Comparative Analysis of Robinson Crusoe and Foe

Daniel Defoes Robinson Crusoe has proven to be one of the most influential and groundbreaking texts of early fictional writing, opening doors for discussion and critique while introducing the writing world to the genre of the island narrative. Defoes novel helps solidify the stereotypical roles of the late 17th century, as it portrays the life of a middle-aged white man during colonization, and how issues of race, gender, exploration, and independence are viewed through his eyes. It was one of the first novels to leave the main character to his own devices, and showed direct interaction between a white man and his black slave, Friday. Although Robinson Crusoe was written hundreds of years ago, a newer look into his island life and social views was created in 1986 when J.M. Coetzee wrote the novel Foe, a pastiche to Defoes famous work. While the two texts have many similarities, Coetzee used his piece to update the outlook of the story by throwing some changes into the mix. With the added presence of a female voice, a setting away from the island, and more modernized worldviews, Foe instantly made room for controversy, discussion, and comparisons between the two texts. Critics have deconstructed both books to uncover their similarities and differences, and Coetzees novel is viewed as the newage Robinson Crusoe. The biggest difference between the two novels is the main characters: Robinson Crusoe is the defined character in Defoes book, while a woman, Susan Barton, narrates Foe. The character of Susan Barton is complex, exemplifying both strength and weakness, while helping fill the void of women left from the earlier text. The moment Barton is shipwrecked on the island with Crusoe, she tries to take charge of the situation, letting her opinions be heard and often complaining about the way Crusoe manages his time and life. While she fights to have situations work to her favor, she also expects Crusoe and Friday to go out of their way to assist her and somewhat pamper her during her stay on the island. She proves to be too weak-willed to help with certain chores, and leaves many decisions up to Crusoe. Coetzees decision to add a female voice offers a fresh twist to an old story, by morphing Crusoes character to fit the descriptions Susan Barton offers. In Robinson Crusoe, we get first-hand knowledge of Crusoes personality, beliefs, and feelings, as hes the narrator and main focus of the book, but in Foe, Barton gives specific physical descriptions that the reader didnt receive from the first novel: The strangers eyes were green, his hair burnt to a straw colour. I judged he was sixty years of age. He worea jerkin, and drawers to below his knees, such as we see watermen wear on the Thames, and a tall cap rising in a cone, all of these made of pelts laced together, the fur outwards, and a stout pair of sandals. In his belt were a short stick and a knife. A mutineer.yet another mutineer (Coetzee 8). Its interesting to take a step back and think about how Foe reflect the views of todays society. Although Coetzee distinguishes the feminine perspective through Susan Barton, her choices and ethics raise controversy in how they compare to women living in the twentieth or twenty-first centuries. Her representation throughout the book varies, as she begins her story with one set of morals and then switches them by the end. On the surface, it appears that Coetzee wants his readers to view Barton as a strong female character, one whos survived on her own and written her own story. However, the farther into the text, the more Susan Bartons character reveals itself to be one of unclear morals and occasional lunacy. Although several chapters are devoted solely to her writing and opinions, she ultimately is waiting for the approval of her male counterparts to have her writing accepted (Probyn). Barton appears apprehensive about achieving approval from the men in her life, she proves to be stronger than Crusoe when it comes to exploration and adventure. A main theme of Robinson Crusoe was the insecurities that came with moving away from personal comfort zones, as well as the desire to be involved in good adventures. Crusoe is admittedly unsure of his abilities to travel and be adventuresome on his own, and Defoe foreshadows much of whats to come in the beginning of his novel. Before Crusoe is stranded on the island, he makes a point to note how difficult it is to be middle class and still have experiences away from the norm. Defoe used this point to strategically grasp readers from the middle-class.

Appealing to his audience was one way Defoe was able to become so popular, and Coetzee seemed to follow this trend by creating characters and events that were more relatable to modern times. Coetzees ideas on adventure and travel are rooted in Susan Barton, who seems to defy Crusoes fear of independent travel and exploration. Barton left Europe single-handedly to search for her lost daughter across the ocean in Brazil, and while this shows insight to Bartons strength and determination, its also an updated version of the typical seventeenth-century woman. Its interesting to compare the differences in strength between Crusoe and Barton, specifically when considering the different gender roles they fill. The concept of having mixed genders on the island lets readers see the interaction between Crusoe, whos been stranded without women for decades, and Barton, a somewhat demanding and promiscuous woman. Although Crusoe hasnt seen a woman in years, the sexual tension the reader expects with Bartons presence seems lost in translation; Crusoe originally views Barton as an annoyance and burden, rather than a good time. While they eventually begin a relationship, its one of necessity, not love.. Foe, however, allows Crusoe to be viewed in a completely different light, and shows the modernization of the original text. Defoe may have purposely left women out of the picture to conform to more conservative social views, while Coetzee was able to write freely for his readers of the twentieth century. Although Crusoe didnt have a woman in the first text, he did have Friday. Both Foe and Robinson Crusoe kept Friday as a substantial character, although he was viewed very differently in each text. Crusoes relationship with Friday comes in several layers. At one point in Robinson Crusoe, Crusoe refers to Fridays people as, blinded, ignorant pagans, and is condescending in the way he speaks to and treats Friday (Defoe 170). He doesnt call Friday by a real name, instead referring to him by the day they met, and Crusoe tells Friday to call him master. Crusoe attempts to civilize Friday by teaching him Christianity, and Crusoe says that through his teachings he (Crusoe) has become a much better scholar in the scripture knowledge (Zuiderveen). However, later in the novel, and in Coetzees interpretation of their relationship, Friday and Crusoe are more friends than master-servant. Theyre essentially the only companionship on the island, and Crusoe depends of Friday for entertainment as well as help with building shelter and finding food. In Robinson Crusoe, Friday can speak, and learns some English and Portuguese from Crusoe; however, in Foe, Fridays tongue has been cut out, making him completely mute throughout the novel. In Robinson Crusoe, Fridays voice helps the reader understand how he communicated with Crusoe, and how he expressed what he was feeling. In Foe, Fridays silence is overwhelming. The reader is never sure whether Friday physically cant speak or simply chooses not to, but he inevitably uses his silence as power over Susan Barton by keeping his past to himself and refusing to let Barton into his life. Daniel Defoes Robinson Crusoe is a novel that has transcended generations and offers inspiration for writers separated by centuries of time. The first of its kind, Robinson Crusoe showed the writing world the genre of the island narrative, and offered social, political, and aesthetic views of the seventeenth century. It prompted J.M. Coetzee to write a response novel, Foe, which attempted to create a modernized version of Defoes text, and gave critics textual evidence to compare to the original novel. While both books have different story lines, they have similarities in style and certain social views. Whether discussing gender, race, or exploration, both novels show different viewpoints on the matter, and illustrate the progression of the island narrative throughout the years. Defoe proves that good writing is good writing, and gives todays generation a distinct look into the past.