss of biodiversity, polluted oceans, the population time bomb. Then as now, he invited to the conference the brand-new environmental NGOs [non-governmental organizations]: he gave them money to come; they were invited to raise hell at home. After Stockholm, environment issues became part of the administrative framework in Canada, the U.S., Britain, and Europe. IN the meantime, Strong continued the international networking on which his influence rests.

He became a member of the World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission). He found time to serve as president of the World Federation of United Nations Associations, on the executive committee of the Society for International Development, and as an advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Wildlife Fund. Above all, he served on the Commission on Global Governance -- which, as we shall see, plays a crucial part in the international power grab. Sometimes, indeed, it seems that Strongs network of contacts must rival the Internet. To list a few: Vice President Al Gore. (Of course) World Bank President James Wolfensohn, formerly on the Rockefeller Foundation Board and currently on the Population Council Board; he was Al Gores favored candidate for the World Bank position James Gustave Speth, head of the Carter Administrations Council on Environmental Quality, crafter of the doomladen Global 2000 report, member of the Clinton - Gore transition team; he now heads the UN Development Program Shridath Ramphal, formerly Secretary General of the (British) Commonwealth, now Co-Chairman of the Commission on Global Governance Jonathan Lash, President of the World Resources Institute -- which works closely with the World Bank, the UN Environment Program, and the UN Development Program -- and Co-Chairman of the Presidents Council on Sustainable Development Ingvar Carlsson, former Swedish prime minister and Co-Chairman of the Commission on Global Governance. But Strong is no snob; he even counts Republican Presidents among his friends. Elaine Dewar again: Strong blurted out that hed almost been shut out of the Earth Summit by people at the State Department. They had been overruled by the White House because George Bush knew him. He said that hed donated some $100,000 to the Democrats and a slightly lesser amount to the Republicans in 1988. (The Republicans didnt confirm.) I had been absolutely astonished. I mean yes, he had done a great deal of business in the U.S., but how could he have managed such contributions? Well, hed had a green card. The governor of Colorado had suggested it to him. A lawyer in Denver had told him how. But why? Id asked. "Because I wanted influence in the United States." So Strong gave political contributions (of dubious legality) to both parties; George Bush, now a friend, intervened to help him stay in charge of the Rio conference; he was thereby enabled to set a deep green agenda there; and Bush took a political hit in an election year. An instructive tale -- if it is not part of Strongs mythmaking. Most of Strongs friends are more obviously compatible, which may explain why they tend to overlap in their institutional commitments. For example, James Wolfensohn (whom Strong had hired out of Harvard in the early Sixties to run an Australian subsidiary of one of his companies) appointed him as his senior advisor almost immediately upon being named chairman of the World Bank. "Id been involved in... Stockholm, which Maurice Strong arranged," says Wolfensohn, who, more recently, has been credited with co-drafting (with Mikhail Gorbachev) the Earth Charter presented for consideration at the Rio + 5 meeting in Brazil earlier this year. As head of the Earth Council, Maurice Strong chaired that meeting. Its not a conspiracy, of course: just a group of like-minded people fighting to save the world from less prescient and more selfish forces -namely, market forces. And though the crises change -- World War II in the Forties, fear of the atom bomb in the Fifties, the "energy crisis" in the Seventies -- the Lefts remedy is always the same: a greater role for international agencies. Today an allegedly looming global environmental catastrophe is behind their efforts to increase the power of the UN. Strong has warned memorably:

"If we dont change, our species will not survive... Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse." Apocalypse soon - unless international bodies save us from ourselves. LAST week, Secretary General Annan unveiled Maurice Strongs plan for reorganizing the UN. To be sure, the notoriously corrupt and inefficient UN bureaucracy could do with some shaking up. Strongs plan, however, mostly points in a different direction - one drawn from a document, Our Global Neighborhood, devised by the interestingly named Commission on Global Governance. The CGG was established in 1992, after Rio, at the suggestion of Willy Brandt, former West German chancellor and head of the Socialist International. Then Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali endorsed it. The CGG naturally denies advocating the sort of thing that fuels militia nightmares. "We are not proposing movement toward a world government," reassuringly write Co-Chairmen Ingvar Carlsson and Shridath Ramphal, "... [but] this is not to say that the goal should be a world without systems or rules." Quite so. As Hofstra University law professor Peter Spiro describes it: "The aim is not a superstate but rather the establishment of norm-creating multilateral regimes . . . This construct already constrains state action in the context of human rights and environmental protection and is on a springboard in other areas." The concept of global governance has been fermenting for some time. In 1991, the Club of Rome (of which Strong is, of course, a member) issued a report called The First Global Revolution, which asserted that current problems, "are essentially global and cannot be solved through individual country initiatives [which] gives a greatly enhanced importance to the United Nations and other international systems." Also in 1991 