Relatorio Arcflash Final

Grupo de Estudos em Qualidade da Energia Eltrica GQEE Instituto de Sistemas Eltricos e Energia ISEE Universidade Federal de Itajub
PROTEO DE SISTEMAS ELTRICOS II ESTUDO DE ARC-FLASH

Orientador: Prof. Dr. Jos Maria de Carvalho Filho
Mestrandos em Eng. Eltrica Arthur Henrique Perini de Medeiros Thiago Moura Galvo.
Itajub 01 de dezembro de 2011
Contedo
1 2
Introduo............................................................................................................................................. 3 Premissas .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 2.2 Normas de Referncia................................................................................................................... 3 Mtodo de Clculo ........................................................................................................................ 3 Outros Mtodos .................................................................................................................... 4
2.2.1 3 4 5 6 7
Diagrama de Proteo .......................................................................................................................... 4 Dados do estudo de Curto circuito ....................................................................................................... 6 Resultados ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Referncias.......................................................................................................................................... 11 Anexo .................................................................................................................................................. 12
1 Introduo
Em complementao ao estudo de proteo e seletividade do sistema proposto nos diagramas apresentado nos itens posteriores, o estudo de Arc-Flash ou Arco Voltaico, essencial para realizar a analise completa dos riscos oferecidos aos colaboradores envolvidos nos trabalhos em eletricidade em uma planta. Este trabalho apresenta um estudo de caso onde calculada a energia incidente proveniente da falta com arco, as distncias seguras de trabalho, o valor da corrente do arco e as classes de proteo dos EPIs dos colaboradores envolvidos. importante ressaltar que esta ultima proteo deve ser mantida como retaguarda da proteo principal que a eliminao da falta no tempo mais rpido possvel.
2 Premissas
Os seguintes itens definem as premissas bsicas para este estudo: A distncia do colaborador at o arco foi considerada para os cubculos de 13,8 kV de 609,6 mm e para os painis de BT de 457,2. importante ressaltar que a norma vigente varre uma gama de valores de que vo de 457,2 a 1828,8, que dependente da forma de instalao dos barramentos nos cubculos. 2.1 Normas de Referncia IEEE 1584 - 2002 Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard NFPA 70E - 2004 Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workspace 2.2 Mtodo de Clculo Os clculos sero efetuados com o auxlio do software ETAP 7, onde oferece a opo de calculo da energia incidente de acordo com as normas IEEE 1584 e NFPA 70-2009. O mtodo escolhido o do IEEE que baseado no somente em clculos tericos, mas sim em resultados experimentais. Contudo o mtodo baseado no mtodo de calcula de Raph Lee que por sua vez leva em considerao a energia mxima do arco, o que pode trazer valores elevados da energia incidente e superdimencionamento das caractersticas das vestimentas de proteo. Quando as condies de contorno das normas IEEE 1584 e NFPA 70-2009 no so respeitadas, por exemplo, quando a tenso nominal excede 15 kV, as equaes de Ralph Lee so utilizadas.
2.2.1
Outros Mtodos
O autor citado em [3], refere-se a dois mtodos de calculo que no usam o modelo de Ralph Lee como base, mas sim as equaes de transferncia de calor da termodinmica sendo conduo, conveco e irradiao as formas pelas quais a energia do arco incidida sobre uma superfcie. Tais equaes so de uma forma geral, mais complexas de serem resolvidas e para tanto a necessidade de software para o auxlio nos clculos extremamente til. Os mtodos propostos esto so implementados atravs dos softwares Heat Flux (Duke Energy) e Arc Pro (HD Electric Company)
3 Diagrama de Proteo
Abaixo na figura 2 est mostrado o diagrama de proteo da planta:
Figura 1 Diagrama de Proteo
4 Dados do estudo de Curto circuito

