BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of the Application of San Diego Gas Application 06-08-010

& Electric Company (U 902 E) for a Certificate of (Filed August 4, 2006)
Public Convenience and Necessity for the Sunrise
Powerlink Transmission Project.

OPENING COMMENTS OF THE CITY OF SANTEE TO THE PROPOSED

DECISION BY ALJ VIETH, THE ALTERNATE PROPOSED DECISION BY
COMMISSIONER GRUENEICH, AND THE ALTERNATE PROPOSED DECISION BY
PRESIDENT PEEVEY

SHAWN D. HAGERTY DAVID L. HUARD

Best Best & Krieger LLP Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
655 West Broadway, Suite 1500 One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor
San Diego, CA 92101 San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (619) 525-1327 Tel: (415) 291-7430
Fax: (619) 233-6118 Fax: (415) 291-7474
E-mail: shawn.hagerty@bbklaw.com E-mail: dhuard@manatt.com

RANDALL W. KEEN
S. NANCY WHANG
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
11355 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90064
Tel: (310) 312-4000
Fax: (310) 914-5721
E-mail: rkeen@manatt.com
nwhang@manatt.com
PUCService@manatt.com

November 20, 2008 Attorneys for THE CITY OF SANTEE

 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of the Application of San Diego Gas Application 06-08-010

& Electric Company (U 902 E) for a Certificate of (Filed August 4, 2006)
Public Convenience and Necessity for the Sunrise
Powerlink Transmission Project.

OPENING COMMENTS OF THE CITY OF SANTEE TO THE PROPOSED

DECISION BY ALJ VIETH, THE ALTERNATE PROPOSED DECISION BY
COMMISSIONER GRUENEICH, AND THE ALTERNATE PROPOSED DECISION BY
PRESIDENT PEEVEY

Pursuant to Rule 14.3 of the California Public Utilities Commission’s (the “Commission”)

Rules of Practice and Procedure and Public Utilities Code Section 311(d), the City of Santee

(“Santee” or the “City”) hereby respectfully submits comments on the Proposed Decision of ALJ

Vieth, Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Grueneich, and Alternate Proposed Decision

of President Peevey in this matter.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 31, 2008, the Commission mailed the Proposed Decision of Administrative

Law Judge (“ALJ”) Vieth entitled “Decision Denying a Certificate of Public Convenience and

Necessity for the Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Project” (the “PD”). The same day, the

Commission issued the Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Grueneich entitled

“Decision Denying a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Sunrise Powerlink

Transmission Project” (the “Grueneich APD”). On November 18, 2008, the Commission issued

the Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey entitled “Decision Granting a Certificate of

Public Convenience and Necessity for the Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Project.” (the “Peevey

1
APD”)1 (the PD, Grueneich APD, and the Peevey APD shall be collectively referred to as the

“Decisions.”)

The Decisions primarily address three matters: (1) reviewing if and how the Sunrise

Powerlink Transmission Project (the “Sunrise Project”) meets the statutory requirements for the

issuance of a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN); (2) determining whether the

Sunrise Project and alternatives is justified and necessary to facilitate California’s renewables

portfolio standard; and (3) evaluating the environmental impacts of the Sunrise Project pursuant to

the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The City’s comments primarily address the

factual and legal error in the Decisions concerning the ENPEX Project that is a part of the All

Source Generation Alternative (“ASGA”).

II. THE CITY OF SANTEE

A. Background on the City of Santee and Its Participation in the Proceeding.

The City is located in eastern San Diego County, northeast of the City of San Diego, and

adjacent to Marine Corps Air Station Miramar (“MCAS Miramar”). The City was incorporated in

December, 1980, and is the eleventh largest of San Diego County’s cities, with a population of

approximately 54,700 residents.

The City does not have a formal position on the Sunrise Project or the proposed

transmission route alternatives. However, the City opposes the inclusion of the San Diego

Community Power Project sponsored by the ENPEX Corporation (“ENPEX Project”) as a

component of the ASGA in the Final Environmental Impact Report / Statement’s (“FEIR/S”). The

ENPEX Project: (1) is not feasible and therefore is not a viable alternative; (2) conflicts with the

1
Comments to the Peevey APD are due on December 8, 2008. For the sake of efficiency, the City incorporates herein
comments on the Peevey APD. However, since the time to file full comments to the Peevey APD has not elapsed, the
City hereby reserves the right to provide additional comments on the Peevey APD in accordance with the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

2
City’s long-standing General Plan and approved projects, namely the recently approved Fanita

Project, a 1,400 unit residential development; (3) would block a key wildlife mitigation corridor

approved by federal, state and local agencies; and (4) would create significant, unmitigated

environmental impacts that are not fully studied in the FEIR/S. In addition, the ENPEX Project

will be a behemoth consisting of a 750 megawatt natural gas-fired power plant project with the

potential for an additional 750 megawatt expansion plant, and given the proposed (though ever

changing) location for the ENPEX Project, it will be in the City’s proverbial backyard.

Due to the serious and unmitigated harm the ENPEX Project poses to the City, the City

actively engaged in this proceeding by participating in the public meetings, submitting comments

on the Draft and Re-circulated EIR/S, and filing testimony, briefs, and now comments with the

Commission. Specifically, on April 14, 2008, the City submitted into the record and ALJ

Weissman accepted the Direct Testimony of Gary Halbert, which cited the reason and basis for the

City’s opposition to the ENPEX Project.2 No party elected to cross-examine Mr. Halbert nor was

testimony submitted to contradict Mr. Halbert’s direct testimony. On May 30, 2008, the City

submitted its Opening Brief and on June 13, 2008, the City submitted its Reply Brief.

B. The City of Santee’s Position on the Decisions

The City recognizes the significant effort and attention, as well as thoughtful consideration,

provided by the Decisions on matters crucial to the evaluation of the need for, the renewables

development relating to, and the environmental impacts of the Sunrise Project. However, the City

believes that in conducting its environmental review, the Decisions treat all of the ASGA similarly

in that they do not give the proper weight to the undisputed testimony submitted by the parties to

this proceeding regarding the ENPEX Project, and do not consider other factors essential to

evaluating the feasibility of the ENPEX Project. The City believes that when the ENPEX Project

2
See generally Direct Phase 2 Testimony of Gary Halbert (“Halbert Testimony”), City of Santee.

3
is considered in light of the testimony and evidence submitted by the parties, the Commission will

and should find that it should properly be excluded from the ASGA. Accordingly, the City

requests that the ENPEX Project be removed from the ASGA.

