Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I=A
_
is the radius of gyra-
tion of the column cross-section, A is the area of cross-section, EI is the exural rigidity of the intact column,
and j is a constant depends on the cross-sectional shape and accounts for the non-uniform distribution of
shear stress across the section, j is derived for various cross-sectional shapes in textbooks on solid mechanics
(e.g., j = 9/10 for circular cross-section and j = 5/6 for rectangular cross-section).
In the absence of rotational inertia and shear deformation, for small amplitude vibrations, the dynamic
equation of motion for the beam is given by [3]
EI
o
4
yx; t
ox
4
m
o
2
yx; t
ot
2
f x; t 0 < x < L 2
In all the relations the Simple beam assumption, are used. Owing to this assumption, the element rota-
tion and shear deformation in comparison with the bending deformation are neglected. In addition, no warp-
ing occurs at any section due to the large bending [3].
2.2.2. Dynamic characteristics of tapered column
Dierentiating from the dynamic equation of motion yields:
EI
o
4
yx; t
ox
4
m
o
2
yx; t
ot
2
f x; t 0 < x < L 3
where dm is the change in the mass distribution along the column and d(EI) is the tapering function which may
characterize the state of increase or decrease in exural stiness along the member length and for stepped col-
umn may be written in the form of
dEI EI
0
w 1
I
0
is the primary moment of inertia of the column. The case w = 1 imply that the column has a uniform sec-
tion, w > 1 and w < 1 indicates respectively the increase and decrease in stiness of column at dierent part.
In this study, it is assumed that there are no changes on the boundaries of column. Thus, the boundary
conditions applied to a column in the uniform-section state can be equally applied to the column in the tapered
Fig. 1. 3-D view of abruptly varying thickness column.
1724 A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735
state. Furthermore, the tapering in a column is assumed to be uniform through the thickness of column (i.e.,
thickness-through tapering). Based on Fox formulation, the changes in the ith mode shape of a stepped col-
umn can be expressed as a linear combination of natural modes of the corresponding uniform section column
[22]:
dy
i
M
j1
a
ij
y
j
i; j 1; 2; 3; . . . ; M 4
Substituting Eq. (4) in dynamic equation of motion Eq. (3) for the ith mode shape yields:
dEI
o
4
y
i
ox
4
EI
M
j1
a
ij
o
4
y
j
ox
4
dm
o
2
y
i
ot
2
m
m
j1
a
ij
o
2
y
j
ot
2
0 5
Multiplying Eq. (5) on the left side by y
k
, that, i 5k and using y
m
X
2
m
y
m
and integrating for the whole
length of column yields:
_
L
0
dEI y
k
o
4
y
i
ox
4
dx
M
j1
a
ij
_
L
0
EI
o
4
y
j
ox
4
y
k
dx
_ _
X
2
i
_
L
0
dm y
i
y
k
dx
M
j1
a
ij
X
2
j
_
L
0
m y
j
y
k
dx 0
6
The orthogonality property implies that:
_
L
0
my
m
y
n
dx d
mn
7
_
L
0
EI y
m
o
4
y
n
ox
4
dx X
2
m
d
mn
8
where X
m
are the natural frequencies for the uniform-section column and d
mn
is the kronecker symbol and
dened as follows:
d
mn
1 m n
0 m 6 n
_
Substituting Eqs. (7) and (8) into Eq. (6), the above equation is expressed as
_
L
0
dEI
o
4
y
i
ox
4
y
k
dx a
ik
X
2
k
X
2
i
_
L
0
dm y
i
y
k
dx a
ik
X
2
i
0 9
From the above equation, the eect of jth mode shape on changes in ith mode shape can be derived as follows:
a
ik
1
X
2
i
X
2
k
_
L
0
dEI
o
4
y
i
ox
4
y
k
dx X
2
i
_
L
0
dm y
i
y
k
dx
_ _
10
Integration by parts of the rst term of Eq. (10); the above equation can be written as follows:
a
ik
1
X
2
i
X
2
k
_
L
0
dEI
o
2
y
k
ox
2
o
2
y
i
ox
2
dx X
2
i
_
L
0
dm y
i
y
k
dx
_ _
11
Dierentiating the orthogonality property of mode shapes with respect to mass would yields:
_
L
0
dm y
2
i
dx 2
_
L
0
my
i
dy
i
dx 0 12
A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735 1725
It can be assumed that the eect of changes in the mass distribution function are negligible in comparison with
the signicant changes in the stiness of the structure. Therefore, the rst term in the left side of Eq. (12) can
be removed. Substitute Eq. (4) into the second part of above equation gives:
2
_
L
0
m y
i
a
ij
y
j
dx 0 13
