Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
January 5, 2012
To the Editor:
What a beautiful piece of
writing. A great journalistic light
has gone out with the passing of
Hitch, but Mr. Irelands writ-
ing proves others walk along-
side his memory.
Jim Cullen
Via email
January 5, 2012
To the Editor:
Thanks to Doug Ireland for
his beautiful, touching trib-
ute to Christopher Hitchens
and, especially, in laying out
so many wonderful personal
anecdotes from their friend-
ship, for the reminder that
Hitchens confusing late politi-
cal de-liberalization neednt get
in the way of love for the rest
of him.
Bruce Nelson
Via email
January 4, 2012
To the Editor:
Doug Ireland s memorial
to Hitchens here is a rich and
beautiful work itself, informa-
tive and appreciated in that it
reflects new light on Christo-
phers life. We came to such
disappointment over his sup-
port for the Bush wars, it had
become easy to dismiss him.
Here we see again, or for the
first time, some of the richness
of his life and are made aware
of the depth of his insights into
sexuality. In the final days, it
was wonderful, again, to enjoy
him on the cable shows speak-
ing up for atheism.
Bill Stribling
Via email
January 6, 2012
To the Editor:
Christopher Hitchens was
my role model for bravery. He
spoke his mind completely and
truly without ever fearing repri-
sal. My mother had a refrig-
erator magnet with a cartoon
of a skunk saying, A friend is
someone who knows everything
about you but likes you any-
way. Thank you Doug for your
flexibility, openness, and exqui-
site comments about your love
and respect for Hitch.
Jeff Karmiole
Via email
January 4, 2012
To the Editor:
Hitchens did more than sim-
ply back George Bush. He gave
a big boost to Islamophobia by
describing the so-called war on
terror as a struggle of Western
Civilization against the hordes
of Islam. As an atheist but also
an internationalist, I saw that
the title of his book, God is not
Great, was in part an attack on
Islam. No doubt Hitchens made
contributions against homopho-
bia and befriended you in per-
sonal ways, Doug. But I with-
drew from the Freedom From
Religion Foundation when it
chose to honor Hitchens several
years ago.
Bob Schwartz
Via email
January 4, 2012
To the Editor:
I totally respect Irelands
friendship and devotion to a
man whom he credits with sav-
ing his life, but nothing here
convinces me Hitchens wasnt
basically a gay man. His talk
of relapsing into homosexual
relations is rather telling. Per-
haps he was a man who sup-
ported gay causes because deep
down he knew it was the right
thing to do, but somehow fig-
ured a basically bi/ heterosex-
ual front would get him further
in journalism, which it did I
mean, Vanity Fair?
He was operating in an ear-
lier era and, as Ireland relates,
eventually became quite con-
servative in at least some of his
views. His still helping Ireland
with gay causes is admirable,
of course, whatever his private
doubts, insecurities, or hypocri-
sies. Sad that even today there
are gay men who, however, gay-
friendly, just cant take that step
into fully declaring themselves
gay.
Bill Samuels
Via email
January 9, 2012
To the Editor:
Doug Ireland writes, I asked
one of the brighter stars in the
UKs journalistic firmament
today, Johann Hari, the openly
gay columnist for the Indepen-
dent, a fine upmarket daily, for
his opinion. Johann Hari is a
disgrace to UK journalism. He
has been suspended from the
Independent. He is a plagiarist,
and has admitted to malicious
editing, under a pseudonym, of
Wikipedia articles about people
he disliked. See economist.
com/blogs/bagehot/2011/09/
unethical-journalism.
Andrew Wood
Via email
January 6, 2012
To the Editor:
After reading the Hitchens
article by Doug Ireland, I looked
with disapproval at the head-
line. I had picked up the paper
due to my interest in Hitchens,
the fiery atheist with Jewish
roots, but the choice to high-
light the word Queer in pink,
in the title, My Queer Friend
Christopher Hitchens, seems
to me to distort reality, depict-
ing the recently deceased bisex-
ual Hitchens as a homosexual.
I see bisexuality as normal, and
homosexuality as more limited
opportunity-wise, and more
unusual.
Corves Fralman
Via email
YOUTH IN THE
LURCH
January 6, 2012
To the Editor:
I was pleased to see your arti-
cle on the Campaign for Youth
Shelter, and I wanted to high-
light the efforts being done by
one of the Campaigns leaders
Congregation Beit Simchat
Torah (CBST). An outspoken
voice in the Jewish and LGBTQ
worlds, CBST has devoted itself
to rallying the faith-based com-
munity around this urgent
issue.
In line with the directives
of the Campaign, CBST has
launched a new initiative called
Shelter of Peace. Uniting clergy
and congregations across New
York City, Shelter of Peace is
developing a base of caring
individuals who will stand up
and speak out on behalf of our
homeless youth.
