Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Thesis submitted to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of
By MANUNATHA N.
DEPARTMENT OF SEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, DHARWAD UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES DHARWAD 580 005 NOVEMBER, 2008
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
DHARWAD NOVEMBER, 2008
Members :
1.
(M. N. MERWADE)
2.
(RUDRA NAIK V.)
3.
(DODDAMANI M. B.)
CONTENTS
Sl. No. CERTIFICATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF APPENDICES 1. 2. INTRODUCTION REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1 Paper factory effluents 2.2 Dairy effluents 2.3 Distillery effluents 2.4 Sewage and sludge effluents 2.5 Textile effluents 2.6 Pharmaceutical effluents 2.7 Treated effluents 2.8 Fertilizer factory effluents 3. MATERIAL AND METHODS 3.1 General description 3.2 Experimental details 3.3 Recording of observations 3.4 Statistical analysis Chapter particulars
Chapter particulars
4.1 Experiment-I: Influence of industrial effluent concentrations on seed quality of cereal crops 4.2 Experiment II Varietal response to industrial effluents on seed quality 5. DISCUSSION 5.1 Influence of industrial effluent concentrations on seed quality of cereal crops 5.2 Varietal response to industrial effluents on seed quality 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 6.1 Experiment-I: Influence of industrial effluent concentrations on seed quality of cereal crops 6.2 Experiment-II: Varietal response to industrial effluents on seed quality REFERENCES APPENDICES
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. 3.01 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19. 4.20. Title Physical and chemical properties of industrial effluents Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Maize Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Sorghum Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Paddy Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Wheat Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Bajra Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Maize Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Sorghum Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Paddy Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Wheat Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Bajra Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka milk federation- Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Maize Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Sorghum Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Paddy Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Wheat Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka milk federation- Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Bajra Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Maize Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Sorghum Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Paddy Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Wheat Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Bajra
Table No. 4.21 4.22 4.23 4.24 4.25 4.26 4.27 4.28 4.29 4.30 4.31 4.32 4.33 4.34 4.35 4.36 4.37 4.38 4.39 4.40
Title Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Maize Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Sorghum Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Paddy Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Wheat Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Bajra Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage, root length (cm) and shoot length (cm) Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10seedlings) Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and first count of germination (%) Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage, root length (cm) and shoot length (cm) Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10seedlings) Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and first count of germination (%) Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage, root length (cm) and shoot length (cm) Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and first count of germination (%) Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination, root length (cm) and shoot length(cm) Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for seedling length (cm), Seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and first count of germination (%) Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination (%), root length (cm) and shoot length (cm) Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germiantion, Bartletts germination rate index and first count of germination (%)
LIST OF FIGURES
Title
Influence of industrial factory effluent of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli on germination percentage of cereal crop seeds Influence of industrial factory effluent of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag on germination percentage of cereal crop seeds Influence of industrial factory effluent of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad on germination percentage of cereal crop seeds Influence of industrial factory effluent of Pumpsagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary on germination percentage of cereal crop seeds Influence of industrial factory effluent of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag on germination percentage of cereal crop seeds Influence of different industrial effluents on germination percentage of maize varieties Influence of different industrial effluents on germination percentage of sorghum varieties Influence of different industrial effluents on germination percentage of paddy varieties Influence of different industrial effluents on germination percentage of wheat varieties Influence of different industrial effluents on germination percentage of bajra varieties
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
5.07
5.08
5.09
5.10
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix No. 1 Title
ISI standards for discharge of industrial effluents (all the values except pH, temperature are in mg/l)
1. INTRODUCTION
Water is at first place in the priority list of basic necessities of life on our planet earth. The available fresh water to man is hardly 0.3 to 0.5 per cent of the total water (2.4 %) supply on earth and therefore, its judicious use is important. Growth of population, massive urbanization, rapid rate of industrialization and introduction of modern technology in agriculture and animal husbandry lead to water pollution which subsequently results in gradual deterioration of quality of water. The wastes or effluents from urban areas and industries are largely disposed of in rivers, streams and lakes, which are otherwise chief sources of water for agriculture, industries, aquiline life apart from for the domestic purposes. Efficient utilization of water and land resources is crucial to crop production for meeting the challenge of feeding the ever increasing human population. Besides meeting the food requirement, the modern agriculture is also responsible for development of large number of industries especially the agro-based industries. Although industrialization is believed to be an index of modernization, it has its unavoidable effects on pollution of air, water and soil depending upon the type of industries, nature of raw material used and manufacturing processes involved. Since the industrialization and pollution are complementary to each other, necessary steps are to be taken for disposal of the pollutants. Green revolution in India has brought a phenomenal rise in fertilizer consumption from 0.75 million tonnes to 18 million tonnes during 2000 (Anon., 2000). Yet nutrient supply is the major constraint in the development of Indian agriculture and the cost of organic fertilizers are also increasing due to excess mining of the nutrients as well. It is well known fact that in the present day there is a limited availability of organic manure in agriculture due to population explosion, intensive agriculture, reduction in livestock population etc. Therefore, the judicious application of nutrients is essential to keep the soil fertile and to make the agriculture sustainable. Other fact is that the plant takes up 17 elements of which C, H, O are available freely in nature, but remaining 14 elements have to be provided through soil only. But what is in practice is application of NPK and that too not in balance. The rest of 10 elements which are normally supplemented through organic sources are not being adopted due to non-availability, labour expensive, etc. This calls for use of alternate sources of nutrients in agriculture. Effluents from industries are normally considered as the main industrial pollutants containing organic and inorganic compounds, acids, alkalies, suspended solids and other materials. When untreated effluents are discharged in to the environment, they disrupt the ecological niches of living organisms. Among such industries, pulp and paper industries consume large quantity of good quality water. In India, there are about 371 paper and paper board factories with an installed capacity of 93.7 million tonnes per annum (Gupta, 1995). The production of one tonne of paper requires 250 tonnes of water. These effluents contain lignin and other phenolic compounds resistant to decomposition, have high biological oxygen demand, possess large amount of sodium and other salts and are alkaline in nature. Therefore, direct disposal of effluents into the water bodies and land possess some harmful effects to the eco-system. On the other hand, disposal of treated effluents, posses some beneficial effects to the ecosystem. It is a well known fact that with the increase in concentration of soluble salts, the electrical conductivity of the soil treated with undiluted effluents would be maximum. It is also obvious that soil pH could increase when alkaline effluent is irrigated to the soil. A larger amount of suspended and dissolved solids increases the BOD and COD of the soil. Direct use of effluent water to the crops results in significantly poor germination, lesser seedling growth and vigour index. This might be due to the presence of greater amounts of Ca, Mg and other solid materials in the effluents. The alkaline pulp and paper mill effluents have been recommended for amendment of acidic soils, but their long-term effect happens to be injurious for soil fertility and this aspect has been not studied in detail. In certain cases, the diluted effluents enhanced the growth of the plants which might be due to the presence of phenolic compounds rendering the beneficial effect on the plant growth. Among many industries, distillery units producing alcohol is one of the major revenue earning enterprise for government. Alcohol is produced from sugarcane molasses. During
recent years, India has emerged as the largest sugar producer of the world. Looking to the present scenario as well as future, demand for alcohol will increase in the country and so also the number of distilleries producing alcohol. Presently, there are 285 distilleries in India (AIDA, 1995) and the annual alcohol production in India has reached 2.7 billion tonnes. The distillery effluent being a sugarcane plant extract, it hardly contains any heavy metals and other toxic substances (Eyini et al., 1993) and it is also known to contain many plant nutrients (Manonmani et al., 1980), making it as a potential substance for irrigation and nutrition but it is characterized by high biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand. The distillery sludge is reported to have high qualities of both macro and micro nutrients (Miller, 1973). It is reported that distillery effluent irrigation decreases the rate of infiltration and bulk density of soil which are favourable traits for sandy soils. Distillery effluent can be used for -1 irrigating maize crop with five times dilution (1000 mg BOD level) which has positive effect on crop growth and productivity. The direct use of distillery effluent has deleterious effect on germination and performance of crops due to its excess amounts of cations and anions. Another agro based industry is dairy industry physico-chemical characteristics and fertilizing efficiency of dairy effluent is highly alkaline in nature and contains large amounts of suspended and dissolved solids resulting in high BOD (3892 mg/l) and COD (9682 mg/l) (Goutam and Bishnoi, 1990a). All the agro-based and non-agro-based industries like paper, distillery, plastics, diary, surgical, pharmaceutical, textile, dyeing, tannery, cardbodary industries, etc. have deleterious effects on agriculture and ecosystem when they are directly disposed off. But their beneficial effects can be achieved by disposal of treated effluents. The quality of irrigation water is important in judging its suitability for irrigation. According to specification prescribed by Bureau of Indian Standards (IS : 2490-1974), the Industrial effluents discharged into in land surface waters should not have biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) more than 30 mg/l, pH 5.5 to 9.0, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids not more than 250 mg/l and 100 mg /l respectively. The prescribed limits for those discharges on land for irrigation are 500 mg/l for BOD, 5.5 to 9.0 for pH, 600 mg/l and 60 per cent for chloride, sulphate and sodium respectively (IS : 3307-1977) (Appendix I). Seed germination and growth are vital for continuation of life of seeds and seedlings are extremely vulnerable to environmental stresses due to presence of polluting agents in the environment especially during seed hydration period which is very important for irrigation and triggering the intricate sequences of metabolism essential for germination and growth of seedlings. The effect of industrial effluents on growth and yield parameters of agricultural crops and soil properties has been extensively studied. But only few studies are made to find out the effect of industrial effluents on germination. Hence considering all the beneficial and harmful effects of industrial effluents on crop plants, the seed technological studies were conducted by using industrial effluents obtained from five different industries of Northern Karnataka as a source of water to find out the seed quality attributes of five different cereal crops with a following four objectives: 1. To find out the optimum dilution level for different industrial effluents to use them as low cost fertilizers for different cereal crops. 2. To find out the tolerance levels of seeds of different cereal crops to different industrial effluents. 3. To find out the suitable industrial effluents for commercial growing of cereal seeds. 4. To find out the varietal response to different industrial effluents for seed quality parameters.
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The literature pertaining to the nature and characterization of industrial effluents and their influence on crop performance has been reviewed and presented in this chapter. The research studies carried out on the effect of industrial effluents on seed quality of cereal crops have also been reviewed and presented in this chapter.
Somashekar et al. (1984) studied the effect of paper industry effluent on jowar, bajra and paddy. The effluents were diluted up to 50 per cent and 25 per cent concentration. The germination percentage of control seeds except paddy was above 90 per cent. Effluents of paper factory almost completely inhibited germination of paddy seeds and even at 25 per cent concentration, the germination percentage was significantly less. The inhibition of germination of jowar, bajra, and paddy seeds in treatment with 100 per cent of effluents were 31, 38 and 82 per cent, respectively. The values come down 27, 26 and 75 per cent in case of 25 per cent effluents. Hence it is clear that the per cent inhibition is directly proportional to the concentration of the effluents and germination being highest at 25 per cent concentration. The vigour index of all the three crop plants was significantly poor in undiluted effluents and it increased with a decrease in their concentration. Dhevagi et al. (2000) studied the effect of paper mill effluent on spermosphere microflore of maize, sunflower, greengram, blackgram, soybean and groundnut with different dilution levels. Among these crops studied, groundnut recorded the maximum microbial population (104.1 x 106-1g of soil), followed by soybean (50.7 x 106-1g of soil). In case of blackgram, greengram, and soybean up to 100 per cent effluent concentration, the total microbial population was higher than the control. As the effluent concentration increases in case of maize, blackgram, greengram, soybean and sunflower, the population load as well as the germination percentage of the seeds also increased till 50 to 75 per cent effluent concentration. The reason for more number of microbes at lower concentrations was pointed to the reduced level of toxic metabolites due to dilution factor. Dhevagi and Oblisami (2000) noticed that paper factory raw effluent (as such) affected the germination percentage to the level of 19, 5.4, 13 and 9.9 per cent for the maize, groundnut, soybean and blackgram respectively. It is because the effluent analysis showed the presence of lower concentration of major organic nutrients and higher EC which has negative correlation with seed germination. Elarajan et al. (2006) recorded germination of rice, maize, sunflower, groundnut, balckgram and greengram with different dilution levels of paper factory effluents. a) Rice (CO 47): Raw effluent diluted with water in 1:3 ratio recorded 78.5 per cent germination, while it was reduced to 61.2 per cent in case of undiluted effluent. Root length of 7.1 cm was observed in raw effluent with water in 1:3 ratio. Lowest root length of 5.5 cm was observed in undiluted raw effluent. There was no significant difference in shoot length in raw effluent with water 1:3 ratio and 1:1 ratio. Control (0% effluent or water) recorded significantly highest germination percentage, root length, shoot length and vigour index followed by effluent treated with water in 1:3 ratio than raw effluent. b) Maize (CO-1): In undiluted effluent, the seeds showed only 64.6 per cent germination, and 7.8 cm and 6.2cm of root and shoot lengths respectively with decreased vigour index. In the treated effluent of 1:3 ratio, 85.5 per cent germination was observed with 9.5 cm root length, 8.3 cm shoot length and highest vigour index than the raw effluent. c) Sunflower (K-1): Sunflower performed better in treated effluent than raw effluent. Raw effluent diluted with water in 1:3 ratio recorded 65.1 per cent germination, while treated effluent with the same treatment recorded 83.2 per cent germination. Treated effluent diluted with 1:3 ratio recorded the highest shoot length of 3.5 cm, shoot length of 5.4 cm which wais on par with 1:1 ratio and control. d) Groundnut (VRI-2): The lowest germination percentage was observed in undiluted raw effluent (80.30 %) followed by the undiluted treated effluent (83.80 %). Treated effluent with water in 1:1 ratio recorded root length of 10.6 cm, which significantly differed from the rest of the treatments. The undiluted raw effluent drastically affected the root length (7.8 cm), whereas the highest root length (10.6 cm) was observed in raw effluent diluted with water to 1:3 ratio. The highest shoot length (10.3 cm) was observed in raw effluent diluted with water in 1:3 followed by effluent with water with 1:1 ratio (9.1 cm) and the least (6.9 cm) was in raw effluent. The highest and lowest values of shoot length in treated effluent being 10.1 cm and 8.6 cm in 1:1 and control, respectively. Very low vigour index of 1180 was observed in undiluted raw effluent whereas raw effluent with water in 1:3 ratio recorded the highest.
e) Blackgram (T-9): In case of blackgram, raw effluent diluted with water in 1:1 ratio recorded 81.2 per cent germination, while the germination of undiluted raw effluent was 74.5 per cent followed by the raw effluent with 3:1 ratio. The lowest root length of 3.7 cm was recorded in control. Treated effluent diluted with water in 1:1 ratio recorded the highest shoot length of 15.8 cm and the lowest (13.0 cm) was in control. f) Greengram (Vamban-2): Greengram performed better in treated effluent with water in 3:1 ratio. In raw effluent treated with water at 1:3 ratio, recorded 65.8 per cent germination. While undiluted raw effluent recorded the lowest (59.2 %) germination. Treated effluent diluted with water in 1:3 ratio recorded 65.5 per cent germination, which was on par with control. Higher root length of 4.2 cm was recorded in treated effluent diluted with water at 1:3 ratio followed by control. In case of raw effluent control performed better than rest of the treatments. Raw effluents with water at 1:3 ratio recorded 7.2 cm of shoot length, while the shoot length was drastically reduced to 6.2 cm in undiluted raw effluent. Effluent with water in 3:1 ration recorded 10.8 cm shoot length followed by 1:1 ratio (10.7 cm) and were on par with each other.