By using orthogonal property, Eq. (7), and applying the Kronecker properties:
2 a
ii
_
L
0
m y
2
i
dx 0 14
It can be shown:
_
L
0
m y
2
i
dx 1
Thus
a
ii
0 15
Generally, the vibrational mode shapes of a tapered column are given by
y
t
i
y
i
dy
i
16
(y
i
)
i
are the ith vibrational mode shapes of tapered columns and dy
i
indicates taper-induced changes in ith
mode shape of a uniform-section column, y
i
refer to various mode shapes of uniform-section columns. Substi-
tuting, dy
i
from Eq. (4) into Eq. (16), may yields:
y
t
i
y
i
M
j1
a
ij
y
j
; i; j 0; 1; 2; . . . ; M 17
where y
i
and y
j
are the natural modes satisfying the eigen-value problem of uniform-section columns, a
ij
shows
the eect of jth mode shape of uniform-section column on the ith mode shape of tapered column and are de-
ned as follows:
a
ij
1
X
2
i
X
2
j
_
L
0
dEI
o
2
y
i
ox
2
o
2
y
j
ox
2
dx X
2
i
_
L
0
dm:y
i
:y
j
dx
_ _
i 6 j
0 i j
_
_
_
i; j 0; 1; 2; . . . ; M
18
In Eq. (18) X
i
and X
j
are the natural frequencies of uniform section column and d(EI) is tapering function and
shows the increase or decrease of stiness in dierent regions of column and can be represented in various
forms; such as, continuous, piecewise, single-valued; and may take positive for stiened or negative values
for reduced stiness columns. The main advantage of this method is that the tapering function can be applied
to any form of stepped columns, having various boundary conditions. That is, of course, if the mode shapes of
uniform-section column are known.
2.3. The energy method
As indicated at the beginning, the vibrational modes of column may be used instead of buckling mode
shapes. This implies that the solution obtained for vibration and buckling dierential equation of column
are similar. By using the vibrational and buckling governing dierential equation, and applying the boundary
condition, it can be shown that the eigen-vectors are the same as for both buckling and vibration analysis of a
column except for magnitude. This constant can be vanished in the process of determining buckling loads in a
way that vibrational modes satisfy the buckling dierential equation; and may thus be used as deected shape
of column for the buckling analysis.
1726 A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735
In this part, the calculus of variation in conjunction with the principle of stationary total potential energy is
used to determine the conditions that should be satised by the column. By applying the principle of station-
ary total potential energy, we need to evaluate the strain energy U, the external work W
e
, and the total poten-
tial energy P of the column.
For an elastic system, the work done by the external forces on the system is stored as strain energy in the
system. Thus, if a virtual displacement is introduced to system, the external virtual work done by the external
forces on the system is stored as virtual strain energy in the system. The strain energy for a column can be
written as
U
_
L
0
EI
2
o
2
y
t
i
o
2
x
_ _2
dx 19
For the centrally loaded column, Fig. 2 the external work done by edge loading can be written as
W
e
P
2
_
L
0
oy
t
i
ox
_ _
2
dx 20
The sum of the strain energy and potential energy of the system is the total potential energy. Using the symbol
P to denote the total potential energy of a system and therefore, can be written in the following form:
P U W
e
21
In view of the inextensibility of the middle surface, total potential energy can be used to investigate the buck-
ling load of column and can be written in the following form:
P
_
L
0
EI
2
o
2
y
t
i
o
2
x
_ _2
dx
P
2
_
L
0
oy
t
i
ox
_ _
2
dx 22
For equilibrium condition, the rst variation of total potential energy must vanish, it yields:
dP 0 23
The last expression is the mathematical statement of the principle of stationary total potential energy. A sta-
tionary value may correspond to a minimum or maximum value of the total potential energy. A minimum
value indicates that the equilibrium is stable and a maximum value indicates that the equilibrium is unstable,
from this procedure; the buckling load (the least value) of columns can be achieved.