The Decisions specifically differ materially on the consideration of the ASGA. The

Grueneich APD and the Peevey APD rightfully reject the ASGA, and by implication the ENPEX

Project, as a feasible alternative to the Sunrise Project. The rejection of the ASGA will provide

greater consistency, advance California’s greenhouse gas reduction goals, and also support the

City’s position – a position that was neither opposed by the applicant, San Diego Gas & Electric

(“SDG&E”), nor any other party to this proceeding. Accordingly, if the ENPEX Project remains

in the ASGA, the City recommends that the Commission adopt either the Grueneich APD or

Peevey APD as the Final Decision. In contrast to the Grueneich and Peevey APDs, the PD

unnecessarily certifies the FEIR/S, thereby inferring that the ENPEX Project, a hypothetical

project, is feasible. The PD should be modified so that the FEIR/S is not certified. This would not

be consistent with the PD’s decision to deny the Sunrise Project.

III. SPECIFIC COMMENTS

A. Environmental Review.

The ENPEX Project is one component of the ASGA identified in the FEIR/S. The City

believes, as described more fully above and in its testimony, comments and briefs filed in this

proceeding, that the ENPEX Project is not feasible, will have substantial and unmitigated

environmental impacts and that the DEIR/S previously and the FEIR/S currently fails to properly

account for these impacts.3 In Section 17.4, the Decisions appear to dismiss concerns about the

viability of the ENPEX Project (among the other ASGA) by stating that these concerns are “over-

3
See generally, Opening Phase 2 Brief of the City of Santee (“Santee Brief”), 4-12.

4
stated.”4 The treatment of the ENPEX Project in the Decisions is troubling.

The Decisions recognize that the projects identified in the FEIR/S’s ASGA serve “as

proxies for a wide range of potential development scenarios,” and because they are proxies, “no

one project in this alternative is essential to the feasibility of the whole of” the ASGA.5 In other

words, the Decisions recognize that the ASGA, including the ENPEX Project, are uncertain

alternatives, and may be substitutes for as-yet-unidentified projects. While acknowledging this

uncertainty, the Decisions also create some uncertainty by stating that the ENPEX Project is not

necessarily infeasible. As support for the ENPEX Project’s potential feasibility, the Decisions cite

to the fact that the ENPEX Project is “in CAISO’s interconnection queue” and lay part of the

blame on “SDG&E’s refusal to sign a power purchase contract with that project’s proponents

despite their lowest cost bid in SDG&E’s solicitation.”6 However, the support offered in the

Decisions for ENPEX’s potential feasible are overstated for three reasons.

First, the significance of ENPEX Project’s place in the California Independent System

Operator’s (“CAISO”) interconnection queue is undercut by CAISO’s own testimony. No party

would be more knowledgeable about the CAISO interconnection queue and its significance than

CAISO. But, even CAISO’s own expert, Robert Sparks, testified that there are “significant

questions” regarding whether the ENPEX Project will be built – even though the ENPEX Project is

ostensibly in the CAISO queue – and that, under both CAISO and the Commission’s planning

rules, it would not be reasonable to assume that ENPEX could be constructed by 2010, if at all.7

CAISO also stated that for its grid planning purposes, CAISO only considers generation

projects that “are under construction when assessing the need for transmission system additions in

4
PD, 228, Grueneich, APD, 231, and Peevey APD, 240.
5
PD, 221, Grueneich APD, 224, and Peevey APD, 232.
6
PD, 228, Grueneich, APD, 231, and Peevey APD, 240.
7
Direct Testimony of Robert Sparks/CAISO, 4-6.

5
5 year planning cases.”8 (emphasis added.) For 10-year planning cases, CAISO only considers

generation projects that “are under construction or have received regulatory approval.”9

(emphasis added.) Because the ENPEX Project is neither under construction nor received

regulatory approval, for planning purposes the CAISO could not assume that the ENPEX Project

would be online within the next 5-10 years.10 Testimony offered by CAISO indicates that the

interconnection queue has diminished significance in assessing the ENPEX Project’s feasibility,

especially when compared to the project’s other logistical and regulatory hurdles.

Essential to the viability of any generation project of the ENPEX Project’s size is the filing

of the application for certification (“AFC”) with the California Energy Commission (“CEC”).11

There is no indication that the ENPEX Project’s proponent has filed a current AFC with the

CEC.12 However, this critical fact is not mentioned, let alone discussed, in the Decisions. The fact

that no AFC has been submitted for the ENPEX Project is particularly revealing, merits greater

weight, and warrants a detailed discussion regarding the impact upon the ENPEX Project’s

viability in the Decisions.

Further, the ENPEX Project was not identified or used by the any of the parties or the

Commission to establish the analytical baseline for in-area fossil resources’ modeling.13 This

omission is significant. It can be inferred, especially given the evidence discussed herein, that the

ENPEX Project was not selected because it is not feasible.14

8
Phase 2 Opening Brief of the California System Operator Corporation, 31-32.
9
Id.
10
Id.
11
Energy Facility Licensing Process, Developers Guide of Practices & Procedures, CEC Staff Report, November
2000, 4. A copy of the staff report can be found at http://www.energy.ca.gov/siting/documents/2000-12-07_700-00-
007.PDF.
12
The California Energy Commission’s Status of All Projects updated on November 19, 2008. A copy of the energy
facility status spreadsheet can be found at http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/all_projects.html. See also, Draft
EIR/S at E.6-9.
13
PD, 47-48, Grueneich APD, 47-48, and Peevey APD, 53-54.
14
See also infra, II.B, 7.