Strong claimed that the Earth Summit, of which he was Secretary General, would play an important role in, "reforming and strengthening the United Nations as the centerpiece of the emerging system of democratic global governance." In 1995, in Our Global Neighborhood, the CGG agreed: "It is our firm conclusion that the United Nations must continue to play a central role in global governance." Americans should be worried by the Commissions recommendations: for instance, that some UN activities be funded through taxes on foreign-exchange transactions and multinational corporations. Economist James Tobin estimates that a 0.5 per cent tax on foreign-exchange transactions would raise $1.5 trillion annually - nearly equivalent to the U.S. federal budget. It also recommended that "user fees" might be imposed on companies operating in the "global commons." Such fees might be collected on international airline tickets, ocean shipping, deep-sea fishing, activities in Antarctica, geostationary satellite orbits, and electromagnetic spectrum. But the big enchilada is carbon taxes, which would be levied on all fuels made from coal, oil, and natural gas. "A carbon tax," the report deadpans, "... would yield very large revenues indeed." Given the UNs record of empire-building and corruption, Catos Ted Carpenter warns: "One can only imagine the degree of mischief it could get into if it had independent sources of revenue." Especially significant for the U.S. was the CGGs proposal for eventual elimination of the veto held by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. The Commission knew that the current permanent members of the Security Council, including the U.S., would not easily surrender their vetoes, and so it recommended a two-stage process. In the first stage, five new permanent members (without a veto) would be added to the Security Council - probably Japan, Germany, Brazil, India, and Nigeria -- along with three new slots for non-permanent members. But the real threat to U.S. interests is the second stage: "a full review of the membership of the Council... around 2005, when the veto can be phased out."

These plans are advancing. In March, the president of the UN General Assembly, Razali Ismail of Malayasia, unveiled his own formula for reforming the Security Council. It closely tracks the CGGs proposals. In particular, Razali proposed, "urg[ing] the original permanent members to limit use of the veto... and not to extend [it] to new permanent members." He wanted to make the veto "progressively and politically untenable" and recommended that these arrangements be reviewed in ten years. In July the State Department compromised -- accepting five new Security Council members but remaining silent on the veto. It plainly hopes that the veto issue will go away if the U.S. concedes on enlarging the Council. Yet the CGGs report makes clear that we are facing a rolling agenda to expand the power of UN bureaucrats. The veto issue may be postponed for ten years -- but what then? "This is an initiative that should be resisted by the United States with special vehemence," says Ted Carpenter. For if the veto were eliminated, the United States would face the prospect of having other countries make key determinations that affect us without our consent. The Commission also wants to strengthen "global civil society," which, it explains, "is best expressed in the global non-governmental movement." Today, there are nearly 15,000 NGOs. More than 1,200 of them have consultative status with the UNs Economic and Social Council (up from 41 in 1948). The CGG wants NGOs to be brought formally into the UN system (no wonder Kenneth Minogue calls this Acronymia). So it proposes that representatives of such organizations be accredited to the General Assembly as "Civil Society Organizations" and convened in an annual Forum of Civil Society. But how would these representatives be selected? This June, the General Assembly held a session on environmental issues called Earth Summit +5. President Razali selected a number of representatives from the NGOs and the private sector for the exclusive privilege of speaking in the plenary sessions. "I have gone to a lot of trouble with this, choosing the right NGOs," he declared. So whom did he choose? Among others: Thilo Bode, executive director of Greenpeace, to represent the scientific and technological community Yolanda Kakabadse, the president of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature "from the farmers, I have chosen an organic farmer, Denise OBrien from the United States, who is a member of the Via Campesina." In what sense are these people "representative"? Whom do they represent? Were the head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the chairman of Toshiba, and the president of the Farm Bureau all too busy to come talk to the General Assembly? Another example of how this selection process operates was the "great civil society forum" convened at the behest of Strongs Earth Council and Mikhail Gorbachevs Green Cross International this past March. Some five hundred delegates met, supposedly to assess the results of the Earth Summit, but in reality to condemn the "inaction" of signatory countries in implementing the Rio treaties. The delegates were selected through a process based on national councils for sustainable development, themselves set up pursuant to the Earth Summit. Membership in these councils means that an organization is already persuaded of the global environmental crisis. So you can bet that the process did not yield many delegates representing business or advocating limits on government power. This kind of international gabfest is, of course, a sinister parody of democracy. "Very few of even the larger international NGOs are operationally democratic, in the sense that members elect officers or direct policy on particular issues," notes Peter Spiro. "Arguably it is more often money than membership that determines influence, and money more often represents the support of centralized elites, such as major foundations, than of the grass roots."

