0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
945 visualizzazioni7 pagine
TOR CDR is intended Ior routine quality control oI radiographic screen-Iilm combinations. The test object can be used to assess the relative perIormance oI different screen-iilm combinations. The recommended beam conditions are 70 kVp with a primary Iilter oI 1 mm copper.
TOR CDR is intended Ior routine quality control oI radiographic screen-Iilm combinations. The test object can be used to assess the relative perIormance oI different screen-iilm combinations. The recommended beam conditions are 70 kVp with a primary Iilter oI 1 mm copper.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
TOR CDR is intended Ior routine quality control oI radiographic screen-Iilm combinations. The test object can be used to assess the relative perIormance oI different screen-iilm combinations. The recommended beam conditions are 70 kVp with a primary Iilter oI 1 mm copper.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Wetherby Road, Boroughbridge, North Yorkshire, YO51 9UY United Kingdom www.leedstestobjects.com +44 (0) 1423 321102 +44 (0) 1423 321107 info@leedstestobjects.com Test object TOR |CDR| is intended Ior routine quality control oI radiographic screen- Iilm combinations, and may also be used Ior non-subtractive digital radiography. Testing should be done on a regular basis, keeping an ongoing record oI the test results, which will indicate any deterioration in the imaging perIormance. In addition to checking imaging consistency, the test object can be used to assess the relative perIormance oI diIIerent screen-Iilm combinations. Eigure 1 shows the layout oI the test details, which enable the Iollowing tests to be carried out: N Eilm density measurements (baseIog, speed index, contrast index) N Low-contrast sensitivity (large details) N High-contrast sensitivity (small details) N Spatial resolution limit SpeciIications oI the X-ray contrasts and spatial Irequencies in the test object are given on pages 5 and 6. Place the test object in contact with the tube side oI the loaded cassette, which should be positioned at an appropriate EED. The orientation oI the test object is not important, but is good practice to use a standard position each time, to reduce any possible variability when making subjective measurements. The recommended beam conditions are 70 kVp with a primary Iilter oI 1 mm copper. Place the supplied Iilter as close as possible to the tube head, normally at the diaphragm housing. Set the diaphragms to the required positions, and expose the Iilm to a background density oI about 1.5 above the baseIog level (ideally, this should be the mid-point oI the linear portion oI the characteristic curve). This is Eilm No1. Next, remove the copper Iilter and use a lower tube voltage, about 50 kVp. Expose a second Iilm, again obtaining a density oI about 1.5 above baseIog. This is Eilm No2. The exposure conditions (EED, kVp, mAs) should be recorded; the same conditions must be used each time (Ior a particular screen-Iilm combination), otherwise the test results can not be compared. II Automatic Exposure Control is used, the consistency oI AEC Iunction will be included in the test. ''HHVVFFUULLSSWWLLRQ RQ 33RRVVLLWWLLRQ RQLLQJ QJWWKH KH77HHVVW W22EEMMHF HFWW ;;UUDD\ \%%HD HDP P&&RQG RQGLLWWLLRQ RQVV On Eilm No1, the 5.6 mm discs at the bottom oI the test pattern Iorm a 10-point grey- scale, which can be measured using a densiometer. Eor routine testing, only three measurements need be made, as Iollows; N BaseIog level, given by the extreme leIt hand disc N Speed index, the density oI the disc closest to 1.0 above baseIog (N.B. the same disc must be measured each time) N Contrast index, the diIIerence between the speed index and the background density, measured adjacent to the disc. A Control chart, plotting the three densities as a Iunction oI time, will indicate the consistency oI radiographic exposure, and oI the Iilm processing conditions (the Iilm processor must be monitored independently by a standard sensiometric programme). The control chart should indicate the permitted tolerance levels Ior each measurement, e.g. baseIog should have an upper limit (say 0.22), the speed index may vary between 0.9 and 1.1 (above baseIog) and the contrast may also vary accordingly. Eigure 1: Layout oI test details (not to scale) ))LO LOP P''HQ HQVVLLWW\ \00HD HDVVXXUUHHPPHQ HQWWVV 00HD HDVVXXUULLQJ QJ77KH/ KH/RRZZ&&RQ RQWU WUDDVVW W66HQ HQVVLLWWLLYYLLWW\\ View Eilm No1 on a light box, and count the number oI large circular details that can be detected against the background. This will depend upon the shape oI the characteristic curve, especially its gradient, and also upon the level oI radiographic noise. The