Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Oxford, UKGWAOGender Work and Organization0968-6673Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004November 2004116ACADEMIC PAPERSEARNING THEIR KEEP AND KEEPING
WHAT THEY EARNGENDER, WORK AND ORGANIZATION
It is now widely understood that the needs of women workers in the infor-
mal sector are not met by the conservative practices of labour organizations
and trade unions. While the contribution of women to the economies of
developing countries is critical, women rarely find employment in the reg-
ulated unionized sectors of these countries, and are found instead in over-
whelming numbers in the sector that is variously termed ‘unorganized’,
‘unprotected’, ‘unregistered’ or ‘informal.’ This article addresses the situ-
ation of women in the informal economy in South Asia. The author
explores the major challenges and opportunities facing women in their
efforts to organize and mobilize for change. She also provides a critical
analysis of the different types of interventions adopted by the state and
civil society organizations in South Asia to empower women in the in-
formal sector. The author concludes with an attempt to identify the mix of
interventions and strategies most needed for different social, political and
economic circumstances.
Introduction
M ore than four decades of ‘development’ in the Third World have not
resulted in the predicted absorption, or even the significant displace-
ment, of marginal small-scale economic activities by large-scale technology-
intensive ventures, even in countries that have witnessed dramatic economic
growth and rapid industrialization. Brisk population growth, increasing
Address for correspondence: *Bipasha Baruah, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York Univer-
sity, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3, e-mail: mobb@yorku.ca.
© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK
and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
606 GENDER, WORK AND ORGANIZATION
remain isolated and unorganized. On the other hand, there are real possibil-
ities for empowerment if they make a collective effort to create new work
structures and institutions and broader forms of solidarity. In numbers
women find the voice and strength to influence and challenge not just local
institutions and processes but also national and international policies and
organizations. While the benefits of organizing are quite clear, the process
itself can be challenging in a variety of ways. Some of the impediments to
organizing arise from women’s weak starting positions and lack of bargain-
ing power while others are a result of the weaknesses of the organizations
representing them. In the following pages I will attempt to provide an under-
standing of some of the most persistent and widespread challenges of organ-
izing women in South Asia.
Organizational weaknesses
There is little point in organizing women for economic empowerment if their
organizing structures are not strong, autonomous and sustainable in the long
term. Women’s organizations in South Asia appear to be faced with three
major weaknesses. Their lack of financial sustainability, or their inability to
achieve self-sufficiency through stable, multiple, interlocking sources of
income and funding, and their inability to survive without external funds
and subsidy is the first of these weaknesses. Managerial weaknesses, char-
acterized by cumbersome bureaucratic structures, administrative difficulties
and inadequate communication between administrators, members and
stakeholders comprise the next major stumbling block. The inability to
develop collaboration and linkages to access markets, governments and the
infrastructural support required for their continued existence comprise the
third most prominent organizational inadequacy. Additionally, organizations
that provide women with credit and other financial services are sometimes
constrained by the limited flexibility of their lending structures and services.
I will briefly address each of these weaknesses.
Financial sustainability
Much evidence from South Asia and around the world supports the view
that organizations that received considerable extended outside assistance,
by and large, have difficulty surviving in the long run (Dichter, 1999;
Narasimhan, 1999; Rutherford, 2000). In contrast, the majority of groups that
start with nothing but their own resources or with a sizeable investment of
their own tend to persist and become self-supporting over time. The chal-
lenge, of course, remains that poor women do not have disposable incomes
to contribute towards organizing efforts and organizations seeking to repre-
sent them must, initially at least, rely upon assistance from domestic and
international governments and other donors.
Once a certain momentum has been generated, several organizations have
been very successful at working towards self-sufficiency by providing paid
services to its members and seeking out productive linkages with private and
public sector enterprises. The crèches run by SEWA, for example, are staffed
by paid members and provide childcare services for a fee to its clients (SEWA,
2002). Other organizations like AWARE (Action for Welfare and Awakening
in Rural Environments) a secular, non-political, voluntary organization serv-
ing rural women in over 3000 communities in India organize women by rais-
ing consciousness about their rights and legal entitlements and then step in
with economic programmes and loans that are strictly limited to matching
whatever resources the community is able to mobilize on its own first, and
the kind of economic intervention the community itself wants (Narasimhan,
1999).