Members of the Shelter of
Peace Network are clergy who
understand that all children
regardless of sexual orientation
or gender expression deserve
safe and supportive shelter
every single night. Families who
choose to reject their children
often turn to religion to provide
credence for their intolerance.
But we have a moral impera-
tive to protect the most vulner-
able members of our society.
Now is the time for the religious
community to stand up for its
youth.
On the weekend of January
20-22, more than 100 interfaith
clergy will be reminding their
congregations of that moral
responsibility. This Weekend of
Prayer and Learning will edu-
cate thousands of individu-
als about our homeless youth.
Those individuals will then put
pressure on the city and state
governments to recognize that
they have their own responsibil-
ity to protect the 3,800 young
people who sleep on the streets.
Interested congregations can
visit the Shelter of Peace website
at shelterofpeace.org.
Jennifer Gurevich
Brooklyn
January 5, 2012
To the Editor:
Thank you for the excellent
article highlighting the con-
tinuing plight of our homeless
youth (Advocates Press Cuomo
on Homeless Youth, by Paul
Schindler, Jan. 4-17). Home-
lessness is a human rights issue
and no one no adult, no
child, no adolescent should
be without a safe and support-
ive place to call home.
New York State government
must reorder its priorities so
that our most vulnerable pop-
ulations are the first, not the
last on the list. Empire State
Coalition has worked for 30
years to ensure that homeless
youth receive the attention they
deserve, and I thank Gay City
News for periodically spotlight-
ing the issue.
For those wanting more
information, our report, which
you reference, can be found at
empirestatecoalition.org.
Margo Hirsch, Esq.
Executive Director
Empire State Coalition
IN PINKWASHING
DEBATES
EMOTIONAL WAKE
January 8, 2012
To The Editor:
Pinkwashing is not so com-
plicated (Pinkwashings Com-
L E T T E R S T O T H E E D I T O R
LETTERS, continued on p.31
13
| January 18, 2012
P E R S P E C T I V E
BY ARTHUR S. LEONARD
A
mong those public
officials and religious
officiants eligible to
perform marriage
ceremonies in New
York State are judges. Some
judges dont do marriages, oth-
ers limit them to family mem-
bers and acquaintances, while
some are basically available
upon reasonable request.
But, as with other officials
who play some role in the
administration of marriages, the
question arises whether there is
a legal or ethical violation if a
judge refuses to perform a mar-
riage between same-sex part-
ners, out of the judges own reli-
gious, ethical, or political oppo-
sition to them.
One judge, who remains
anonymous, submitted ques-
tions to the New York State
Advisory Committee on Judi-
cial Ethics, a body established
by law, seeking guidance on the
matter, and got back muck. The
Committee, whose opinion was
posted on the New York Law
Journals website on January
13, refused to bite the bullet
and give clear ethical advice.
The judge posed these ques-
tions:
1. May I ethically refuse to
conduct same-sex marriages?
2. If I continue to perform
male/ female marriages, may
I ethically refuse to conduct
same-sex marriages?
3. May I refuse to conduct
all marriages?
4. May I refuse to conduct
same-sex marriages if I pro-
vide the contact information
of others (including judges or
civil officers) who are willing
to conduct same-sex mar-
riages?
5. May I limit weddings that
I conduct to those people who
are friends or relatives?
The key to the answer is that
judges are not required to con-
duct marriages and that con-
ducting marriages are not part
of their official duties of office.
They have the privilege of con-
ducting marriages, but not the
obligation. But if they decide to
exercise the privilege, must they
do it in a non-discriminatory
manner or otherwise run afoul
of ethical standards?
The Committees answers,
after reciting a bunch of gen-
eral propositions, were clearest
regarding questions 3 and 5:
In the Committees view,
the Rules Governing Judicial
Conduct do not, by their terms,
require judges to perform mar-
riages. Accordingly, unless a
judge is required by law to per-
form marriages, the Committee
sees no impropriety if a judge
declines to conduct all mar-
riages.
Similarly, it is permissible
consistently to decline to con-
duct marriages for anyone who
is not a friend or relative, as
such a policy honors the judges
time constraints and does not
raise reasonable questions
about invidious discrimination,
bias, or prejudice.
But, regarding the really key
questions 1, 2, and 4 the
Committee essentially punts:
The new Marriage Equality
Act declares that marriage is a
fundamental human right and
amends the Domestic Relations
Law to provide that a marriage
that is otherwise valid shall be
valid regardless of whether the
parties to the marriage are of
the same or different sex. The
overall statutory scheme contin-
ues to provide, as it did before,
that No marriage shall be valid
unless solemnized by one of a
list of public officials, includ-
ing, among others, a justice or
judge of a court of the unified
court system.
