Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PUBLIC
OUTCRY
isjust fine, " he tells FRONTLINE. '1t's in the interest of prosecutors and defense /~rs and judges, and they've devised elaborate rationales for this process. I don~ think 01Q1 of the rationales make seme, and I think that makes me a maverick "Bruq Darket is Charles GamperoJr. 's newdefense attorney and is currently 'MJrldngon getting his guilty plea withdrcMn based on new evidence, the involuntary nature of Gampero's plea, and the ineffective msistance of Charles Gampero's first attomey. He also talks about how most prosecutors handle plea bargaining, and defends the plea and its role in thejustice process: "... ~ have tens of thousands of cases. They can~ all be tried You have to get people to plead guilty. If you don~, the system breaks dmm. " SteMen BriJdtt is a defense attorney, professor of law at Yale and Han;ard Universities and director of the Southern Centerfor Human Rights. He believes America's caurt systems are ''like afast food restaurant, "processing cases through the rampant use of plea bargains. "One reason a lot of people plead guilty is because they're told they can go home that day ... they'llget probation. What they usually don't take into account is that they're being set up tofail "1b sameexact tbin& hapj)ened to QguI General: Rev. Dr, Malachi Z. York when he was tDd tbat the 3 female co-defendants would be released that day. John LaJl&bein is aprofessor of law and legal history at Yale Law School In this inte1View,he describes how the plea bal'gain system pressures people to buckle and accept a plea - EVEN IF TBEYABEINNOCENT - and how prosecutors, jud5es and defeme attorneys have a role - a stake even - in seeing that this happem. Consul General: Rev. Dr. MaJochi Z. York's caw is a prime exalJllle of how the gal system with the aid of the defense attorDe.}'Swill force an INNOCENT person to plead ~. He also talks about the Supreme Court's indijfererre to the pressures on a defendant in the plea process, and ~ he believes the rampant growth of pleas is rooted in the trial system's failures. ~ Schulbofer is a professor of law at New Yom-University School of Law. In this interview, he explains ~ he believes thatfrom every perspective of the justice process, plea bargaining "isa disastrous system" that takes ~ the rights and liberties of the defendant. He lays out how '~hesystem in its details puts the defenthnt under ... .J11'mure" so that they end upfeeling trapped and with no choice other than to plead guilty, EVEN IF THEY AREJNN()..
m.x
wbQe
~
Again this statement is a mimr image to how Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was tortured into takin2 a plea under dur~ bein2 subjected to sIee.p de,priwtion, physical atye, mental abuse, lack ofprnper medication and food with a 24 hour time 6mit to decide Abbe Smith is a professor of law at Georgetmm University and has been Patsy Kelly Jatrett's defense attorneyfor the last 10years. Here, she
summarizes Jarrett's case. Smith strongly defends pleas as a criticalparl of defense l~ring - not because they are good but because the system ''stinks." Smith ~ she WJUld haveforcefUlly pressed Jarrett to take the guilty plea had she been her layer at the time. "It's thejob of a defense lawyer to make our clJJ!nts plead guilty /fit's in their interest to do so. '" layering is alljudgment. If I think my client's going to go d<Mnat trial, or in the appellate process, it's my job to make c/ien pIeod guilty and cut their losses, EveNIF THEYAREINNOCENX" Consul General: Rev. Dr: Malachi Z. York Is a VICDM oftbe LEGAL SYSI'EM
"9'
Program
isjust fine, " he tells FRONTllNE. "It's in the interest of prosecutors and defense lawyers and judges, and they've devised elaborate rationales for this process. I don't think ~ of the ratiomles maJresense, am I think that makes me a fOOVerick. ''Bntce Barket is Charles GamperoJr. 's 1rW defense attorney and is C1ITentlyworking on getting his guilty plea withdrawn based on 1rW eviderre, the invo/~ nature ofGampero's plea, and the iniffective assistarK:eof Charles Gampero's first attorney. He also talks about how most prosecutors handle plea bargaining, and defends the plea and its role in thejustice process: "... m? have tens of thousands of cases. They can't all be tried You have to get people to plead guilty. If you don'~ the system breaks down. "StqJben Bri&bt is a difense attorney, professor oflaw at Yale ani Harvard Universities and director of the Southern Centerfor Human Rights. He believes America's court systems are '1ike afast food restaur(Ul/,"rrocessing cases through the rampant use of plea bargains. '~ reason a lot of people plead guilty is because they're told they can go home that day ... they'll get probation What they usually don't take into account is that they1'e being set up tofail "This same exact thin2 baooened to Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York when he was told that the 3 female co-defendants would be rrIrasM that day. John l.angbein is a professor iflaw and legal histay at Yale Law School. In this interview, he d!scribes how the plea bargain system p-essures people to bzckJe cud m:ept a plea - ErENIF THEfARE INNOCENT- cud how prosecutors, judges and defense ~ have a role - a stake even - in seeing that this happens. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York's case is a prime example of how the legal system with the aid of the defense attorneys will force an INNOCENT person to plead eui!ty. He also talks about the Supreme Court's indiffererr::eto the presswes on a deferttmt in the plea process, and ~ he believes the rampant growth ofp/eas is rooted in the trial system's failures. ~ S4:hulhofer is a professor iflaw at New York University School q[law. In this interview, he expfains ~ he believes thatfrom erery perspective of the justice process, plea bargaining ''isa disastrous system" that takes mwy the rights and liberties of the defendant. He Jaysout how '~hesystem in its cf!tails puts the defendant under ... Pressure" so that they end upfeeling trapped and with no choice other than to plead guilty, EVEN IF THEfARE INNO-
(;JJJYJ;
Again this statIment is a mimr image to how Comd General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York Was tortured into tak:in& a plea under ~ while bein& subjected to @pdejlriyation, pbicaI abt& mental abuse, lack ofprmer medication and food with a 24 boor time limit to decide ~ Abbe Smith is a prifessor oflaw at Georgetown University and has been Patsy Kelly Jarrett's defense attorney for the last 10years. Here, she
summarizes Jarrett's case. Smith strongly defends pleas as a critical part of defense lawyering - not because they are good but because the system ''stinks." Smith ~ she 1WUld kJve f<rcefidJypressedJarrett to take the guilty plea had she been her faH.yerat the time. "It's the job if'1I defense lawyer to make our clients plead guiJty if iJls in their interest to do so. ... limyering is alljudgment. -if I think "9i client's going to go down at trial, or in the appellate process, its"!y job to nuke 1t9' client plead guilty and cut their losses, EVEN IF THEY ARE INNOCENI:" Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z.
York is a
60 REASONS TO F EE MA
eg lteam@unitednuwaubiannation.com
I officialnaia@yaho
REASON# 360:
Government's witnesses have recanted their previous testimony against him. 8 alleged victims claimed it never hafpened. Judge C. Ashley Royal has a conflict of interest by acting as an attorney against the York family in previous tria . There was no DNA evidence. Videos and pictures taken into evidence shows families dining happily in restaurants, and birthday parties. There is no Medical evidence that corroborated the accusations. Judge SpIvey of the Ocmulgee Judicial Circuit handling cases dealing with juveniles stated on July 22, 2002 that the 5 children taken from the land on May 8, 2002 had not been molested or abused. The conspiracy has been revealed from the Prosecutions Main Witness in her recantment. Not all of the Jurors were convinced of the Prosecutions claim- the Original verdict was a hunSJury. Jud~e Royal charged the Jurors to go back and deliberate and find him guilty on the prosecutions ' grounds la1 out. HE S INNOCENT The above points alone should give Mr. York a new trial and in fact an acquittal. However, because of racism in Middle District of Georgia Federal Judge C. Ashley Royal and the Federal Prosecution seek to block this information. There have been other cases where new trials have been granted and defendants even acquitted. The only difference is that they are "WHITE" and not facing trial in the Middle District of Georgia. 1. Martha Stewart after being found guilty has filed a motion for new trial because the expert witness for the prosecution lied on the stand. 2. Mr. John Stoll of Bakersfield, California was released from prison and acquitted on molestation charges that he was sentenced to life in prison for, after witnesses who testified against him recanted their testimonies and stated that they were never molested. 3. Edward Stokes of Renton, California was acquitted of all molestation charges because his accusers were not brought into court as in 'Malachi's case. At this point looking at the above-mentioned examples Mr. York should be getting a New Trial or even better an Acquittal. The federal law states in Rule 33 that legally Mr. York should get a new trial because the rule requires three things: 1. The evidence with due diligence could not have been found before trial (Habiba Washington's recantment is new evidence and could not have been discovered until she made it) 2. The evidence if presented at trial would have caused an acquittal (Habiba Washington and others reveal the conspiracy that all the charges are false and built on lies conspired by her and others) 3. It must be material and unique to prove a fact at issue (Only Habiba Washington herself and others could have revealed this new evidence that proves Malachi York is innocent.). Mr. York fits all the legal requirements This case must be overturned during the week of September 12 2005.