(The CGG has benefited substantially from the largesse of the MacArthur, Carnegie, and Ford Foundations.) Hilary French, Vice President of the alarmist Worldwatch Institute, justifies this revealingly as, "a paradox of our time . . . that effective governance requires control being simultaneously passed down to local communities and up to international institutions." Paradoxically or not, the voters hardly appear in this model of governance. It bypasses national governments and representative democracy in order to empower the sort of people who are willing to sit in committee meetings to the bitter end. Those who have better things to do - businessmen, workers, moms - would be the losers in the type of centralized decentralization envisioned by Worldwatch. The result would be decisions reached by self-selecting elites. In domestic politics, we have a name for such elite groups - special interests. ANOTHER CGG recommendation is that the old UN Trusteeship Council "be given a new mandate over the global commons." It defines the global commons to include the atmosphere, outer space, the oceans beyond national jurisdiction, and the related environmental systems that contribute to the support of human life. A new Trusteeship Council would oversee, "the management of the commons, including development and use of their resources... [and] the administration of environmental treaties in such fields as climate change, biodiversity, outer space, and the Law of the Sea." It is hard to see what this expansive definition would exclude from the jurisdiction of the Trusteeship Council. Biodiversity encompasses all the plants and animals on the earth, including those that live in your backyard. Will UN troops swoop in to stop you from cutting down trees on your property? Doubtless not. But a recent case near Yellowstone National Park may be a foretaste of how international agencies can meddle in U.S. domestic affairs. Yellowstone has been designated a "World Heritage Site." These Sites are natural settings or cultural monuments recognized by the World Heritage Committee of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as having "outstanding universal value." Sites are designated under a Convention ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1973, and it is possible to place such sites on a "List of World Heritage Sites in Danger." In this case, a mining company wanted to construct a gold mine outside the boundaries of Yellowstone. The normal environmental review of the projects impact was still proceeding under U.S. law. But a group of environmentalist NGOs opposed to the mine were not content to wait for that review to take its course. They asked that members of the World Heritage Committee come to Yellowstone to hold public hearings. George Frampton, the Clinton Administrations Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, wrote to the WHC saying: "The Secretary [Bruce Babbitt] and the National Park Service have clearly expressed strong reservations with the New World Mine proposal." Frampton added: "We believe that a potential danger to the values of the Park and surrounding waters and fisheries exists and that the committee should be informed that the property as inscribed on the . . . List is in danger." Four officials of the WHC duly came to Yellowstone and held hearings. And at its December 1995 meeting in Berlin, the Committee obligingly voted to list Yellowstone as a "World Heritage Site in Danger." "It was, in my opinion, a blatantly political act," declared Rep. Barbara Cubin (R., Wyo.) during congressional hearings about the listing. "It was done to draw attention, public reaction, public response, and public pressure to see that the mine wasnt developed." Jeremy Rabkin, a Cornell political scientist, agrees that the international listing of such sites "provides an international forum through which to put pressure on U.S. policy." Would the mine really have endangered Yellowstone? Well never know. The environmental-impact statement was never issued, and, under pressure, the mining company accepted a $65-million federal

buyout plus a trade for unspecified federal lands somewhere else. Thus, even with no enforcement power, this UN dependency was able to make land-use policy for the United States. These events prompted Rep. Don Young (R., Alaska) to introduce the American Land Sovereignty Act. With 174 co-sponsors to date, the Act aims to "preserve sovereignty of the United States over public lands and... to preserve State sovereignty and private property rights in non-federal lands surrounding those public lands." Congress would have to approve on a case-by-case basis land designations made pursuant to any international agreements. But is U.S. sovereignty really in danger? In an interview, Strong dismissed Youngs anxieties. "I do not share his concern. It is no abdication of sovereignty to exercise it in company with others, and when youre dealing with global issues thats what you have to do." He continues: "If you put yourself in a larger unit, of course, you get some advantages and you give up some of your freedom. And thats whats happening in Europe, that