In the committees view,
Questions 1, 2, and 4 raise
serious legal issues relating to
statutory and constitutional
interpretation, questions which
are both unsettled and highly
controversial. The Committee is
not empowered to answer such
questions... Therefore, with
respect to Questions 1, 2, and
4, the Committee can state only
that if the inquiring judge acts
in conformity with the govern-
ing constitutional and statutory
law concerning same-sex mar-
riage and sexual orientation,
the judge will not violate the
Rule Governing Judicial Con-
duct. These legal issues, to the
extent unsettled, must be raised
and addressed by persons with
standing in the appropriate
legal venue.
This opinion essentially
to abstain from addressing the
ethical issue until such time
as a court has resolved the
legal question in an appropri-
ate proceeding, presumably a
discrimination claim brought
by a same-sex couple who are
turned away by a judge was
put forward even as the Com-
mittee noted that a judge must
not engage in extra-judicial
activities that will cast rea-
sonable doubt on the judges
capacity to act impartially as a
judge and that state law for-
bids discrimination on the basis
of sexual orientation.
Of course, the questi on
whether that ban on sexual ori-
entation discrimination applies
to judges acting in their vol-
untary capacity as marriage
officiants is, as the Committee
indicates, a question yet to be
answered. Is a judge a public
accommodation when acting
as a marriage officiant?
I would be curious to know
whether the Committee would
think a judge is acting unethi-
cally if he or she declines to
perform mixed-race marriages
while being generally happy to
perform marriages in which
both parties are of the same
race?
Statutory bans agai nst
mixed-race marriages have
been considered unconstitu-
tional nationwide since 1967,
but is it unethical for judges to
refuse to perform them? If so,
why after New York has leg-
islatively stated that the right to
marry a partner of the same sex
is a fundamental right here is
it not unethical for judges who
would otherwise be available
and willing to perform mar-
riages to turn down a request
because the parties are of the
same sex.
I think the Committee is hid-
ing behind the question of legal-
ity and what is ethical is not
invariably tied to what is legal.
At the same time, its reticence
is not surprising given the sen-
sitive nature of the underlying
question. If judges were deemed
to be public accommodations
for purposes of voluntary wed-
ding officiating, the ethics of the
matter would follow from that.
Otherwise, the ethics of the sit-
uation remain unaddressed.
Arthur S. Leonard is professor
of law at New York Law School
and editor of Lesbian/ Gay Law
Notes.
BY KELLY JEAN COGSWELL
S
unday morning, my
girlfriend and I piled
on the layers and
shivered our way to
the West Village to
see a movie. The F train wasnt
running uptown, so we sprang
for a cab and got there early.
We thought about going for
coffee to kill time, but a crowd
accumulated quickly, and I got
nervous until I realized most
were there for the handsome
Harry Belafonte, not the Wim
Wenders documentary about
Pina Bausch.
Even in New York, the major-
ity of people dont care about
dance or art for that mat-
ter. I only discovered Bausch
because I took a class on perfor-
mance art in college where they
showed part of Carnations.
The segment was pretty simple
a guy in a suit doing a sign
language version of The Man I
Love as Sophie Tucker sings it
in the background.
I d like to say it was the
moment I realized the beau-
ty of homolove and came out
as queer, but no, I remember
thinking, Hmm, a guy, inter-
esting choice, and wondering if
he was the only person around
that could do sign language.
The obvious went right over my
head. Still, that performance
stuck in my mind all these years
as one of the purest expressions
of romantic yearning Id ever
seen.
What can I say? It took me
ages to see myself as queer
much less you or anyone else.
There were all those girls on the
field hockey team that I defend-
ed as just affectionate, playing
around, not lezzies at all. Football
players roughhouse, too, after all,
indulging in all that high-spirited
slapping and grabbing, and walk
around afterwards with their
arms hanging loosely over each
others shoulders.
Even after Id had a girlfriend,
I still didnt see myself that way.
Neither did the girl who started
it, raising my hand to her mouth
and kissing a finger somewhere
between New Orleans and Ken-
tucky, setting off a perfect storm
in the twilight of a Greyhound
bus.
We homo not so sapiens are
talented in nothing if not deni-
al. Sometimes thats essential
for our survival. If I had come
out as a teenager, I would have
been even more miserable than
I was. Maybe ended up home-
less. When I broke the news to
my mother as an adult, she said
she didnt want to hear from me
again until I was the girl God
meant for me to be. Imagine if I
had heard that at 14? Why not
bury it deep?
Knowledge isnt that easy to
come by not for any of us.
Partly because we dont quit
talking long enough to think.
