Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ADRIAN
R. COOPER
LEONARD
SUSSKIND
AND LARUS
THORLACIUS
ABSTRACT
Two-dimensional with central quantum gravity coupled to conformally a toy model for quantum invariant gravity matter in four
dimensions.
in the string theory target space and does not appear to effects.
be suppressed by wormhole
Invited talk presented at the Strings and Symmetries workshop, Stony Brook, N. Y. May 20-25, 1991.
* Work supported by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515, t Supported in part by NSF grant PHY89-17438
1. Introduction
In this lecture some implications cosmological of string theory for Coleman theory of the s
constant [l] will be discussed. String theory will not be considered in but rather as a model of quantum gravity Much of the point
its role as a possible theory of everything with the two-dimensional material worldsheet
is the observation
coupled
to D > 25 scalar matter fields has all the ingredients to make Coleman argument. s The main requirements
l
are: topologies
a sum over geometries which includes non-trivial an action for the conformal a Euclidean
mode which is unbounded from below of a sphere with radius N -&- where X ID constant. to the Euclidean action for such
is the two-dimensional
. a spherical geometry is given by SE = $ log X for large D The power law behavior
in four dimensions is replaced by a logarithm result the Baum-Hawking sum over wormholes exponential amplitude in the two-dimensional theory. As a the
Coleman s exponential
exp X -D/6.
Nevertheless, if, as suggested by Coleman, this expression distribution for the cosmological constant, then
it implies the vanishing of X in two dimensions. Coleman s wormhole argument consists of two parts. The first says that the sum over quantum
topologies
t Gravitational fluctuations are suppressed as D ---i cm. The existence of this semi-classical limit will be crucial for some of our arguments later on. 2
summing
This is to be compared with the conclusions that string theory leads to. First of all, it appears to be correct that topology change makes the couplings of the twodimensional worldsheet theory into quantum argument variables in target space. However, by string theory. The
is not supported
by phenomena which
as follows.
quantum
gravity
and establish the connection we study cosmological governs the propagation of baby universes. equations of motion couplings with
universe in a background
In section 4 we examine the relation and the renormalization Section 5 deals with
group, and consider the evolution the question of the two-dimensional calculation
scale.
cosmological
We present an explicit
of the proce-
using an appropriate
renormalization
2. Two-dimensional
Quantum
Gravity
gravity,
and String
Theory
Let us begin with a theory of quantum spacetime (go, or), involving treatments quantum
have focused on the case D 5 1 but for the purpose of modelling cosmology it is appropriate invariant, to consider D > 25. The action is taken to but can otherwise be quite general. It is also the theory out the
non-perturbative
method of regularizing
no such method
continuum
covariant manner.
the Lagrangian
At the end of the day, the gauge symmetry which place constraints
is re-imposed
identities,
A particular
Gauge fixing:
The first step is to remove the over-counting invariance. For each worldsheet topology
metric
metric is conformal
(24
The original Xi(a) path integral is replaced by an integral over the matter fields
Regularization:
path integral
the ultra-
violet divergences of the theory need to be regularized. perturbative discretization The regulator regulator can be introduced by discretizing
is to remain fixed and not be summed over as in matrix involves a shortest fiducial length defined by,
models.
(2.2)
where E is the line element connecting the nearest lattice points and S tends to zero as the cut-off is removed. A more covariant definition would refer would
the cut-off scale to the physical metric Yab, but then the regularization
4
over.
Thus we are
in order to have a
Renormalization:
tions of both the matter and gravitational terms, involving 4 and Xi,
fields generates various interaction These terms will in ?& and therefore
the effective theory will not be manifestly original theory is assumed to be invariant mations
the possible couplings but merely labels them acproperties under fiducial reparametrizations. does not depend on the determinant of all couplings in the theory vanish.
This means that the gauge fixed theory must be an exact fixed point of the renormalization To summarize: scalar fields, X . a non-covariant to the matter group in order to maintain the original general covariance.
We start with a generally covariant theory of gravity coupled to In order to define the path integral we fix a gauge and regularize in
manner.
The resulting
vanish. Notice that in this way of stating things 4 and Xi are The Liouville This approach field has been promoted to the quantization to an additional
of two-dimensional
two dimensions.
functional
dependence on $ and Xi, and with any number of derivatives For convenience, let us define X0 = $5 where q2 = y. standard normalization can then be written, for the Liouville
s = & /- d2a fi
{T(X)
+ ~b&xp&xYG,,(x)
+ 2ii Q(X) + -. -} ,
(2.3)
zero more k.
with p = O,l,. . . , D. We have written and two: derivatives but there is an infinite
theory, have the form of field equations in target-space (tachy on, dilaton and graviton fields respectively),
the propagation
of the particle-like
strings in spacetime, or more to the point of this paper, one-dimensional containing matter fields! Because of the identification
constant.