The spent wash contains 1000, 40, 11000 and 500 mg /l of N, P, K, respectively. However, most of the distilleries have installed bio-methanation digester which reduces the BOD by 90 per cent. The total effluent of 40 billion litres generated annually in India, after methanation, can provide 2, 40,000, 13,000 and 800 tonnes of K, N, and P respectively (Joshi et al., 1996). The composition of distillery effluents depends upon the method of collection and treatment procedure adopted before they are released from the factory premises. The distillery effluent is acidic (pH 4.0 to 5.4) and has very high BOD value ranging from 3.5 x 104 to 4.5 x 104 mg reported a high organic load (50,000 mg/l BOD and 95,000 mg/l COD) in spent wash whereas post methanation effluents had considerably lower organic load (5,000 mg/l BOD and 25,000 mg/l COD) (Jadhav and Savant, 1975). The distillery effluent irrigation helps to build up the soil fertility by increasing organic carbon and available phosphorus and potassium status (Singh and Bahadur 1997), Zalawadia et al. (1996) stated that the improvement in the soil fertility could be credited to the inadvertent addition of total N, P and K to the tune of 204, 153 and 1139 mg/kg soil respectively, through distillery water. The effluents are also good sources of micronutrients as the available micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) increased with distillery effluent application and availability being the highest in 1:10 dilution (Kayauizh, et al., 2001).
effluent concentration increased the acidity and toxicity which might have retarded the germination and seedling growth. Zalawadia and Raman (1994) studied the effect of distillery waste water with graded fertilizer levels on sorghum yield and soil properties. They recorded on par sorghum yield with 75 per cent of the recommended fertilizer application along with the distillery waste water irrigation compared to100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer application with normal water. The per cent utilization of N, P and K applied through chemical fertilizer were more in distillery waste water irrigation with 100 per cent fertilization dose. The organic carbon contents were significantly more in the distillery waste water irrigated soils. Further the soils applied with 75 and 100 per cent fertilizer dose with distillery waste water irrigation recorded maximum organic carbon. The available N was highest in the treatment irrigated with distillery waste water and fertilizer with 100 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizer. Singh and Bahadur (1997) recorded the growth of maize plant as height, leaf area per plant and leaf area index. All the indices increased with increasing amount of ten times diluted effluent applied as irrigation water. Single application of effluent at 45 DAS had no significant effect on maize yield, but two such irrigations of effluent at 45 and 60 DAS increased yield by 37 per cent. Regular irrigations with ten and fine times diluted effluent increased yield by 59 and 78 per cent, respectively. The results of the study revealed that distillery effluents can be used for irrigating maize crop after its dilution to five times which has positive effect on crop growth and productivity. The effluent irrigation helps building soil fertility by increasing the organic carbon and available phosphorus and potassium status. On a long run basis effluent irrigation can improve the overall productivity of light textured soils inherently poor in plant nutrient reserves. Sukanya and Meli (2003a) conducted a study to find out the effect of distillery effluents as a source of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of wheat during winter seasons of 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Out of the 10 nitrogen substitution levels, the level S5 (50 % N substitution through solid distillery effluent + 50 % N substitution through inorganic source) recorded higher grain (53.14 q/ha) and straw yield (68.3 q/ha) compared to other nitrogen substitution levels but was found on par with nitrogen substitution levels of S7 (25 % N through solid effluent + 75 % N through inorganic source) and S10 (100 % N through inorganic source).In the study S5 showed higher yield with better expression of growth of parameters like total dry matter production, number of productive tillers per metre row length, ear length, ear weight and test weight. This superiority of S5 was attributed by them to the higher availability of nitrogen and other nutrients with the external application of solid effluent to substitute nitrogen. This indicated the availability of increased native nitrogen status in the soil at right times. Other nitrogen substitution levels which substitute 100 per cent nitrogen through solid and liquid effluents either in combination or individually could not meet the nitrogen demand timely and adequately which was clearly reflected on straw yield. Sukanya and Meli (2003b) studied the effect of distillery effluent irrigation on growth, yield and quality of maize. Treatments involved four dilution levels viz., 1:5, 1:10, 1:25, 1:50 (liquid effluent and good water), and only undiluted effluent and only good water irrigation. Totally maize received two irrigations during the effective crop growth period. Results indicated that a lower dilution level of 1:5 recorded significantly higher seed yield (76.82 g/ha) than other dilution levels. The 1:5 dilution level recorded significantly higher growth parameters. Again, the protein and reducing sugar content of seeds showed improvement with 1:5 dilution levels. It is well established fact that good water irrigation meets the only water requirement of crop but effluent irrigations meets out both water and nutrient requirement. Yield and yield parameters were significantly better in case of irrigation with 1:5 concentrations due as the availability of nutrients was more. The reduction in yield in other cases might be due to toxic effects of excessive quantities of soluble solids and solid materials which might have affected soil porosity due to reduced uptake of nutrients and ultimately affected growth and yield. Soudarrajan et al. (2007) studied the impact of distillery spent wash on seed germination, seedling growth and yield of bhendi. The effluent was diluted to 25, 50, 75 and 100 times. The results revealed that application of spent wash diluted at higher level (50 T) recorded increased germination percentage (74 %), growth (47 cm) and fruit yield -1 (264g pot ) over control. From this study, they stated that the direct use of distillery spent wash caused a significant effect on seed germination, growth and yield of bhendi crop.
Sludge
Sludge is formed from the biological growths that accrue in aerobic organic containing liquids. These grow upon continued feeding and develop in to flocculent suspensions that settle rapidly. It is estimated that over 27 million tonnes of solid wastes are generated per annum. Sludge is usually disposed off on land as manure to soil or as a soil conditioner or barged in to sea. The most common method is to utilize it as a landfill. In some cases wet sludge, raw or digested, as well as supernatant from digester can be lagooned as a temporary measure but such practice may create problems like odour nuisance, ground water pollution and other public health hazards. Channakeshava et al. (2007) reported that sludge contains about 8.5 per cent of P2O5 mostly in the forms of dicalcium phosphate dehydrate which is citrate soluble and in slowly available form. The sludge contains appreciable amounts of floride (10 %) which may pose problem in the soil and plants.
Textile effluent composition varies from unit to unit. In case of sizing operation the effluent has 4.1 pH, 440-8350 mg/l total dissolved solids, 50-3100 mg/l suspended solids and BOD varies from 65-2220 mg/l.
3.1.2 Location
Geographically, Dharwad is situated in the transitional tract (Zone-8) of Karnataka at 18 North latitude and 75 07 East longitude on an altitude of 678 metres above mean sea level.
3.2.1 ExperimentI: Influence of industrial effluent concentrations on seed quality of cereal crops
Treatment details: Concentration of industrial effluents T1 0 % effluent concentration T2 2.5 % effluent concentration T3 5.0 % effluent concentration T4 10.0 % effluent concentration T5 25.0 % effluent concentration T6 50.0 % effluent concentration T7 75.0 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration With the above concentration levels the following industrial effluents namely: West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli Shreyus Plastics, Gadag Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag.
Were used as water source for finding out the response on germination and other related studies in the following cereal crops: Maize Paddy Wheat Bajra Sorghum Treatments Design - C.R.D Replication -4 -8
Physical
KMF, Dharwad
Colour Total solids (mg/l) Suspendedsolids (mg/l) Dissolved solids (mg/l) Hardness (mg/l) Physico-chemical pH EC (mhos/cm) Chemical Calcium (mg/l) Magnesium (mg/l) Sodium (mg/l) Potassium (mg/l) Alkaline (mg/l) Carbonates (mg/l) Residual sodium (mg/l) Carbonates (mg/l) Chlorides (mg/l) % sodium (mg/l) Oil and grease (mg/l) Ammonium (mg/l) Free ammonium (mg/l) BOD (mg/l) COD(mg/l) Sulphates (mg/l) ND 12.40 0.99% 27 174 342 1952 208 38 4.0 270 5171 280 380 780 Nil 268 250 150 Nil ND ND 250 31 44.8 4.4 180 6 460 6.6 70 1350 4 4500 8.0 1800 260 880 510 380 4100 4500 7.9 1101 212 718 212 1236 752 9.8 1765 32 988 130 8.5 1210 8.8 7600 8.6 20,800 220 4996 1450 800 13480 4300
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The results obtained from the laboratory experiments conducted at Department of Seed Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to find out the influence of industrial effluents on seed quality parameters of cereal crops are presented in this chapter.
4.1 Experiment-I: Influence of industrial effluent oncentrations on seed quality of cereal crops
4.1.1 West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli 4.1.1.1 Seed quality of Maize
The data pertaining to seed quality parameters of maize as influenced by different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli are presented in the Table 4.01 It is observed that with increase in concentration level of effluent from 0 (T1) to 10 per cent (T4) gradual but steady increase in various seed quality parameters were recorded. Further increase in effluent concentration level beyond 10 per cent recorded significant reduction in seed quality of maize. The treatment 10 per cent effluent concentration level (T4) recorded 94.50 per cent germination as compared to T1 (95.75 %) and were on par with each other. Looking to the other various seed quality parameters it is noticed that T4 emerged as the optimum effluent concentration level for maize seed by recording 11.48, 11.50 and 22.98 cm root length, shoot length and seedling length respectively, 2171 seedling vigour index, 0.325 (g/10 seedlings) seedling dry weight, 44.36 speed of germination, 0.518 Bartletts germination rate index and 26.50 per cent first count of germination. The 100 per cent effluent concentration (T8) recorded significantly least values for all the above seed quality parameters studied.
Table 4.01. Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Maize Germination (%) 95.75 (78.20) 95.5 (77.81) 95.25 (77.74) 94.50 (786.54) 92.50 (74.26) 80.00 (63.47) 72.25 (58.25) 61.25 (51.54) 85.88 (69.73) 1.02 4.04 Root length (cm) 10.90 10.30 11.28 11.48 11.58 8.18 7.30 6.18 9.65 Shoot length (cm) 9.16 9.71 10.16 11.50 10.61 7.58 6.68 5.30 8.84 Seedling length (cm) 20.06 19.89 21.50 22.98 22.19 15.75 13.98 11.48 18.48 Seedling vigour index 1921 1911 2041 2171 2051 1260 1010 702 1633 Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.250 0.284 0.293 0.325 0.361 0.221 0.215 0.211 0.270 Speed of germination 46.23 46.27 45.56 44.36 41.36 39.19 31.34 28.19 40.31 Bartletts germination rate index 0.523 0.514 0.512 0.518 0.493 0.433 0.422 0.326 0.467 First count of germination (%) 27.75 27.25 27.00 26.50 23.50 23.00 20.50 18.00 24.19
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean
S Em CD at 1%
0.29 1.16
0.32 1.25
0.003 0.010
0.10 0.39
0.004 0.020
0.82 3.25
Table 4.02. Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Sorghum
Treatments
Germination (%) 98.50 (84.08) 97.50 (81.20) 96.25 (79.09) 80.50 (63.84) 74.50 (59.71) 69.50 (56.51) 68.50 (55.89) 62.50 (52.27) 80.97 (66.57) 1.22 4.82
Root length (cm) 21.47 21.56 22.15 21.13 18.71 17.56 16.96 15.27 19.35
Shoot length (cm) 8.34 8.82 8.96 8.04 7.70 7.51 7.43 7.25 8.00
Seedling length (cm) 29.80 30.37 31.11 29.16 26.40 25.07 24.39 22.52 27.35
Seedling vigour index 2935 2961 2993 2347 1966 1742 1672 1407 2253
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.324 0.330 0.334 0.312 0.309 0.291 0.275 0.273 0.306
Speed of germination
Bartletts germination rate index 0.293 0.250 0.243 0.242 0.231 0.225 0.212 0.210 0.238
First count of germination (%) 29.25 27.50 27.00 23.25 21.50 19.50 18.75 17.25 23.00
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean
S Em CD at 1%
0.32 1.28
0.07 0.26
0.005 0.020
0.66 2.62
0.002 0.008
0.80 3.16
germination. 100 per cent effluent concentration (T8) noticed the lowest values for all the seed quality parameters.