the states of Europe have decided that overall theyre better off to create a structure in which they give up some of their national rights and exercise them collectively through the Union." This example of the European Union, however, worries Ambassador Lichenstein. The EUs bureaucracy in Brussels, he complains, "is responsible to no one. Governments get together -- foreign ministers, finance ministers -- they presumably hand down the guidelines, but dont kid yourself, the bureaucrats are running things." The Yellowstone case is an example of how "feel-good" symbolism about the environment can be transformed into real constraints upon real people imposed outside the law, with no democratic oversight and no means of redress. Ironically, Strong himself had a run-in with Colorado environmentalists over local water rights. They did not have the wit to call in an international agency against the New Age rancher -- or maybe they realized that Strong was one property owner whose rights the UN would respect. As troubling as the Yellowstone incident is, much greater potential for mischief lies in a new series of "framework treaties" designed to handle global environmental issues. Initially, the treaties called for voluntary actions by governments and set up a consultative process. But environmental activists like Hilary French know very well how this process works. "Even though it can look disappointing, the political will created [by these framework conventions] can lead to commitments of a more binding nature," she said. This is already happening. "Although its declaration of principles was transparently aspirational, the 1972 Stockholm world conference on the human environment is generally recognized as a turning point in international environmental-protection efforts," wrote Peter Spiro. "From it emerged a standing institution (the UN Environment Program); weak but more focused framework treaties followed, which in turn are being filled out by specific regulatory regimes. The 1985 Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer itself included no obligations, but the 1987 Montreal protocols and subsequent amendments set a full phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ozone-depleting substances by 1996. The regime covers 132 signatories with a total population of 4.7 billion people. Between 1987 and 1991, global CFC consumption was in fact reduced by half. A similar filling-out process is likely to occur with the biodiversity and climate-change conventions signed at Rio." The "conventions" that Spiro was talking about emerged from the Earth Summit chaired by Maurice Strong. They deal with two of the alleged global environmental crises -- global warming and species extinction. At the time of the Earth Summit, some scientists predicted on the basis of climate computer models that the earths average temperature would increase by 4 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century because of the "greenhouse effect." These predictions are controversial among scientists. And as the computer models are refined, they show that the atmosphere will warm far less than originally predicted. Furthermore, more accurate satellite measurements show no increase in the average global temperature over the last two decades.

Finally, an important study published in Nature concluded that even if the warming predictions are right, it could well be less costly to allow greenhouse gas emissions to continue to rise for a decade or more because technological innovations and judicious capital investment will make it possible to reduce them far more cheaply at some point before they become a significant problem. In other words, we neednt take drastic and costly action now. The process forges ahead anyway. The Framework Convention on Global Climate Change signed by President George Bush at the Rio Earth Summit is already beginning to harden. Initially, countries were supposed voluntarily to reduce by the year 2000 the "greenhouse gases" to the level emitted in 1990. Then, a year ago, at a UN climate-change meeting in Geneva, the Clinton Administration offered to set legally binding limits on the greenhouse gases the United States can emit. In June of this year, at the UNs Earth Summit +5 session, President Clinton reaffirmed this commitment. And mandatory limits on carbon emissions are to be finalized at a global meeting of Convention signatories in Kyoto this December. Estimates of the costs to the United States of cutting emissions range from $90 billion to $400 billion annually in lost Gross Domestic Product and a loss of between 600,000 and 3.5 million jobs. Global costs would be proportionately higher. Yet while the U.S. may be committing itself to limits, 130 developing nations, including China and India, are excluded under the Framework Convention from having to reduce their emissions, which, on present trends, will outstrip those of the industrialized world early in the next century. If the U.S. and other industrial countries have to limit energy use while the Third World is exempt, many industries will simply decamp to where energy prices are significantly lower. If