A cosmological
term in the original classical action corresponds to a tachyon backwith increasing two-dimensional scale,
J
as the tachyon background
d2a JrX
d2a &LZ%~~
.
theory,
(2.4
as long growth
* For simplicity, we have not included the anti-symmetric tensor field. Its presence would not qualitatively alter our conclusions. t We will use the string theory names for the target-space fields, but the reader should keep in mind their cosmological interpretation. 6
is modified eventually
by quantum
fluctuations.
The exponentially
growing background
will
space theory
governed by the behavior of the tachyon background the connection between the two is more subtle. of motion, obtained
in the non-linear
by setting beta-functions
to
action.
For simplicity,
T o 1ea d g or d er in derivatives, m
(2.5)
form of V(T)
[11,12]. It should b e st ressed that using such a prescription fact that the target space equations are non-linear satisfied by a simple exponential
tachyon background.
amplitudes
We will return to this point in section 5, where we propose an appropriate and present a calculation of V(T) to all orders in T.
3. Quantum
Cosmology
in Two Dimensions
The equations of motion which follow from the target space action (2.5) are
v2T-2vfbvT=
V'(T),
0%-2(vq2=-
+ V(T), ;G,,(~T)~.
RpV - ~G,,R=-~~~v~~+G,,~~~+v,Tv,T-
These equations have a simple solution, the so called linear dilaton background [13], which for D > 25 is given by
(3.2)
-Qxo
like. This means that the kinetic term of X0 in (2.3) has the wrong sign and the Euclidean action of the two-dimensional theory is unbounded from below. This
of the Euclidean
gravity, which lies at the heart of Coleman argument for the vanishing of the coss mological gravity constant. On the other hand, it means that Euclidean is ill-defined two-dimensional group
computation,
as a formal argument.
of Lorentzian signature
but it is unclear at present how to perform the steps inof such a theory (regularization, people have sought to circumvent renormalization, etc.).
complex plane to obtain a well defined integral [14]. While this formal procedure can also be applied in the two-dimensional question [15]. theory, its validity has been called into
theory for
D > 25. The equations of motion (3.1), which were arrived at via a formal derivation based on a Euclidean Lorentzian worldsheet, lend themselves to an interpretation as a is
Our assumption,
that a consistent Lorentzian space field theory. describe splitting two-dimensional butions
worldsheet formulation
would lead to the same target singular geometries which in the Lorentzian
path integral.
the path integral will receive contrifrom the background, in Euclidean which
By contrast,
of the
string coupling depends on the dilaton field in target space. A key feature of the linear dilaton background to the two-dimensional (3.2) is that the string loop coupling constant is related
scale,
g =
go e@
=goe2
QXO
(3.3)
We can only expect the effective field theory to be simple where this coupling is weak. For D > 25 the theory is strongly coupled for sufficiently small strings and on
in the ultraviolet
induced, and
define it by the point at which gee @ = 1. The factor of go can be absorbed by a constant shift of the dilaton. The effective Planck-scale is then set by q-l. It
* In contrast with the D 5 1 case, where the strength of quantum corrections tends to zero
in the limit of metrically small strings. 9
depends on the number of scalar fields in the theory, and in particular, is a semi-classical limit for gravitational fluctuations+. Another
D + 00
- T-7 defines the Planck scale in this theory is to consider the relation classical conformal A particularly mode and the quantum interesting cosmological variable, ZC$= X0.
uni-
verse which starts out at small scale. The question of initial cated, just as it is in four-dimensional strongly quantum
is compli-
coupled early on. We will assume that the short distance physics can be by some unknown initial state at the Planck-time, which then evolves conditions on
summarized
in the weakly coupled theory. the target-space in target-space. A background Iis beta-function and is non-linear.
solution
(3.2).
depends on the shape of the effective potential, we will assume that the background
V(T),
field is
-i#T+i$T-qdoT+2T=0,
and if we further find solutions assume that the tachyon background
(34
only depends on X0, we
T(X)
Such a homogeneous background two-dimensional
= Xe (-fQ$+a)x
configuration
(3.5)
and Kawai
PV
One of the solutions decays in the weak coupling regime X0 j 00 but the other one grows exponentially with scale. The system is unstable and is likely to
t For D 5 1 a corresponding semi-classical limit is reached as the number of scalar fields is formally taken to D --+ -co. 10
tachyons.
limit
growing
f +2.