Table 4.03. Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Paddy
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 98.25 (82.65) 96.50 (79.40) 96.25 (78.94) 94.50 (76.54) 85.50 (67.67) 73.25 (58.89) 67.00 (54.97) 60.50 (61.09) 83.97 (68.77) 0.88 3.49
Root length (cm) 17.77 17.95 18.82 18.96 15.13 14.25 12.24 11.70 15.85 0.10 0.38
Shoot length (cm) 9.14 9.55 9.63 10.25 7.64 6.31 5.46 5.29 7.91 0.07 0.29
Seedling length (cm) 26.91 27.49 28.45 29.21 22.77 20.55 17.69 16.99 23.76
Seedling vigour index 2643 2653 2738 2760 1947 1506 1186 1028 2058
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.173 0.176 0.182 0.185 0.163 0.154 0.144 0.134 0.164 0.001 0.004
Speed of germination 16.49 15.67 14.28 13.72 12.16 10.25 8.52 7.23 12.29 0.08 0.32
Bartletts germination rate index 0.395 0.385 0.375 0.344 0.325 0.314 0.296 0.273 0.338 0.002 0.006
First count of germination (%) 24.50 22.25 21.75 20.25 19.25 17.25 14.50 11.00 18.84 0.62 2.46
Table 4.04. Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Wheat
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 90.50 (72.11) 89.50 (71.15) 87.75 (69.56) 81.50 (64.57) 70.50 (57.14) 63.50 (52.86) 56.50 (48.76) 41.50 (40.13) 72.66 (59.53) 0.54 2.15
Root length (cm) 9.17 9.56 9.99 9.26 6.59 6.35 3.24 2.52 7.08 0.13 0.51
Shoot length (cm) 4.48 4.76 5.25 3.35 3.22 2.15 1.15 0.00 3.04 0.09 0.36
Seedling length (cm) 13.65 14.32 15.23 12.61 9.80 8.50 4.39 2.52 10.13
Seedling vigour index 1235 1282 1337 1028 691 540 248 105 808
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.280 0.283 0.276 0.265 0.257 0.243 0.237 0.225 0.258
Speed of germination 34.41 34.23 33.75 32.81 26.15 22.80 14.16 12.25 26.32 0.15 0.61
Bartletts germination rate index 0.681 0.676 0.673 0.663 0.625 0.615 0.613 0.582 0.641 0.004 0.017
First count of germination (%) 27.25 26.50 25.25 18.50 17.75 16.25 15.50 12.50 19.94 0.79 3.13
Table 4.05. Influence of different concentrations of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli effluent on seed quality of Bajra
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 94.50 (76.54) 93.50 (75.32) 87.50 (69.35) 80.50 (63.84) 76.50 (61.04) 71.25 (57.61) 65.50 (54.06) 60.25 (50.94) 78.69 (63.59) 0.64 2.55
Root length (cm) 16.25 16.95 17.51 15.22 14.16 13.23 12.80 12.16 14.78 0.11 0.43
Shoot length (cm) 8.56 9.27 9.53 8.23 8.13 7.75 6.23 5.24 7.87 0.04 0.17
Seedling length (cm) 24.82 26.22 27.04 23.45 22.29 20.98 19.03 17.40 22.65
Seedling vigour index 2345 2452 2366 1888 1705 1495 1246 1048 1818
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.335 0.346 0.345 0.325 0.296 0.275 0.265 0.246 0.304
Speed of germination 35.86 33.76 32.85 32.44 28.63 24.54 23.80 22.45 29.29 0.04 0.18
Bartletts germination rate index 0.415 0.397 0.353 0.346 0.344 0.336 0.326 0.314 0.354 0.002 0.006
First count of germination (%) 28.00 27.50 25.50 21.75 20.25 19.50 18.50 17.50 22.31 0.80 3.18
Table 4.06. Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Maize
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 93.75 (75.77) 92.25 (73.91) 89.75 (71.41) 80.25 (63.67) 78.50 (62.41) 71.50 (57.77) 61.25 (51.53) 59.75 (50.65) 78.38 (63.39) 0.95 3.75
Root length (cm) 11.26 11.84 11.28 9.23 8.28 6.13 6.00 5.58 8.70 0.80 0.70
Shoot length (cm) 9.15 8.25 9.66 8.64 8.53 7.54 5.15 4.16 7.64 0.07 0.27
Seedling length (cm) 20.42 20.09 20.95 17.87 16.80 13.67 11.15 9.74 16.33
Seedling vigour index 1913 1800 1930 1599 1393 1130 690 607 1383
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.246 0.252 0.261 0.234 0.214 0.211 0.188 0.173 0.222
Speed of germination 44.22 43.40 41.73 38.18 37.25 30.26 27.25 21.25 35.44 0.44 1.74
Bartletts germination rate index 0.532 0.522 0.515 0.433 0.425 0.416 0.393 0.376 0.451 0.002 0.010
First count of germination (%) 28.25 24.00 23.25 20.25 17.00 16.50 14.75 13.25 19.66 0.77 3.00
0.363 (g/10 seedlings) seedling dry weight, 40.50 speed of germination, 0.244 Bartletts germination rate index and 23.25 per cent first count of germination.
Table 4.07. Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Sorghum
Treatments
Germination (%) 98.00 (82.05) 97.50 (81.20) 96.25 (79.01) 89.50 (71.15) 81.25 (64.38) 70.25 (56.98) 62.50 (52.27) 59.50 (50.50) 81.85 (67.19) 0.85 3.39
Root length (cm) 21.26 21.32 21.13 22.25 20.14 18.25 17.26 16.24 19.73
Shoot length (cm) 8.15 8.81 9.25 9.53 7.57 6.53 6.24 5.23 7.66
Seedling length (cm) 29.41 30.13 30.37 31.78 27.71 24.77 23.50 21.47 27.39
Seedling vigour index 2881 2931 2941 2743 2423 1872 1530 1337 2332
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.350 0.354 0.363 0.342 0.333 0.331 0.323 0.310 0.338
Speed of germination
Bartletts germination rate index 0.258 0.251 0.244 0.237 0.225 0.217 0.215 0.213 0.232
First count of germination (%) 26.25 25.50 23.25 20.00 17.25 17.00 16.25 14.50 20.00
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean
For comparing means of S Em CD at 1% 0.03 0.13 0.06 0.26 0.07 0.30 21 83 0.001 0.005 1.05 4.17 0.002 0.009 1.17 4.64
Table 4.08. Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Paddy
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 97.50 (81.20) 96.25 (78.94) 95.75 (78.35) 94.50 (76.54) 88.50 (70.23) 81.50 (64.58) 75.25 (60.21) 68.50 (55.89) 87.22 (70.74) 0.98 3.87
Root length (cm) 16.14 16.24 17.26 18.16 14.18 13.26 12.12 9.32 14.59 0.06 0.23
Shoot length (cm) 8.27 8.74 8.88 9.13 7.24 7.18 6.64 6.15 7.78 0.11 0.45
Seedling length (cm) 20.16 20.62 21.33 21.82 17.11 15.44 13.27 12.76 17.81
Seedling vigour index 2565 2616 2582 2117 2011 1395 1053 859 1900
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.185 0.182 0.196 0.216 0.176 0.166 0.166 0.154 0.180
Speed of germination 17.48 16.24 15.20 14.58 13.38 12.50 9.42 8.25 13.38 0.09 0.35
Bartletts germination rate index 0.375 0.374 0.355 0.367 0.294 0.275 0.264 0.243 0.318 0.004 0.015
First count of germination (%) 25.25 24.50 23.25 21.50 20.00 18.25 15.75 12.50 20.13 0.76 3.02
For comparing means of 6.98 23 0.002 27.62 90 0.006 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration
T4 10 % effluent concentration
Table 4.09. Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Wheat Germination (%) 90.50 (72.11) 89.25 (70.94) 87.75 (69.56) 81.50 (64.57) 70.50 (57.14) 66.50 (54.66) 54.50 (47.61) 40.50 (39.54) 72.63 (59.52) 0.58 2.29 Root length (cm) 9.26 9.59 8.35 7.69 6.52 5.25 4.30 3.29 6.78 0.08 0.33 Shoot length (cm) 4.48 4.26 4.15 3.28 2.15 1.24 1.13 0.00 2.59 0.07 0.27 Seedling length (cm) 13.75 13.85 12.49 10.97 8.67 6.48 5.43 3.29 9.36 Seedling vigour index 1244 1207 1205 948 693 516 348 174 792 Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.265 0.271 0.254 0.242 0.233 0.225 0.213 0.210 0.239 Speed of germination 37.45 35.54 30.29 28.24 23.70 18.14 15.24 9.85 24.80 0.13 0.53 Bartletts germination rate index 0.675 0.652 0.645 0.635 0.624 0.617 0.613 0.584 0.630 0.002 0.010 First count of germination (%) 26.50 25.75 22.50 19.50 17.25 14.50 13.50 11.25 18.84 0.72 2.85
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Table 4.10. Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag effluent on seed quality of Bajra
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 95.50 (77.89) 94.25 (76.27) 81.50 (64.57) 78.25 (62.25) 76.50 (61.04) 65.25 (53.91) 60.75 (51.24) 55.50 (48.18) 75.94 (61.92) 0.74 2.94
Root length (cm) 16.25 16.87 15.30 14.79 13.46 12.24 12.17 9.74 13.85 0.12 0.49
Shoot length (cm) 8.27 8.38 7.24 6.26 5.25 5.19 4.18 3.29 6.01 0.05 0.21
Seedling length (cm) 24.52 25.25 22.53 21.05 18.71 17.43 16.34 13.03 19.86
Seedling vigour index 2341 2321 1965 1687 1533 1217 997 858 1615
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.326 0.335 0.325 0.317 0.316 0.294 0.255 0.247 0.302
Speed of germination 34.38 33.27 32.16 28.88 24.46 23.94 23.16 22.10 27.79 0.03 0.13
Bartletts germination rate index 0.396 0.386 0.379 0.354 0.325 0.316 0.286 0.255 0.337 0.002 0.008
First count of germination (%) 30.25 27.50 24.75 20.50 18.50 17.50 14.50 15.25 21.09 0.76 2.99
Table 4.11. Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka milk federation- Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Maize
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 94.50 (76.54) 93.50 (75.32) 91.25 (72.86) 89.75 (71.41) 81.50 (64.57) 72.25 (58.25) 60.50 (51.09) 50.50 (45.31) 79.22 (64.42) 0.72 2.87
Root length (cm) 10.93 11.26 12.18 9.25 7.26 6.15 5.55 4.26 8.35 0.07 0.29
Shoot length (cm) 8.27 8.53 8.16 7.14 5.33 4.89 3.25 3.15 6.09 0.16 0.64
Seedling length (cm) 19.19 19.79 20.34 16.39 12.59 11.04 8.80 7.41 14.44
Seedling vigour index 1813 1850 1856 1471 1026 796 532 374 1215
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.253 0.256 0.254 0.234 0.214 0.211 0.188 0.173 0.227
Speed of germination 44.22 43.40 41.73 38.18 37.25 30.26 27.25 21.25 35.44 0.43 1.74
Bartletts germination rate index 0.546 0.545 0.537 0.529 0.514 0.494 0.456 0.414 0.504 0.002 0.009
First count of germination (%) 28.25 27.50 26.25 24.25 21.50 18.25 16.75 15.75 22.31 0.97 3.86
Table 4.12. Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Sorghum
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 96.00 (78.59) 95.25 (77.54) 94.00 (75.98) 93.50 (75.32) 80.50 (63.84) 79.50 (63.12) 71.50 (57.77) 60.50 (51.09) 83.84 (67.91) 0.82 3.26
Root length (cm) 20.21 21.16 21.56 22.47 19.32 18.50 17.60 16.15 19.62 0.10 0.40
Shoot length (cm) 8.55 9.24 9.56 9.95 7.35 7.24 6.15 6.15 8.02 0.02 0.06
Seedling length (cm) 29.17 30.41 30.71 31.74 28.08 25.76 23.86 22.48
Seedling vigour index 2799 2806 2848 2881 2513 2113 1769 1447
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.343 0.348 0.355 0.363 0.333 0.326 0.322 0.314
Speed of germination
Bartletts germination rate index 0.257 0.255 0.247 0.236 0.226 0.224 0.218 0.216 0.235 0.003 0.010
First count of germination (%) 26.75 24.50 24.25 23.25 18.50 16.50 14.25 13.50 20.19 0.80 3.20
41.59 41.25 40.25 38.53 36.95 36.27 34.23 32.45 37.69 0.11 0.45
27.77 2397 0.338 For comparing means of 0.40 33 0.003 1.59 131 0.010 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.13. Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Paddy
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 94.25 (76.23) 93.50 (75.32) 92.00 (73.68) 82.50 (65.31) 76.50 (61.04) 71.50 (57.77) 65.75 (54.21) 58.50 (49.92) 79.31 (64.19) 0.73 2.87
Root length (cm) 18.25 18.22 19.21 20.17 14.26 11.15 10.26 9.94 15.18 0.06 0.23
Shoot length (cm) 8.97 9.73 9.85 6.45 6.12 5.25 4.88 4.43 6.96 0.07 0.30
Seedling length (cm) 27.22 27.95 29.06 26.62 20.37 16.40 15.13 14.37 22.14
Seedling vigour index 2565 2616 2582 2117 2011 1395 1053 859 1900
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.182 0.196 0.205 0.212 0.216 0.185 0.174 0.165 0.192
Speed of germination 18.50 17.26 16.30 15.57 14.66 13.27 9.33 8.73 14.20 0.10 0.39
Bartletts germination rate index 0.365 0.354 0.343 0.335 0.325 0.316 0.296 0.285 0.327 0.001 0.006
First count of germination (%) 26.75 25.25 24.75 24.75 22.00 18.50 16.25 14.50 21.59 0.62 2.46
For comparing means of 0.084 21 0.002 0.33 83 0.007 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.14. Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka milk federation- Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Wheat Germination (%) 94.50 (76.54) 93.75 (75.67) 87.25 (69.12) 81.50 (64.57) 77.25 (61.56) 66.50 (54.66) 55.50 (48.18) 45.50 (42.44) 75.22 (61.59) 0.75 2.98 Root length (cm) 9.28 10.55 8.26 7.14 6.26 5.39 5.13 4.33 7.04 0.06 0.26 Shoot length (cm) 4.31 4.78 3.27 3.22 2.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.23 0.07 0.29 Seedling length (cm) 13.58 15.33 11.53 10.36 8.54 5.39 5.13 4.33 9.27 Seedling vigour index 1284 1317 1206 936 728 416 299 234 802 Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.283 0.276 0.273 0.264 0.135 0.115 0.948 0.635 0.366 Speed of germination 36.47 35.54 28.26 25.36 17.26 16.25 14.34 10.65 23.01 0.05 0.19 Bartletts germination rate index 0.674 0.667 0.659 0.646 0.613 0.584 0.554 0.534 0.616 0.002 0.010 First count of germination (%) 29.75 28.50 27.75 21.50 19.75 15.50 14.50 12.75 21.25 0.77 3.06