6
 Second, the Decisions seem to pay little heed to the undisputed evidence in the record.15

During the proceeding, SDG&E and CAISO presented evidence that various regulatory approvals

and construction would prevent the ENPEX Project from coming online within the necessary

timeframe.16 The City also presented evidence on the ENPEX Project’s inherent infeasibility.17

This evidence was not contradicted.18 Importantly, the ENPEX Project’s proponents did not

participate in this proceeding and certainly have not disputed the evidence presented by SDG&E,

CAISO or the City with regard to the ENPEX Project. However, the Decisions do not appear to

take the undisputed testimony into account sufficiently, and the City requests that such evidence

with regard to the ENPEX Project be given its proper weight in the Final Decision.

Third, the Decisions state that the ENPEX Project’s biggest hurdle to development is

SDG&E’s refusal to sign a power purchase contract with the ENPEX Project’s proponents. In

support, the Decisions cite to the FEIR/S General Response GR-1.19 But, with regard to this

accusation, General Response GR-1 relies heavily on comments filed by the ENPEX Project’s

sponsor ENPEX Corporation, an entity who was not a party to this proceeding, who did not submit

any testimony or evidence in this proceeding, and who was not subject to the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure Rule 1.1, which forbids any party from “mislead[ing] the Commission

or its staff by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.”20 By relying so heavily on the FEIR/S’s

General Response GR-1, the Decisions inadvertently give more credibility to comments filed by a
15
PD, 222-224, Grueneich APD, 225-227, and Peevey APD, 233-237.
16
PD, 222-224, Grueneich APD, 225-226, and Peevey APD, 233-236.
17
PD, 225, Grueneich APD, 228, and Peevey APD, 236.
18
PD, 222-224, Grueneich APD, 225-227, and Peevey APD, 233-237.
19
Moreover, the FEIR/S’s General Response GR-1 expressly admits that “the [ENPEX Project] has been under
development by ENPEX [Corporation] since 2000 and [] the development status is unclear.” See FEIR/S, General
Response, GR-1, 2-7. In other words, the FEIR/S admits that even after 8 years of “development,” which ostensibly
refers to the ENPEX’s project’s interconnection queue status, the ENPEX Project’s viability and status remains
“unclear.” The ENPEX Project cannot reasonably be considered feasible.

The Peevey APD also refers to the Draft EIR/S E.6. The City addressed the issues raised in the Draft EIR/S through
its Opening Brief, its comments to the Draft EIR/S and the Re-circulated EIR/S, and through the comments herein.
20
FEIR/S General Response GR-1, p. 2-7.

7
non-party than to undisputed testimony offered by SDG&E, CAISO and the City; all of whom,

when submitting testimony and otherwise participating in the proceeding, were subject to Rule 1.1.

This undisputed testimony indicates that the ENPEX Project is not a reasonably viable project in

the near future.

B. Future Generation Additions and Assumptions About In-Area Fossil

Resources.

The City supports the ommission of the ENPEX Project from the analytical baseline for in-

area fossil resources assumptions in Section 6.7 of the Decisions.21 The City notes that the

ENPEX Project was omitted even though the Decisions expressly acknowledge that it is one of

only “three combined cycle generation facilities proposed for construction in SDG&E’s service

territory,” and the ENPEX Project is purportedly in some stage of development.22 The fact that the

ENPEX Project was omitted from the analytical baseline calculation is telling and further supports

the City’s contention that the ENPEX Project is not realistic in the near future, and should not be

included as one of the ASGA in any of the Decisions.

C. Conclusions Reached in the Decisions.

Even though the ENPEX Project was not considered as a part of the analytical baseline and

merely serves as a “proxy” for viable projects, despite the significant environmental impacts posed

by the ENPEX Project and despite recognizing that the ASGA “would greatly increase GHG

impacts compared to Sunrise,” the PD concludes that the FEIR/S is a “comprehensive document”

with adequate and accurate analysis of the environmental impacts of the Sunrise Project and all

alternatives.23 The City does not support the PD’s conclusion and believes that it is not supported

by the record, including testimony submitted by the City. Furthermore, the City believes that the

21
PD, 46-48, Grueneich APD, 47-79, and Peevey APD, 53-55.
22
PD, 27, Grueneich APD, 28, and Peevey APD, 34.
23
PD, 46-48, 170, & 247.

8
PD unnecessarily certifies the FEIR/S, and by implication the ENPEX Project as a component of

the ASGA. If the PD intends to deny the Sunrise Project, the City requests that the PD be

modified so that the FEIR/S is not certified.

In contrast, the Grueneich APD and Peevey APD finds that the FEIR/S alternatives,

including the ASGA “are not feasible” when considered against other considerations, namely

California’s greenhouse gas reduction goals, and rejects the ASGA.24 Because the Grueneich APD

and Peevey APD finds the ASGA “infeasible,” the City supports both the Grueneich and Peevey

APDs.

IV. CONCLUSION

The City does not have a formal position on the Sunrise Project or the proposed

transmission alternatives. However, the City opposes the inclusion of the ENPEX Project as a

component of the ASGA because, among other issues described more fully above, the ENPEX

Project is not feasible, conflicts with the City’s General Plan, and will cause serious and

unmitigated environmental impact. Despite these significant problems, the Decisions include the

ENPEX Project in the ASGA. The City believes that the undisputed testimony submitted by the

parties to this proceeding, and other relevant factors require the ENPEX Project to be removed

from the ASGA. If the ENPEX Project is kept with the ASGA, then the City recommends

adoption of the Grueneich or Peevey APD as the Final Decision, or the City requests that the PD

24
Grueneich APD, 251, 253, and Peevey APD, 259, 262

9
be modified so that the FEIR/S is not certified.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ S. Nancy Whang____________

S. Nancy Whang

SHAWN D. HAGERTY DAVID L. HUARD

Best Best & Krieger LLP Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
655 West Broadway, Suite 1500 One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor
San Diego, CA 92101 San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (619) 525-1327 Tel: (415) 291-7430
Fax: (619) 233-6118 Fax: (415) 291-7474
E-mail: shawn.hagerty@bbklaw.com E-mail: dhuard@manatt.com

RANDALL W. KEEN
S. NANCY WHANG
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
11355 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90064
Tel: (310) 312-4000
Fax: (310) 914-5721
E-mail: rkeen@manatt.com
nwhang@manatt.com
PUCService@manatt.com

November 20, 2008 Attorneys for THE CITY OF SANTEE

10
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing OPENING COMMENTS OF THE CITY

OF SANTEE TO THE PROPOSED DECISION AND ALTERNATE PROPOSED

DECISION on all known interested parties of record in A.06-08-010 to each party named in the

official service list via e-mail to those whose email address is listed in the official service list and

via first class mail with postage prepaid to those whose email address is not available.