Wheeler-Dewitt description
In order to make contact with a more conventional of cosmology, nentially let us consider fluctuations
TB(X )
= X e(-f+GJxoe
ample, a tachyon with some non-zero space-like momentum a one-dimensional universe with some matter excitation. invariant.
k. This corresponds to
The target-space action it
= e -- Yx) T(X)
P-6)
= 0.
is well approximated
(3.7)
by the of all but the leading (3.7) becomes
equation, whereupon
a,Uk + (k2-2-$)Uk
where i = XV (O).
+ ie (-f+&ixoUk
= 0,
(3.8)
a2 a { $u-&~
Up to factor-ordering
+ (k2-2-c)
+ ia2}Uk
= 0.
equation
(3.9)
derived
ambiguities,
Lagrangian
of two-dimensional
gravity,
L = -( ;)2 - -$ [k - (2+$
The three terms in square brackets are the matter, constant energy densities.
+ j;, ]
.
and cosmological
curvature
It seems that we have recovered a more or less conventional description constant of large scale cosmology. In particular,
Wheeler-Dewitt
is the usual one. In order to obtain vanishing cosmological increasing solution for T(X) must be fine-tuned
exponentially
about the short distance physics, which is supposed to determine so we have no way of gauging how likely
However, this is not the whole story. Even if the tachyon background near the top of the potential order non-linear it will eventually
already mentioned,
prescriptions
term in V(T) is universal the different schemes will all agree near T = 0, but away from the origin they can present very different pictures. of whether identify Dewitt candidate For example, the question The key issue here is to to Wheeler-
V(T)
h as a minimum
is scheme-dependent.
T within
It should be emphasized that the non-linear do not disappear and joining in the semi-classical limit
about
D + co. In particular,
are unsuppressed even at large scales. This may seem surprising coupling is becoming weak, with e@ = e-;Xo.
U(X')
[V2
(2 + c)]u
= ~eetXou2.
limit
As we move toward
the semi-classical
q +
co, though,
squared increases as L , so that the unstable exponential 4 the decreasing coupling the tachyon instability, ponentially case. strength.
4. The Running
Before delving further clarify the connection malization
of Coupling
Constants
cosmology, we would like to
between the target space equations of motion and the renorfield theory.
The equations of motion for the target-space fields are that the beta-functions of all two-dimensional couplings vanish. From this one might conclude that the
couplings seen by a two-dimensional the correct interpretation. as renormalization renormalization hence determines miliar
We can think of the equations for the target-space fields with the logarithm of the
scale. The X0 dependence of the coupling functions their evolution with scale. This connection (3.1) are second-order
T, @, G,, . . .
by first-order of theories
* The equations of motion (3.1) are of course only the leading order approximation to the exact beta-function equations, which include terms with an arbitrary number of derivatives. 13
of quantum
seems to imply that no time evolution tells us how the wave function verse. The Wheeler-Dewitt is second-order. classical limit two-dimensional or equivalently
of matter
equation,
for T, a, GpV,
The first-order
the semi-classical
D +
00
qt
field equa-
renormalization renormalization
systematically
in a large q expansion. as a simple example, the case of fluctuations with about the linear a flat target-space to the
&
1 &ew2
{ (vA,)~
- 2(1-n)Ai
+ . . .} .
is
+ k2 - 2(1-n)]
As we saw previously, the tachyon rolling
A, = 0.
P-2)
this equation has unstable solutions for n = 0, which describe off the top of its potential. Note, however, that the solutions graviton and
for n > 1 are stable for all values of q. In other words, the dilaton, higher couplings do not become tachyonic for large D.
(4.2) as
[T
a2
(us)
+ yu
$ k2 - 2(1-n)]
14
A, = 0.
(4.3)
equation,
a $ A, = (-k2 + 2(n-1))
A,,
(4.4
3 + O($)
for large q. This is the usual lowest order 2n. In particular the
-k2 as expected.
of motion will include complicated higher-
The exact target space equations derivative limit terms, which are difficult
to compute explicitly,
they will all be suppressed by powers of qw2 in the same way as the second-
order term in (4.3). T o see that, note first of all that the only effect of the linear dilaton background (3.2) on beta-function calculations is to shift the anomalous
dimensions
of vertices.
k,
shifted from dk = 2 - k2 to dk = 2 + iqko - k2, but this is the factor of q enters into the tachyon beta-function. sigma model Feynman One graphs
[2]. As a result, all terms in the equations of motion with higher-order with respect to the conformal equations
derivatives,
in terms of the scale factor a. These terms will therefore all vanish in limit and should be viewed as gravitational computed corrections
group beta-functions
on a flat worldsheet.