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
For comparing means of 0.09 15 0.006 0.37 58 0.020 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.15. Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka milk federation- Dharwad effluent on seed quality of Bajra
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 94.50 (76.54) 92.25 (73.94) 83.50 (66.08) 75.25 (60.21) 71.50 (57.77) 66.50 (54.66) 63.50 (52.86) 52.25 (46.31) 74.91 (61.05) 0.70 2.77
Root length (cm) 16.75 17.81 15.23 14.90 12.25 11.12 10.26 9.23 13.44 0.03 0.11
Shoot length (cm) 8.28 8.72 7.16 6.28 5.12 4.59 4.33 3.13 5.95 0.03 0.12
Seedling length (cm) 25.03 26.53 22.39 21.18 17.37 15.71 14.59 12.36 19.40
Seedling vigour index 2366 2349 2085 1619 1431 1120 981 700 1581
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.334 0.345 0.334 0.326 0.295 0.285 0.274 0.255 0.306
Speed of germination 33.55 32.26 31.44 29.48 28.23 27.32 25.16 24.84 29.03 0.04 0.16
Bartletts germination rate index 0.379 0.364 0.355 0.346 0.334 0.315 0.276 0.253 0.328 0.003 0.011
First count of germination (%) 27.50 26.00 24.50 22.25 21.25 20.50 17.50 16.50 22.00 0.83 3.31
For comparing means of 0.04 20 0.002 0.16 78 0.006 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.16. Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar distilleries Ltd. - Bellary effluent on seed quality of Maize
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 96.25 (79.09) 95.50 (77.89) 94.50 (76.54) 93.50 (75.32) 90.50 (72.11) 81.25 (64.39) 72.50 (58.41) 60.50 (51.09) 85.56 (69.35) 0.89 3.54
Root length (cm) 11.25 12.27 12.41 13.19 12.55 8.13 8.50 7.25 10.69 0.05 0.20
Shoot length (cm) 9.59 10.15 10.28 10.50 7.24 5.68 6.23 5.13 8.10 0.77 3.07
Seedling length (cm) 20.84 22.41 22.64 23.68 19.79 15.69 14.73 12.38 19.02
Seedling vigour index 1984 2021 2103 2073 1659 1385 868 824 1615
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.254 0.276 0.282 0.214 0.208 0.194 0.186 0.150 0.221
Speed of germination 45.27 44.53 43.17 42.27 35.50 31.26 28.17 21.28 37.89 0.01 0.04
Bartletts germination rate index 0.572 0.567 0.528 0.512 0.493 0.476 0.425 0.327 0.487 0.001 0.004
First count of germination (%) 28.00 27.25 26.25 24.50 21.50 18.00 16.00 14.50 22.00 0.96 3.80
Table 4.17. Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Sorghum
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 98.00 (82.05) 97.50 (80.99) 97.00 (80.14) 96.25 (79.54) 94.50 (76.49 83.25 (65.91) 71.50 (57.77) 66.75 (54.82) 88.09 (72.19) 1.01 4.01
Root length (cm) 21.26 21.39 22.28 22.54 19.23 18.13 16.25 15.28 19.54 0.34 1.35
Shoot length (cm) 10.15 10.56 11.25 11.51 10.00 8.14 7.41 7.36 9.54 0.22 0.87
Seedling length (cm) 31.41 31.95 33.53 34.04 29.22 26.27 23.66 22.63 29.09
Seedling vigour index 3069 3086 3141 3192 2707 1992 1704 1575 2558
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.342 0.347 0.350 0.356 0.344 0.336 0.335 0.324 0.342
Speed of germination 28.89 38.34 36.25 36.16 35.25 34.26 33.26 31.56 34.24 3.93 15.55
Bartletts germination rate index 0.256 0.254 0.245 0.235 0.226 0.223 0.215 0.214 0.233 0.003 0.010
First count of germination (%) 27.50 25.50 25.25 24.25 22.75 17.75 16.50 13.75 21.66 0.67 2.67
For comparing means of 0.37 48 0.002 1.45 191 0.007 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
4.1.5 Sri Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt., Ltd, Garag 4.1.5.1 Seed quality of maize
The data pertaining to the seed quality of maize as influenced by different concentrations of Sri Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt., Ltd., Garag effluent are given in Table 4.21. It is noticed that increase in effluent concentration from 0 (T1) to 10 per cent (T4) a gradual but steady increase in various seed quality parameters were noticed and with further increase in effluent concentration level, there was significant reduction in seed quality of maize. Ultimately 100 per cent effluent concentration treatment (T8) recorded significantly least values for all the seed quality parameters. Though T1 recorded the highest (94.25%) germination but the 5 per cent effluent concentration level (T3) recorded 92.50 per cent germination and 10 per cent (T4) level by recording 90.25 per cent germination was on par with T1. Observing all the seed quality parameters it is found that T4 emerged as the optimum effluent concentration level for Sri Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag for maize seeds by recording 13.53, 10.27 and 23.79 cm root length, shoot length and seedling length respectively, 2109 seedling vigour index, 0.261 (g/10 seedlings) seedling dry weight, 37.23 speed of germination, 0.516 Bartletts germination rate index and 22.75 per cent first count of germination.
Table 4.18. Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Paddy
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 96.50 (79.40) 95.00 (77.15) 88.00 (69.78) 81.00 (64.19) 76.00 (60.71) 71.75 (57.93) 65.75 (54.21) 61.25 (52.46) 72.52 (59.71) 0.62 2.47
Root length (cm) 17.20 17.33 18.43 15.13 14.25 13.18 12.25 11.18 14.87 0.10 0.39
Shoot length (cm) 8.80 8.75 9.60 7.13 6.90 6.65 5.55 5.25 7.33 0.08 0.32
Seedling length (cm) 26.00 26.08 28.03 22.25 21.15 19.83 17.80 16.43 22.19
Seedling vigour index 2469 2283 2180 1941 1580 1396 114 107 1509
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.174 0.165 0.155 0.147 0.137 0.126 0.119 0.113 0.142
Speed of germination 13.70 17.53 16.24 15.77 15.25 14.25 13.87 12.35 14.87 1.86 7.37
Bartletts germination rate index 0.325 0.315 0.295 0.285 0.275 0.235 0.224 0.216 0.271 0.003 0.012
First count of germination (%) 26.25 26.00 24.00 23.50 22.25 19.50 11.75 10.50 20.47 0.64 2.52
For comparing means of 0.13 16 0.002 0.52 65 0.007 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.19. Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Wheat
Treatments
Germination (%)
Speed of germination
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
94.50 (76.54) 92.50 (74.19) 88.25 (70.02) 81.50 (64.57) 74.75 (59.87) 64.25 (53.31) 56.50 (48.76) 48.00 (43.88) 75.03 (61.39) 0.68 2.69
9.15 9.74 7.49 7.18 6.81 5.23 4.34 3.34 6.66 0.08 0.32
4.53 4.81 3.12 3.15 2.25 2.14 1.26 0.00 2.66 0.07 0.30
36.53 35.64 28.24 25.35 17.24 16.25 14.35 10.54 23.02 0.04 0.17
0.674 0.666 0.656 0.584 0.554 0.545 0.536 0.433 0.581 0.002 0.010
27.25 26.74 25.26 24.25 21.46 19.75 16.26 15.27 22.03 0.10 0.43
For comparing means of 0.12 12.43 0.006 0.46 49.17 0.020 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration
T4 10 % effluent concentration
Table 4.20. Influence of different concentrations of Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary effluent on seed quality of Bajra
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 92.75 (74.44) 92.75 (74.50) 91.50 (73.14) 81.00 (64.20) 76.50 (61.04) 67.25 (55.12) 67.25 (55.12) 61.75 (51.83) 78.84 (63.67) 0.69 2.76
Root length (cm) 16.28 16.80 17.28 14.92 12.28 11.25 10.45 9.36 13.58 0.02 0.08
Shoot length (cm) 9.28 9.29 9.45 8.25 6.29 5.32 4.12 3.58 6.95 0.03 0.12
Seedling length (cm) 25.56 26.09 26.73 23.17 18.57 16.57 14.57 12.94 20.52
Seedling vigour index 2389 2339 2126 1953 1426 1157 949 866 1651
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.343 0.355 0.364 0.325 0.310 0.276 0.245 0.235 0.306
Speed of germination 36.45 35.72 34.55 33.47 28.24 24.46 22.16 21.51 29.57 0.09 0.36
Bartletts germination rate index 0.416 0.411 0.395 0.375 0.354 0.346 0.335 0.325 0.369 0.002 0.010
First count of germination (%) 28.25 28.00 26.25 25.25 24.50 23.75 16.50 17.50 23.75 0.73 2.87
Table 4.21. Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Maize
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 94.25 (76.27) 93.50 (75.32) 92.50 (74.19) 90.25 (71.89) 87.75 (69.58) 71.50 (57.77) 62.50 (52.27) 59.75 (50.65) 81.50 (65.99) 0.81 3.21
Root length (cm) 11.26 12.14 12.54 13.53 9.31 8.14 7.36 6.59 10.11 0.09 0.38
Shoot length (cm) 9.17 9.59 10.16 10.27 8.19 7.26 6.49 5.25 8.29 0.05 0.18
Seedling length (cm) 20.42 21.72 22.70 23.79 17.50 15.40 13.85 11.84 18.40
Seedling vigour index 1924 1964 2084 2109 1959 1453 1046 787 1666
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.233 0.250 0.253 0.261 0.212 0.208 0.193 0.183 0.224 0.003 0.013
Speed of germination 42.27 41.32 40.45 37.23 31.56 27.27 20.32 19.17 32.45 0.01 0.05
Bartletts germination rate index 0.624 0.524 0.523 0.516 0.428 0.414 0.410 0.394 0.479 0.001 0.005
First count of germination (%) 27.50 26.50 24.50 22.75 19.50 18.50 17.50 15.50 21.53 1.01 4.00
Table 4.22. Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Sorghum
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 97.75 (81.59) 96.75 (80.00) 95.75 (78.35) 95.50 (78.06) 93.75 (75.63) 88.25 (70.02) 80.25 (63.65) 72.25 (58.26) 90.03 (73.19) 1.25 4.98
Root length (cm) 21.14 21.78 22.39 22.56 19.90 18.88 17.72 17.76 20.27 0.56 2.23
Shoot length (cm) 8.96 9.25 9.15 9.27 8.76 7.26 6.26 6.33 8.15 0.37 1.47
Seedling length (cm) 30.24 31.03 31.54 31.83 28.66 26.14 23.98 24.09 28.44
Seedling vigour index 2956 2970 2992 3030 2992 2546 2219 1929 2704
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.363 0.360 0.352 0.348 0.344 0.338 0.327 0.318 0.344
Speed of germination 36.63 36.55 36.64 35.86 34.28 32.15 31.13 30.11 34.17 0.02 0.08
Bartletts germination rate index 0.255 0.253 0.248 0.243 0.235 0.223 0.216 0.215 0.236 0.001 0.004
First count of germination (%) 27.00 26.75 25.75 26.25 25.25 21.25 17.75 16.25 23.28 0.81 3.20
For comparing means of 0.63 61 0.005 2.50 241 0.019 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.23. Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Paddy
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 97.25 (80.85) 96.25 (78.94) 95.50 (77.89) 84.25 (66.67) 78.00 (62.07) 71.25 (57.61) 67.25 (55.12) 61.50 (51.68) 81.41 (66.35) 0.88 3.50
Root length (cm) 17.28 17.65 18.60 14.20 13.20 12.13 11.05 9.80 14.24 0.09 0.37
Shoot length (cm) 8.63 8.83 9.73 6.85 5.73 5.53 4.25 3.55 6.63 0.08 0.33
Seedling length (cm) 25.90 26.48 28.33 21.05 18.93 17.65 15.30 13.35 20.87
Seedling vigour index 2665 2615 2582 2116 2010 1394 1053 858 1899
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.175 0.185 0.195 0.176 0.164 0.135 0.125 0.114 0.158
Speed of germination 20.33 19.25 18.39 16.25 12.25 10.42 9.25 8.24 14.30 0.08 0.33
Bartletts germination rate index 0.175 0.185 0.195 0.176 0.164 0.135 0.125 0.114 0.158 0.001 0.01
First count of germination (%) 28.75 27.25 24.25 22.50 21.25 18.25 12.25 11.50 20.75 0.58 2.31
For comparing means of 0.15 21 0.001 0.58 83 0.006 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration
T4 10 % effluent concentration
Though T1 recorded the highest (97.25%) germination the 5 per cent effluent concentration level (T3) treatment recorded 95.50 per cent germination and was on par with T1. Looking to other seed quality parameters it is noticed that T3 is the optimum level for the paddy which recorded 18.60, 9.73 and 28.33 cm root length, shoot length and seedling length respectively, 2582 seedling vigour index, 0.195 (g/10 seedlings) seedling dry weight, 18.39 speed of germination, 0.195 Bartletts germination rate index and 24.25 per cent first count of germination.