A PUBLIC
OUTCRY
torture, coercion and abuse! Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was forced to sien this plea UNDER DURE S! This is their tactic to force defendants to "plea guilty" EVEN IF THEY ARE INNOCENT. It is a procedure ofthe court to try
and force a plea agreement, which would prevent them from having to pay the cost of court fees, lawyer fees, witness provision and jury provision fees. "The system would collapse if every case that wasfiled in the criminal justice system were to be set
for trial, " says Judge Caprice Cosper of the Harris County Criminal Court in Houston, Texas. "The system would just entirely collapse." Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was also told ifhe signed the agreement the other 3 female co-defendants would be freed. He was willing to make that sacrifice. The prosecution wanted this plea agreement to go through so bad that they were willing to drop 3 counts, yet Judee Hugh Lawson had to RECUSE himself after participatine in this illegal agreement. The illegal practices to force this agreement was exposed and the agreement was not accepted by the court. According to the legal experts on the Frontline PBS special on the plea, "Those who refuse to cut a deal, insiders say, are often rewarded with extra-harsh prison sentences as a lesson tofuture defendants." This statement is proven to be true when Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was sentenced to 135 years in prison for a crime HE DID NOT COMMIT Consul General:
Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York decided to pursue his right to trial and prove to the world his innocence, which can not be denied after the prosecution's lead witness Habiba "Abigail" Washington recanted and confessed that the charges against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York are all totally false.
ev. Dr. Malach' Z. York was forced to si n this lea UNDER DURE
for trial, , sa,vsJudge Caprice Cosper of the Harris County Criminal Court In Houston, Texas. "The system wouldjust entirely collapse.' Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was also told ifhe signed the agreement the other 3 female co-defendants would be freed. He was willing to make that sacrifice. The prosecutIOn wanted this plea agreement to go through so bad that they were willing to drop 3 counts, yet Jnd&eHneh Lawson had to RECUSE himself after participatine in this iIIeeal a&reement. The illegal practices to force this agreement was exposed and the agreement was not accepted by the court. According to the legal experts on the Frontline PBS special on the plea, "Those who refuse to cut a deal, insiders say, are often rewarded with extra-harsh prison sentences as a lesson tofuture defendants." This statement is proven to be true when Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was sentenced to 135 ears in pnson for a crime HE DID NOT COMMIT Consul General:
Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York decided to pursue his right to trIal and prove to the world his innocence, which can not be denied after the prosecution's lead witness Habiba "Abigail" Washington recanted and confessed that the charges against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York are all totally false.
This is their tactic to force defendants to "plea guilty" EVEN IF THEY ARE INNOCENT. It is a procedure ofthe court to try and force a plea agreement, which would prevent them from having to pay the cost of court fees, lawyer fees, witness provision and jury p,rovision fees. "The system would collapse if every case that wasfiled in the criminal justice system were to be set
PUBLIC
OUTCRY
REASON NO.1:
HE IS INNOCENT
On May 8, 2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was arrested on charges he did not commit. At the onset of the illegal detention, Rev. Dr. Malachi York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial publicity. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is ilIDocent and this fact was proven at trial and soon after when the Prosecution's lead witness, Ms. Habiba .,Abigail" Washington revealed through a taped interview' with her legal representative and a court certified videographer, that the entire case was a HOAX, a CONSPIRACY again..~t onsul General: Rev. Dr. fvfalachiZ. York. Not only C did Ms. Washington state under oath that the allegations were false, she gave the motive and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories with one another after meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. This video along with, not one, but two notarized affidavits signed by Ms. Washington, were entered into court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr. rv1alachiZ. York a new trial. After much delay in the time of filing the motion for New Trial up until the actual date the court heard the motion,rvts. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It was too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!!