Pina Bausch said dance was for
the moments when life leaves
us speechless. But hardly any-
body admits to speechlessness
anymore. We tweet, tumblr, FB
absolutely everything. We pro-
nounce rather than explore.
Political candidates feed the
camera a diet of sound bites
and certainty, all delivered from
the lofty perch of moral high
ground where theres no room
for doubt or absolute misery.
No questions like, Are we going
about this all wrong? or Is
Speechless
NY Judicial Ethics Gurus
Punt on Same-Sex Marriage
SPEECHLESS, continued on p.28
January 18, 2012 | www.gaycitynews.com
14
BY PAUL SCHINDLER
I
n an impressive show of Demo-
cratic unity on the issue of mar-
riage equality, on the same
day that New Jersey Senate
and Assembly leaders in Tren-
ton announced reintroduction of a gay
marriage bill, all seven of the states US
House members from that party as well
as its two US senators released a letter
voicing their support.
In their letter, made public on January
9, the congressional Democrats argued
that New Jerseys civil union law
enacted in 2006 in response to the State
Supreme Courts ruling that the Legis-
lature must afford same-sex couples all
the rights and benefits of marriage
failed to do that.
Ample testimony before the New Jer-
sey Senate Judiciary Committee two
years ago demonstrated that the civil
union law has not successfully provided
equality to same-sex couples in New Jer-
sey, the letter stated. Couples testified
that hospitals still refuse visitation and
medical-decision rights because they do
not consider civil unions to be equal to
marriage. Similarly, couples demonstrat-
ed that employers continue to refuse to
grant equal benefits to civil union part-
ners.
At a Trenton press conference, Sen-
ate President Steve Sweeney and Assem-
bly Speaker Sheila Oliver both pledged
speedy action and predicted victory.
Regarding evidence that the civil union
law was falling short, Oliver, in a written
statement, said, It sends a message that
same-sex couples are not good enough
to warrant equality. This is the same
wrong message we heard from segrega-
tion laws. Separate treatment was wrong
then. And separate treatment is wrong
now.
Republican Governor Chris Chris-
tie has repeatedly stated his opposition
to marriage equality legislation, argu-
ing that the civil union law is sufficient.
Given the governors national profile and
the possibility he may seek higher office
down the road, its unlikely he would
reconsider his position and buck anti-
gay conservatives across the nation who
currently wield significant influence in
the GOP.
Former Democratic Governor Jon Cor-
zine had pledged to sign a gay marriage
bill, but in the final days of his admin-
istration in January 2010, movement
was blocked by Sweeneys unwillingness
to support the legislation. He has since
voiced strong regret for his inaction and
this week said he expects the Senate to
move by March.
Sweeney will be succeeded as major-
ity leader by Loretta Weinberg, a Tean-
eck Democrat who has been the Legisla-
tures most vocal champion of marriage
equality.
Assemblyman Reed Gusciora, a gay
Democrat from Princeton, pointed out
that Christies political stumping on
behalf of Mitt Romneys presidential cam-
paign has taken him to Iowa and New
Hampshire and that hes also recently
traveled to New York, Massachusetts,
and Washington, DC all jurisdictions
with marriage equality.
And in none of these places, has he
seen any diminishment of the institution
of marriage other than perhaps when
he is in the presence of Newt Gingrich,
Gusciora said, poking the former US
House speaker for his three marriages
and his affair with his current wife dur-
ing his second marriage.
The world has changed since the Leg-
islature last debated a marriage equal-
ity bill in 2009, said Steven Goldstein,
the chairman of Garden State Equality
(GSE), the states LGBT lobby. Today,
states with a combined population of
more than 35 million people have mar-
riage equality The days are over when
marriage equality was the third rail of
American politics.
With Republican Assemblywoman
Mary Pat Angelini pre-
pared to support the
marriage equality bill as
she did the last time it
came up and GOP Sena-
tor Jennifer Beck having
moved from opposition to
support, Goldstein said
the bill can now fairly be
described as bipartisan
in both legislative cham-
bers. Angelini and Beck
represent the Asbury Park
area.
Asked how much confi-
dence GSE has that Sen-
ate and Assembly lead-
ers can deliver on their
commitment, Goldstein
responded, Do things look good? Yes.
But we dont take anything for granted.
We need every vote for passage.
Democrats hold 24 of 40 seats in
the Senate and 47 of 80 seats in the
Assembly.
Having enough votes to override a
Christie veto is likely another matter alto-
gether. Noting that Vermont is the only
Governor Chris Christie, currently a darling of Republicans nationwide, is opposed to marriage equality.
N
J
O
F
F
IC
E
O
F
T
H
E
G
O
V
E
R
N
O
R
NEW JERSEY, continued on p.17
Senate President Steve
Sweeney and Assembly
Speaker Sheila Oliver both
pledged speedy action and
predicted victory.
