UNIVERSITY OF LA SALLE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION SCIENCES BA IN SPANISH, ENGLISH, AND FRENCH RESEARCH AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICUM FINAL REVISIONS

S CHECKLIST
TIPS Proof-read your paper for spelling mistakes and typos Check the grammar and punctuation of the paper carefully If there are paragraphs that seem to be too long, or which seem to deal with two very different ideas, separate them into smaller paragraphs If there are paragraphs which seem to short, join the short paragraph with another nearby paragraph or move it to another part of the paper Look at your transitional words and phrases to make sure there is coherence and cohesion (remember you need to help the reader understand the connections and distinctions between one paragraph/section and the next) Check pronouns referents to make sure there is clarity and singular/plural consistency (people-they, it-its, etc.) Eliminate unnecessary or obscure words Vary your sentence length and structure Maintain consistent use of verb tense and appropriate verbs Cite accurately and consistently your sources, using APA Make sure you paraphrase and summarize material (remember you are not supposed to simply copy what others say) Use a sufficient variety of sources (authors, articles, books, theories, etc.) Check that ALL your quotations are necessary and well written WRITING QUESTIONNAIRE Paragraph structure 1. Does each paragraph have a single central topic, stated or implied? 2. Is each paragraph well developed? (Have you provided enough reasons, examples, facts, definitions, etc., to support the topic sentence?) 3. Is each paragraph unified? (Do all sentences clearly relate to one topic?) 4. Is each paragraph coherent? (Does each sentence relate to the ones before and after it in a logical way? Are there appropriate transitions?) Mechanics (Grammar, Punctuation, Style, Format, Diction) 1. Have you proofread your sentences carefully to detect and correct errors in y sentence completeness (fragments, run-ons)? y subject/verb agreement? y pronoun reference (be sure all pronouns have only one antecedent)? y modifiers (adjective/ adverb form; misplaced and dangling modifiers)? y verb tense? y punctuation? 2. Where appropriate, have you y eliminated unnecessary words? y varied your syntax, sentence length, and word choice? y put parallel thoughts into parallel form? y checked to see that comparisons are worded logically? y referred active to passive verb forms? 3. Have you checked your words to be sure they are y correctly spelled and used? y appropriate? (Avoid inappropriate slang, trite expressions and cliches) 4. Have you used the proper format? Is your paper y typed, double spaced, 12-point font, page numbers, a title page (if required), etc.? y in line with APA, or other academic guidelines for quotes, footnotes, bibliography, etc.? Information Sources 1. Have you properly attributed all quotes and paraphrases of other's work? 2. Have you checked your sources to see that they are sufficiently numerous, authoritative, various, relevant, and appropriate? 3. Have you checked that the references are all included and correct?
Adapted from http://writingcenter.gmu.edu/resources-template.php?id=17 & http://carey.jhu.edu/writing_center/UGwriting_checklist.html

UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLE RESEARCH AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICUM YAMITH JOS FANDIO

UNIVERSITY OF LA SALLE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION SCIENCES BA IN SPANISH, ENGLISH, AND FRENCH RESEARCH AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICUM ACADEMIC PAPER RUBRICS CRITERIA ASSIGNMENT VERY GOOD (5)
The paper shows great effort and commitment. The paper addresses the purpose of the assignment. The paper certainly follows instructions regarding length, number of sources, etc. Sentences structure is refined, creative, and varied. Format follows appropriate guidelines (APA) very well. The length and structure of sentences is very good. Facility with language is apparent. Usage is mostly correct and language is appropriate. Punctuation, spelling, capitalization, etc., are correct. The paper is logically organized. Paragraphs are coherent, well developed, and unified around clear topics. Transitions are logical, signaled by connecting language.

GOOD (4)
Response to the assignment is focused and coherent. The paper addresses the purpose of the assignment adequately. The paper follows instructions regarding length, number of sources, format, etc. Sentences are generally clear and complete in structure. Format follows appropriate guidelines (APA) adequately. The length and structure of sentences is adequate. Usage is regularly correct and language is appropriate. Punctuation, spelling, capitalization, etc., are appropriate. The paper is generally focused, with adequate sections. Paragraphs are coherent, adequately developed, and unified around concise topics. Transitions are logical, signaled by connecting language.

SATISFACTORY (3)
Contents and/or topics may show lack of care. The paper does not follow instructions/standards in all regards. The paper may be too short or long; it may not incorporate enough sources, etc. Intermittent grammar errors appear (e.g. fragments, subject/verb agreement) Little variety or sophistication in the length and structure of sentences. Writing is occasionally wordy and unclear. Other errors appear (in usage and word choice, spelling, capitalization, punctuation) Organization is not always logical or appropriate. Coherence and unity are not always successful. Ideas and topics are unfocused and partially developed. The paper occasionally skips around without adequate transitions. Knowledge of subject is acceptable but not deep. Ideas and concepts are supported acceptably with reasons, quotes, etc. Information sources are elementary or used without much elaboration. Approach to subject lacks creativity, mastery.

POOR (2)
Contents and topics are defectively developed or approached. Text does not follow instructions/standards. Paper is limited and it does not incorporate enough sources, and so forth). Constant grammar errors appear (e.g. fragments, subject/verb agreement). The length and structure of sentences are inadequate. Writing is often wordy and unclear Format does not fully follow academic guidelines. Several errors appear (in usage and word choice, spelling, capitalization, punctuation) Organization is confusing or obscure. Paragraphs lack coherence and unity. Ideas topics are unfocused and not developed. The paper does not use adequate transitions. Knowledge of subject is inadequate. Ideas and concepts are not supported properly. Information sources are flawed or accepted uncritically. Approach to subject lacks creativity, mastery.

MECHANICS

ORGANIZATION

THOUGHT

The paper demonstrates very good knowledge of subject. Ideas and concepts are supported successfully with evidence, reasons, quotes, etc. The paper shows critical and logical thought. Sources of information are examined successfully and weighed against other sources adequately.

The paper demonstrates knowledge of subject. Ideas and concepts are supported adequately with evidence, reasons, quotes, etc. The paper shows some critical and logical thought. Sources of information are examined properly and weighed against other sources sufficiently.

Adapted from http://carey.jhu.edu/writing_center/UGwriting_checklist.html

UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLE RESEARCH AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICUM YAMITH JOS FANDIO