3. Numerical results
3.1. General
Eq. (17) provides a general equation for evaluating the buckling load of columns. This method (MVM) uses
the buckled shape of the uniform-section column, and the modication coecient a
ij
from Eq. (18) to provide
buckling mode shape and the corresponding load for tapered column. The selected examples are for compres-
sion purpose only and do not represent the full capabilities of the proposed method. The numerical procedure
based on the aforementioned developed formulation are then programmed on a desktop computer and numer-
ical resulted are presented for many cases in the following sections.
Fig. 2. An analytical model for buckling analysis of a pinned-ended column.
A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735 1727
3.2. Comparison of results
In order to demonstrate the accuracy, convergency, and applicability of the present method (MVM), sev-
eral buckling problem of columns with variable thicknesses are analyzed and numerical results are tabulated
and compared with the values available in the literature. Generally speaking, this method is applicable to all
columns whose mode shapes can be expressed by analytical functions, either trigonometric or polynomial.
The natural vibration mode corresponding to natural vibration frequency x
i
for a prismatic, simply sup-
ported column Fig. 2 becomes:
y
i
x C Sin
ipx
L
_ _
i 1; 2; 3 . . . ; M 24
where y
i
(x) is the ith natural vibration mode of the uniform-section column and C is an arbitrary coecient,
these mode shapes are unique, except for the magnitude. The magnitude of the eigen-vectors can be rendered
unique by a process known as normalization; thus using the orthogonal property, the following equation can
be written:
_
L
0
m y
i
x y
j
x dx d
ij
i; j 1; 2; 3; . . . ; M 25
where M indicates the number of normal modes superposed in the analysis and d
ij
is the kronecker delta.
By substituting Eq. (24) into Eq. (25), and applying the Kronecker properties, the following expression can
be obtained as
m C
2
_
L
0
Sin
ipx
L
_ _ _ _
2
dx 1 i 1; 2; 3; . . . ; M 26
Introducing the constant, C, into Eq. (24), the mass-normalized mode shape can be achieved as follows:
y
i
2
m L
_
Sin
ipx
L
_ _
i 1; 2; 3; . . . ; M 27
By substituting Eq. (27), and the natural frequency of simply supported intact column, X
i
ip
2
EI=mL
4
_
,
into Eq. (18), the modied vibrational mode shape of the corresponding stepped column can be achieved from
Eq. (17).
Based on the principle of stationary total potential energy, among all the possible mode shapes (the third
one is shown in Fig. 3) the one that minimizes the energy functional is governed and it should be used as
deected shape of column for buckling analysis.
According to the numerical studies on buckling load of several tapered columns it is found that in the case
of 1 < w < 2 the rst mode shape is governed. However, in order to identify the lowest buckling load for w > 2
Fig. 3. First three vibrational/buckling mode shapes of a simply supported, tapered columns.
1728 A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735
higher order values of i and j may be required to be taken into account. This is because during the evaluation
process of (y
t
)
i
, there is no prior guarantee that the rst mode shape is always induces the least buckling load.
Numerical studies shows that in most cases, the accurate buckling loads can be estimated with 7 up to 11 mode
shapes and there is no signicant improvement with an increased number of mode shapes.
Herein the study focused on nding the modied rst mode shape of such a column with w < 2.5. Hence to
obtain the modied rst mode shape of such tapered columns, one can substitute i = 1 in Eq. (17), it yields:
y
t
1
y
1
M
j1
a
1j
y
j
j 1; 2; 3; . . . ; M 28
where (y
t
)
1
and y
1
represent the rst mode shape of tapered and the uniform-section column respectively. It
can be seen that the manner of convergence of present method (MVM) results is desirable. Based on preceding
formulation, a FORTRAN computer program was written to obtain the buckling load of such a column.
3.2.1. Buckling load of simply supported stepped column; middle portion fatted
An examination of the bending-moment diagram for the simply supported buckled column shows that a
column of uniform cross-section is not the most optimal form to carry compressive load. For example, in
the case of a compressed bar with hinged ends, the stability can be increased by removing a portion of material
from the ends and increasing the cross-section over the middle section [1].
