Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
www.geo-slope.com
A 2:1 homogeneous slope is used as illustrated in Figure 1. The key in modeling an infinite slope is to use a fully specified slip surface and a tension crack line. A fully specified slip surface defined parallel to the slope was used to ensure that all slices are having the same thickness, which is the condition of an infinite slope. The tension crack line is used to force the first and last slices to go vertically up, so that even the first and last slices will have the same thickness as the rest of the sliding mass (Error! Reference source not found.).
22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2
Elevation
Infinite slope
-5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Distance
Page 1 of 3
www.geo-slope.com
Three cases of the closed form solutions are considered. The factors of safety for the three cases are calculated using the parameters shown in Table 1 Parameter values used for infinite slope analyses.
Table 1 Parameter values used for infinite slope analyses
Parameter Case 1 Frictional Angle, (degrees) Cohesion, c (kPa) Pore-water Coefficient, ru Unit Weight, (kN/m3) Steepness, (degrees) Vertical Height, H (m) 35 0 0 19.62 26.565 (2:1 slope) 1.0 Values Used Case 2 35 0 0.25 19.62 26.565 (2:1 slope) 1.0 Case 3 35 5 0.25 19.62 26.565 (2:1 slope) 1.0
Case 1: Dry Frictional Material with No Cohesion For a dry infinite slope consisting of a frictional material with no cohesion, the factor of safety is:
= 0.963
Case 3: Wet Frictional Material with Cohesion For a frictional material with cohesion under the conditions of flow parallel to the slope, the factor of safety is:
Page 2 of 3
www.geo-slope.com
Factor of Safety =
c tan + 1 Ru sec 2 tan H cos sin 5.0 = + 0.963 19.62 1.0 cos 26.565 sin26.565 = 1.600
SLOPE/W Solutions
The three cases of the infinite slope are analyzed using SLOPE/W. The sliding mass is simulated with 30 slices. Figure 2 illustrates the solution for Case 1, where the Morgenstern-Price method is used.
Table 2 tabulates the comparison of the three cases between the closed form solutions and the SLOPE/W solutions. Factors of safety for the Bishop Simplified method and the Morgenstern-Price method are presented.
Table 2 Comparison of SLOPE/W solutions with closed form solutions for an infinite slope
Case c Ru Closed Form Solution 1 2 3 35 35 35 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.25 0.25 1.400 0.963 1.600 Factor of Safety SLOPE/W Bishop Simplified 1.402 0.965 1.601 SLOPE/W Morgenstern-Price 1.400 0.963 1.600
Conclusion
Infinite slope can be modeled quite easily with SLOPE/W. In all the above three infinite slope cases, the factors of safety computed by SLOPE/W are identical to the closed form solutions for the infinite slope. This simple example confirms that SLOPE/W is formulated correctly.
SLOPE/W Example File: Comparison with infinite slope.doc (pdf) (gsz) Page 3 of 3