Dated at Los Angeles, California, this 20th day of November, 2008.

/s/ Nicole Holieway_________

Nicole Holieway

11

Podgorsky@wrightlaw.com
thompson@wrightlaw.com
ssiegel@biologicaldiversity.org
ssiegel@biologicaldiversity.org
sara@calparks.org
nwhang@manatt.com
sptp@msk.com
thomas.burhenn@sce.com
dwood8@cox.net
dlindsay@sunbeltpub.com
mwells@parks.ca.gov
scotmartin478@msn.com
david.lloyd@nrgenergy.com
conniebull@cox.net
dj0conklin@earthlink.net
edwrdsgrfx@aol.com
pwhalen2@cox.net
oakhollowranch@wildblue.net
jhfark@pacbell.net
denis@vitalityweb.com
hikermomma1@yahoo.com
gbarnes@sempra.com
fortlieb@sandiego.gov
jwalsh@sempra.com
mcalabrese@sandiego.gov
shawn.hagerty@bbklaw.com
liddell@energyattorney.com
mshames@ucan.org
cadowney@san.rr.com
ko'beirne@semprautilities.com
hpayne3@gmail.com
kritchey@san.rr.com
jleslie@luce.com
dhogan@biologicaldiversity.org
sjkeene@iid.com
barbschnier@yahoo.com
AirSpecial@aol.com
wblattner@semprautilities.com
mflorio@turn.org
wolff@smwlaw.com
map@cpuc.ca.gov
ttf@cpuc.ca.gov
norman.furuta@navy.mil
bpowers@powersengineering.com
jaugustine@biologicaldiversity.org
rcox@pacificenvironment.org
bcragg@goodinmacbride.com
richard.raushenbush@lw.com
Service List
vprabhakaran@goodinmacbride.com
jeffgray@dwt.com
dietrichlaw2@earthlink.net
dkates@sonic.net
jsanders@caiso.com
jdh@eslawfirm.com
btorgan@parks.ca.gov
ktobias@parks.ca.gov
steven@iepa.com
kmills@cfbf.com
elizabeth.klein@lw.com
janice.schneider@lw.com
julie.greenisen@lw.com
michael.gergen@lw.com
kelly@kellyfuller.net
Henry.Martinez@ladwp.com
randy.howard@ladwp.com
cfaber@semprautilities.com
rkeen@manatt.com
Case.Admin@sce.com
darell.holmes@sce.com
margandona@calwild.org
donnatisdale@hughes.net
mjumper@sdihf.org
rebeccap@environmentalhealth.org
ddowney@nctimes.com
jharry.jones@uniontrib.com
patricia_fallon@sbcglobal.net
dandbcarey@julianweb.com
celloinpines@sbcglobal.net
vmp@sbcglobal.net
skyword@sbcglobal.net
colobiker@gmail.com
nparinello@gmail.com
cpuc@92036.com
dwvoss@cox.net
WSK@astro.caltech.edu
carolyn.dorroh@cubic.com
jwmitchell@mbartek.com
jwmitchell@mbartek.com
soliviasmom@gmail.com
oldjulianco@integrity.com
wolfmates@cox.net
Csmmarket@aol.com
joe@ranchitarealty.com
cesposit@sdcoe.k12.ca.us
bgendron@nethere.com
kimmerlys@yahoo.com
12
gedrown@mindspring.com phil@auclairconsulting.com
gecko_greens@juno.com editorial@californiaenergycircuit.net
Reneeandbear@aol.com mrw@mrwassoc.com
dan@energysmarthomes.net dmarcus2@sbcglobal.net
deanna.spehn@sen.ca.gov sweissman@law.berkeley.edu
sfr@sandag.org bjolley@herumcrabtree.com
jason.ohta@lw.com kent@wkpalmerton.com
patricia.guerrero@lw.com ziad@zglobal.biz
sierraclubintern@yahoo.com e-recipient@caiso.com
mmitrosky@sierraclubsandiego.org david@branchcomb.com
kmkiener@cox.net PGS@IEEE.org
jimbellelsi@cox.net lonwhouse@waterandenergyconsulting.com
srogers647@aol.com ddfreeman@yahoo.com
usdepic@gmail.com abb@eslawfirm.com
bruce.bigelow@uniontrib.com Audra.Hartmann@Dynegy.com
onell.soto@uniontrib.com Darren.Boutton@gov.ca.gov
gcourser@hotmail.com jreede@energy.state.ca.us
centralfiles@semprautilities.com KMCDO@parks.ca.gov
Irene.stillings@energycenter.org kellie.smith@sen.ca.gov
jennifer.porter@energycenter.org kdw@woodruff-expert-services.com
sabrina.ozturk@sdcounty.ca.gov rlauckhart@globalenergy.com
sephra.ninow@energycenter.org alan.comnes@nrgenergy.com
tblair@sandiego.gov daniel@wildroseenergy.com
Dahvia.Lynch@sdcounty.ca.gov mrx@cpuc.ca.gov
jfirooz@iesnet.com bcb@cpuc.ca.gov
sanrocky@aol.com dhn@cpuc.ca.gov
Thomas_Zale@blm.gov dsh@cpuc.ca.gov
up@undergroundpower.us gxh@cpuc.ca.gov
c@californiabotanicalhabitat.com hmm@cpuc.ca.gov
swilson@pcta.org jjj@cpuc.ca.gov
Lnastro@parks.ca.gov xjv@cpuc.ca.gov
bruce.foster@sce.com jlo@cpuc.ca.gov
Diane.Fellman@fpl.com jmh@cpuc.ca.gov
wolff@smwlaw.com kwh@cpuc.ca.gov
rcox@pacificenvironment.org lau@cpuc.ca.gov
bbirdsall@aspeneg.com ljw@cpuc.ca.gov
dtk5@pge.com mjd@cpuc.ca.gov
jay2@pge.com nms@cpuc.ca.gov
kmsn@pge.com rae@cpuc.ca.gov
mspe@pge.com rwh@cpuc.ca.gov
tmurphy@aspeneg.com wsc@cpuc.ca.gov
Cassandra.sweet@dowjones.com sjl@cpuc.ca.gov
dhuard@manatt.com saw@cpuc.ca.gov
jwoodruff@nextlightrp.com tdp@cpuc.ca.gov
jfieber@flk.com tbo@cpuc.ca.gov
cem@newsdata.com slee@aspeneg.com
regrelcpuccases@pge.com Claufenb@energy.state.ca.us
robin.harrington@fire.ca.gov darren.bouton@gov.ca.gov
joe.paul@dynegy.com mpryor@energy.state.ca.us
hzaininger@aol.com prichins@energy.state.ca.us