renormalization
for the example considered above. The rightto /?:(A;), the beta-function correction of A, to ,Bi we
[-$(+
l]a-$L
= PO@.) z 7 n
(4.5)
15
h(A)
E aLAn
to rewrite
any higher-derivative
space
equations as a contribution
to the renormalization
group beta-functions,
suppressed
by some powers of q -2. In this way a systematic to compute gravitational of motion corrections
to beta-functions.
for a given target space field has a number of solutions. tachyon background
(3.5).
in the limit
q, and it is not hard to see that this semi-classical branch also provides a solution
to the corresponding corrections. We have so far been considering two-dimensional cosmology with a trivial matan first-order renormalization group equation with gravitational
ter sector, consisting of several free fields. A more complicated interacting matter sector coupled to the conformal
theory, involving
tests of the above ideas. One can, for instance, study an asymptotically model coupled to gravity. of the target-space r(X ),
This case was considered in reference [a], taking compactified to a sphere of time-dependent
dimensions
into the details here, but only discuss the qualitative coupling strength is l/r,
the coupling
form into the target space equations of motion (3.1). In the semi-classical
16
standard
renormalization
group flow,
ug
is reproduced. This calculation
(;)
= 2(g3,
(4.7)
is
weakly coupled, but breaks down as the system passes into the strongly regime. However, since we know that the flat space sigma-model
coupled only
contains
[ 191, we may speculate that well below the induced mass scale, the
degrees of freedom decouple. This would correspond to the effective becoming smaller at some point in the evolution of
central charge of the matter the universe. All this has important trivial sigma-model
constant.
The non-
dynamics
manifests
of the tachyon field as it rolls off the top of constant term in the Wheeler-Dewitt
equation (3.9). W e might imagine that it would be possible to fine tune the initial conditions constant so that the tachyon would thus vanish. stays balanced at the top, and the cosmological
was flat, we saw that this could indeed be done. Now, however, the coupling the sigma-model to the two-dimensional gravity will make it impossible.
There
are terms in the target space effective action which couple T and G,,. be determined explicitly by beta-function calculations,
They can it
will suffice to note that there must be some such term because string theory has a non-zero graviton-graviton-tachyon term involving of motion. vertex. There will thus be an extra source in the tachyon equation from the initial at large
As the three-sphere
cosmological
whether observers in a two-dimensional would register a non-zero cosmological of the tachyon background at large
approach is described in reference [2] and the leading terms are obtained Such calculations rapidly get quite involved and it is not tractable to all orders. In addition, the cosmological renormalization enormously.
complete beta-function
of the results is sensitive to the choice of perturbative In the semi-classical limit the problem simplifies
argument given in the previous section can be applied to the equation of motion for a homogeneous tachyon background. As q + 00 all terms with higher derivatives,
with respect to the conformal mode, will be suppressed. Since all space-derivatives vanish for homogeneous backgrounds the equation becomes first-order classical limit, in the semi-
a-&T = -V (T),
and the dynamics is completely determined
(54
for tachyons with vanishing
the beta-function
i.e. for a constant tachyon field. This might appear to be tachyon background only con-
to the two-dimensional
a view to take, for it does not take into account the effect of the regularization which is required to define the quantum theory. If, for example, the ultra-violet then the excluded volume
divergences are cut off using a hard sphere regulator, introduces non-trivial effects even when T is constant.
18
Begin by introducing
spacing E. In each cell we define an amplitude over the two-dimensional fields in the interior
the boundary
cell, fixing the values on the boundary. on the lattice edges. The remaining
This defines an effective theory that lives over the boundary values of the
integration
Z=
Renormalization and integrating
D4boundary
($boundary @
can be carried out by fixing the field values on some sub-lattice over the field on the remaining 9 are by construction lattice edges. amplitudes. To intro-
Wheeler-Dewitt
X be the zero-mode part of X on the boundary. Q = (1 - T(i) where 90 is the free theory amplitude. to be independent
- Gp&%)&!
By requiring
. . +&
(54
behavior
in the presence of general couplings, but in the special case of a constant function is simply
tachyon field, we can obtain the full answer. Then the partition
Z=Jn
F = c2 log 2 = log(l-T).
D4boundary
(1 -
T)
*O (4boundary)
cells
(5.4
= (1 - T)% (T
= 0))
to $. The free energy is therefore
of the coupling
T with E is defined by
requiring
the partition
function
to be independent
$F (T)g.
(5.6)
F-7)
cannot be
at T = 1, which is singular
continued
beyond T = 1. To see how this works, insert (5.7) into the first-order motion, u; This is easily solved by writing
T = -2(1-T)
(1-T)
log(l-T) .
