Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Municipality:
Current Land Use / Current Issues
Dagupan City
HAZARDS (REDAS) Proposed Action/Revisi on? HOW? (Possible Solutions and Strategies) Time Frame
1. SETTLEMEN T AREAS City Health Office Concerns: - Only 15 Health Centers out of 31 Barangays.
-Need for evacuation centers per barangay with strong enclosed infrastructure and basic supplies. -Accessibility (travel time from main health center) and availability of medical Supplies and Services. -The need for more manpower
-Flooding Re-zone as HIGH/PRONE low density *especially in low lying areas/baranga ys and near rivers Liquefaction HIGH RISK In all barangays *Dagupans geo nature/origin as a river meander. -Tsunami HIGH RISK Ground shaking MODERATE Intensity VII
Page1
-Intensive Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavioral change building/planni ng initiated by LGUs and NGOs -Elevate emergency centers at least a floor higher up to fourth floor. -Identify and build relocation/evac uation areas in Calasiao and Mangaldan. -Installation of tsunami warning in identified areas near shores and river such as barangays(e.g Bonuan,
Medium to Long
Short to Medium
Medium to Long
Short
Short
Calmay, Pantal, Lomboy, Salapingao, and Pugaro). -Relocation of Informal settlers from shoreline.
HAZARDS (REDAS)
Proposed Revision
Time Frame
AREAS
Tsunami Flood
2. PROTECTION
Page1
3. INFRASTRUCT URE
List 1. Four Policy Areas of CLUP land uses and physical resources involving some degree of SETTLEMENT urban or rural concentration and their associated demand S and supply requirements PRODUCTIO N PROTECTION INFRASTRUC TURE
focused on economic production from the extractive to the modern service sector
resources that need to be protected, conserved or rehabilitated, including areas that require prevention and mitigation of disasters deals with capital investments that support spatial integration, production efficiency and social service delivery
List 2. Earthquake Hazards and other Natural Hazards Ground Shaking PEIS (Intensity VI, VII, VIII) EarthquakeInduced Moderate / Low / Not Susceptible
Page1
Landslide Liquefaction Ground Rupture Tsunami Flood Rain-Induced Landslide Storm Surge High / Moderate / Low / Not Prone Along the Fault / Not along Fault Prone / Not Prone Prone / Not Prone High / Moderate / Low / Not Susceptible / Depositional Area Prone / Not Prone
Sample Answer to Columns 1 and 2: Land Classification of Gabaldon and their Vulnerabilities to Ground Shaking and other associated Hazards of Earthquake Land Class
Ground Shaking
Earthquake Hazards
Ground Rupture High on Identified Areas Landslide Low to Moderate Liquefaction Moderate to High
Built-up Areas
(Residential, Commercial, Industrial and Agroindustrial, Institutional, open space and infrastructures)
Agricultural (Crop
Subdevelopment)
High Intensity VIII High Intensity VIII High Intensity VIII Moderate
Livestock Subdevelopment
(Rivers and Creeks)
Low to High
Page1
Fishery Subdevelopment
None
Livestock Subdevelopment Agro-Forestry Zone Watershed and Forestry Zone Military Reserve SAMPLE ANSWER:
Current Land Use / Current Issues
Intensity VII Low Intensity VIII Low Intensity VIII Low Intensity VIII HAZARDS (REDAS)
Identified Areas None None None Moderate to High Moderate to High Moderate to High HOW? (Possible Solutions and Strategies) None None None
Proposed Revision
Time Frame
Re-zone as Low Shaking = Density IntVIII Tsunami= High EQ- Induced Landslide=Not Prone Liquefaction=Hi gh Flooding=Prone Storm Surge=Prone Rain-Induced Landslide=Not Prone
Ground
Additional Building Regulations More Use Regulation Discourage Further Growth and Create Secondary Growth Enforcement of Buffer Strip / Reclassify as locally protected area
ShortTerm
MediumTerm
Page1
PROTECTION
INFRASTRUCTUR E
Page1