Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Thomas Bier Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs Cleveland State University
Out
48,000 87,000
Net
-15,000 -36,000 -$1.1 b
$1.28 b $2.38 b
Cuyahoga County is losing middle- and upper-income residents. Many prefer inner locations but lack of renewal pushes them out. Lack on inner renewal and Cuyahogas land situation define the way forward.
As Cuyahogas supply of greenfield land has shrunk, development has shifted to adjacent counties*
Cuyahogas Share of 7-County New Housing (units)
1985 2010
44% 20%
1400
Adjacent Counties
1200
Millions of Dollars
Cuyahoga
2000 2005 2010
Cleveland
19 Inner Suburbs
Outer Suburbs
Cleveland
19 Inner Suburbs
Outer Suburbs
Cuyahoga County
Cleveland
4
19 Inner Suburbs
3
Outer Suburbs
2
Cuyahoga County
Adjacent Counties
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cuyahoga is on the road to shrinking tax base, higher taxes, reduced bond rating while neighboring counties continue to grow.
Cuyahogas decline undermines economic prospects for the region just as Clevelands decline did, but on a larger scale.
No Other Option
To prevent worsening decline, redevelopment and renewal of the countys old core Cleveland and inner suburbs must be a dominant countywide priority.
The Issue is the future of the county: core redevelopment and renewal must
Offset the loss of greenfield development.
Offset real estate depreciation and demolition in the core. Attract residents and businesses to the core.
1,800
200 500 2,500
Double Downtown Cleveland by 2032 Average 250 units per year Result: population 20,000
The Question
Will the 59 jurisdictions in Cuyahoga County pull together and focus policies, programs and resources on renewing and rebuilding its old core communities?