Managerial sustainability
Managerial or administrative sustainability has also been identified as a
challenge for many organizations (Cheston and Kuhn, 2002; Dichter, 1999;
Holcombe, 1995). Until women have the necessary exposure to new ideas
and technologies, their desire and ability to assume responsibility are big
constraints to continued operation. They have to struggle to learn adminis-
trative and management skills every time a new problem comes up. The
absence of literate women in their membership has sometimes forced orga-
nizations to depend on volunteers or male community members for day-to-
day management, creating new problems associated with power and access.
The provision of management training and literacy skills, and the services of
younger, highly educated and motivated women have gone a long way
towards addressing administrative issues in many non-governmental organ-
izations (NGOs) and community organizations. It is increasingly evident
that self-employed women possess strong numeric and accounting skills and
learn quickly, as long as the training provided is practical and relevant to
their occupations, life experiences and needs. SEWA, for example, now has
an entire human resource department training programme for women in co-
operatives. It includes training in co-op management, legal issues, functional
literacy, marketing and communications. By including repeated exposure to
new places and new knowledge, it has established a system for women to
learn business and co-operative skills as well as trade skills.
Collaborations
Facilitating and maintaining linkages and extension services with the private
sector and governmental infrastructure is vital for the survival of women’s
organizations but this is, unfortunately, an area that many have not paid
attention to (Carr et al., 1996). Some organizations have attempted to form
collaborations with very positive results. BRAC, for example, has developed
a women-owned poultry programme that is now co-administered by the
Government of Bangladesh and receives valuable inputs (in the form of
chicks and veterinary services) and training from government departments
(Carr et al., 1996; Chen, 1996).
Lending structures
Organizations that provide women with credit face several challenges that
relate to lending structures. The Grameen Bank pioneered the substitution of
physical collateral with social collateral, in the form of peer pressure exerted
on clients by other members of the credit circles who risk losing their lending
privileges as a result of the default of any one of its members. The model has
been declared extremely successful by the Bank and within development
circles because of the very high repayment rates, but it is not without unde-
sirable ramifications. Research conducted by several scholars reveals that, in
the interest of protecting their line of credit and avoiding censure from other
group members, women were occasionally forced to borrow money from the
very moneylenders from whose clutches the Grameen Bank was trying to
extricate them, in order to repay their loans (Goetz and Sengupta, 1996;
Rahman, 1999). Hence, organizing mechanisms that are deemed financially
astute or logical can occasionally have effects that are contradictory to the
original objective of the organizing effort. Other organizations that provide
credit but that are unable to accept deposits or provide savings accounts due
to their NGO status also struggle with the fact that women in many parts of
South Asia need safe, liquid, interest-bearing savings instruments more than
they need credit (Dichter, 1999; Rutherford, 2000). In the absence of secure
places in which to save their money, women all too often turn to traders,
middlemen, husbands and grown-up sons for ‘safe keeping’, with very
negative consequences.
Other factors
There are other factors that organizations with good intentions have in com-
mon that sometimes actually contribute to the maintenance of institutional
barriers that hinder the entry and organization of women. Examples of such
barriers include the following: the limited outreach of NGO programmes and
their concentration in urban areas with high populations; the extremely
bureaucratic and complex structures of governmental programmes that
undo the potential benefits of the greater outreach of broad-based national
programmes; the lack of co-operation and co-ordination between organiz-
ations that promote the role of self-employed women in development in
other useful ways and those that seek to organize them; the lack of clear
definitions of target groups and the absence of trained women to serve as
extension service workers.
outweigh the impediments. In the following pages, I will outline the major
opportunities and motivations for organizing South Asian women for eco-
nomic empowerment.
The continued survival and growth of the informal sector over the
decades, despite predictions about its absorption by large-scale economic
activities, provides the most forceful validation and argument for organizing.
While the proposition that support to large enterprises will produce expan-
sion and create employment for the self-employed displaced by it has been
abundantly contradicted over the decades, it is still not widely understood
that it is, indeed, the smallness and adaptability of the economic activities in
the unorganized sector that ensures its survival, and that more and more
people will in the future be engaging in it to secure livelihoods. The con-
tinued existence of the sector and the sheer number of women who will be
involved in it in South Asia provide perhaps the most basic opportunity and
compelling reason to form collectives.
The economies of scale presented by such large numbers of women
involved in different sectors of the informal economy also provide opportun-
ities for organizing. Poor women have very few financial resources or
assets, but pooling together what they have can have a significant impact.
