Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
It has been stated in Chapter 30 that it is very easy to convert a network into a bar chart, especially if the durations and week (or day) numbers have been inserted. Indeed, the graphical method of analysis actually generates the bar chart as it is developed. If we now divide this bar chart into a number of time periods (say, weeks or months) it is possible to see, by adding up vertically, what work has to be carried out in any time period. For example, if the time period is in months, then in any particular month we can see that one section is being excavated, another is being concreted and another is being scaffolded and shuttered, etc. From the description we can identify the work and can then find the appropriate rate (or total cost) from the bills of quantities. If the total period of that work takes six weeks and we have used up four weeks in the time period under consideration, then approximately two-thirds of the value of that operation has been performed and could be certificated. By this process it is possible to build up a fairly accurate picture of anticipated expenditure at the beginning of the job, which in itself might well affect the whole tendering policy. Provided the job is on programme, the cash flow can be calculated, but, naturally, due allowance must be made for the different methods and periods of retentions, billing and reimbursement. The cost of the operation must therefore be broken down into six main constituents: Labour Plant Materials and equipment Subcontracts Site establishment Overheads and profit.
0 0
By drawing up a table of the main operations as shown on the network, and splitting up the cost of these operations (or activities) into the six constituents, it is possible to calculate the average percentage that each constituent contains in relation to the value. It is very important, however, to deduct the values of the subcontracts from any operation and treat these subcontracts separately. The reason for this is, of course, that a subcontract is self-contained and is often of a specialized nature. To break up a subcontract into labour, plant, materials, etc. would not only be very difficult (since this is the prerogative of the subcontractor) but would also seriously distort the true distribution of the remainder of the project.
Roof sheeting
Side sheeting Steel frame (painted) R.C slab Mass concrete base Cross section of building (unheated warehouse) Site clearance movement
+ 2 months
Paint Materials
T-+n
Site clear
Site clear
Site clear
Durations in weeks
Building 'C'
10
14
16
20
23
27
29
32 33
40
Building '6
12
14
18
21
25
27
30 31
36
38
Building 'A
10
12
16
19
23
25
28 29
34
36
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
I,
Founds conc.
8,
I ,
I ,
Sides Paint
:beet
I ,
Founds exc.
8,
Foundsconc
I,
I ,
Re-bal; lay Slab cpnc Roof sheet Sides sheet Paint Weeks
0 4
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
measurement period, it is convenient to split this up into two-weekly periods of $4700. Hence in Figure 31 S , foundation excavation for building A is shown as 47 in period 1 47 in period 3 The summation of all the costs in any period is shown in Figure 31.6. Figure 31.6 clearly shows the effect of the anticipated delays in payment of certificates and settlement of contractors accounts. For example, material valued at 118 in period 2 is paid to the contractor after one month in period 3 (part of the 331, which is 90% of 368, the total value of period 2 ) , and is paid to the supplier by the contractor in period 4 after the two-month delay period. From Figure 31.6 it can be seen that it has been decided to extract overhead and profit monthly as the job proceeds, but this is a policy that is not followed by every company. Similarly, the payment delays may differ in practice, but the principle would be the same.
47
+ 47 = 94 in period 2
100
Total value
62 94 94 71 71 220 220 106 106 71 71 66 66 100 100 66 44 743 885 1628 4884
Labour Value
30 40 40 20 20
-
Plant Value
Yo 48 43 43 28 28
Y O 3 2 $3 $3 14 14
Y O 5
Value
8 8 8 8 8
I ,
Founds conc.
I ,
I,
Steel erect
I,
I ,
91 91 28 28 28 28 14 14
Re-bar lay
I , I,
30 30 20 20
-
9 9 9 9 8 8 9
Slab conc.
"
I,
Roof sheet
I , I ,
Sides sheet
I, I ,
Paint
5 3 2
250
34
19
1 IF
91 91 90 90 91 91 803 91
9 10
10 9 9
8 9
2 4 8
3 12
4 16
9 36
10 40
11
0
% 91 9 % 34 19 32
I 367
SIC OH&P
- I -
171 58 33 55 12 13 171
354
128
>
Outflow
Plant
$x100
Ix
58
55
13 71
12 29
26 36
7 116
31
116 115 (1) 4416
I
Curnul. out
I
71
Curnul.
Curnul.
-7 1
y
-83
-55
883
3235
4768
4884
888
1413
2229
2993
3535
3962
I
I
+5
-21 1
-352
-242
-302
-454
4281
4396
-487
-488
Period
10
11
-200
Y/
/.A
Tp"
Period
10
11
Figure 3 1.6 shows the total outflow and inflow for each time period and the net differences between the two. When these values are plotted on graphs as in Figures 3 1.7 and 3 1.8, it can be seen that there are only 3 periods of positive cash flow, i.e. periods 3 , 4 and 7. However, while this shows the actual periods when additional moneys have to be made available to fund the project, it does not show, because the gap between the outflow and inflow is so large for most of the time, that for all intents and purposes the project has a negative cash flow throughout its life. This becomes apparent when the cumulative outflows and inflows, which are tabulated in the last three lines of Figure 3 1.6. are plotted on a graph as in Figure 3 1.9 and 3 1.10. From these it can be seen that cumulatively, the only a positive cash flow (a mere $500) is in period 4.
203
Period
5 6 7 Cumulative curves
10
11
Figure 31.9
This example shows that the project is not self financing and will possibly only show a profit when the 10% retention moneys have been released. To restore the project to a positive cash flow, it would be necessary to negotiate a sufficiently large mobilization fee at the start of the project to ensure that the contract is self financing.