Table 4.24. Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Wheat
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 93.50 (75.32) 92.50 (74.19) 91.25 (72.85) 85.00 (67.25) 80.50 (63.84) 71.50 (57.77) 62.50 (52.27) 55.50 (48.18) 79.03 (63.96) 0.59 2.33
Root length (cm) 9.19 9.52 10.25 7.75 6.18 5.26 4.37 3.12 6.95 0.089 0.35
Shoot length (cm) 4.25 4.77 5.13 4.13 3.40 3.26 0.00 0.00 3.12 0.051 0.20
Seedling length (cm) 13.44 14.29 15.38 11.88 9.57 8.52 4.37 3.12 10.07
Seedling vigour index 1257 1305 1354 1313 947 760 376 273 948
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.284 0.289 0.268 0.254 0.185 0.115 0.112 0.105 0.201
Speed of germination 42.85 38.24 35.63 34.84 33.73 27.63 22.45 15.41 31.35 0.03 0.11
Bartletts germination rate index 0.695 0.683 0.674 0.665 0.575 0.554 0.535 0.473 0.607 0.004 0.015
First count of germination (%) 28.50 26.50 24.75 23.50 21.50 19.50 17.25 14.50 22.00 0.76 3.00
For comparing means of 0.10 12 0.002 0.42 49 0.013 T5 25 % effluent concentration T6 50 % effluent concentration T7 75 % effluent concentration T8 100 % effluent concentration
Table 4.25. Influence of different concentrations of Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag effluent on seed quality of Bajra
Treatments T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 Mean S Em CD at 1%
Germination (%) 94.50 (76.54) 92.25 (73.89) 91.25 (72.86) 82.50 (65.31) 81.25 (64.38) 78.25 (62.24) 71.50 (57.77) 61.75 (51.82) 81.66 (65.60) 0.56 2.21
Root length (cm) 15.25 16.21 16.78 14.92 11.59 10.24 10.45 8.34 12.97 0.02 0.10
Shoot length (cm) 9.83 9.95 10.28 8.21 6.45 5.32 4.15 3.21 7.17 0.02 0.08
Seedling length (cm) 25.08 26.16 27.06 23.13 18.03 15.55 14.60 11.54 20.14
Seedling vigour index 2370 2381 2443 2281 1763 1373 1126 976 1839
Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) 0.354 0.364 0.375 0.384 0.323 0.312 0.254 0.243 0.326
Speed of germination 37.51 36.56 35.76 34.57 28.53 25.54 22.35 21.26 30.26 0.09 0.36
Bartletts germination rate index 0.397 0.386 0.353 0.346 0.335 0.323 0.316 0.316 0.346 0.001 0.010
First count of germination (%) 29.25 27.50 26.50 23.50 21.25 19.50 17.50 17.50 22.81 0.81 3.20
Table 4.26. Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage, root length (cm) and shoot length (cm)
Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 94.50 ( 76.49 89.75 (71.37) 90.75 (72.33) 93.50 (75.28) 90.75 (72.33) 91.85 (73.56) V2 95.50 (77.81) 88.50 (70.22) 92.50 (74.15) 93.75 (75.57) 91.25 (72.84) 92.30 (74.12) S Em 19.02 19.02 42.53
Germination (%) Varieties(V) V3 V4 94.75 (76.80) 88.75 (70.44) 92.75 (74.42) 93.50 (75.28) 88.75 (70.44) 91.70 (73.48) 95.25 (77.46) 87.75 (69.55) 91.75 (73.35) 92.75 (74.42) 91.50 (73.09) 91.80 (73.58) V5 94.25 (76.17) 87.75 (69.55) 92.75 (74.42) 92.25 (73.88) 91.50 (73.09) 91.70 (73.42) CD at 1 % NS NS NS Mean 94.85 (76.95) 88.50 (70.23) 92.10 (73.74) 93.15 (74.89) 90.75 (72.36) 91.87 (73.63) V1 10.92 11.28 12.18 13.18 13.53 12.22 V2 10.93 11.29 12.16 13.23 13.55 12.23 S Em 0.30 0.30 0.66
Root length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 V4 10.89 11.24 12.15 13.18 13.55 12.20 10.91 11.23 12.14 13.16 13.56 12.20 V5 10.86 11.25 12.13 13.18 13.52 12.19 CD at 1 % 1.11 NS 2.48 Mean 10.90 11.26 12.15 13.19 13.54 12.21 V1 11.51 9.66 8.16 10.54 10.27 10.03 V2 11.54 9.64 8.14 10.53 10.28 10.03
Shoot length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 V4 11.52 9.65 8.14 10.53 10.24 10.02 11.54 9.68 8.13 10.51 10.25 10.02 V5 11.52 9.69 8.15 10.56 10.27 10.04 CD at 1 % 0.80 NS 1.78 Mean 11.53 9.66 8.14 10.53 10.26 10.03
NS Non significant * Figures in the parentheses indicate arcsine transformed values Effluents (E) Varieties (V) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration V1 DSV-2 E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration V2 570 E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration V3 CSV-216 E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration V4 SPV-489 E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration V5 CSH-14
Table 4.27. Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for Seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10seedlings)
Seedling length (cm) Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 22.43 20.94 20.34 23.72 23.80 22.25 V2 22.48 20.93 20.30 23.76 23.83 22.26 S Em 0.24 0.24 0.53 Varieties(V) V3 22.41 20.90 20.29 26.34 23.79 22.74 V4 22.45 20.91 20.27 23.68 23.81 22.22 V5 22.38 20.94 20.29 23.73 23.79 22.23 CD at 1 % 0.88 NS NS Mean 22.43 20.92 20.30 24.25 23.80 22.80 V1 2120 1879 1846 2218 2160 2045 V2 2146 1852 1877 2227 2174 2055 S Em 22.61 22.61 50.55 Seedling vigour index Varieties(V) V3 2123 1854 1882 2464 2111 2087 V4 2138 1835 1860 2196 2178 2041 V5 2109 1838 1881 2189 2177 2039 CD at 1 % 84.50 NS NS Mean 2127 1852 1869 2259 2160 2053 V1 0.325 0.262 0.255 0.214 0.262 0.263 V2 0.326 0.265 0.257 0.219 0.262 0.266 S Em 0.001 0.001 0.002 Seedling dry weight (g/10seedlings) Varieties(V) V3 0.328 0.264 0.252 0.218 0.267 0.266 V4 0.321 0.264 0.253 0.219 0.262 0.264 V5 0.325 0.264 0.215 0.218 0.261 0.256 CD at 1 % 0.0007 0.0007 0.0016 Mean 0.325 0.264 0.246 0.217 0.263 0.263
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
The data on interaction between E x V recorded non significant differences on speed of germination.
Table 4.28. Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and First count of germination(%) Speed of germination Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 44.36 41.73 41.73 42.27 37.24 41.47 V2 44.34 41.78 41.72 42.29 37.30 41.49 S Em 0.07 0.07 0.15 Varieties(V) V3 44.35 41.75 41.73 42.25 37.26 41.47 V4 44.39 41.74 41.78 42.26 37.28 41.49 V5 44.34 42.54 41.76 42.25 37.27 41.63 CD at 1 % 0.25 NS NS Mean 44.36 41.91 41.74 42.26 37.27 41.51 V1 0.518 0.515 0.518 0.512 0.515 0.516 V2 0.515 0.516 0.538 0.516 0.517 0.520 S Em 0.002 0.002 0.004 Bartletts germination rate index Varieties(V) V3 0.517 0.513 0.539 0.511 0.518 0.520 V4 0.519 0.517 0.538 0.516 0.514 0.521 V5 0.521 0.519 0.536 0.515 0.519 0.522 CD at 1 % 0.001 0.001 0.002 Mean 0.518 0.516 0.534 0.514 0.517 0.519 V1 27.00 23.25 26.25 24.50 22.75 24.75 V2 27.50 23.50 26.75 24.75 21.25 24.75 S Em 0.14 0.14 0.31 First count of germination (%) Varieties(V) V3 27.75 22.75 26.50 25.50 22.75 25.05 V4 26.75 23.50 26.00 24.50 21.25 24.40 V5 26.50 24.50 26.75 24.75 23.25 25.15 CD at 1 % 0.52 0.52 1.17 Mean 27.10 23.50 26.45 24.80 22.25 24.82
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Table 4.29. Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage, root length (cm) and shoot length (cm)
Germination (%) Effluents (E) V1 96.25 (78.89) 95.75 (78.16) 93.50 (75.30) 96.25 (78.89) 95.50 (77.81) 95.45 (77.81) V2 97.50 (80.99) 96.50 (79.28) 93.25 (74.99) 95.50 (77.81) 94.50 (76.49) 95.45 (77.91) S Em 0.18 0.18 0.40 Varieties(V) V3 96.25 (78.89) 97.75 (81.45) 94.25 (76.17) 96.75 (79.68) 95.75 (78.16) 96.15 (78.87) V4 95.75 (78.16) 96.25 (78.89) 93.50 (75.28) 97.75 (81.45) 96.75 (79.68) 96.00 (78.69) V5 96.75 (79.68) 96.75 (79.68) 94.50 (76.49) 95.75 (78.16) 96.50 (79.28) 96.05 (78.66) CD at 1 % 0.50 0.50 1.12 Mean 96.50 (79.32) 96.60 (79.49) 93.80 (75.64) 96.40 (79.20) 95.80 (78.28) 95.82 (78.39) V1 22.15 22.14 22.47 22.54 22.54 22.37 V2 22.18 22.15 22.48 22.57 22.53 22.38 S Em
Root length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 22.15 22.18 22.45 22.53 22.57 22.38 V4 22.14 21.16 22.44 22.57 22.55 22.17 V5 22.17 21.14 22.47 22.52 22.55 22.17 Mean 22.16 21.75 22.46 22.54 22.55 22.07 V1 8.96 8.25 9.96 11.52 9.27 9.59 V2 8.95 9.26 9.94 11.53 9.25 9.79
Shoot length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 8.94 9.22 9.97 11.55 9.25 9.79 V4 8.93 9.28 9.93 11.57 9.24 9.79 V5 8.96 9.24 9.97 11.58 9.23 9.80 CD at 1 % 0.007 0.007 0.015 Mean 8.95 9.05 9.95 11.55 9.25 9.75
CD at 1 % NS NS NS
NS Non significant * Figures in the parentheses indicate arcsine transformed values Effluents (E) Varieties (V) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration V1 DSV-2 E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration V2 570 E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration V3 CSV-216 E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration V4 SPV-489 E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration V5 CSH-14
Irrespective of industrial effluents significantly shoot length was highest (9.80 cm) in V5 and least (9.59 cm) in V1, varieties respectively. Interaction effect between E x V recorded, significant difference on shoot length. The Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary effluent in all the varieties recorded higher shoot length (11.52, 11.53, 11.55, 11.57 and 11.58 cm) whereas Shreyas Plastics, Gadag recorded lesser shoot length (8.96, 8.95, 8.94, 8.93 and 8.96 cm) in V1, V2, V3, V4 and V5 varieties respectively.
Table 4.30. Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for Seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10seedlings) Seedling length (cm) Effluents (E) E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV V1 31.11 30.39 32.44 34.06 31.81 31.96 V2 31.13 31.41 32.42 34.09 31.78 32.17 S Em 0.004 0.004 0.01 Varieties(V) V3 31.09 31.40 32.42 34.12 31.82 32.17 V4 31.07 30.44 32.37 34.14 31.79 31.96 V5 31.13 30.38 32.44 34.10 31.78 31.97 Mean 31.11 30.81 32.42 34.10 31.80 32.05 V1 2994 2910 2842 3278 3038 3012 V2 3035 3031 3023 3256 3003 3070 S Em 17 17 38 Seedling vigour index Varieties(V) V3 2992 3070 3055 3301 3047 3093 V4 2975 2930 3027 3337 3076 3069 V5 3012 2939 3066 3265 3067 3070 Mean 3002 2976 3003 3287 3046 3062 V1 0.334 0.363 0.362 0.359 0.348 0.353 V2 0.333 0.363 0.368 0.352 0.349 0.353 S Em 0.0003 0.0003 0.001 Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Varieties(V) V3 0.338 0.362 0.365 0.357 0.342 0.353 V4 0.335 0.369 0.365 0.358 0.346 0.355 V5 0.336 0.366 0.363 0.355 0.349 0.354 CD at 1 % 0.001 0.001 0.002 Mean 0.335 0.364 0.364 0.356 0.347 0.353
CD at 1 % 63 NS NS
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Table 4.31.
Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and First count of germination (%) Speed of germination Bartletts germination rate index Varieties(V) V5 41.29 40.57 40.27 36.12 35.88 38.83 CD at 1 % 0.03 NS 0.06 Mean 41.26 40.54 40.27 36.14 35.87 38.82 V1 0.244 0.244 0.237 0.235 0.243 0.241 V2 0.245 0.247 0.237 0.232 0.242 0.241 S Em 0.0002 0.0002 0.001 V3 0.247 0.248 0.233 0.234 0.246 0.242 V4 0.244 0.246 0.235 0.237 0.246 0.242 V5 0.242 0.242 0.233 0.236 0.248 0.240 CD at 1 % 0.001 0.001 0.002 Mean 0.245 0.245 0.235 0.235 0.245 0.241 V1 27.75 23.75 23.50 24.25 27.75 25.40 V2 27.25 24.50 23.50 25.25 26.75 25.45 S Em 0.15 0.15 0.33 First count of germination (%) Varieties(V) V3 26.50 23.75 24.75 25.50 25.50 25.20 V4 26.50 23.50 24.50 24.25 25.75 24.90 V5 27.75 23.75 24.75 26.75 25.50 25.70 CD at 1 % 0.56 0.56 1.24 Mean 27.15 23.85 24.20 25.20 26.25 25.33
Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 41.26 40.51 40.33 36.15 35.86 38.82 V2 41.26 40.53 40.24 36.18 35.89 38.82 S Em 0.01 0.01 0.02
Varieties(V) V3 41.23 40.57 40.21 36.14 35.87 38.81 V4 41.27 40.52 40.28 36.12 35.87 38.81
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Table 4.32. Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage, root length (cm) and shoot length (cm)
Germination (%) Effluents (E) E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV V1 94.50 (76.49) 94.50 (76.49) 92.00 (73.64) 88.00 (69.78) 95.50 (77.81) 92.90 (74.84) V2 95.75 (78.16) 96.75 (79.68) 92.75 (74.42) 87.50 (69.33) 95.75 (78.16) 93.70 (75.95) S Em 0.16 0.16 0.36 Varieties(V) V3 95.50 (77.81) 95.25 (77.46) 93.50 (75.28) 87.75 (69.55) 96.75 (79.68) 93.75 (75.96) V4 95.75 (78.16) 96.50 (79.28) 92.50 (74.15) 88.25 (69.99) 95.75 (78.16) 93.75 (75.95) V5 94.75 (76.80) 95.50 (77.81) 94.50 (76.49) 87.75 (69.55) 96.25 (78.89) 93.75 (75.91) CD at 1 % 0.60 0.60 1.34 Mean 95.25 (77.48) 95.70 (78.14) 93.05 (74.80) 87.85 (69.64) 96.00 (78.54) 93.57 (75.72) V1 18.96 18.15 19.21 18.43 18.60 18.67 V2 18.98 18.14 19.23 18.43 18.64 18.68 S Em 0.002 0.002 0.004
Root length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 18.95 18.12 19.25 18.46 18.68 18.69 V4 18.95 18.16 19.28 18.43 18.62 18.69 V5 18.94 18.14 19.29 18.49 18.68 18.70 CD at 1 % 0.01 0.01 0.02 Mean 18.96 18.14 19.25 18.45 18.64 18.69 V1 10.26 9.13 9.85 9.62 9.75 9.72 V2 10.27 9.14 9.83 9.64 9.77 9.73
Shoot length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 10.29 9.16 9.86 9.63 9.72 9.73 V4 10.25 9.18 9.86 9.64 9.75 9.73 V5 10.24 9.15 9.85 9.67 9.78 9.74 CD at 1 % 0.01 0.01 0.02 Mean 10.26 9.15 9.85 9.64 9.75 9.73
* Figures in the parentheses indicate arcsine transformed values Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
germination whereas lower speed of germination, in all the varieties were with Sri. Lasmi Narayana Distilleries, Garag.
Table 4.33. Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for Seedling length (cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Seedling length (cm) Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 29.22 27.28 29.06 28.05 28.35 28.39 V2 29.25 27.28 29.06 28.06 28.41 28.41 S Em 0.003 0.003 0.01 Varieties(V) V3 29.24 27.28 29.11 28.09 28.40 28.42 V4 29.20 27.34 29.14 28.07 28.37 28.42 V5 29.18 27.29 29.14 28.16 28.46 28.44 CD at 1 % 0.01 0.01 0.03 Mean 29.22 27.29 29.10 28.09 28.40 28.42 V1 2761 2578 2674 2468 2707 2638 V2 2801 2639 2695 2455 2720 2662 S Em 4 4 8 Seedling vigour index Varieties(V) V3 2793 2598 2721 2465 2748 2665 V4 2795 2638 2695 2477 2716 2664 V5 2764 2606 2753 2471 2739 2667 Mean 2783 2612 2708 2467 2726 2659 V1 0.185 0.185 0.205 0.156 0.195 0.185 V2 0.186 0.184 0.205 0.154 0.198 0.185 S Em 0.0002 0.0002 0.001 Varieties (V) V1 DSV-2 V2 570 V3 CSV-216 V4 SPV-489 V5 CSH-14 Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Varieties(V) V3 0.188 0.185 0.202 0.158 0.195 0.186 V4 0.182 0.186 0.207 0.153 0.192 0.184 V5 0.183 0.187 0.206 0.156 0.196 0.185 CD at 1 % 0.001 0.001 0.002 Mean 0.185 0.185 0.205 0.155 0.195 0.185
CD at 1 % 14 14 31
Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Table 4.34. Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and First count of germination (%) Speed of germination Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 13.73 14.58 16.29 16.29 18.24 15.83 V2 13.78 14.55 16.50 16.28 18.28 15.88 S Em Varieties(V) V3 13.77 14.54 16.38 16.25 18.31 15.85 V4 13.75 14.53 16.38 16.22 18.23 15.82 V5 13.74 14.58 16.24 18.26 18.25 16.21 Mean 13.75 14.56 16.36 16.66 18.26 15.92 V1 0.345 0.367 0.343 0.295 0.186 0.307 V2 0.342 0.362 0.348 0.296 0.196 0.309 S Em Bartletts germination rate index Varieties(V) V3 0.348 0.369 0.346 0.291 0.197 0.310 V4 0.346 0.365 0.342 0.296 0.196 0.309 V5 0.347 0.368 0.348 0.292 0.194 0.310 Mean 0.345 0.366 0.345 0.294 0.194 0.309 V1 21.75 21.50 24.75 24.50 24.50 23.40 V2 21.25 21.75 24.50 24.75 24.75 23.40 S Em First count of germination (%) Varieties(V) V3 22.50 21.50 24.25 24.50 24.50 23.45 V4 20.25 21.25 24.50 25.75 24.50 23.25 V5 21.75 21.75 24.75 24.25 23.25 23.15 Mean 21.50 21.55 24.55 24.75 24.30 23.33
CD at 1 %
CD at 1 %
CD at 1 %
0.003 NS 0.01
0.12 0.12 0.27 Varieties (V) V1 DSV-2 V2 570 V3 CSV-216 V4 SPV-489 V5 CSH-14
0.44 NS 0.99
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Irrespective of paddy varieties among the industrial effluents, Sri. Lakshmi Narayanar Distilleries, Bellary noticed significantly highest (18.26) speed of germination and the significantly lowest (13.75) speed of germination was recorded by West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli. Among the paddy varieties, significantly the highest (16.21) speed of germination was recorded by Jaya (V5) paddy variety and lowest (15.82) in MTU-101 variety. Interaction effect of E x V recorded, significant difference with regard to speed of germination. West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli noticed maximum values of speed of germination whereas Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary noticed minimum value of speed of germination in all the varieties.
Table 4.35. Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination, root length (cm) and shoot length(cm) Germination (%) Effluents (E) V1 87.50 (69.33) 87.75 (66.55) 87.50 (69.33) 92.75 (74.42) 91.25 (72.84) 89.35 (71.10) V2 87.75 (69.55) 85.75 (67.86) 86.25 (68.27) 92.50 (74.15) 91.50 (73.09) 88.75 (70.59) S Em 0.12 0.12 0.28 Varieties(V) V3 85.75 (67.86) 87.25 (69.12) 86.75 (68.69) 92.75 (74.42) 91.50 (73.09) 88.80 (70.64) V4 85.75 (67.86) 87.25 (69.12) 86.75 (68.69) 92.25 (73.88) 91.75 (73.35) 88.75 (70.58) V5 86.25 (68.27) 88.75 (70.44) 92.50 (74.15) 92.50 (74.15) 91.50 (73.09) 90.30 (72.02) CD at 1 % 0.46 0.46 1.03 Mean 86.60 (68.58) 87.35 (69.22) 87.95 (69.83) 92.55 (74.21) 91.50 (73.09) 89.19 (70.08) V1 9.99 8.35 8.26 9.75 10.26 9.32 V2 9.99 8.36 8.24 9.79 10.23 9.32 S Em 0.002 0.002 0.004 Root length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 9.96 8.38 8.28 9.76 10.27 9.33 V4 9.96 8.37 8.23 9.75 10.29 9.32 V5 9.97 8.39 8.28 9.75 10.27 9.33 CD at 1 % 0.01 NS 0.01 Mean 9.97 8.37 8.26 9.76 10.26 9.32 V1 4.48 4.15 3.28 4.82 5.13 4.37 Shoot length (cm) Varieties(V) V2 4.47 4.13 3.29 4.88 5.15 4.38 S Em 0.002 0.002 0.004 V3 4.42 4.15 3.25 4.87 5.12 4.36 V4 4.45 4.18 3.29 4.85 5.17 4.39 V5 4.49 4.12 3.25 4.87 5.13 4.37 Mean 4.46 4.15 3.27 4.86 5.14 4.38
NS Non significant * Figures in the parentheses indicate arcsine transformed values Effluents (E) Varieties (V) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration V1 DSV-2 E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration V2 570 E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration V3 CSV-216 V4 SPV-489 E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration V5 CSH-14
Interaction between E X V recorded significant differences on root length. Sri. Laksmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag recorded higher values of root length where as Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad recorded least values of root length in all the varieties.
Table 4.36. Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for Seedling length (cm), Seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Seedling length (cm) Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 14.47 12.50 11.54 14.57 15.39 13.69 V2 14.46 12.49 11.53 14.66 15.38 13.70 S Em Varieties(V) V3 14.38 12.53 11.53 14.63 15.39 13.69 V4 14.41 12.55 11.52 14.60 15.46 13.71 V5 14.46 12.51 11.53 14.62 15.40 13.70 Mean 14.44 12.52 11.53 14.62 15.40 13.70 V1 1266 1097 1009 1351 1404 1225 V2 1269 1071 994 1356 1407 1219 S Em Seedling vigour index Varieties(V) V3 1233 1093 1000 1357 1408 1218 V4 1236 1095 999 1347 1418 1219 V5 1247 1110 1066 1352 1409 1237 Mean 1250 1093 1014 1353 1409 1223 V1 0.277 0.254 0.273 0.278 0.265 0.269 V2 0.278 0.253 0.278 0.275 0.264 0.269 S Em Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Varieties(V) V3 0.275 0.254 0.276 0.271 0.265 0.268 V4 0.276 0.264 0.277 0.276 0.266 0.272 V5 0.274 0.251 0.275 0.278 0.261 0.268 Mean 0.276 0.255 0.276 0.276 0.264 0.269
CD at 1 %
CD at 1 %
CD at 1 %
6 6 14
0.001 0.001 0.002 Varieties (V) V1 DSV-2 V2 570 V3 CSV-216 V4 SPV-489 V5 CSH-14
Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Table 4.37. Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and First count of germination (%) Speed of germination Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 33.76 30.28 28.26 35.65 35.63 32.71 V2 33.78 30.25 28.28 37.18 35.68 33.04 S Em 0.08 0.08 0.18 Varieties(V) V3 33.76 30.32 28.24 35.68 35.64 32.73 V4 33.79 30.23 28.28 35.62 35.63 32.71 V5 33.74 30.26 28.29 35.68 35.93 32.78 Mean 33.77 30.27 28.27 35.96 35.70 32.79 V1 0.675 0.645 0.659 0.666 0.675 0.664 V2 0.679 0.648 0.658 0.664 0.674 0.665 S Em 0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 Bartletts germination rate index Varieties(V) V3 0.678 0.643 0.654 0.663 0.679 0.663 V4 0.672 0.642 0.659 0.669 0.674 0.663 V5 0.675 0.648 0.654 0.665 0.674 0.663 CD at 1 % 0.001 0.001 0.002 Mean 0.676 0.645 0.657 0.665 0.675 0.664 V1 25.25 22.50 27.25 26.75 24.75 25.30 V2 25.75 22.75 27.25 26.25 22.75 24.95 S Em 0.12 0.12 0.27 First count of germination (%) Varieties(V) V3 26.75 22.75 25.50 25.50 24.25 24.95 V4 25.75 22.75 26.25 25.75 25.00 25.10 V5 25.75 22.50 25.50 25.25 25.75 24.95 CD at 1 % 0.44 NS 0.99 Mean 25.85 22.65 26.35 25.90 24.50 25.05
CD at 1 % 0.30 NS 0.67
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Table 4.38. Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for Germination (%), Root length (cm) and Shoot length (cm) Germination (%) Effluents (E) V1 87.50 (69.33) 94.25 (76.17) 92.50 (75.15) 91.50 (73.09) 91.25 (72.84) 91.40 (73.17) V2 86.75 (68.70) 94.75 (76.80) 93.50 (75.30) 91.75 (73.35) 91.75 (73.35) 91.70 (73.50) S Em 0.15 0.15 0.34 Varieties(V) V3 87.25 (69.12) 95.25 (77.46) 92.00 (73.62) 90.75 (72.33) 91.50 (73.09) 91.35 (73.13) V4 86.50 (68.48) 96.00 (78.55) 92.50 (74.15) 91.25 (72.84) 91.75 (73.35) 91.60 (73.43) V5 86.75 (68.69) 97.25 (80.53) 94.25 (76.17) 92.50 (74.15) 91.25 (72.84) 92.40 (74.48) CD at 1 % 0.56 0.56 1.26 Mean 86.95 (68.86) 95.50 (77.90) 92.95 (74.68) 91.55 (73.15) 91.50 (73.09) 93.82 (73.54) V1 17.52 16.88 17.82 17.28 17.78 17.46 V2 17.52 16.84 17.82 17.26 16.76 17.24 S Em 0.003 0.003 0.01 Root length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 17.58 16.83 17.88 17.25 16.76 17.26 V4 17.49 16.89 17.82 17.29 16.78 17.25 V5 17.56 16.84 17.86 17.25 16.76 17.26 CD at 1 % 0.01 0.01 0.02 Mean 17.53 16.86 17.84 17.27 16.97 17.29 V1 9.58 8.38 8.74 9.46 10.27 9.28 V2 9.53 8.37 8.75 9.45 10.26 9.27 S Em 0.23 3.58 2.25 Shoot length (cm) Varieties(V) V3 9.56 8.35 8.75 9.42 10.26 9.27 V4 9.57 8.39 8.76 9.48 10.28 9.29 V5 9.54 8.32 8.73 9.46 10.25 9.26 CD at 1 % 0.86 NS NS Mean 9.55 8.36 8.75 9.45 10.26 9.27
NS Non significant * Figures in the parentheses indicate arcsine transformed values Effluents (E) Varieties (V) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration V1 DSV-2 V2 570 E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration V3 CSV-216 E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration V4 SPV-489 E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration V5 CSH-14
Irrespective of bajra varieties, Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad recorded significantly the highest (17.84 cm) root length whereas lowest (16.86 cm) root length was recorded by Shreyas Plastics, Gadag. Irrespective of industrial effluents, shoot length was significantly maximum (17.46 cm) in (V1) bajra variety while it was minimum (17.24 cm) in V2. Interaction effect of E x V was significant on root length. Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad effluent recorded highest root length where as Shreyas Plastics, Gadag recorded least root length in all the varieties.