There are many well-documented cases of women combining their savings as
a means of acquiring credit for productive purposes. NGOs like Proshika and
BRAC in Bangladesh, AWARE in India and the Aga Khan Rural Support Pro-
gramme in Northern Pakistan have organized women to pool their resources
to acquire essential equipment such as tube wells, solar panels and water fil-
ters. In other cases, women have pooled their labour to start nurseries or
catering services, for example; tasks that would have been difficult to under-
take on an individual basis. SEWA has organized 30 all-women production,
service and banking co-operatives in rural and urban areas and has discov-
ered that it can provide a structure for women to come together on the basis
of their work, where they are both the owners and the workers (Bhatt, 1995).
In the male-dominated societies of South Asia, poor women’s collective own-
ership of assets is an important first step towards independent ownership.
Additionally, because such efforts are small and decentralized, they can
develop at each group’s own pace and be responsive to individual experi-
ences, affording women the opportunity to grow into their new roles and
realities. Collectively, many such small organizing efforts can make econom-
ically weak women powerful. While the national memberships of larger
organizations currently run into the millions in South Asia, they are still able
to reach only a small percentage of the women who would benefit from
organizing into co-operatives, unions, credit and savings circles, producer
groups and other collectives. The populous Indian sub-continent offers
numerous additonal possibilities for such initiatives.
The success of well-known organizations of humble beginnings such as
the Grameen Bank, SEWA, Proshika, WWF, BRAC and AWARE with poor,
basket weavers in Sri Lanka were able to access export markets through their
involvement with the Aga Khan Rural Support Programme and the Women’s
Development Federation respectively (Carr et al., 1996).
Once an organization has created a unifying platform for its members and
put its finances in order, other objectives can be added to the initial agenda.
Women’s organizations have not only effectively provided work insurance
and basic social security services like maternity, healthcare and childcare on
a premium or user-fee basis but, through their lobbying activities, they have
also won significant policy victories over governments and labour associ-
ations. The most prominent examples include the struggle of the women in
the informal sector in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu to bring the Construc-
tion Workers Act into existence, and the change of policies in Gujarat to pro-
vide healthcare and maternity benefits to tobacco workers (Carr et al., 1996;
WWF, 2000).
Providing low-cost housing for families and hostels for low-income
women is another service in which a few organizations have made a dif-
ference. Organizations like the Nari Udyog Kendra in Bangladesh, which
provides safe, affordable housing for single women working in garment
factories and also lobbies for better and more affordable transportation for
working women, provide very valuable services in support of women’s eco-
nomic empowerment (Nari Udyog Kendra, 2000). Of course, such initiatives
create the inevitable debate of how much energy should be expended by
organizations in developing responsive parallel models through the women
themselves, and in demanding appropriate responses from the public and
private sector. Nevertheless, I believe they provide organizations with
unique learning opportunities to test their ability to deliver such services and
to identify useful linkages and collaborations with the other two sectors.
Finally, from a more personal but crucial perspective, organizing promises
women a source of affiliation and identity beyond those offered by family
and traditional kinship structures. This is especially important for women
who have worked all their lives but have never perceived themselves as
workers with rights, entitlements and demands. Organizing offers women
the opportunity to explore their potential and abilities as workers and as
agents of change. Organized women are much more likely to lose their fear
and pessimism and to gain confidence in the process of coming together in
solidarity and sisterhood. As a group, they develop the potential to fight
exploitation, not just at work but also at home and in society in general. They
are able to establish relationships of mutual respect with employers and with
more advantaged sections of society who, perhaps for the first time, perceive
them as a force of their own instead of as isolated, vulnerable, powerless
women. In meetings, unionized textile workers in Ahmedabad now pull up
chairs across the table from employers instead of sitting at their feet with
their heads covered as they have done for decades; rural Bangladeshi women
from community organizations have abandoned purdah against the wishes
of village elders to protest against the illegal felling of trees; Grameen Bank
members are now frequently found on village and community-level boards;
Proshika members have successfully resisted the eviction efforts of slumlords
and local gangs in Dhaka, and police in Gujarat, previously infamous for
their brutality towards peddlers, now meekly accept SEWA membership
cards and vending licenses from street vendors.