NJ Congressional Dems Push for Trenton Gay Marriage
Action State legislative majorities press bill; Christie is roadblock
| January 18, 2012 15
KEY WEST BI G PI NE KEY & THE LOWER KEYS MARATHON I S
L
A
M
O
R
A
D
A
K
E
Y
L
A
R
G
O
Historic Hideaways
Providing an exceptional collection
of private vacation homes. Historic
homes, cozy cottages, and condos
you are sure to love!
800-654-5131 or 305-294-3064
historichideaways.com
Oasis Coral Tree
Coconut Grove
Everything You Could Want. Three
Jacuzzis One Giant Hot Tub Three
Pools Sundecks. Buffet Style
Breakfast Daily. Clothing Optional.
800-362-7477
keywest-allmale.com
Island House
Award-winning clothing-optional resort
for men. Luxurious rooms. Poolside
caf and bar. Gym, sauna, steamroom,
Jacuzzis. Poolside massage pavilion.
800-890-6284 or 305-294-6284
islandhousekeywest.com
Pearls Key West
Guesthouse ambience, resort amenities,
2 pools, 2 spas, gym, Wi-Fi, patio bar,
full breakfast, perfect location.
Award-winning property.
Gay owned.
800-749-6696 or 305-292-1450
pearlskeywest.com
No matter which way you go, youre always headed in
the right direction in Key West.
a-keys.com/gaykeywest 1.877.999.9539
A whole new
kind of cruising.
January 18, 2012 | www.gaycitynews.com
16
Canada Reafrms All Same-Sex Marriages Stephen Harpers
Conservatives back off court ling questioning foreign couples vows
BY PAUL SCHINDLER
I
n a dramatic turnaround that
happened in scarcely more than
24 hours, the government of
Canadian Prime Minister Ste-
phen Harper has repudiated
a Justice Department brief that had
threatened the validity of thousands
of marriages by US same-sex couples
there.
Marriages performed in Canada that
arent recognized in the couples home
jurisdiction will be recognized in Cana-
da, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said
in Toronto on January 13, according to
the CTV Television Network. I want to
be very clear that our government has
no intention of reopening the debate on
the definition of marriage.
One day before, an international
uproar broke out over a story in the
Globe and Mail of Toronto that a Justice
Department filing in the divorce case
of a lesbian couple from outside Canada
who married there argued that their
marriage had never been valid.
In this case, neither party had the
legal capacity to marry a person of the
same sex under the laws of their respec-
tive domiciles Florida and the United
Kingdom, wrote Sean Gaudet, the Jus-
tice Department attorney. As a result,
their marriage is not legally valid under
Canadian law.
The newspaper reported that more
than 5,000 of the 15,000 same-sex mar-
riages that have taken place in Canada
since 2003 involved foreign couples, pre-
sumably the bulk of them from the Unit-
ed States.
Within hours of the Globe and Mail
story, both the prime minister and Nich-
olson began to back-pedal, stating the
government was not aiming to curtail the
rights of any couples married there.
Foreign couples who married in Can-
ada already faced the hurdle of having
to reside in that nation for a year prior
to obtaining a divorce which, accord-
ing to the Globe and Mail, the couple
in question, who are not identified by
name, had not done but the govern-
ment attorney took the further position
that their marriage had not been valid in
the first place.
The couple were in court seeking a
waiver of the residency requirement in
order to end their marriage. Far from
curbing the rights of foreign same-sex
couples to marry, Harpers Conservative
government now appears prepared to
ease the burden on those from outside
Canada who wish to divorce but cannot
do so at home because their marriage is
not recognized there. Nicholson blamed
the former Liberal government for not
addressing that legislative gap, CTV
reported.
The original Globe and Mail story
hinted at the storm about to erupt in
response to the Justice Department fil-
ing. Martha McCarthy, the couples
Toronto attorney who was active in the
marriage equality push there, noted that
Ontario tried to dodge the divorce ques-
tion by kicking the case up to the fed-
eral level, and told the newspaper, It is
appalling and outrageous that two levels
of government would be taking this posi-
tion without ever having raised it before,
telling anybody it was an issue, or doing
anything proactive about it. All the while,
they were handing out licenses to per-
form marriages across the country to
non-resident people.
Evan Wolfson, who heads up Freedom
to Marry in New York, told the Globe and
Mail, One of the benefits that marriage
gives to families is security and clarity.
They dont have to deal with a tangle of
uncertainty. If the Canadian government
is serious about trying to cast doubt on
peoples marriages, it not only insults
their dignity and hurts them personally,
but it raises all sorts of complex legal and
economic questions for everyone who
deals with them employ-
ers, businesses, banks, and
on and on.