value oI the threshold contrast can be Iound Irom the table oI page 5. N.B. when the image has a relatively high noise level (as with Iast rare-earth screens) it may be necessary to view more than one sample image and Iind a mean value. Still viewing Eilm No1, count the number oI small (0.5 mm) details that can be detected. A magniIying lens (x4 to x8) may be Iound useIul. The detectability oI these small details will depend upon radiographic noise and unsharpness. The threshold contrast value can be Iound Irom page 5. The resolution limit is a simple indicator oI radiographic unsharpness, which is Iully speciIied by the MTE oI the screen-Iilm combination. Radiographic unsharpness is caused almost entirely by the screen, but may deteriorate due to poor screen-Iilm contact. Measurement oI the resolution limit requires the test pattern to be imaged under optimum conditions, with high contrast and low noise, and these are provided by Iilm No2. View this Iilm on the light box, and note the resolution groups where the bars and spaces are all visible, using the magniIier iI necessary. Erom the speciIication table, determine the highest spatial Irequency that can be resolved. 00HD HDVVXXUULLQJ QJ77KH KH++LLJK JK&&RQ RQWU WUDDVVW W66HQ HQVVLLWWLLYYLLWW\\ 00HD HDVVXXUULLQJ QJ77KH KH55HHVVRROOXXWWLLRQ/ RQ/LLPPLLWW The results obtained Irom these measurements should be recorded in a way which allows any trend towards deterioration (over a period oI time) to be detected. However, even without deterioration, it is unlikely that exactly the same values will be obtained Ior each routine test, and it is useIul to establish tolerances in respect oI the maximum and minimum values that are acceptable Ior each type oI screen-Iilm combination. This can be done aIter several sets oI measurements have been obtained, using several cassettes. The best results may be taken as the standard to be expected oI that particular combination. The worst results (depending how much worse) may deIine the lower limit oI acceptability. When deciding these values, there are several sources oI variability which should be taken into account; N The variability oI subjective measurements, including inter-observer variability N The variability oI exposure conditions, including the AEC system (iI used) N The variability oI Iilm processing conditions, which must be monitored separately. A set oI reIerence Iilms oI the test pattern, Ior diIIerent types oI screen-Iilm combination, will allow diIIerences in image quality to be observed directly, showing the eIIects oI diIIerent radiographic noise, unsharpness and contrast. Such Iilms can be used to train new observers and to monitor their perIormance, ensuring that their psycho-physical judgement oI threshold contrasts remains stable. Also, they can be used as control images while investigating new radiographic products or techniques (e.g. when considering changes to current clinical procedures). ,,QQWWHHUUSSUUHHWWDDWWLLRQR RQRI I55HHVVXXOOWWVV 55HHIIHHUUHQFH) HQFH)LO LOPPVV X-ray contrast values are given Ior beam conditions oI 70 kVp (constant potential) with 1 mm copper Iiltration. These should be regarded as nominal values; actual contrasts will depend on the shape oI the kV waveIorm etc. They are also subject to manuIacturing tolerances oI +5. N Grey scale: 10 discs, diameter 5.6 mm, with nominal X-ray contrasts as Iollows; 1.0, 0.91, 0.82, 0.73, 0.64, 0.50, 0.41, 0.30, 0.20, 0.11 (background 0.0) N Low-contrast sensitivity: 17 circular details, diameter 11 mm; Disc Number Contrast Disc Number Contrast 1 0.075 10 0.015 2 0.067 11 0.013 3 0.053 12 0.011 4 0.045 13 0.009 5 0.039 14 0.007 6 0.032 15 0.005 7 0.027 16 0.003 8 0.022 17 0.002 9 0.017 - - N High-contrast sensitivity: 17 circular details, diameter 0.5 mm; Disc Number Contrast Disc Number Contrast 1 0.954 10 0.167 2 0.820 11 0.128 3 0.726 12 0.117 4 0.573 13 0.088 5 0.496 14 0.067 6 0.360 15 0.061 7 0.302 16 0.045 8 0.238 17 0.039 9 0.203 - - 66SHF SHFLLIILLFD FDWWLLRQ RQV VRRI IWWKH KH77HHVVW W''HHWWDDLO LOVV N Resolution test patterns: There are 30 separate groups oI bar patterns, each group comprising 5 bars and 4 spaces, giving 4 line-pairs. The Iollowing table gives the spatial Irequencies in line-pairs per mm. Group Number Spatial Freq. Group Number Spatial Freq. 1 0.50 16 2.80 2 0.56 17 3.15 3 0.63 18 3.55 4 0.71 19 4.00 5 0.80 20 4.50 6 0.90 21 5.00 7 1.00 22 5.60 8 1.12 23 6.30 9 1.25 24 7.10 10 1.40 25 8.00 11 1.60 26 8.90 12 1.80 27 10.0 13 2.00 28 11.1 14 2.24 29 12.5 15 2.50 30 14.3
Pages From Valerie F. Andolina, Shelly L. Lillé-Mammographic Imaging - A Practical Guide (Point (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) ) - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2010)