they are permitted to do so. For, as Sen. Chuck Hagel (R., Neb.) asked at a conference on "The Costs of Kyoto" held by the Competitive Enterprise Institute: "Who will administer a global climate treaty?... Will we have an international agency capable of inspecting, fining, and possibly shutting down American companies?" Sen. Hagel is not alone is his concern. In July the U.S. Senate passed 95 to 0 a resolution urging the Clinton Administration not to make binding concessions at the Kyoto conference. But the climate-change treaty is not the only threat to U.S. interests. Though Mr. Bush refused to sign the Bio-diversity Convention at the Rio Earth Summit -- chaired, remember, by GOP contributor Strong - that only delayed things. The Clinton Administration signed shortly after its inauguration. Since the treaty obliges signatories to protect plant and animal species through habitat preservation, its implementation could make the World Heritage Committees activities on U.S. land use seem pennyante by comparison. MEANWHILE, how much further down the path sketched out by the CGG will the UN reforms developed by Maurice Strong and announced by Kofi Annan last week take us? The most important initiative is the recommendation that the General Assembly organize a "Millennium Assembly" and a companion "Peoples Assembly" in the year 2000. (The "Peoples Assembly" mirrors the CGGs "Civil Society Forum" idea -- among other things, only accredited NGOs would be invited to advise the General Assembly.) But what would these grand new bodies actually do? The Millennium Assembly would invite, "heads of Government... to articulate their vision of prospects and challenges for the new millennium and agree on a process for fundamental review of the role of the United Nations." That last innocuous phrase is diplomatese for opening up the UN Charter for amendment. If that happens, so could anything -- notably eliminating the veto in the Security Council. The Millennium Assembly would also consider adopting Strongs Earth Charter. For the most part the Charter reads like another feel-good document -- its draft says that "we must reinvent industrialtechnological civilization" and promises everybody a clean environment, equitable incomes, and an end

to cruelty to animals -- but we have seen how such vacuous symbolism can have real consequences down the line. Inevitably, the Charter advocates that, "the nations of the world should adopt as a first step an international convention that provides an integrated legal framework for existing and future environmental and sustainable-development law and policy." This is, of course, a charter for endless intervention in the internal affairs of independent states. Which leaves external affairs. Hey presto! In line with the CGGs plan, Annan/Strong urge that the UN Trusteeship Council, "be reconstituted as the forum through which member states exercise their collective trusteeship for the integrity of the global environment and common areas such as the oceans, atmosphere, and outer space." For the time being, however, Annan and Strong have avoided calling for global taxes or user fees to finance the UN. One spokesman said that the issue was simply "too hot to handle right now." What they propose is a Revolving Credit Fund of $1 billion so that the UN will have a source of operating funds even if a major contributor (e.g., the U.S.) withholds contributions for a time. In short, the CGGs blueprint for a more powerful UN closely resembles the movement to expand the requirements of the Framework Convention on Global Climate Change. While the process may be piecemeal, the goal is clear: a more powerful set of international institutions, increasingly emancipated from the control of the major powers, increasingly accountable not to representative democratic institutions but to unelected bureaucracies, and increasingly exercising authority over how people, companies, and governments run their affairs -- not just Americans, but everyone. In short, Col. Qaddafis definition of his leftist Green Revolution: "Committees Everywhere." If so, the future looks good for Maurice Strong. One UN source suggested that, at the very least, he would like to be made Secretary General of the Millennium Assembly or the Peoples Assembly. Others suspect that, even at age 68, Strong is angling to be the next UN Secretary General. Such eminence may help explain a puzzling incident in his early career. Having long had political ambitions, he decided to enter the Canadian Parliament. A candidate was evicted from a safe constituency by the Liberal leadership, and Strong moved in. Then, with only a month to go before the 1979 election, he suddenly pulled out of the race. Strongs business deals were especially complicated at the time -- he was setting up a Swiss oil-and-gas exploration company with partners that included the Kuwaiti Finance Minister and the Arab Petroleum Investment Corporation -- and that is the explanation usually given. But maybe he just decided that for a man who wants power, elections are an unnecessary obstacle.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock04b.htm