13
trf@cpuc.ca.gov
jgrau@energy.state.ca.us

Proceeding: A0608010 - SDG&E - CPCN FOR THE

Filer: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U902E)
List Name: LIST
Last changed: November 18, 2008

Parties
ARNOLD B. PODGORSKY MICHAEL J. THOMPSON
WRIGHT & TALISMAN, P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW
1200 G STREET, N.W., SUITE 600 WRIGHT & TALISMAN, PC
WASHINGTON, DC 20005 1200 G STREET, N.W., STE 600
FOR: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY WASHINGTON, DC 20005
FOR: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY

STEVE SEIGEL STEVEN SIEGEL

3421 PARK PLACE STAFF ATTORNEY
EVANSTON, IL 60201 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
FOR: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 3421 PARK PLACE
EVANSTON, IL 60201
FOR: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

SARA FELDMAN S. NANCY WHANG

CA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ATTORNEY AT LAW
714 W. OLYMPIC BLVD., SUITE 717 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 11355 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD.
FOR: CA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION LOS ANGELES, CA 90064

ARTHUR FINE THOMAS A. BURHENN

MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
11377 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

DON WOOD SR. DIANA LINSDAY

PACIFIC ENERGY POLICY CENTER ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION & INSTITUTE
4539 LEE AVENUE PO BOX 2001
LA MESA, CA 91941 BORREGO SPRINGS, CA 92004

LINDA A. CARSON MICHAEL L. WELLS

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS&RECREATION
ANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION 200 PALM CANYON DRIVE
PO BOX 2001 BORREGO SPRINGS, CA 92004
BORREGO SPRINGS, CA 92004

SCOT MARTIN DAVID LLOYD

PO BOX 1549 ATTORNEY AT LAW
BORREGO SPRINGS, CA 92004 CABRILLO POWER I, LLC
4600 CARLSBAD BLVD.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008

CONNIE BULL DIANE J. CONKLIN

24572 RUTHERFORD ROAD SPOKESPERSON

14
RAMONA, CA 92065 MUSSEY GRADE ROAD ALLIANCE
PO BOX 683
RAMONA, CA 92065

ELIZABETH EDWARDS PAM WHALEN

RAMONA VALLEY VINEYARD ASSOCIATION 24444 RUTHERFORD ROAD
26502 HIGHWAY 78 RAMONA, CA 92065
RAMONA, CA 92065

MICHAEL PAGE HEIDI FARKASH

17449 OAK HOLLOW ROAD JOHN & HEIDI FARKASH TRUST
RAMONA, CA 92065-6758 PO BOX 576
FOR: STARLIGHT MOUNTAIN ESTATES OWNERS RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067

DENIS TRAFECANTY MARY ALDERN

COMMUNITY OF SANTA YSABEL & RELATED COMM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR SENSIBLE ENERGY
PO BOX 305 PO BOX 321
SANTA YSABEL, CA 92070 WARNER SPRINGS, CA 92086

E. GREGORY BARNES FREDERICK M. ORTLIEB

ATTORNEY AT LAW OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CITY OF SAN DIEGO
101 ASH STREET, HQ 13D 1200 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 1200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

JAMES F. WALSH MICHAEL P. CALABRESE

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTORNEY AT LAW
101 ASH STREET CITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF SAN DIEGO
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 1200 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 1100
FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

SHAWN D. HAGERTY DONALD C. LIDDELL

CITY OF ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP DOUGLASS & LIDDELL
655 W. BROADWAY, 15TH FLOOR 2928 2ND AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3301 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

MICHAEL SHAMES CARRIE DOWNEY

ATTN: MICHAEL SHAMES LAW OFFICES OF CARRIE ANNE DOWNEY
UCAN 1313 YNEZ PLACE
3100 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE B CORONADO, CA 92118
SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

KEVIN O'BEIRNE HARVEY PAYNE

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY RANCHO PENASQUITOS CONCERNED CITIZENS
8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32D 13223 - 1 BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD, 264
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92129

KEITH RITCHEY JOHN W. LESLIE, ESQ.

POWERLINK ISSUES MANAGER ATTORNEY AT LAW
8744 CREEKWOOD LANE LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS,
LLP
SAN DIEGO, CA 92129 11988 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 200
FOR: WEST CHASE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION SAN DIEGO, CA 92130

JOETTA MIHALOVICH DAVID HOGAN

11705 ALDERCREST POINT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

15
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131 PO BOX 7745
SAN DIEGO, CA 92167

STEPHEN KEENE PATRICIA C. SCHNIER

ATTORNEY AT LAW 14575 FLATHEAD RD.
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT APPLE VALLEY, CA 92307
333 EAST BARIONI BLVD., PO BOX 937 FOR: SELF
IMPERIAL, CA 92251

JACQUELINE AYER BILLY BLATTNER

2010 WEST AVENUE K, NO. 701 MANAGER REGULATORY RELATIONS
LANCASTER, CA 93536 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
FOR: JACQUELINE AYER 601 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 2060
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