I)UBLIC
OUTCRY
PUBLIC
OUTCRY
REASON NO.1:
HE ISINNOCE:NT
On May 8, 2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was arrested on charges he did not commit. At the onset of the illegal detention, Rev. Dr. ~~lachi York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial pubhClty. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is innocent and this fact was proven at trial and soon after when the Prosecution'5 lead witness, 1'1s. Habiba Abigail" Washington revealed through a taped interview with her legal representative and a court certified videographer, that the entire case was a HOAX, a .CONSPI~CY against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York. Not only dId Ms. Washington state under oath that the allegations were false, she gave the motive and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories with one another after meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. This video along with, not one, but two notarized affidavits signed by Ms. Washington, were entered into court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York a new trial. After much delay in the time of filing the motion for New Trial up until the actual date the court heard the motion, Ms. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It was too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!!
44
WWW.OFFICJALNAIA.ORG
OUTCRY
REASON
"lfyou entertain a reasonable doubt as to any fact or element necessary to constitute the defendant's guilt, it is vour duty to give him the benefit of that doubt and return a verdict of not guilty. Even where the evidence den'lonstrates a probability of guilt, if it does 1I0t establish such guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, you must acquit the accused. On AprillH.s 2004 A.D. Habiba "Abigail" Washington, her attorney and a certified court
videographer, recorded an hour long confession to the conspiracy that lead to the imprisonment of Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York for 135 years. On April 23, 2004 A.D. Habiba" Abigail" Washington signed a legal affidavit under oath attesting to the conspiracy to imprison Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York. On May 19,2004 A.D. Habiba" Abigail" Washington expounded on the previous signed affidavit and signed yet another affidavit confessing to the conspiracy, the comparing of testimonies to lie to the FBI, the fact that she had never witnessed nor seen any children being molested, nor was she ever molested. She also admitted to the anger that made her react maliciously to continue in a lie and the names of all those whom were participants in the illegal conspiracy. Habiba" Abigail" Washington did not recant one time but THREE TIMES. According to the defInition of reasonable doubt, "this doubt, however, must be a reasonable one; that is one tllat isfound-
ed upon a real tangible substantial basis and not upon mere caprice and conjecture. It n,ust be such doubt as would give rise to a grave uncertainty, raised in your mind by reasons of the unsatisfactory character of the evidence or lack thereof. A reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt. It is an actual substantial doubt. It is a doubt that a reasonable man can seriously entertain." With the Prosecution's lead witness along with two other recantments and 7 alleged victims stating that they were never abused is a prime example of REASONABLE DOUBT. Having stated these facts any logical and reasonably thinking individual can come to the conclusion that Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York should be presumed innocent and EXONERATED of all charges on the grounds of REASONABLE DOUBT. FOR MORE INFORMATION: WWW.OFFICIALNAIA.ORG
PUBLIC
OUTCRY
INfl'
ERNATIONAL
AFFAIRS
REASON NO.1:
HE ISINNOCENT
On 1vlay8,2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York \-vasan-ested on char~es he did not commit. At the onset of the illegal detention., Rev. Dr. ~1~lachl York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial publtCIty. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is innocent and this fact was ~rov~n ~;,trial a~d soon after when the Prosecution's lead witness, Ms. Habiba :-\b,lg.aIl Washmgton re~:aled.through a taped interview with her legal representatIve and a court certified vldeographer, that the entire case was a HOAX a .CONSP~~CY against Consul General: Rev. Dr. 1V1alachi York. Not onl; Z. dId Ms..'Iv ashington state under oath that the allegations were false, she gave th~ motIve and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories wIt.h o~e another aft.er meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. ThIS ~ldeo along WIth, n~t one, but two notarized affidavits signed by !vIs. \Vashmgton, were entered mto court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr. !"1alachiZ. Yo~k a new .trial.After much delay in the time of filing the motIon for New Tnal up untIl the actual date the court heard the motion Ms. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It wa~ too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!! .