Table 4.39. Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for seedling length(cm), seedling vigour index and seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Seedling length (cm) Effluents (E) V1 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV 27.09 25.26 26.56 26.74 28.06 26.74 V2 27.05 25.22 26.58 26.70 27.01 26.51 S Em Varieties(V) V3 27.15 25.18 26.62 26.67 27.02 26.53 V4 27.05 25.28 26.58 26.76 27.06 26.55 V5 27.10 25.17 26.59 26.71 27.01 26.52 Mean 27.09 25.22 26.59 26.72 27.23 26.57 V1 2371 2381 2457 2447 2560 2443 V2 2347 2389 2485 2450 2478 2430 S Em Seedling vigour index Varieties(V) V3 2368 2398 2449 2420 2472 2422 V4 2340 2427 2458 2442 2483 2430 V5 2351 2447 2506 2471 2465 2448 Mean 2355 2408 2471 2446 2492 2434 V1 0.335 0.335 0.345 0.365 0.375 0.351 V2 0.338 0.338 0.348 0.363 0.378 0.353 S Em Seedling dry weight (g/10 seedlings) Varieties(V) V3 0.335 0.339 0.346 0.362 0.375 0.351 V4 0.334 0.334 0.342 0.369 0.379 0.352 V5 0.338 0.333 0.348 0.368 0.375 0.352 Mean 0.336 0.336 0.346 0.365 0.376 0.351
CD at 1 %
CD at 1 %
CD at 1 %
0.0002 0.0002 0.0004 Varieties (V) V1 DSV-2 V2 570 V3 CSV-216 V4 SPV-489 V5 CSH-14
Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli and Shreyas Plastics, Gadag recorded least values in all the varieties.
Table 4.40. Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for speed of germination, Bartletts germination rate index and First count of germination (%) Speed of Germination Effluents (E) E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 Mean For comparing means of E V ExV V1 32.85 33.27 32.25 34.56 34.76 33.54 V2 32.89 33.25 32.27 34.58 34.75 33.55 S. Em 0.003 0.003 0.01 Varieties(V) V3 32.84 33.28 32.24 34.57 34.78 33.54 V4 32.88 33.25 32.26 34.58 34.74 33.54 V5 32.85 33.22 32.28 34.55 34.78 33.54 CD at 1 % 0.01 NS 0.03 Mean 32.86 33.25 32.26 34.57 34.76 V1 0.353 0.386 0.368 0.396 0.375 0.375 V2 0.356 0.385 0.367 0.397 0.373 0.376 S. Em 0.0003 0.0003 0.001 Bartletts germination rate index Varieties(V) V3 0.351 0.387 0.368 0.394 0.378 0.376 V4 0.358 0.385 0.368 0.392 0.369 0.375 V5 0.358 0.384 0.368 0.397 0.374 0.376 CD at 1 % 0.001 NS 0.003 Mean 0.355 0.385 0.368 0.395 0.374 0.375 V1 25.00 27.50 26.00 26.25 26.50 26.25 First count of germination (%) Varieties(V) V2 25.50 27.50 27.25 25.50 25.50 26.25 S. Em 0.15 0.15 0.35 Varieties (V) V1 DSV-2 V2 570 V3 CSV-216 V4 SPV-489 V5 CSH-14 V3 25.25 27.75 26.75 25.50 25.25 26.10 V4 24.75 27.50 25.75 24.50 26.25 25.75 V5 24.25 25.75 25.50 24.50 25.75 25.15 CD at 1 % 0.58 0.58 1.29 Mean 24.95 27.20 26.25 25.25 25.85 25.90
NS Non significant Effluents (E) E1- West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli -5 per cent effluent concentration E2- Shreyas Plastics, Gadag -5 per cent effluent concentration E3- Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad -10 per cent effluent concentration E4- Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary 10 per cent effluent concentration E5- Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10 per cent effluent concentration
5. DISCUSSION
The results of the laboratory experiments conducted to know the effect of industrial effect on seed quality of cereal crops are discussed in this chapter in line with findings of earlier researchers.
Sorghum
Paddy
Wheat
Bajra
LEGEND T1 0% effluint concentration T2 2.5% effluint concentration T3 5% effluint concentration T4 10% effluint concentration T5 25% effluint concentration T6 50% effluint concentration T7 75% effluint concentration T8 100% effluint concentration
T3
T4 Treatments
T5
T6
T7
T8
Fig.5.01: Influence of west coast paper mills- Dandeli effluent concentration on seed quality of cereal crop seeds
seed germination in maize, groundnut, soybean and blackgram. In the present study also similar results were recorded in line of the above stated reasons.
Maize 100 95 90 85
Germination (%)
Sorghum
Paddy
Wheat
Bajra
LEGEND T1 0% effluint concentration T2 2.5% effluint concentration T3 5% effluint concentration T4 10% effluint concentration T5 25% effluint concentration T6 50% effluint concentration T7 75% effluint concentration T8 100% effluint concentration
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 T1 T2 T3 T4
Treatments
T5
T6
T7
T8
Fig. 5.02 : Influence of different concentrations of Shreyas plastics-Gadag effluent on seed quality of cereal crop seeds
Maize 100 95 90 85
Germination (%)
Sorghum
Paddy
Wheat
Bajra
LEGEND T1 0% effluint concentration T2 2.5% effluint concentration T3 5% effluint concentration T4 10% effluint concentration T5 25% effluint concentration T6 50% effluint concentration T7 75% effluint concentration T8 100% effluint concentration
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 T1 T2 T3 T4
Treatments
T5
T6
T7
T8
Fig. 5.03 : Influence of different concentrations of Karnataka milk federation- Dharwad effluent on seed quality of cereal crop seeds
Maize 100 95 90 85
Germination (%)
Sorghum
Paddy
Wheat
Bajra
LEGEND T1 0% effluint concentration T2 2.5% effluint concentration T3 5% effluint concentration T4 10% effluint concentration T5 25% effluint concentration T6 50% effluint concentration T7 75% effluint concentration T8 100% effluint concentration
80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 T1 T2 T3 T4
Treatments
T5
T6
T7
T8
Fig. 5.04 : Influence of different concentrations of Pumpsagar distilleries Ltd. - Bellary effluent on seed quality of cereal crop seeds
Maize 100 95
Sorghum
Paddy
Wheat
Bajra
LEGEND
90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 T1 T2 T3 T4
Treatments T1 0% effluint concentration T2 2.5% effluint concentration T3 5% effluint concentration T4 10% effluint concentration T5 25% effluint concentration T6 50% effluint concentration T7 75% effluint concentration T8 100% effluint concentration
Germination (%)
T5
T6
T7
T8
Fig. 5.05 : Influence of different concentrations of Sri Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Garag effluent on seed quality of cereal crop seeds
is a gradual but steady increase in all the seed quality parameters. But beyond 10 per cent concentration causes adverse effect on seed quality parameters in all the five cereal crops. Subsequently 100 per cent i.e. raw effluent had negative effects for all the seed quality characteristics (Fig. 5.05). Hence, 10 per cent concentration of Sri. Laksmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt., Ltd., Garag is emerged as best concentration for maize (Table 4.21) and sorghum (Table 4.22). Similarly, 5 per cent concentration is optimum for paddy (Table 4.23), wheat (Table 4.24) and bajra (Table 4.25). This might be due to Sri. Laksmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt., Ltd., effluent consists of higher amounts of suspended solids (800 mg/l), dissolved solids (3480 mg/l), hardness (4300 mg/l), EC (20,800 m hs/cm), calcium (880 mg/l), potassium (4100 mg/l) and chlorides (4500 mg/l) and other micro and macro nutrients. Here, it is well established fact that beyond 25 per cent concentration of effluent, sharp reduction in seed quality parameters was observed. The germination percentage and early seedling growth of cereal crops were markedly suppressed as the concentration of the effluent increased. These findings are in accordance with the observations of Saxena et al. (1986) on the germination of mungbean, urdbean, chickpea and pea with tannery effluent. The high TDS (total dissolved solids) value of distillery effluents seems to be responsible for germination inhibition and subsequent seedling growth because they would disturb the prolific relation of seed with water and thus reduce the amount of water absorbed. On the other hand, the high TDS (total dissolved solids) value would retards seed germination by enriching the salinity and conductivity of the solutes being absorbed by the seeds prior to its germination. However, at its lower (below 10 %) concentration the effluent did not affect seed germination and its quality parameters, whereas higher (beyond 25 %) concentration decreased the seed quality parameters of cereal crops. Similar observations were recorded by Somashekar et al. (1984) in jowar, bajra and rice crops. The results of the present study indicate that industrial effluents when applied as such or at higher concentrations to agricultural land have elicited deleterious effects on the overall growth of the cereal seedlings studied. Therefore, it is suggested that the selected few industrial effluents may be used as liquid fertilizer for certain crops after proper dilution in order to avoid the irrigation water scarcity as well as fertilizer crisis across the country in the present status.
E1
100
E2
E3
E4
E5
LEGEND Industrial effluents E1- West coast paper mills, Dandeli -10% effluent concentration E2- Shreyas plastics, Gadag -5% effluent concentration E3- Karnataka milk federation, Dharwad -5% effluent concentration E4- Pumpsagar distilleries, Bellary 10% effluent concentration E5- Sri Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10% effluent concentration Varieties V1 - Vijay 711 V2 KH 517 V3 DK 984 V4 Godavari 989 V5 C - 55
98
96 Germination (%)
94
92
90
88
86 V1 V2 V3 Varieties (V) V4 V5
Fig. 5.06 : Maize varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage
E1
100
E2
E3
E4
E5
LEGEND Industrial effluents E1- West coast paper mills, Dandeli -10% effluent concentration E2- Shreyas plastics, Gadag -5% effluent concentration E3- Karnataka milk federation, Dharwad -5% effluent concentration E4- Pumpsagar distilleries, Bellary 10% effluent concentration E5- Sri Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10% effluent concentration Varieties V1 - Vijay 711 V2 KH 517 V3 DK 984 V4 Godavari 989 V5 C - 55
99
98 Germination (%)
97
96
95
94
93 1 2 3 Varieties (V) 4 5
Fig. 5.07 : Sorghum varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage
In this study Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary ranks first this might be because the particular effluent is composed of optimum amounts of plant nutrients like sodium (260 mg/l), chlorine (1350 mg/l), sulphates (280) etc. The promotion of seed quality parameters by the lower concentrations of the effluent was due to the presence of optimum levels of plant nutrients in the effluents. In the higher concentrations of effluents chlorides, sulphates, sulphides and organic pollutants are present at higher levels. These nutrients and organic pollutants inhibited seedling growth by altering the osmotic relations. Among the varieties CSV-216 proved better in seed quality parameters by recording higher values for germination (96.15 %) (Table 4.29), root length (22.38 cm) (Table 4.29), seedling length (32.17 cm) (Table 4.30), seedling vigour index (3093) (Table 4.30) and Bartletts germination rate index (0.242) (Table 4.31). This might be due to its excellent genetic makeup and capacity to sustain the toxicity. In interaction effect, the CSV-216 variety performed well with the Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad for all quality parameters (Fig. 5.07).
E1
100
E2
E3
E4
E5
LEGEND Industrial effluents E1- West coast paper mills, Dandeli -10% effluent concentration E2- Shreyas plastics, Gadag -5% effluent concentration E3- Karnataka milk federation, Dharwad -5% effluent concentration E4- Pumpsagar distilleries, Bellary 10% effluent concentration E5- Sri Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10% effluent concentration Varieties V1 - Vijay 711 V2 KH 517 V3 DK 984 V4 Godavari 989 V5 C - 55
98
96 Germination (%)
94
92
90
88
86 V1 V2 V3 Varieties (V) V4 V5
Fig. 5.08 : Paddy varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage
Irrespective of the wheat varieties, DWR 2006 performed better in germination (90.30 %) (Table 4.35) and root length (9.33 cm) (Table 4.35). This might be due to its genetic back ground and capacity to resist toxic substances. Interaction between E x V the wheat variety DWR-1006 performed better with Sri Laksmi Narayana Distilleries in seed quality parameters namely root length (10.29 cm) (Table 4.35), shoot length (5.17 cm) (Table 4.35), seedling length (15.46 cm) (Table 4.36), seedling vigour index (1418) (Table 4.36) and seedling dry weight of 0.272 (g/l 10 seedlings) (Table 4.36) (Fig. 5.09).
E1
100
E2
E3
E4
E5
LEGEND Industrial effluents E1- West coast paper mills, Dandeli -10% effluent concentration E2- Shreyas plastics, Gadag -5% effluent concentration E3- Karnataka milk federation, Dharwad -5% effluent concentration E4- Pumpsagar distilleries, Bellary 10% effluent concentration E5- Sri Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10% effluent concentration Varieties V1 - Vijay 711 V2 KH 517 V3 DK 984 V4 Godavari 989 V5 C - 55
98
96
Germination (%)
94
92
90
88
86
84 V1 V2 V3 Varieties (V) V4 V5
Fig. 5.09 : Wheat varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage
E1 98
E2
E3
E4
E5
LEGEND Industrial effluents E1- West coast paper mills, Dandeli -10% effluent concentration E2- Shreyas plastics, Gadag -5% effluent concentration E3- Karnataka milk federation, Dharwad -5% effluent concentration E4- Pumpsagar distilleries, Bellary 10% effluent concentration E5- Sri Lakshmi Narayana distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag -10% effluent concentration Varieties V1 - Vijay 711 V2 KH 517 V3 DK 984 V4 Godavari 989 V5 C - 55
96
94 Germination (%)
92
90
88
86
84 V1 V2 V3 Varieties (V) V4 V5
Fig. 5.10 : Bajra varietal response to different industrial effluents for germination percentage
12. Among the different sorghum varieties, CSV-216 proved little bit resistance to different industrial effluents. 13. Among the different paddy varieties Jaya proved little bit resistance to different industrial effluents. 14. Among the different wheat varieties DWR-2006 proved little bit resistance to different industrial effluents. 15. Among the different bajra varieties HC-4 proved little bit resistance to different industrial effluents.