MICHEL PETER FLORIO OSA L. WOLFF

ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER, LLC
711 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 350 396 HAYES STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

MARION PELEO TRAVIS FOSS

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
LEGAL DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION
ROOM 4107 ROOM 5028
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

NORMAN J. FURUTA BILL POWERS

ATTORNEY AT LAW POWERS ENGINEERING
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES 311 CALIFORNIA STREET
1455 MARKET ST., SUITE 1744 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103-1399 FOR: POWERS ENGINEERING

JUSTIN AUGUSTINE RORY COX

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY RATEPAYERS FOR AFFORDABLE CLEAN ENERGY
351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 600 311 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 650
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

BRIAN T. CRAGG RICHARD W. RAUSHENBUSH

ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW
GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI RITCHIE & DAY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900 505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 2000
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

VIDHYA PRABHAKARAN JEFFREY P. GRAY

GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI DAY & LAMPREY LLP
505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
FOR: LS POWER; SOUTH BAY REPLACEMENT
PROJECT, LLC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP
505 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 800
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-6533

WILLIAM F. DIETRICH DAVID KATES

ATTORNEY AT LAW DAVID MARK AND COMPANY
DIETRICH LAW 3510 UNOCAL PLACE, SUITE 200
2977 YGNACIO VALLEY ROAD, NO. 613 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403-5571
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598-3535 FOR: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY

16
JUDITH B. SANDERS JEFFERY D. HARRIS
ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP
151 BLUE RAVINE ROAD 2015 H STREET
FOLSOM, CA 95630 SACRAMENTO, CA 95811-3109

BRADLY S. TORGAN KATHRYN J. TOBIAS

ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF PARKS & RECREATION CA DEPT. OF PARKS AND RECREATION
1416 NINTH STREET, ROOM 1404-06 1416 9TH STREET, 14TH FLOOR
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

STEVEN KELLY KAREN NORENE MILLS

POLICY DIRECTOR ATTORNEY AT LAW
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
1215 K STREET, SUITE 900 2300 RIVER PLAZA DRIVE
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95833

KEVIN LYNCH
IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC
1125 NW COUCH ST., SUITE 700
PORTLAND, OR 97209

Information Only
ELIZABETH KLEIN JANICE SCHNEIDER
LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP
555 11TH STREET NW, STE. 1000 555 11TH STREET NW, STE 1000
WASHINGTON, DC 20004 WASHINGTON, DC 20004

JULIE B. GREENISEN MICHAEL J. GERGEN

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
SUITE 1000 SUITE 1000
555 ELEVENTH STREET, NW 555 ELEVENTH STREET, NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1304 WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1304

KELLY FULLER E. CRAIG SMAY

ENERGY AND NATURE E. CRAIG SMAY PC
PO BOX 6732 174 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

HENRY MARTINEZ RANDY S. HOWARD

LADWP LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER AND POWER
111 N. HOPE ST., ROOM 921 111 NORTH HOPE STREET, ROOM 921
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

CLAY E. FABER RANDALL W. KEEN

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ATTORNEY AT LAW
555 WEST FIFTH STREET, GT-14D6 MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 11355 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD.
FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY LOS ANGELES, CA 90064

CASE ADMINISTRATION DARELL HOLMES

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TRANSMISSION MANAGER
LAW DEPARTMENT, ROOM 370 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE 2244 WALNIT GROVE AVE, 238M, QUADB, G01

17
ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

MONICA ARGANDONA DONNA TISDALE

DESERT PROGRAM DIRECTOR BOULEVARD SPONSOR GROUP
CALIFORNIA WILDERNESS COALITION PO BOX 1272
167 NORTH THIRD AVENUE, STE M BOULEVARD, CA 91905
UPLAND, CA 91786

MATTHEW JUMPER REBECCA PEARL

SAN DIEGO INTERFAITH HOUSING FOUNDATION POLICY ADVOCATE, CLEAN BAY CAMPAIGN
7956 LESTER AVE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COALITION
LEMON GROVE, CA 91945 401 MILE OF CARS WAY, STE. 310
FOR: SAN DIEGO INTERFAITH HOUSING NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950
FOUNDATION FOR: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COALITION

BOB & MARGARET BARELMANN DAVE DOWNEY

6510 FRANCISCAN ROAD NORTH COUNTY TIMES
CARLSBAD, CA 92011 207 E. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
ESCONDIDO, CA 92025

J. HARRY JONES PAT/ALBERT BIANEZ

SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE 1223 ARMSTRONG CIRCLE
800 WEST VALLEY PARKWAY, SUITE 114 ESCONDIDO, CA 92027
ESCONDIDO, CA 92025

WALLY BESUDEN DAVID W. CAREY

PRESIDENT DAVID CAREY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SPANGLER PEAK RANCH, INC PO BOX 2481
PO BOX 1959 JULIAN, CA 92036
ESCONDIDO, CA 92033

LAUREL GRANQUIST MARTHA BAKER

PO BOX 2486 VOLCAN MOUNTAIN PRESERVE FOUNDATION
JULIAN, CA 92036 PO BOX 1625
JULIAN, CA 92036

JOHN RAIFSNIDER BRIAN KRAMER

PO BOX 121 PO BOX 516
JULIAN, CA 92036-0121 JULIAN, CA 92036-0516

NANCY PARINELLO PAUL RIDGWAY

PO BOX 516 3027 LAKEVIEW DR.
JULIAN, CA 92036-0516 PO BOX 1435
JULIAN, CA 92036-1435

DAVID VOSS SCOTT KARDEL

502 SPRINGFIELD AVENUE PALOMAR OBSERVATORY
OCEANSIDE, CA 92057 PO BOX 200
PALOMAR MOUNTAIN, CA 92060

CAROLYN A. DORROH JOSEPH W. MITCHELL, PH. D.