Fig. 4 shows a simply supported column of length L, Youngs modulus of elasticity E = 210 (GPa), exural
moment of inertia I
0
= 2.1644e
9
m
4
. This column has an abrupt changes in cross-section of length fL, the
stiness fL ratio w = 2 and are subjected to axial compression P
cr
. The modied mode shape of this column
that is used in Eq. (22), is shown in Fig. 5. The obtained results have been compared with those obtained by
FEM method. To develop a model of the stepped column under buckling analysis, the general purpose nite
element program ANSYS [24] was used in this study. The aforementioned column has been modeled with
BEAM3. BEAM3 is a uniaxial element with tension, compression, and bending capabilities. Each node of
the element has three degrees of freedom: translations in the nodal x and y directions and rotation about
Fig. 4. Abruptly varying thickness column, with fL as the length of stiened region.
Fig. 5. Modied vibration/buckling mode shapes of a simply supported stepped column.
A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735 1729
the nodal z-axis. Table 1 present the buckling load computed by the present method (MVM) and are com-
pared to those obtained by the nite element method [24], and exact expression proposed by Timoshenko
and Gere [1].
The variation of buckling load of the simply supported tapered column subjected to axial compression load
(see Fig. 4), versus tapered size parameters f is presented in Fig. 6. For comparison, the same gure shows
results obtained by Timoshenko and Gere [1]. As it is seen, good agreement exists between results. It should
be noted that the expression proposed by Timoshenko, can be used if the number of tapered part is unity.
However, the method proposed by Timoshenko can be used if the number of changes in the cross-section
is greater than one, but the derivation of expression become more complicated.
3.2.2. Multiple stepped columns subjected to compressive loads
Aging steel structures are prone to suer various types of damages such as corrosion, cracks, and dents and
these members should be free from disastrous structural failures due to these sectional non-uniformity. Hence,
it is of interest to investigate the buckling load of such columns. Fig. 7 shows a simply supported columns of
length L, Youngs modulus E = 210 (GPa), exural moment of inertia I
0
= 4.2231e
9
m
4
, stiness ratio
w = 0.5, and are subjected to axial compression P
cr
. Present method (MVM) can be applied to determine
the buckling load of such stiness-reduced column. Table 2 provides some information on the accuracy
and convergence of the present solution with those obtained by FEM analysis [24]. The table also includes
another case of simply supported column with many reduced-stiness parts (see Fig. 8), subjected to axial
Table 1
Comparison of the present analysis results (MVM) with the other results on the buckling loads of a simply supported stepped column
(see Fig. 4)
Specimen dimension P
cr
(N)
L (m) f Timoshenko [1] Present analysis (FEM) [24] Present analysis (MVM)
5 0.125 195.023 195.027 199.325
5 0.25 222.914 222.913 226.315
5 0.375 254.589 254.576 258.659
6.25 0.3 154.976 154.971 154.502
6.25 0.5 183.902 183.902 184.127
6.25 0.7 210.125 210.116 210.934
7.5 0.4 116.094 116.080 117.410
7.5 0.6 138.126 138.117 138.735
7.5 0.8 150.420 150.429 150.623
Fig. 6. Variation of the elastic critical buckling load of the tapered column versus tapered size parameter, f.
1730 A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735
compression. The results obtained by the present method are in very good agreement with those of obtained
by the nite element program ANSYS [24].
3.3. Buckling of simply supported tapered column, side part fatted
Babcock and Waas [23] have conducted tests in which the column is buckled and loaded into post-buckled
range (see Fig. 9). The specimen ends are ground to form a V-shape, and are supported on V-notched blocks
to simulate simply supported end conditions [23]. Fig. 9 shows a simply supported columns of length L and
exural stiness EI
0
= .6658 (N m
2
) with abrupt change in cross-section of length fL and the stiness ratio
w = 2.4095, subjected to axial compression P
cr
. The results are reported at Table 3 for various value of f.
Fig. 7. Abruptly varying thickness column.
Table 2
Comparison of the present analysis results (MVM) with the FEM results on the buckling loads of simply supported multiple stepped
columns (see Figs. 7 and 8)
Multiple tapered column P
cr
(N)
Model No. of tapered part Length (m) Present analysis (FEM) [24] Present analysis (MVM)
Fig. 7 2 6 157.60 162.914
Fig. 8 3 6 224.91 225.621
Fig. 8. Multiple stepped column; stiness reduction at several part of column.