CONFLICT
PUBLIC
OUTCRY
REASON NO. 1:
HE IS INNOCENT
On May 8,2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was arrested on charges he did not commit. At the onset of the i1legal detention, Rev. Dr. ~~lachi York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial publICIty. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is innocent and this fact was proven at trial and soon atter when the Prosecution's lead witness, Ms. Habiba "Abi~air' Washington revealed through a taped interview with her legal representatlve and a court certified videographer, that the entire case was a HOAX, a .CONSPI~CY against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York. Not only dId Ms. .\Vashington state under oath that the allegations were false , she b 0ave h e lllotI've and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories t wi~h o~e another aJt.er meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. ThIS ~ldeo along WIth, not one, but two notarized affidavits signed by Ms. Washmgton, were entered into court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York a new trial. Ailer much delay in the time of filino the motion for New Trial up until the actual date the court heard the motionOMs. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!!
W;q
PUBLIC
OUTCRY
\VW\V.OFFICIALNAIA.ORG
APUBLIC
OUTCRY
REASON NO. 1:
HE IS INNOCENT
On May 8,2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. :rvlalachiZ. York \vas arrested on char~es he did not commit. At the onset of the illegal detention, Rev. Dr. ~~lachl. York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial pubhCIty. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is innocent and this fact was proven at trial and soon after when the Prosecution's lead witness !vis. Habiba "Abig.ail' Washington re~r~aled.hrough a taped interview with he~ legal repret sentatI~e and a court certified vldeographer, that the entire case was a HOAX, a .CONSP~~CY against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York. Not only dId !vIs ..Washmgton state under oath that the allegations were false, she gave t~~ motIve and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories wlt.h o~e another aft.er meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. ThIS ~ldco along WIth, not one, but t\",Onotarized affidavits signed by Ms. Washington, were entered into court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr .. Malachi Z. Yo:k a new triaL After much delay in the time of .filing the motion for New Tnal up until the actual date the court heard the motion Ms. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It wa~s too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!!
WW'W.OFFICIALNAIA.ORG
WE ARE TOLD THE TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS IN THE CASE AGAINST MALACHI YORK HAVE BEEN
with by Court Reporter Craig DeLoatch, 478-741-3005 2nd Floor Macon Federal Court House. Rumor has it that in the Macon Federal Court House in Middle District GA, Craig DeLoatch, court reproter for Judge C. Ashley Royal, has deleted vital information out of the trial transcripts. Family members of Malachi York purchased the trial transcripts on Feburary 27,2004 A.D. Thirty days from the date the court reporter received the fee for the transcripts, which was $13,000, which was an exuberant amount, the defense attorneys were supposeq to be provided with their copy to prepare for Malachi York's motion for new trial and appeal. The United States Attorneys filed a motion to seal the transcripts from the public, ignoring the fact that none of the trial testimony was closed to the public. Why are they hiding vital information from the public? Its appears that the court reporter, Craig DeLoatch must 4jlve made a deal with the government to hold the transcripts. He has given the excuse that it is a lot of work to do and that he needed to contract the work out to another transcriber. Further research has proven he lied when talking to York~sattorneys and in fact gave it to his wife. Now it appears Craig DeLoatch's family is in on the conspiracy against Malachi York. Craig DeLoatch has stated during a phone conversation with Malachi York's "White attorney that be does not want to deal witf!,4'Those People", speaking ofNuwaubians and saying that "I don't trust those kind of people" which must mean "Black" people. "Those People" are the same people that paid him $13,000 CASH UPFRONT for the transcripts at that point no racisnl was involved just all smiles when the money was exchanged. He also stated that he would prefer dealing with Attorney Marks and not Attorney Charles, Malachi York's "African" attorney, further proof of Middle Georgia's racism. "Those People" plan on filing an.official complaint with the 1\JationalCourt Reporters Association against Craig DeLoatch for tampering with the transcripts. Demand that they release
H
TAMPERED
The Truth. Malachi York is Innocent A PUBLIC OUTCRY FREE KATHY AND MALACHI
A PUBLIC
OUTCRY
REASON NO.1:
E IS INNoCENT
On May 8, 2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was arrested on charges he did not commit. At the onset of the illegal detention, Rev. Dr. Malachi York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial publicity. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is innocent and this fact was proven at trial and soon after when the Prosecution's lead witness, Ms. Habiba "Abigail" Washington revealed through a taped interview with her legal representative and a court certified videographer, that the entire case was a HOAX, a CONSPIRACY against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York. Not only did Ms. Washington state under oath that the allegations were false, she gave the motive and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories with one another after meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. This video along with, not one, but two notarized affidavits signed by Ms. Washington, were entered into court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York a new trial. After much delay in the time of filing the motion for New Trial up until the actual date the court heard the motion, Ms. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It was too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!!