RAMONA COMMUNITY PLANNING GROUP M-BAR TECHNOLOGIES AND CONSULTING
17235 VOORHES LANE 19412 KIMBALL VALLEY RD
RAMONA, CA 92065 RAMONA, CA 92065

JOSEPH W. MITCHELL, PHD LARA LOPEZ

M-BAR TECHNOLOGIES AND CONSULTING 16828 OPEN VIEW RD

18
19412 KIMBALL VALLEY RD. RAMONA, CA 92065
RAMONA, CA 92065

PETER SCHULTZ PHILLIP &ELIANE BREEDLOVE

OLD JULIAN CO. 1804 CEDAR STREET
PO BOX 2269 RAMONA, CA 92065
RAMONA, CA 92065

WILLIAM TULLOCH CAROLYN MORROW

28223 HIGHWAY 78 GOLIGHTLY FARMS
RAMONA, CA 92065 36255 GRAPEVINE CANYON ROAD
RANCHITA, CA 92066

JOSEPH RAUH STEVE/CAROLYN ESPOSITO

RANCHITA REALTY 37784 MONTEZUMA VALLEY ROAD
37554 MONTEZUMA VALLEY RD RANCHITA, CA 92066
RANCHITA, CA 92066

BONNIE GENDRON GLENDA KIMMERLY

4812 GLENSIDE ROAD PO BOX 305
SANTA YSABEL, CA 92070 SANTA YSABEL, CA 92070

GLENN E. DROWN JOHN&PHYLLIS BREMER

PO BOX 330 PO BOX 510
SANTA YSABEL, CA 92070 SANTA YSABEL, CA 92070

K. RENEE MARTIN DAN PERKINS

PO BOX 1276 ENERGYSMARTHOMES.NET
POWAY, CA 92074 983 PHILLIPS ST.
VISTA, CA 92083

DEANNA SPEHN SUSAN FREEDMAN

POLICY DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF SENATOR CHRISTINE KEHOE
39TH STATE SENATE DISTRICT
2445 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
SENIOR REGIONAL ENERGY PLANNER
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
401 B STREET, SUITE 800
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

JASON M. OHTA PATRICIA GUERRERO

LATHAM &WATKINS LLP ATTORNEY AT LAW
600 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 1800 LATHAM & WATKINS
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3375 600 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 1800
FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3375

KATHARINE WOLFROM MICAH MITROSKY

SIERRA CLUB OF SAN DIEGO SIERRA CLUB
3802 RAY STREET 3820 RAY STREET
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104 SAN DIEGO, CA 92104-3623

KIM KIENER JIM BELL

504 CATALINA BLVD 4862 VOLTAIRE ST.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92106 SAN DIEGO, CA 92107

STEPHEN ROGERS EPIC INTERN

1340 OPAL STREET EPIC/USD SCHOOL OF LAW
SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 5998 ALCALA PARK

19
 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110
BRUCE V. BIEGELOW ONELL SOTO
STAFF WRITER SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE PO BOX 120191
PO BOX 120191S SAN DIEGO, CA 92112-0191
SAN DIEGO, CA 92112-0191 FOR: SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE

GEORGE COURSER CENTRAL FILES

3142 COURSER AVENUE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
SAN DIEGO, CA 92117 CP31-E
8330 CENTURY PARK COURT
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123

IRENE STILLINGS JENNIFER PORTER

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POLICY ANALYST
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
8520 TECH WAY, SUITE 110 8690 BALBOA AVENUE, SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123

SABRINA OZTURK SEPHRA A. NINOW

MSCP DIVISION POLICY ANALYST
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
5201 RUFFIN ROAD, SUITE B 8690 BALBOA AVENUE, SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123

TOM BLAIR DAHVIA LOCKE

ENERGY ADMINISTRATOR ENIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGER
CITY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
9601 RIDGEHAVEN COURT, SUITE 120 5201 RUFFIN ROAD, SUITE B
SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1636 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1666

JALEH (SHARON) FIROOZ, P.E. EILEEN BIRD

ADVANCED ENERGY SOLUTIONS 12430 DORMOUSE ROAD
17114 TALLOW TREE LANE SAN DIEGO, CA 92129
SAN DIEGO, CA 92127

KIMBELRY SCHULZ GREGORY T. LAMBRON

10303 CANINITO ARALIA NO 96 LAMBRON LAKESIDE RANCH, LLC
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131 PO BOX 15453
SAN DIEGO, CA 92175-5453

LYNDA KASTOLL THOMAS ZALE

REALTY SPECIALIST BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 1661 SO. 4TH STREET
EL CENTRO FIELD OFFICE EL CENTRO, CA 92243
1661 SOUTH 4TH STREET
EL CENTRO, CA 92243

J. STHURA JOHN STHURA

UNDERGROUND POWER ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA BOTANICAL HABITAT
PO BOX 1032 PO BOX 1032
HEMET, CA 92546 HEMET, CA 92546

SUZANNE WILSON LOUIS NASTRO

PO BOX 798 PO BOX 942896
IDYLLWILD, CA 92549 SACRAMENTO, CA 92860-0001

20
BRUCE FOSTER
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
601 VAN NESS AVENUE, STE. 2040
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
SHERIDAN PAUKER
SHUTE,MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP
396 HAYES STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
BREWSTER BIRDSALL
ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP
235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 935
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
JASON YAN
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
77 BEALE STREET, MAIL CODE B13L
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
MICHAEL S. PORTER
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
77 BEALE ST., MAIL CODE 13L RM 1318
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
CASSANDRA SWEET
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
201 CALIFORNIA ST., 13TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
JAMES B. WOODRUFF
VICE PRESIDENT REGULATORY AND GOVT AFFAI
NEXTLIGHT RENEWABLE POWER, LLC
101 CALIFORNIA STREET, STE 2450
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
CALIFORNIA ENERGY MARKETS
425 DIVISADERO ST.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117
ROBIN HARRINGTON
CAL. DEPT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTIO
PO BOX 944246
SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2460
HENRY ZAININGER
ZAININGER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
1718 NURSERY WAY
PLEASANTON, CA 94588
J.A. SAVAGE
CALIFORNIA ENERGY CIRCUIT
21
DIANE I. FELLMAN
DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS
FPL ENERGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC.
234 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
AARON QUINTANAR
RATE PAYERS FOR AFFORDABLE CLEAN ENERGY
311 CALIFORNIA STREET, STE 650
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
DAVID T. KRASKA
ATTORNEY AT LAW
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
PO BOX 7442, 77 BEALE ST, B30A
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
KATARZYNA M. SMOLEN
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
77 BEALE STREET, MC B9A
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
PAUL C. LACOURCIERE
THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER
101 SECOND STREET, SUITE 1800
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
DAVID L. HUARD
ATTORNEY AT LAW
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 30TH FL.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
JULIE L. FIEBER
FOLGER LEVIN & KAHN LLP
275 BATTERY STREET, 23RD FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
CASE COORDINATION
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
PO BOX 770000; MC B9A
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94177
JOSEPH PAUL
SENIOR CORPORATE COUNSEL
DYNEGY, INC.
4140 DUBLIN BLVD., STE. 100
DUBLIN, CA 94568
PHILIPPE AUCLAIR
11 RUSSELL COURT
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598
MRW & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1814 FRANKLIN STREET, SUITE 720
3006 SHEFFIELD AVE OAKLAND, CA 94612
OAKLAND, CA 94602