= es, so that
d azS=2S.
There is one integration constant which is determined by initial conditions
(5.9)
on T, (5.10) term (2.4) with
T = 1 - eeAa2.
For small T this solution cosmological constant reduces to the classical cosmological
can eliminate
the
field S is no
longer proportional
to the Wheeler-Dewitt
(3.6). in-
universe containing
equation it satisfies
O=u-+k2r+V(T)~
(5.11)
=(u$
In the semi-classical with non-vanishing limit
+ k2 - 2 + iu 7. )
to the Wheeler-Dewitt equation (3.9)
cosmological
for the large-scale cosmology that the tachyon potential It is the singular behavior at T = 1,
cosmological
complicated
in the q +
tachyon background
+-(1-T)
This suggests the alternate definition o(X) In the large q limit the following
+ i u2(1-T)
= 0.
(5.12)
= e-@(X)(l
is equivalent equation
to (5.12).
Equation
equation to identify
that the SL(2, C) vacuum of string theory satisfies [3], and it is natural that state with the most symmetric universe [3,22]. cosmological constant the tachyon background (5.10) apuniverse or Hartle-Hawking state of a one-
dimensional
of its potential
at T = 1 as the two-dimensional
evolves to ever larger scale. It is unclear what conformal responds to a tachyon field sitting rather trivial a standard one. By the arguments matter theory
at rest at T = 1, but we suspect it to be a of Kutasov and Seiberg [20,23] it cannot be the 2 = 1 fixed point
coupled to gravity.
Apparently
behavior of an expanding
constant scale) have been passed. The only remaining matter fields from which the scale of the metric
is analogous to that in QCD at very large distance scales Another closer example
where the only degrees of freedom are massless pions. is provided cal constant by the D = 0 one-matrix corresponds to a matrix model. potential
Gaussian matrix
breaks down.
6. Conclusions
Our results can be summarized ogy can be formulated as follows. Two-dimensional quantum cosmol-
fields.
of fields in the string theory target-space stants in the two-dimensional in two dimensions a non-linear that, universe.
constant
tachyon
equation
the non-linear
a two-dimensional
universe interacting
constant.
22
is correct
space The
topologies
Including
in string theory
field theory.
As emphasized by variables.
However, the effective value of Planck constant for the target-space theory is itself s a field, and is given by h,ff cc e2@= e- Jxo. Thus quantum corrections are expected
to become negligible for large X0, and hence only to influence small scales. Now consider the quantum Its Lagrangian is mechanics of a tachyon field depending only on X0.
V qxo ( -f2 Qe
where V is the volume quantum fluctuations of (Xl,.
+ 2T2 + . . .) ,
If this volume is infinite,
(64
then If the
. . , XD)-space.
are negligible
evolves classically.
volume is finite, then the tachyon, and therefore the two-dimensional constant, is a true quantum variable. To describe it, a quantum
cosmological wave-function
at some value of X0 for which e-qxo is already small summarizes small wormholes. If we assume that this wave-function rapidly
is of some generic form at becomes classical, the only distribution quantization for the initial can force the
large-scale cosmological
23
REFERENCES
1. S. Coleman, Nucl. Phys. B30 (1988), 867., Nucl. Phys. B310 (1988), 643. 7
2. A. Cooper, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, April
Two-Dimensional
Quantum
Cosmology, SLAC-PUB-5536,
3. J. Polchinski,
(1989), 123.
6. T. Banks, Physicalia Magazine, vol 12, Special Issue in Honor of the 60th Birthday of R. Brout,(Gent 1990).
7. S. R. Das, S. Naik and S. R. Wadia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A4 (1989), 1033; S. R. Das, A. Dhar and S. R. Wadia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A5 (1990), 799. 8. T. Banks and J. Lykken, 9. A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B331 (1990), 173.
(1986), 561;
Hopkins preprint,
13. A. Chodos and C. B. Thorn, Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974), 509; T. L. Curtright and C. B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1988), 371;
48 (1982), 1309;
Phys. Lett. 211B
24
S. P. deAlwis, 449.
J. Polchinski
and R. Schimmrigk,
(1989),
14. G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking and M. J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B138 141. 15. J. Polchinski in Strings 90, Proceedings of the Superstring
(1978),
Workshop, Texas
A&M
1991).
16. F. David, Mod. Phys. Lett. A3 (1988), 1651. 17. J. Distler and H. Kawai, Nucl. Phys. B321 (1985), 332. (1989), 509.
-20. N. Seiberg, Notes on Quantum Liouville Rutgers preprint, 21. G. Moore, RU-90-29, 1990.
RU-90-60, 1990.
25