REASON NO. 1:
HE IS INNOCENT
On May 8, 2002 A.D. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York was arrested on charges he did not commit. At the onset of the illegal detention, Rev. Dr. Malachi York was the victim of negative, biased, and vindictive pre-trial publicity. Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York is innocent and this fact was proven at trial and soon after when the Prosecution's lead witness, Ms. Habiba "Abigail" Washington revealed through a taped interview with her legal representative and a court certified videographer, that the entire case was a HOAX, a CONSPIRACY against Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York. Not only did Ms. Washington state under oath that the allegations were false, she gave the motive and means on how each alleged victim corroborated their stories with one another after meeting with the FBI special agents handling the case. This video along with, not one, but two notarized affidavits signed by Ms. Washington, were entered into court as evidence to grant Consul General: Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York a new trial. After much delay in the time of filing the motion for New Trial up until the actual date the court heard the motion, Ms. Washington was intimidated and threatened to recant her recantment. It was too late REASONABLE DOUBT had already been established. When reasonable doubt is present in any case the court is to decide in favor of the defendant. Further proof that HE IS INNOCENT!!
Pastor. lV.ways
Teaching Commander
NO FOOD FOR YOU MR. YORK ~ NO WATER FOR YOU MR. YORK NO WASHING FOR YOU MR. YORK NO BIRTH NAME FOR YOU MR.YORK NO COMB FOR YOUR HAIR MR. YORK NO SLEEP FOR YOU .MR. YORK NO MEDICINE FOR YOUR SWELLING THROAT MR. YORK
>
>-
>>>-
NO FAMilY VISITS FOR YOU MR. YORK NO MEDICINE FOR YOUR SPOUSE'S MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS NO HOME FOR YOUR CHILDREN MR. YORK NO FREEDOM FOR YOUR SPOUSE MR. YORK
ALL WE HAVE FOR YOU MR. YORK IS THIS ORANGE SUIT. THE PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF WHO IS AGAINST YOU, LURKING NEARBY. THE SAME SHERIFF WHO ALMOST TRIPPED YOU DOWN A FLIGHT OF STAIRS WHILE YOU WERE SHACKLED ON LIVE T.V. JUST THINK MR. YORK WHAT WE WILL DO TO YOU BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. AND BEST OF ALL: MR. YORK, A GUILTY PLEA FOR 15YRS. INSTEAD OF 1000 YRS. IF YOU WERE UNDER DURESS IN MALACHI Z. YORK'S SHOES, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE???? .:;
Sponsored By: 2005 Public Outcry Office Of Public Relations PO Box 81462 Athens, GA 30608 Pu bIicOu tcry@charter.net 706.227.YORK 706.354.9000 (FAX) Our goal is to clear his name and undo the injustices worldwide. In this case, we seek a full exoneration. If you would like to express. our public outcry you may submit yo r information to the above address all organizations welcome. This is an attempt to unify and un-do the injustices world\'Vide.