Asked later how seriously
he took the possibility that
the court filing might in fact
reflect Harpers desire to curb
marriage by foreign same-sex
couples, Wolfson told Gay
City News, I am not going to
assume this is some cleverly
thought-out conspiracy to
push back on marriage rights
when it very well may be just
a blunder that the govern-
ment will have to figure out
how to resolve.
Then alluding to com-
ments Harper made in Hali-
fax appearing to back off the filing, Wolf-
son added, My hope is that the prime
ministers response indicates that.
Asked by CTV about the Globe and
Mail story, Harper responded, We
have no intention further of opening or
reopening this issue. This, I gather, is a
Stephen Harpers Conservative government repudiated a controversial legal filing from just the day before.
J
IL
L
T
H
O
M
P
S
O
N
/ O
F
F
IC
E
O
F
T
H
E
P
R
IM
E
M
IN
IS
T
E
R
Foreign couples who
married in Canada already
faced the hurdle of having
to reside in that nation for
a year prior to obtaining a
divorce.
CANADA, continued on p.17
| January 18, 2012 17
state where the Legislature successfully
overrode a governors marriage equality
veto, Goldstein said, We are realistic.
GSE has worked constructively with
Christies office on a number of major
issues, and Goldstein gave the governor
particularly high marks on his embrace
of the states new bullying law. Still, he
conceded that moving Christie at this
point is not in the cards.
He said he is going to veto it and we
take him as his word, Goldstein said.
We are not nave. Thats not going to
change.
What GSE hopes for is
that the governor will not
stand in the way of GOP
legislators joining their col-
leagues Beck and Angelini
in supporting the measure.
Goldstein noted GSEs
partnership with Free-
dom to Marry and the
Human Rights Campaign,
two nationwide groups, in
pushing the legislation in
Trenton. He also pointed to
Lambda Legals advocacy
in front of the New Jersey
Supreme Court.
Lambda has gone back
to court, armed with the
evidence the civil union law
is failing to live up to the 2006 judicial
mandate to deliver all the rights of mar-
riage. The suit has not yet gone to trial,
but Goldstein does not think Christie
would demagogue a ruling in favor of
marriage equality.
Chris Christie is right of center, but
he is not Rick Santorum, he said. I
believe that Chris Christies most impor-
tant issues are downsizing government
and improving the economy. Acknowl-
edging the governor is not prepared to
enhance the legal standing of same-sex
couples, Goldstein added, He is not
obsessed with denying gay and lesbian
couples their rights.
In a written statement, Marc Solomon,
Freedom to Marrys national campaign
director, said, What New Jerseys legis-
lative leaders are telling us clearly today
is that the Garden State values its gay
and lesbian citizens fully, and does not
accept treating same-sex couples and
their families as second-class citizens, as
it presently does with civil unions.
NEW JERSEY, from p.14
case before the courts where Canadian
lawyers have taken particular positions
based on the law. But I will be asking
officials to provide me more details with
this particular case.
That answer was the first hint that the
brief may not have been vetted at senior
levels in the federal Justice Department.
Shortly after the prime ministers com-
ments, Nicholson went further in trying
to tamp down the uproar .
I want to be very clear that the gov-
ernment has no intention of reopening
the debate on the definition of marriage,
he said, a comment he repeated the fol-
lowing day. This case today involved the
fact that, under current law, some mar-
riages performed in Canada could not be
dissolved in Canada. I will be looking at
options to clarify the law so that marriag-
es performed in Canada can be undone
in Canada.
Longtime New York gay activist Bren-
dan Fay, who married his husband,
Thomas Moulton, in Toronto in 2003,
co-founded Civil Marriage Trail, an orga-
nization that helped US couples who
wished to marry in Canada. He recalled
an event in Toronto the following year in
which a number of same-sex US couples
married in the presence of that citys
mayor.
The Liberal governments minister
of foreign affairs, also on hand, told the
group that with many in the US angry
at Canada over its refusal to participate
in the invasion of Iraq, it was heartening
to see Americans traveling there to cel-
ebrate the equal rights offered above the
49th parallel.
Recognizing the uncertainty and anxi-
ety the Globe and Mail story was creating
among US couples who married in Can-
ada, a group of leading marriage equality
advocates and litigation groups released
a joint statement late on January 12
stating, There is no reason to suggest
that Canadian marriages of same-sex
couples are in jeopardy, or to advocate
that people try to marry again else-
where, as that could cause these couples
unnecessary complications, anxiety, and
expense.
Shortly after that, Wolfson, who had
signed on to the joint statement, said
in an email message to Gay City News
that he had spoken several times to my
Canadian counterparts, who have heard
from the government that this will be
fixed.
