Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The Theory
The main thrust behind Martins idea is that the location of the Temple is over the Gihon Spring. He equates Zion with the site of the Temple and begins by stating that Zion was limited to the southern end of the southeastern ridge of Jerusalem. The Temple was built there, he claims, because of the Gihon Spring. The Bible even indicated that the Temple was abutting to the northern side of the City of David. writes Martin. Further, he alleges that David placed the Ark of the Covenant over the Gihon Spring, quoting Ps 87: all my springs are in thee and Ps 116. I will pay my vows unto the Lord now in the presence of all his people, in the courts of the Lords house [within the Temple], in the midst [center] of thee, O Jerusalem (KJV). Martin tries to derive further support for his theory from the Book of Revelation where we are told that those who were thirsty could drink from the fountain (spring) of water that issued from the New Jerusalem that would come down from heaven to earth (Rv 21:6, KJV) He then moves on to the prophecy of Jesus Who, according to his interpretation, told His disciples that not one stone of the Temple and its support buildings would be left on top the other. He theorizes that all the walls of the Temple and the Temple Mount were torn down to their foundations just as Jesus prophesied. Only the Antonia, which he equates with the Herodian Temple Mount, escaped the destruction of AD 70. Martin then interprets Josephus who said that the Temple Mount was a precise square of one stadium length on each side of about 600 ft. The southeastern corner of th... You must have a subscription and be logged in to read the entire article. Click here to subscribe visitor : : uid: ()