Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Hector
seem to think, he was pouting. They forget that he was the crown jewel of the Greek Army. They forget that he later goes on to avenge his friends death. And they forget that while perhaps nine out of ten people will know who Achilles is if you randomly ask them, almost nobody will know who Hector is. Nobody seems to think that there might be a reason for that. The thought that Achilles was pouting is what seems to be the only one that those who prefer Hector seem to be able to come up with. And as was stated earlier, Achilles was not in fact pouting, but he was abiding by his principles, and refusing to help those who wronged him. If Achilles had not done this, he would have been, in his mind, a coward, someone who let people take advantage of them without doing anything about it. By refusing to fight, he avoided this, and was able to keep his dignity. However, those who vie for Hector cannot seem to come up with any solid reason why there is anything particularly remarkable about Hector that Achilles cannot stand up to. I heard one person quote a line from Mythology that told of how great a warrior Hector was, and yet, Achilles kills Hector. Defeats him. This makes Achilles the greater warrior by default, and so that single, almost decent argument falls. And there it is. Why Achilles greater than Hector. A greater warrior. A greater hero. A greater man. Achilles was a spectacular fighter, nigh invincible. Achilles had morals and principles that meant something to him, morals and principles that he lived and abided by. Achilles was a good friend. What was Hector? An above average warrior. How can anybody, after seeing the comparison between Achilles and Hector, possibly contest that Hector was greater than Achilles? The answer is simple: they cannot.