These, and many other examples, bear testimony to what organizing has
accomplished for millions of women in South Asia and also provide a sense
of what is possible in the foreseeable future. In the following pages I will
attempt to categorize and critique the specific economic empowerment strat-
egies that have enjoyed the most widespread support and replication.
Financial interventions
Other than a few organizations that make political goals like legal literacy
and voter education their sole agenda, almost all women’s organizations in
South Asia have a strong financial component. Micro-credit is easily the most
popular financial intervention. The Grameen Bank has to date disbursed
more than US$2.5 billion (Yunus, 1999). SEWA Bank, the largest co-operative
under the umbrella organization, currently has 125,000 self-employed
women depositors and has disbursed more than US$10 million in loans
(SEWA, 2002). Even organizations that were not originally motivated to
women through ‘thrift’, in the form of savings, and credit groups (Carr et al.,
1996). The ultimate goal of CDF’s work is the self-sufficiency of the co-
operatives and the organization currently takes almost no donor money. CDF
is also involved in co-operative advocacy both within and beyond its home
state. It was recently engaged in a major effort to change co-operative law
both at state and central government levels. The primary purpose was to free
the co-op sector from excessive government control and interference and to
make the laws relating to co-ops enabling, rather than controlling, instru-
ments. An act to this effect was created in response to CDF’s advocacy and it
has restored member control of co-operatives and allowed informal organ-
izations, such as CDF’s thrift and credit groups, to register as formal co-ops.
The NGO hopes that other groups outside the CDF umbrella will ultimately
follow their example to register a state-level federation of women’s thrift
co-ops.
In general, co-operative movements have been important for the self-
employed because they serve the dual purpose of struggling for better work-
ing conditions and developing alternative economic systems by allowing the
workers themselves to control their means of production in an environment
where there are no employers and employees in the conservative sense, but
where they all own what they produce. Co-operatives are powerful economic
interventions, especially when combined with a formal or informal unioniz-
ing component. If the co-operative is in the same trade and among the same
set of workers as the union, the co-op can set a standard and provide a model
of higher wages and earnings. This allows the union to demonstrate to the
employers or traders that a higher wage or better working terms are possible
and affordable. It also provides workers with a bargaining and lobbying tool
for policy change. SEWA has used these strategies extensively with its vari-
ous co-ops and its current national membership stands at close to half a mil-
lion women (SEWA, 2002). Co-operatives also make good business sense in
South Asia, because they are entitled to financial and policy support from
governments. Weavers’ co-ops, for example, qualify for equipment subsidies,
loans and certain quotas of raw materials, for rebates to customers on
finished goods and for administrative support for the initial years of the
co-operatives’ operation.
Access to finances is usually a necessary condition for women’s involve-
ment in economic activities but it is rarely a sufficient one. Women face other
constraints such as the saturation of markets, competition, the inability to dif-
ferentiate one’s product from those sold by competitors, the lack of informa-
tion and pricing uncertainties arising from credit’s widespread assumption
that the poor, who are engaged in some kind of economic activity, already
know what they need to know about business and lack only capital. In reality,
this is not always the case for all sections of the poor, and those who started
out from relatively stronger positions are also generally those who are
most likely to benefit from access to credit. While most borrowers are usually
rational and respond to market forces in the manner that they deem most
appropriate, many are often not fully informed about the consequences and
repercussions of their actions, or those of the networks and institutions
through which they operate. Such limitations have motivated many organi-
zations to explore enterprise development through the provision of training
and technologies as a platform for organizing women.
Enterprise development
Many organizations in South Asia have taken on the responsibility of pro-
viding poor people with the information and skills to choose viable activities
and occupations and to access the necessary backward and forward linkages,
including the care and maintenance of their assets, raw materials supplies,
markets and insurance. Some of these initiatives are very innovative and sen-
sitive to women’s particular needs. For example, the Aga Khan Rural Sup-
port Programme (AKRSP) in Northern Pakistan provides both subsistence
and graduated packages so that women can start off by improving their exist-
ing subsistence-level household activities and graduate on to commercial
production (Carr et al., 1996). After experiencing difficulty with collective
production packages, the NGO adapted its programme to women’s prefer-
ences by introducing individual packages.