The following day, the Harper govern-
ment formally committed to that fix.
Christie said he is going to
veto it and we take him as
his word, Goldstein said.
We are not nave. Thats
not going to change.
CANADA, from p.16
January 18, 2012 | www.gaycitynews.com
18
THEATER
BY CHRISTOPHER BYRNE
O
ne wishes that the
half-written play
one that relies
heavily on exposi-
ti on rather than
character development and on
sketchy, cinematic scenes that
take the place of explored situ-
ations were more an anomaly
than it is these days. The audi-
ence at such an outing is left
with impressions of people and
events but without enlighten-
ment, engagement, or under-
standing. The play becomes
a Rorschach test, asking the
viewer to fill in what the play-
wright has not supplied.
The latest example of this
trend is Zayd Dohrns Outside
People, getting its premiere at
the Vineyard in a co-production
with Naked Angels. It is a fish-
out-of-water story about a man
at the end of his career rope
who travels to China to seek a
new life redemption even
and who has to negotiate the
complex ways of Chinese busi-
ness and love.
If this sounds
familiar to you,
thats not sur-
prising. It is vir-
tually the same
story as David
Henry Hwangs
Chi ngl i sh,
now on Broadway a much
better piece and a fully writ-
ten play.
Outside People tells the
story of Malcolm, in Beijing
to work for his former Stan-
ford roommate, Da Wei, who is
known as David. David intro-
duces Malcolm to his girlfriend,
Samanya, and a young woman,
Xiao Mei, who serves as a lan-
guage tutor. Though communi-
cation between them is a prob-
lem, Malcolm falls
in love with her
and i ntends to
take her back to
the US until David
intervenes. Mal-
col m expresses
shock when hear-
ing that, despite
her protestations of love, Xiao
Mei may want to marry him
Flunking Social Studies Outside People is an
incomplete play and a complete disappointment
BY DAVID KENNERLEY
T
he printed program for Ded-
alus Lounge, Gary Duggans
play about three woebegone
misfits around Christmas-
time, thoughtfully includes
a glossary of Irish references. Thats
because the work is set in Dublin, where
it originally premiered, and the cre-
ators wisely chose to retain much of the
authentic language, refusing to dumb
it down for us Americans. Indeed, one
of the chief strengths of the unsettling
drama lies in its sharp, lyrical dialogue.
Yet while the glossary offers defini-
tions for slagging (trading biting insults
among friends), mincer (a campy gay
man), and wanking (okay, we already
know that one), it neglects to explain the
titular reference.
As any Irishman knows, it refers to
Stephen Dedalus, the protagonist in
James Joyces literary masterworks, who
in turn was based on Daedalus in Greek
mythology. An artist and inventor, not
only did he become lost in a labyrinth of
his own making, but he was a high-flying
dreamer who didnt fully think his plans
through and paid the price. You get
burned if you soar too close to the sun.
Well, its safe to say the three 30-ish
friends who try to drink away their trou-
bles at the Dedalus Lounge struggle with
similar dashed endeavors. Foresight is
not their forte.
Danny (Anthony Rapp), a geek wear-
ing unstylish, ill-fitting clothes, is try-
ing to get a Queen tribute band off the
ground. Sporting tawny hair and a wisp
of a stache, his Freddie Mercury imper-
sonation is sadly lacking. Though he
feels a secret kinship with his outsider
visionary idol, he doesnt have nearly the
charisma or the confidence, and his plan
seems destined to die.
Delphine (Dee Roscioli) is having a
doomed affair with a Parliament member
who may or may not leave his wife. And
feisty Daragh (James Kautz, in impossi-
bly tight black jeans) is a neer do well,
a battered pervert who has
taken to shoplifting and trad-
ing hardcore kink for cash,
propelling him deeper into a
dark maze of misery. Make
shit up as you go along is
his motto.
Sounds like dreary stuff.
Fortunately, director Chris
Henry has punched up the
production with such eye-
popping flourishes as gritty
video projections (courtesy
of David Bengali) and large
calendars on shades that
periodically roll down from
the rafters, marking
time with a menacing
thwack. Occasionally a
character will step out
of the action and deliver
a plaintive soliloquy.
A pair of interpretive
dancers (Curtis How-
ard and Heather Phil-
lips, choreographed by Joann M.
Hunter) artfully enact a sexual encoun-
ter and a few fantasy sequences. And the
handful of rocking original Queen-esque
numbers, co-written by Daniel A. Weiss
and Rapp, add welcome jolts of energy to
the proceedings. No matter that theyre
pieces of his imagination. At one point,
Rapp strips down to his vest (transla-
tion: wifebeater undershirt) and briefs in
an attempt to evoke the genius, flamboy-
ant glam-rock icon.