Fig. 9. Geometry, coordinates system, and applied in-plane loads of tapered column with abruptly varying section.
Table 3
Comparison of the present analysis results (MVM) with the published test results on the buckling loads of a simply supported stepped
column (see Fig. 9)
Specimen dimensions P
cr
(N)
L (m) f Test results [23] Madhusudan et al. [21] Present analysis (FEM) [24] Present analysis (MVM)
0.2032 0.38 169.032 185.490 185.513 187.142
0.2286 0.33 146.791 139.674 140.221 145.786
0.1905 0.40 204.618 215.738 215.680 220.064
0.1842 0.41 209.066 233.531 233.442 234.915
0.1778 0.43 262.445 256.662 256.493 261.578
0.1715 0.44 289.134 279.348 279.334 284.673
A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735 1731
The results obtained by present method (MVM) are compared by those reported by Babcock and Waas [23],
Madhusudan et al. [21] and FEM [24].
The buckling analysis of this stepped column is carried out to study the convergence behavior of the present
method. Fig. 10 shows the variation of buckling load with respect to the number of imposed modes. The num-
ber of imposed modes are varied from one to seven in this study. For the case, w < 2.5 it is observed that the
buckling loads are found to converge with seven modes and increasing the number of higher modes does not
show any appreciable improvement. For the columns, having multiple stepped parts and w > 2.5 the higher
mode shapes, eleven modes, may result in a good results.
3.4. Buckling of cantilever tapered column
Fig. 11 shows a steel tapered cantilever column of length L, primary exural stiness I
0
= 24.3e 6 m
4
,
Youngs modulus E = 200 GPa, the stiness ratio w = 2. The vibrational mode shape of a prismatic cantilever
column can be expressed as
y
i
x Ccosa
i
x cosha
i
x pcosa
i
x cosha
i
x
P
i
cosa
i
L cosha
i
L
sina
i
L sinha
i
L
; a
4
i
x
2
i
m
EI
29
Fig. 10. Convergence of buckling load with an increasing number of imposed mode.
Fig. 11. Cantilever column with abruptly varying thickness; geometry and coordinate.
1732 A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735
Moreover, the corresponding natural frequency can be dened as follows:
x
i
aL
2
i
EI
mL
4
_
; aL
i
p
2
2i 1; i 1; 2; 3; . . . ; M 30
Table 4
Comparison of the present analysis results (MVM) with the other results on the buckling loads of a cantilever stepped column (see Fig. 11)
Specimen dimension P
cr
(kN)
L (m) f Timoshenko [1] Present analysis (FEM) [24] Present analysis (MVM)
5 0.125 545.488 545.482 545.612
5 0.25 623.491 623.497 624.130
5 0.375 712.065 712.060 713.054
7 0.3 335.663 335.659 337.221
7 0.5 410.072 410.067 411.121
7 0.7 468.533 468.530 469.120
9 0.4 225.473 225.472 227.505
9 0.6 268.294 268.291 269.231
9 0.8 292.209 292.206 292.976
Fig. 12. Modied vibrational/buckling mode shape of tapered cantilever column.
Fig. 13. Geometry, coordinates system, and applied in-plane loads of tapered column of linearly varying section.
A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735 1733
The modied mode shape of this column can be obtained by using Eq. (17) which is shown in Fig. 12. Using
the aforementioned procedure used for simply supported stepped column and using Eqs. (29) and (30) will
result in Table 4, which implies the agreement between present method (MVM) and those obtained by Tim-
oshenko [1], and nite element analysis performed by ANSYS [24].
And nally, Fig. 13 shows a steel tapered cantilever column used by Karabalis [6], and Li [19] as a numer-
ical example for calculating the elastic critical axial load. The results obtained by Karabalis [6], and Li and Li
[19] are compared with those obtained by present study (MVM). Table 5 presents the buckling loads of such a
cantilever column and conrms that the present method is an eective one for buckling analysis of cantilever
column. As it is seen in the most examples, the buckling load obtained by present method (MVM) is higher
than those obtained by experiment and results developed by other researchers.