6.1 Experiment-I: Influence of industrial effluent concentrations on seed quality of cereal crops
For maize 10 per cent effluent concentration level of west coast paper mills, Dandeli, Pumpasagara Distilleries, Bellary and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries, Garag, 5 per cent level of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag and Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad emerged as the optimum concentration level for different industrial effluents by recording higher values for various seed quality parameters. For sorghum 10 per cent effluent concentration level of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad, Pumpasagara Distilleries Ltd., Bellary and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag, 5 per cent effluent concentration levels of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli and Shreyas Plastics, Gadag emerged as the optimum concentration level for different industrial effluents by recording higher values for various seed quality parameters. For paddy 5 per cent effluent concentration of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad, Pampasagar a Distilleries, Bellary and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag, 10 per cent effluent concentration of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli and Shreyas Plastic, Gadag emerged as the optimum concentration level for different industrial effluents by recording higher values for various seed quality parameters. For wheat seeds 5 per cent effluent concentration of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli, Shreyas Plastics, Gadag, Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag and 2.5 per cent effluent concentration of Pampasagar Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Bellary emerged as the optimum level for different industrial effluents by recording higher values for various seed quality parameters. For Bajra 5 per cent effluent concentration of West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli, Pampasagar Distilleries Ltd., Bellary and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag, 2.5 per cent effluent concentration of Shreyas Plastics, Gadag and Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad emerged as the optimum level for different industrial effluents by recording higher values for various seed quality parameters.
Jaya performed better in seed quality parameters. The interaction between E x V the West Coast Paper Mill, Dandeli and the Jaya variety combination recorded higher values. Among the different industrial effluents, Sri.Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt., Ltd., Gadag effluent performed well by recording higher better in seed quality parameters for which was followed Pampasagar Distilleries but least values were recorded in case of Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad. Irrespective of the wheat varieties, DWR-2006 out performed other varieties. Interaction effect between DWR-1006 variety and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries, Pvt., Ltd., Garag was superior. Among industrial effluents, Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries, Garag recorded higher seed quality parameters and this was followed by Pampasagar Distilleries, Bellary whereas poor performance was noticed by Shreyas Plastics, Gadag. Among the varieties of bajra, HC-4 performed better in majority of the seed quality parameters. Interaction between E x V for bajra recorded non-significant values for all the seed quality parameters.
REFERENCES
Abul-Baki, A.A. and Anderson, J.D., 1973, Vigour determination in soybean by multiple criteria. Crop Sci., 13: 630-637. AIDA, 1995, All India Distillers Association. Circular, June. Amudha, P. and Mahalingam, S., 1999, Effect of dairy effluent on the body composition of Cyprinus carpio (Cyprinidae). J. Ecotoxicol. Environ., 9 (1): 03-08. Anonymous, 1985, Effect of city compost alone and mixed with sewage sludge (1:1) in combination with area/ superphosphate on the drymatter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 27: 110-117. Anonymous, 1999, International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Tech., 27 : 25-30. Arumugam, K., 2007, Impact of pharmaceutical factory effluent on seed germination and seedling growth of five varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogea). J. Ecotoxico Eunviron. Monit., 17 (3): 245-250. Bal, A.S., 1999, Waste water management for textile industry On overview. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 41: 264-290. Bartlett, M.S., 1973, Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology (supplement). J. Res. Stat. Soc., 4 (2): 137-183. Behera, B.K. and Misra, B.N., 1982, The effect of Sugar Mill effluent on enzyme activities of rice seedlings. Ben, P.V., Sherges, M.B., Curtis, O.D., Nugent, A.C. and Mc. Cornick, L.L., 1965, Paper mill waste water for crop irrigation and its effect on the soil. Lousiana State Uni. Agric. Mechanical College, Bull., p.604. Bhosale, T.A. and Patil, T.M., 2006, Effect of paper mill waste water irrigation on soil. J. Ecobiol., 18 (2): 189-191. Channakeshava, P., Sarangamath, A. and Anand Naik, 2007, Direct and residual effect of sludge and other P sources on nutrient status and uptake under paddy cowpea cropping sequence. J. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Monit., 17 (1): 73-80. Datar, M. T., 1997, Performance of dairy effluent treatment plant. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 39: 52-60. Day, A.D. and Taher, 1982, Wheat grain grown with treated municipal waste water. Agron. Abstr., 23: 34-30. Dhevagi, P. and Oblisami, 2000, Effect of paper mill effluent on germination of agricultural crops. J. Ecobiol., 12 (4): 243-249. Dhevagi, P., Rajannan, G. and Oblisami, 2000, Effect of paper mill effluent on Spermosphere microflora. J. Ecobiol., 12 (2): 149-152. Elarajan, M. and Murugesha Bupathi, P., 2006, Effect of paper factory effluent on germination and seedling vigour of selected crops. J. Ecobiol., 19 (2): 173-183. Evans, L.E. and Bhatt, G.M., 1977, A non destructive technique for measuring seedling vigour in wheat. Canadian J. Pl. Sci., 57: 983-985. Eyini, M., Jayakumar, M. and Pannireselum, S., 1993, Distillery effluent induced changes in epicuticular wax deposits in Eichornia crassipes. Indian J. Ecol., 20 : 1-4. Goutam, D. D. and Bishnoi, S., 1999a, Characterization of urmal dairy effluent. Okossay, 7(1/2): 13-16. Goutam, D. D. and Bishnoj, S., 1990b, Studies on the effluents of urmal dairy effluent dairy effluent on soil characteristics and growth of wheat plant. Adv. Pl. Sci., 3(2): 26-244. Goutam, D. D., Kumar, K. and Bishno, S., 1992, Effect of diary effluent on seed germination of some rabi and kharif crop plants. J. Environ. Biol., 13 (1): 7-12. Gupta, G. C. and Mozumdar, A. K., 1973, Treatment of coke oven effluents, I. A. W. P. C. Commemoration, pp.155-165.
Gupta, G. C. and Tagan Nath, 1987, Chemical composition of pressmud from different sugar factories in Haryana. Indian Agric. Res., 21(1) : 43-48. Hodges, L., 1973, Environmental pollination. Holt, Richard and Wintson, Inc (Publ.), New York. Indian Standards Institution (ISI), 1966, Methods for sampling and test for industrial effluents. Part I, I. S., 2488, Indian Standard Institution, New Delhi, pp. 1-32. Indian Standards Institution (ISI), 1977, Tolerance limits for industrial effluents discharged on land for irrigation purposes. I. S., 3307, Indian Standard Institution, New Delhi, pp.1-8. Jadhav, H.D. and Sawanth, N.K., 1975, Influence of added spent was on chemical and physical properties of soil. Indian J. Agric. Chem., 8: 73-84. Johimani, P. and Elayarajan, M., 2003, Impact of dye effluent on sodium, calcium and magnesium levels in soil nutrient content of crops. J. Ecobiol. 15 (2): 89-98. Jothimani, P. and Elayarajan, M., 2003, Effect of treated effluent on germination, shoot length, root length and vigour index of crops. J. Ecobiol., 15 (1): 49-54. Kanchan Bala Verma and Kumar P., 2004, Effects of agro-based industrial effluents on the growth and development on wheat (Iriticum aestivum L. var. RR-21) maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J. Ecol., 31 (2): 93-96. Kumar, G., Sharmica Banu, G. and Kannan, 2006, Effects of textile mill effluents on seed germination, seedling growth and pigment content on Arachis hypogea. J. Ecobiol., 19 (1): 19-22. Magurie, J.D., 1962, Speed of germination, aid in selection evaluating for seedling emergence and vigour. Crop Sci., 2: 176-177. Malleshappa, G., 1979, Agronomic studies on the utilization of paper mill effluent in the production of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Uni. Agric. Sci., Bangalore (India). Miller, T. B. 1973, Malt distilleries grains symposium arranged by the Agricultural Industrial Training Services, June 1973, In : Hand book of organic waste conversion. Ed. Michael, W. M. B. Vannorstrand Reonhold Environ. Series, pp.135-164. Mishra, P. and Bera, A.K., 1995, Effect of tannary effluent on seed germination and early seedling growth wheat. Seed Res., 23 (2): 129-131. Nagaraj, D.N., 1987, Agronomic investigations on the utilization of raw sewage effluent in crop production. Ph. D. Thesis, Uni. Agric. Sci., Bangalore (India). Nair, G. and Hippalgaonkar, K.V., 2996, Effect of sewage irrigation on nitrate and oxalate contents in three leafy vegetable crops. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 38 : 113-118. Pandey, D.K. and Soni, P., 1994, Comparative study of germination of Acacia catechu and Moria alba seeds under effluent irrigation. Van Vigyan, 32: 29-36. Panes, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V., 1978, Statistical methods for agriculture workers, Indian Council of Agric. Res., New Delhi. Prashanth Rajan, M. and Kannan, 2007, Effect of paper board mill sludge bio-compost and effluent irrigation on physiological attributer and yield of cowpea. J. Ecobiol., 21 (4): 377-382. Rajanan, G. and Oblisami, G., 1979, Effect of paper factory effluents on soil and crop plant. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 120-130. Rajanan, G. and Oblisamy, G., 1979, Effect of paper factory effluents on soil and crop plants. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 21: 120-130. Rajaram, N. and Janardhan, N., 1988, Effect distiller effluent on seed germination and early seedling growth of soybean, cowpea, rice and sorghum. Seed Res., 16(2): 173-177. Rukmangada Reddy, S., 2007, Effect of FYM, sewage sludge and urban compost on growth and yield of sweet sorghum (Sorghum biocolor (L.) Moench). J. Soil Crops, 19 (2): 261-263.
Sahai, R., Jabeen and Saxena, P. K., 1983, Effect of distillery waste on seed germination, seedling growth and pigment content of rice. Indian J. Ecolol., 10: 7-10. Singh, Y. and Bahadur, R., 1997, Effect of distillery irrigation on maize grain crop and soil fertility. Indian J. Ecol., 24 (1): 53-59. Somashekar, R.K., Gowda, M.T.G., Shettigar, S.L.N. and Srinath, K.P., 1984, Effect of industrial effluents on crop plants. Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 26 (2): 136-146. Soudarrajan, M. and James Pitchai, G., 2007, Impact of distillery spent wash on seed germination, seedling growth and yield of bhendi. J. Ecol., 20 (4): 385-389. Sukanya, T.S. and Meli, S.S., 2003a, Distillery effluent as nitrogen source on maize yield and soil properties. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24 (3): 430-445. Sukanya, T.S. and Meli, S.S., 2003b, Feasibility of distillery effluent as nitrogen source and its effect on nutrient uptake and soil nutrient status in wheat production. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 17 (3): 421-427. Tiwari, R. C. and Misra, S.G., 1964, Studies on retention of Zn in some soils of up. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 12: 301-309. Unnamalai, C.T., Ganapathy, M. and Angayar Kanni, A., 2004, Effect of industrial and urban solid water on nutrient uptake of rice. J. Ecobiol., 16 (3): 223-225. Zalawadia, M. and Raman, S., 1996, Effect of distillery waste water with graded fertilizer levels on sorghum yield and soil properties. J. Indian Soc. Sci., 42 (4): 575-579.
Appendix-I: ISI standards for discharge of industrial effluents (all the values except pH, temperature are in mg/l) Tolerance limits for industrial effluents discharged Into land surface waters On land for irrigation (IS 2490-1974) (IS 3307-1977) BOD, 5 days 20C COD pH Suspended solids Total dissolved solids Temperature (C) Oils and greece Phenolic compounds Cyanide Sulphide Fluoride Total residual chloride Cadmium Chromium (Hexavalent) Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Zinc Chloride Bolan Sulphate Percent sodium Ammonium nitrogen 30 250 5.5-9.0 100 40 10 1.0 0.2 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.1 3.0 0.1 0.01 3.00 0.05 5.00 50 500 5.5-9.0 2100 30 600 2 1000 60 -
APPENDIX
ABSTRACT
The study entitled effect of industrial effluents on seed quality attributes of cereal crops was carried out in the Department of Seed Science and Technology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Results of the first experiment revealed that, 5% concentration of effluent for maize, sorghum and wheat, 10% concentration of effluent for paddy and maize was fond as the optimum concentration level for west coast paper mills, Dandeli, 5% concentration of effluent for maize, sorghum and wheat, 5% concentration of effluent for paddy and 2.5% concentration of effluent for bajra for Shreyas Plastics, Gadag, 5% concentration of effluent for maize, paddy and wheat, 10% concentration for sorghum and 2.5% concentration of effluent for bajra for Karnataka Milk Federation, Dharwad, 10% concentration of effluent for maize and sorghum, 5% concentration for paddy and bajra and 2.5% concentration for wheat are considered as the optimum concentration level for the Pumpasagar Distilleries, Bellary. Second experiment study results revealed that among the different tested for maize, paddy, bajra. The different industrial effluents used West Coast Paper Mills, Dandeli out performed the other industrial effluents. Whereas, for sorghum and wheat Pumpasagar Distilleries, Bellary and Sri. Lakshmi Narayana Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., Garag out performed the other industrial effluents respectively. Among the different maize varieties tested KH-517 proved little bit resistance to different industrial effluents. Similarly for sorghum, CSV-216 variety, for paddy Jaya variety, for wheat DWR-2006 variety and for bajra HC-4 variety proved little bit resistance to different industrial effluents. Therefore, the study revealed both positive and negative impact on its beneficial and harmful effects. Hence, there is a need to standardize the effective optimum level of different industrial effluents in field condition in relation to seed quality.