All of the lead performances are
remarkably strong its always a treat
to see Rapp, the openly gay original
Rent boy, gyrating and wailing to a
rock score. You almost forget that the
cast members are not real Dubliners.
These efforts are not enough, however,
to distract us from the plays disconnects
and contrivances.
In an act of desperation both on
the part of the characters and perhaps
the playwright the trio feels the need
to connect on a sexual level. With each
other. Sure, I suppose its not unheard of
for friends of 15 years to one day wake
up and act on repressed mutual attrac-
tions, but it feels false here. Balls-deep
in your best
f r i e nd, a s
Daragh so elo-
quently puts
it.
In fact, some
stretches find
t he s e s up -
po s e d be s t
friends behav-
ing like passing acquaintances. They
know scant basic facts about each oth-
ers families, for instance. Danny and
Daraghs sudden bout of bisexuality
seems to erupt out of nowhere.
Despite the abundance of inventive
ideas and occasional flashes of raw, scin-
tillating brilliance, this plucky little Off
Off Broadway piece doesnt hang togeth-
er or feel satisfying. My diagnosis? Id say
that the creative team suffers from a bit
of the Dedalus complex as well.
Dublin Dreamers Delusional mists embrace illicit love,
masochism, and Freddie Mercury
OUTSIDE PEOPLE
The Vineyard Theatre
108 E. 15th St. near Irving Pl.
Tue. at 7 p.m.
Wed.-Sat. at 8 p.m.
Sat., Sun. at 3 p.m.
$70-$100; vineyardtheatre.com
Or 212-353-0303
DEDALUS LOUNGE
Interart Theatre Annex
500 W. 52nd St., second .
Through Jan. 30
Thu.-Sat. at 8 p.m.; Sun at 6 p.m.
Other shows listed at ticket site
$18; brownpapertickets.com
Or 800-838-3006
James Kautz, Anthony Rapp, and Dee Roscioli in Gary Duggans Dedalus
Lounge, directed by Chris Henry.
R
U
S
S
R
O
W
L
A
N
D
Nelson Lee and Matthew Dellapina are former Stanford roommates in Zayd Dohrns Outside People.
C
A
R
O
L
R
O
S
E
G
G
OUTSIDE PEOPLE, continued on p.21
| January 18, 2012 19
Management reserves the right to change or cancel at any time without notice. Must be 21 or older to gamble, enter and remain in a New Jersey casino or participate in any Caesars Entertainment promotion.
Know When To Stop Before You Start.
January 5, 2012
To the Editor:
You need to look at his pattern of vot-
ing before you say he doesnt like gays.
Dr. Paul consistently votes against any
federal law enforced upon the states.
Basically the government needs to stay
out of our personal business. He wants
the government out of marriage. If peo-
ple would stop twisting things around
on him, most would see that. If you want
anti-gay, look to the other candidates.
Ron Paul is one of the few who views all
equally under the law.
Danny Haley
Via email
January 4, 2012
To the Editor:
With all due respect, I think you are
wrong about Ron Paul. He is for the indi-
viduals rights. If you understand the
philosophies of individualism versus col-
lectivism, which Ron Paul sees as the real
cause of discrimination, then you can
begin to appreciate that he is the least
racist, bigoted candidate. He wants the
individual to rise by assuring his or her
liberties for as long as there is no violation
of others.
If you understand the philosophies
that he is advocating then you will begin
to understand the man. He may not be
comfortable with the lifestyle, but he will
staunchly protect your right to live it.
There is a big difference.
I belong to the LGBT community and I
agree with Ron Paul that when we begin to
see people as belonging to groups (collec-
tivism), it opens doors to further discrimi-
nation and marginalizing. We all have our
opinions about what others do that make
us uncomfortable, but that does not make
us racists or prejudiced just human.
Delilah Marconi
Via email
January 5, 2012
To the Editor:
Nonsense. Put down the agenda and
see Ron Pauls opposition to bills for
what they are. He opposed an award for
Mother Teresa, and hes a Christian for
Christs sake! Do you know what a liber-
tarian is?
Sam Geoghegan
Via email
Write Us!
Please address letters to the editor
of 250 words or l ess t o Edi t or@
GayCityNews.com or mail them to 515
Canal Street, Suite 1C, New York, NY
10013. We reserve the edit any letter for
space or legal considerations.
LETTERS, from p.31
January 18, 2012 | www.gaycitynews.com 36
2
0
1
1
V
ia
c
o
m
In
c
. A
ll r
ig
h
ts
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
@RuPaulsDragRace
/RuPaulsDragRace
MONDAYS
ARE THE BIGGEST
DRAG EVER.
only on
New Season! JAN 30
MON
9PM