Furthermore, the AKRSP adopted the dynamic strategy of training women
from the communities to provide advice, guidance, training and inputs to
other women as ‘master trainers’. This is especially important and useful in
remote areas and where seclusion norms of purdah are prevalent, limiting
women’s mobility and their contact with men. AWARE uses a similar strat-
egy to train community leaders who, in turn, not only share their awareness
and mobilize other women in their communities but also prepare others as
leaders in their own right (Narasimhan, 1999). I have commented upon
SEWA and BRAC’s imaginative enterprise development activities several
times in this article. Both organizations are moving from credit and service
delivery towards integrated development packages for women due to their
wide range of well-developed sub-sector programmes and productive col-
laborations. SEWA has organized skill training for its members through
numerous channels: government extension, the Labour Department, volun-
tary agencies, vocational schools, village council training institutes, univer-
sities, industrial boards, co-op unions, handicraft boards, and their own
skilled artisans (SEWA, 2002).
Self-employed women generally have very specific needs for training that
have to relate directly to their daily problems of work and survival. This
explains why the skills training provided by organizations like SEWA and
BRAC are more popular than standard literacy programmes. Women also
have to be compensated financially during training for the work they are
missing, or they may not be able to afford to attend. Since most women who
Market strategies
Programmes that promote women’s self-employment often tend to give
inadequate attention to market trends and to the marketability of the prod-
ucts. Market constraints are usually of two types. There may be no real
demand for the product because the market is saturated. Alternately, there
may be a demand for the product but poor entrepreneurs may not be able to
sell it, because of inadequate access to markets or lack of information about
where the markets are.
Several organizations in South Asia have attempted to find solutions
to these problems. In the case of flooded markets, BRAC, AKRSP and
Unionizing
The benefits of unionizing and collective bargaining have been outlined in
other parts of the article. A few of the disadvantages have as well. The most
successful unionizing processes take place at three different levels. At the
grassroots level, women unionize to struggle against their direct exploiters
like contractors or extorting policemen; at the next level, they struggle
against an ineffective or indifferent labour enforcement bureaucracy and
legal system and at the third level, against unfavourable or absent national or
international laws and policies. While this process may seem incremental or
linear, organizations that use unionizing principles like SEWA and WWF are
quick to point out that, in reality, the union inevitably finds itself struggling
concurrently not just against individual contractors or manufacturers but
also against the policies of an industry or trade as a whole.
While several unions have been effective at bringing public visibility to the
exploitation of women and pushing for policy change, it is important to stress
that conventional union-style work can be unsuccessful and even damaging
in some circumstances. A prominent case is that of rural agricultural work,
where women outnumber men but where rigid caste, feudal and gender hier-
archies combined with the sheer lack of other employment opportunities ren-
der them extremely vulnerable to exploitation. Women face problems of low
wages, the non-payment of wages and extremely long hours during trans-
planting and harvesting seasons, followed by the uncertainty of work for the
remaining eight months of the year. While employers may verbally agree to
pay minimum wages upon demand, SEWA organizers found that it was easy
for them to terrorize women and hire, or threaten to hire, outside labour.
Conclusion
The primary objective of this article was to explore the major challenges and
opportunities of organizing women in the informal economy in South Asia.
The most prominent factors that impede the ability of South Asian women to
organize were identified as follows: women’s weak starting positions and
their lack of bargaining power, borne out a pervasive sense of fear and help-
lessness; the strong opposition and even violent repression from those
factions most likely to lose power as a result of women’s solidarity; their
strategies have enjoyed much success in parts of South Asia and limited suc-
cess in others.
The least successful efforts were generally in areas where low wages and
working conditions were the result of sheer lack of employment opportun-
ities. In such cases, the joint strategy of unionization and formation of co-
operatives or other reasonable alternatives is especially effective. In addition
to raising the visibility of informal sector workers, the biggest contributions
of the women’s unions in South Asia were the successful induction of women
into the legal and labour machinery of states and countries; the demonstra-
tion of the link between employment and social services and successful
lobbying to influence policy and regulation at the grassroots, national and
international levels.
Many organizations have stressed the importance of social and political
strategies to help women rise out of their subordinated positions in the fam-
ily and society. In some cases they have demonstrated that psychological
priming is more important, or at least as important, as material input for
women’s overall empowerment. Overcoming deeply rooted male biases in
land and property rights stands out as one of the most pressing priorities for
such organizations, together with calls for advocacy activities that demand
the formulation and implementation of policies at the national level that spe-
cifically accommodate the needs of women in the informal sector and recog-
nize their role and rights as primary agents in land and landed property
ownership.
References