4. Conclusion
In this study, a new procedure using energy method based on modied vibrational mode shapes (MVM) is
formulated for the buckling analysis of columns. This method is applicable for columns of various regions of
tapering, including dierent stiness function along their length. It is shown that the vibrational mode shapes
of a tapered column is in fact a linear combination of various mode shapes of the uniform-section columns.
This phenomenon is used to estimate the vibrational mode shapes of taper columns. In turn, these mode
shapes are incorporated to evaluate their buckling loads. The method enables to solve for the buckling loads
of any polynomial thickness variation that can be represented as a function in x-direction. Many numerical
analyses are carried out to represent the accuracy of the proposed method by comparing the results to the
works presented by other researchers.
References
[1] Timoshenko SP, Gere JM. Theory of elastic stability. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1961.
[2] Chen WF, Lui EM. Structural stability; theory and implementation. New York: Elsevier; 1987.
[3] Meirovitch L. Principles and techniques of vibrations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1997.
[4] Girijavallabhan VC. Buckling loads of nonuniform columns. J Struct Div 1969;95(11):241931.
[5] Just DJ. Plane frameworks of tapering box and I-section. J Struct Div 1977;103(1):7186.
[6] Karabalis DL. Static dynamic and stability analysis of structures composed of tapered beams. J Comput Struct 1983;16(6):73148.
[7] Coulter BA, Miller RE. Vibration and buckling of beam-columns subjected to non-uniform axial loads. Int J Numer Meth Eng
1986;23:173955.
[8] Bradford MA, Cuk PE. Elastic buckling of tapered monosymmetric I-beams. J Struct Eng 1988;114(5):97796.
[9] Frieman Z, Kosmatka JB. Exact stiness matrix of a nonuniform beam-extension, torsion and bending of a BernoulliEuler beam.
Comput Struct 1992;42(5):67182.
[10] Frieman Z, Kosmatka JB. Exact stiness matrix of a nonuniform beam-bending of a Timoshenko beam. Comput Struct
1993;49(3):54555.
[11] Rajasekaran S. Equations for tapered thin-walled beams of generic open section. J Eng Mech 1994;120(8):160729.
[12] Rajasekaran S. Instability of tapered thin-walled beams of generic open section. J Eng Mech 1994;120(8):163040.
[13] Kim MC, Lee GC, Chang KC. Inelastic buckling of tapered members with accumulated strain. Struct Eng Mech 1995;3(6):61122.
[14] Al-Gahtani HJ. Exact stiness for tapered members. J Struct Eng 1996;122(10):1234349.
[15] Dube GP, Dumir PC. Tapered thin open section beams on elastic foundationbuckling analysis. Comput Struct 1996;61(5):84557.
[16] Dube GP, Dumir PC. Tapered thin open section beams on elastic foundationvibration analysis. Comput Struct 1996;61(5):85969.
[17] Gupta P, Wang ST, Blandford GE. Lateral-torsional buckling of nonprismatic I-beam. J Struct Eng 1996;122(7):74855.
[18] Kim SB, Kim MY. Improved formulation for spatial stability and free vibration of thin-walled tapered beams and space frames. Eng
Struct 2000;22:44658.
Table 5
Comparison of the present analysis results (MVM) with the published test results on the buckling loads of a cantilever tapered column (see
Fig. 13)
Specimen dimensions P
cr
(N)
L (m) Karabalis [6] Li [19] Present analysis (MVM)
0.254 241.08 238.04 240.657
E = 206.85 GPa.
1734 A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735
[19] Li GQ, Li JJ. A tapered TimoshenkoEuler beam element for analysis of steel portal frames. J Construct Steel Res 2002;58:153144.
[20] Li JJ, Li GQ, Chan SL. A second-order inelastic model for steel frames of tapered members with slender web. Eng Struct
2003;25:103343.
[21] Madhusudan BP, Rajeev VR, Nageswara Rao B. Post-buckling of cantilever columns having variable cross-section under a combined
load. Int J Non-Linear Mech 2003;38:151322.
[22] Fox RL, Kapoor MP. Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. J AIAA 1968;6(12):24269.
[23] Babcock CD, Wass AM. Eects of stress concentrations in composite structures, National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
NASA CR 176410, 1985.
[24] ANSYS. 5.7.1 html online documentation, Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., 2001.
A.R. Rahai, S. Kazemi / Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 13 (2008) 17211735 1735