Radio propagation channel Model tuning overview

29 Sep 2009

Overview of propagation model used in planet

Input
Scanner or CW drive test Map, projection Site configurations used (e.g, link budget, GPS)

Planet general model (PGM)

Slope based Okumura-Hata type model

CRC- predict4 model

Deterministic (i.e., map dependent, instead of survey), physical-optics based model

Universal model (UM)

Additional license required Unmasked and masked version Unmasked means that antenna correction is done by planet prediction engine, instead of UM calculation
2

PGM overview (1)

PGM overview (2)

Account for FSL
K1 (freq-dependent intercept), K2 (slope) K5 (multiplier for effective antenna height)

Effective antenna height gain

BTS ht gain side as K3 MS ht gain as K6

Clutter effect
Weight factor K in last 1km to rx

Diffraction
multiply by K4 for non-LOS Calculation based on Epstein-Peterson method for 3 diffracting edge Use clutter height evaluate diffraction for non-LOS Use Clutter separation as distance between last effective diffracting clutter obstruction to rx antenna

PGM tuning
PGM only compute vertical diffraction In DU/U environment where horizontal diffraction can be significant, PGM often over-estimate vertical diffraction loss Compensate with clutter gain PGM effective where BTS ht >= surrounding clutter Using AMT manual Use Hata for K3 and K5, clutter offset = optimize Optimize K1, K2 and K4 smart Optimize K1 to K5 and CAL in one pass Optional 2nd step Fix tuned K and using clutter tuner to re-tune CAL or do manual change

CRCCRC-predict4

Clutter effect specified as clear distance and obstacle height to receiver Map pixel

Huygen principle
(vector summation of secondary radiation sources)

Comparison of PGM and CRC predict4

PGM
Application Urban to suburban

CRC predict
Accurate clutter/terrain maps, secondary radiation sources Detailed prediction along many radials 360 Easy to tune, since accuracy dependent on clutter/terrain, NOT DT data Deterministic model based on Physical optics to calculate diffraction over terrain/clutter All mobile have same height for all clutter class Optimize clutter absorption property

Advantage

Fast, good for long distance propagation 720 Needs more CW data to estimate slope Similar to COST231/HataOkumura, slope-based model with various K parameters Different value assigned to each clutter Optimize K, clutter absorption/ separation

Typical prediction resolution (No of radial) Weakness

Model

Receiver height Auto tune tool

7

Before model tuning

Add new sites
Setup link budget to get correct EIRP (e..g., PA power, pilot %, cable loss, rx antenna gain) Add combined gain/loss = receiver antenna gain receiver cable loss,
to DL link budget for all sectors Similar to manually adjust K1 in PGM

If scanner DT is used
Planet uses RSSI as CPICH RSCP/pilot power for CDMA based network Allocate scanner record to sector and export as survey

If needed, combine multiple scanner log from same sector to 1 log Create header for each survey data per sector Filter survey data Average survey data
Assign filtered/averaged survey data to associated sector

Model tuning work flow (1) import survey

Model tuning work flow (2) create header

Site configuration is assigned to that survey

Select sector which survey belongs to

Survey changes color after header is generated

10

Model tuning work flow (3) filter survey

Extract valid survey data for model tuning

11

Model tuning work flow (4) average survey

Remove fast Rayleigh fading 10~20 or about 2m for 2.5GHz Average by distance to avoid bias effect or 1/3 of map pixel or 5m (use 2m since it is smaller)
12

Model tuning work flow (5) assign to sector

13

Used to compare prediction coverage with survey data by calculating mean/std/RMS error

Survey histogram (after filter and averaging)

Dense urban sites

Smooth monotonically rolloff on both ends of dBm

urban sites

suburban sites

Clutter distribution (after filter and averaging)

Dense urban sites

urban sites (recommend 2000~3000 sample per clutter class for good model tuning, absolute minimum is 200~300 sample per clutter class)

suburban sites

Distance regression (after filter and averaging)

Dense urban sites DU model should has steepest slope (i.e., larger K2 magnitude) compared to U and SU model

urban sites

suburban sites

Model tuning (1) create untuned version

Clutter separation ~ 1 or 2 pixel distance, depending on environment Most clutter have some diffraction loss (except water) For PGM Diffraction loss is pre-calculated based on clutter separation/height, only clutter absorption loss is tuned
17

Model tuning (2) automatic model tuner (PGM)

Use smart to tune all K values and CAL in one pass Optional 2nd step after running AMT, run CAL tuner to tune CAL only with fixed K values obtained from AMT
18

Model tuning (3) verify tuned model (PGM)

Check model tuning report K and CAL comparison BEFORE and AFTER running AMT (automatic model tuner)

Check error
If negative model error model is over-predicting (i.e., predicted dBm is higher than survey) CAL is only calculated if survey available in that clutter class (if no survey, set to 0 by default) If clutter separation is too short, diffraction loss calculated will be too high. If clutter has gain, it basically means clutter separation is too low or clutter height too high uses clutter class with most sample as a reference to compute K1 and compare with other clutter type give -/+ clutter absorption loss

19

Model tuning (4) check error between survey vs prediction based on tuned model
Rerun prediction using tuned model, and check error for each sector

Rule of thumb <3dB mean, <9dB std

20

Model tuning (5) sanity check for PGM models

DU site with PGM DU model DU sites with PGM U model DU site with PGM SU model

21

Model tuning (6) predicted coverage with survey

Legends for predicted coverage and thematic map of survey are same

22