DAVID MARCUS STEVEN WEISSMAN

PO BOX 1287 ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR-ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
BERKELEY, CA 94701 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
2440 BANCROFT WAY, SUITE 207C
BERRKELEY, CA 94720-7230

BRETT JOLLEY W. KENT PALMERTON

JAM INVESTMENTS, INC WK PALMERTON ASSOCIATES, LLC
2291 W. MARCH LANE SUITE B-100 2106 HOMEWOOD WAY, SUITE 100
STOCKTON, CA 95207 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608

NANCY J. SARACINO ZIAD ALAYWAN

ATTORNEY ZGLOBAL INC. ENGINEERING AND ENERGY
CALIFORNIA INDEP. SYSTEM OPERATOR CORP. 193 BLUE RAVINE RD, STE 120
151 BLUE RAVINE ROAD FOLSOM, CA 95630
FOLSOM, CA 95630

LEGAL & REGULATORY DEPARTMENT DAVID BRANCHCOMB

CALIFORNIA ISO BRANCHCOMB ASSOCIATES, LLC
151 BLUE RAVINE ROAD 9360 OAKTREE LANE
FOLSOM, CA 95630 ORANGEVILLE, CA 95662

PAUL G. SCHEUERMAN LON W. HOUSE

SHEUERMAN CONSULTING WATER & ENERGY CONSULTING
3915 RAWHIDE RD. 4901 FLYING C RD.
ROCKLIN, CA 95677 CAMERON PARK, CA 95682

DARRELL FREEMAN ANDREW B. BROWN

1304 ANTRIM DR. ATTORNEY AT LAW
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 ELLISON SCHNEIDER & HARRIS, LLP
2015 H STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95811

AUDRA HARTMANN DARRON BOUTTON

DYNEGY, INC. DEPUTY CABINET SECRETARY
980 NINTH STREET, SUITE 2130 OFFICE OF GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 STATE CAPITOL
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

JAMES W. REEDE JR. ED.D KELLI MCDOWELL

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CA DEPT. OF PARKS AND RECREATION
1516 - 9TH STREET 1416 NINTH STREET, ROOM 1404-06
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

KELLIE SMITH KEVIN WOODRUFF

SENATE ENERGY/UTILITIES & COMMUNICATION WOODRUFF EXPERT SERVICES, INC.
STATE CAPITOL, ROOM 4038 1100 K STREET, SUITE 204
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

RICHARD LAUCKHART G. ALAN COMNES

GLOBAL ENERGY CABRILLO POWER I LLC
2379 GATEWAY OAKS DRIVE, SUITE 200 3934 SE ASH STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 PORTLAND, OR 97214

22
DANIEL SUURKASK
WILD ROSE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
430 8170 50TH STREET
EDMONTON, AB T6B 1E6
CANADA

State Service
MARCUS NIXON BILLIE C. BLANCHARD
CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PUBLIC ADVISOR OFFICE ENERGY DIVISION
320 WEST 4TH STREET SUITE 500 AREA 4-A
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

DAVID NG DONALD R. SMITH

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
EXECUTIVE DIVISION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH
ROOM 5207 ROOM 4209
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

GREGORY HEIDEN HELEN M. MICKIEWICZ

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
LEGAL DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION
ROOM 5039 ROOM 5123
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

JANET A. ECONOME JEAN VIETH

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
ROOM 5116
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
ROOM 5010
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

JEANETTE LO JULIE HALLIGAN

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
UTILITY & PAYPHONE ENFORCEMENT
ROOM 2253
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SAFETY DIVISION
ROOM 2203
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

KEITH D WHITE LAURENCE CHASET

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ENERGY DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION
AREA 4-A ROOM 5131
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

LINDA J. WOODS MATTHEW DEAL

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
UTILITY & PAYPHONE ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE DIVISION

23
AREA 2-A ROOM 5215
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

NICHOLAS SHER ROBERT ELLIOTT

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
LEGAL DIVISION ENERGY DIVISION
ROOM 4007 AREA 4-A
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

ROBERT HAGA SCOTT CAUCHOIS

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
EXECUTIVE DIVISION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH
ROOM 5304 ROOM 4103
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

SCOTT LOGAN STEVEN A. WEISSMAN

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH
ROOM 4209
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
ROOM 5107
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

TERRIE D. PROSPER TRACI BONE

CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
EXECUTIVE DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION
ROOM 5301 ROOM 5206
505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

SUSAN LEE CLARE LAUFENBERG

ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 935 1516 NINTH STREET, MS 46
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

DARRON BOUTON MARC PRYOR

DEPUTY CABINET SECRETARY CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER 1516 9TH ST, MS 20
STATE CAPITOL SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

PAUL C. RICHINS JR. THOMAS FLYNN

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
1516 9TH STREET ENERGY DIVISION
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 770 L STREET, SUITE 1050
FOR: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

JUDY GRAU TOM MURPHY

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION VP., SACRAMENTO OPERATIONS
1516 NINTH STREET MS-46 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-5512 8801 FOLSOM BLVD., SUITE 290
SACRAMENTO, CA 95826

41337604.2

24