Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
To proceed, please check "Agree" to the above mentioned Terms and Conditions.
Title:
Name:
Year Of Graduation?
Mr.
2011
Mr. Mr.
2011 2011
Dr.
Quratulain Saeeda
2011
Mr. Dr.
2006 2008
Mr.
Azeem Akhtar
2008
Dr.
Salina Mukhtar
2011
Contact Number
Current Email
Gender
Age
Karachi
21-29 years
Karachi, Pakistan
21-29 years
Dr.mmustafa@hotm 3008286375 aol.com Male adanish1@gmail.co 3002245101 m Male adanish1@gmail.co 3002245101 m Male
karachi karachi
mansoor.khan@pha 2136616381 rmevo.biz Male R_sanjhira@yahoo. 3003035601 com Male azeem.akhtar@hot 3002790490 mail.com
karachi
Male
40-49 years
azeem.akhtar@hot 3002790490 mail.com Male MRkhan@yahoo.co 8120945 m Male dr.malik@hotmail.co 3002149912 m Male
Karachi, Pakistan
0300-2374117
21-29 years
3. How would you 1. How satisfactory grade your overall was the teaching 2. How helpful was class instructors within the program your academic in the following: at IoBM? advisor? [Knowledge]
Biomedical Engineer
Very satisfactory
Very helpful
Average
Good Good
Doctor
Very satisfactory
Very helpful
Good
Rs. 55,000 - Rs. 69, 000 Very satisfactory Rs. 70, 000 - Rs. 99,000 Very satisfactory Rs. 70, 000 - Rs. 99,000 Very satisfactory
Bechelor Doctor
Rs. 55,000 - Rs. 69, Extremely 000 satisfactory Rs. 70, 000 - Rs. 99,000 Very satisfactory Rs. 70, 000 - Rs. 99,000 Rs. 70, 000 - Rs. 99,000 Rs. 55,000 - Rs. 69, 000 Rs. 70, 000 - Rs. 99,000 Moderately satisfactory Moderately satisfactory Very satisfactory Moderately satisfactory
Good Good
Engineer
Extremely helpful
Good
M.B.B.S
Moderately satisfactory
Very helpful
Good
4. How would you grade the following attributes with respect to the how 3. How would you 3. How would you well they were grade your overall grade your overall 3. How would you groomed/develope class instructors class instructors grade your overall d by the end of in the following: in the following: class instructors MHM? [Delivery of the [Teaching in the following: [Professional subject] methodology] [Student support] skills]
4. How would you grade the following attributes with respect to the how well they were groomed/develope d by the end of MHM? [Verbal Communications]
Good
Good
Average
Good
Good
Good Good
Average Good
Average Good
Good
Good
Average
Good
Average
Good Good
Average Good
Good Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Average
Good
4. How would you grade the following attributes with respect to the how well they were groomed/develope d by the end of MHM? [Written skills]
4. How would you 4. How would you 4. How would you 4. How would you grade the grade the grade the grade the following following following following attributes with attributes with attributes with attributes with respect to the how respect to the how respect to the how respect to the how well they were well they were well they were well they were groomed/develope groomed/develope groomed/develope groomed/develope d by the end of d by the end of d by the end of d by the end of MHM? [Logical MHM? [Ability to MHM? [Linking MHM? [Computer and analytical work with theory with proficiency] thinking] numbers] practice]
Good
Good
Good
Good
Average
Good
Average
Good
Average
Average
4. How would you 4. How would you grade the grade the following following attributes with attributes with respect to the how respect to the how well they were well they were groomed/develope groomed/develope d by the end of d by the end of MHM? [Decision MHM? [Team making] building]
4. How would you grade the following attributes with respect to the how well they were groomed/develope d by the end of MHM? [Leadership qualities]
4. How would you grade the following attributes with respect to the how well they were 5. How useful were groomed/develope the services d by the end of provided by the onMHM? [Research campus career knowledge] center?
Good
Good
Good
Good
Moderately useful
Good
Good
Good
Good
Very useful
Moderately useful
Additional What was your 6. What was your comments, if any designation before objective of 7. Do you think the (e.g., suggest one getting enrolled in persuing the MHM MHM program met improvement to the MHM program? your objectives? the program) programm? Need some addition in Health Electives. Personal Grooming Yes Field Engineer One suggestion that I would like to made is the follow up of graduates especially in terms of placements. It seems that the link breaks down once people are graduated. The program should include placements of people so that right people on the right place at the right time should take over the system for a better Consultant country. Physiotherapist IT Officer Marketing of Health Services should be included in the curriculum as a core course instead of just being taught as an elective course. Doctor Health elective as well as business electives should be revised and new courses should be added to the course Doctor Manager Manager
Service Manager
Yes Yes
Yes
MBA
Value Added career Yes Professional grooming Yes Professional grooming Yes
Career enhancement grooming Professional and career enhancement Professional and career enhancement grooming Professionalism
Yes Yes
Manager RMO
Yes
Manager
Project manager
Manager Doctor Doctor Need to incorporate more Pharmaceutical related courses in the program. Currently the program includes majority of the courses related to hospital management and research. More courses involving Pharmaceutical marketing should be included in the Assistant Product program Manager
To improve the managerial abilities as they were not incorporated in medicine curriculum. Additionally, my profession (Pharma marketer) required managerial excellence Yes
4. How would you grade the following attributes with respect to the how well they were groomed/develope d by the end of MHM?
4 4 4
4 4
4 5 4