Abaixo na tabela 1est mostrado o resultado do clculo de curto circuito em ciclo simtrico. O software utilizado o ETAP 7.0.
Tabela 1 Resultados do calculo de curto circuito
5 Resultados
A figura 2 abaixo mostra os resultados diretamente no diagrama de proteo montado no software ETAP 7.
Figura 2 Resultados da anlise de Arc-Flash mostrados no diagrama unifilar pelo ETAP
A tabela 2 abaixo resume os resultados aps os clculos efetuados pelo software ETAP 7.
Tabela 2 Resultados da anlise de Arc-Flash
A tabela 2 abaixo mostra os resultados aps os clculos efetuados pelo software ETAP 7. Na anlise dos resultados pode-se observa que a categoria de risco para a especificao dos EPIs
tem o seu limite ultrapassado na Barra B2-QD1. Isto devido ao tempo de extino da falta considerado 85,80 ciclos que o maior tempo de abertura de um dos disjuntores interligados na barra este disjuntor o 52-3. O parmetro energia incidente o responsvel pela extrapolao do limite da categoria de risco, pois como mencionado acima dependente do tempo de extino da falta. Portanto a eliminao da falta com o menor tempo possvel imprescindvel neste caso e pode obter este resultado com a adio de um rel de arco no sistema de proteo referente ao cubculo QD1. Considerando um tempo de deteco de 0,02 s para o rel de arco e 0,04 s do tempo de abertura dos disjuntores pode-se reduzir para aproximadamente 60 ms ou aproximadamente 4 ciclos. O rel de deteco de Arco Voltaico do fabricante SEL Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories modelo SEL-751A, utiliza as informaes de sensores de luz e os sinais de correntes providos dos tcs para providenciar uma atuao rpida eficiente, onde o fabricante indica tempos de deteco na ordem de 2 ms. A figura 3 abaixo ilustra um esquema de proteo disponvel em [2].
Figura 3 Esquema de proteo com o rel de arco
O software ETAP tambm permite imprimir etiquetas de risco para os equipamentos analisados como barramentos, cubculos e disjuntores. Abaixo so mostradas algumas destas etiquetas plotadas para este estudo em questo.
Figura 4 Etiquetas modelos 3,5x7 Perigo Barras
Figura 5 Etiqueta modelo 3x6 Perigo - Barra
Figura 6 Etiqueta modelo 4x4 Ateno - Barra
Figura 6 Etiqueta modelo Avery 6579 Ateno - Barra
6 Referncias
[1] CARVALHO FILHO, Prof. Jos Maria de. PROTEO CONTRA ARCOS ELTRICOS INTERNOS. Itajub: Apostila Didtica, 2009 [2] SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES. SISTEMA DE PROTEO CONTRA ARCO VOLTAICO EM PAINIS DE MDIA E BAIXA TENSO. Disponvel em: <www.selinc.com.br/art_tecnicos/sel_artigo_arcovoltaico.pdf>. Acesso em: 01 out. 2011. [3] IDEAL WORK. Introduo a Anlise do Arco Eltrico, Conceitos e Aplicaes: Por Aguinaldo Bizzo. Disponvel em: <www.idealwork.com.br/download/aguinaldo_bizzo2.pdf>. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2011. [4] HDE ELECTRIC COMPANY. Focus on Safety Equipment and Clothing. Disponvel em: <http://www.hdelectriccompany.com/more-information/library-archives/Focus-on-SafetyEquipment-and-Clothing.htm>. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2011. [5] Norma NFPA 70E - 2004 Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workspace [6] Norma IEEE 1584 - IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations, 2002.
7 Anexo
Abaixo mostrado o relatrio completo realizado atravs do software ETAP 7. Onde constam todos os dados de entrada do sistema, bem como a tabela resumo com os resultados do estudo.
Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:
PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
1 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Electrical Transient Analyzer Program Arc Flash Analysis IEEE 1584 ANSI Short-Circuit
Swing Number of Buses: 2
V-Control 0
Load 6
Total 8
XFMR2 Number of Branches: 3
XFMR3 0
Reactor 0
Line/Cable 4
Impedance 0
Tie PD 0
Total 7
Synchronous Generator Number of Machines: 1
Power Grid 1
Synchronous Motor 0
Induction Machines 4
Lumped Load 0
Total 6
System Frequency: Unit System: Project Filename: Output Filename:
60 Hz Metric trabalho_prot C:\ETAP 700\trabalho_prot\Untitled.AAF
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
2 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Adjustments
Apply Tolerance Transformer Impedance: Reactor Impedance: Overload Heater Resistance: Transmission Line Length: Cable Length: Adjustments
Yes Yes No No No
Individual /Global
Individual Individual
Percent
Apply Temperature Correction Transmission Line Resistance: Cable Resistance: Adjustments

Yes Yes
Individual /Global
Global Global
Degree C
0 0
Hazard/Risk Levels
NFPA 70E 2009
Hazard/Risk Level 0 1 2 3 4 Category ID Cat 0 Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 cal/cm 1.20 4.00 8.00 25.00 40.00
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
3 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Bus Input Data
Bus
ID B1-SE B2-QD1 B3-QD2 B4-CCM1 B5-QD3 B6-CCM2 CX-M3 CX-M4 Type SWNG SWNG Load Load Load Load Load Load 8 Buses Total All voltages reported by ETAP are in % of bus Nominal kV. Base kV values of buses are calculated and used internally by ETAP . Nom. kV 138.000 13.800 13.800 4.160 0.480 0.480 0.480 0.480 Base kV 138.000 13.800 13.800 4.160 0.480 0.480 0.480 0.480 Sub-sys 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Initial Voltage
%Mag. 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Ang. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
4 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Bus Arc Flash Input Data

Faulted Bus
ID B1-SE B2-QD1 B3-QD2 B4-CCM1 B5-QD3 B6-CCM2 CX-M3 CX-M4 Nom. kV 138.000 13.800 13.800 4.160 0.480 0.480 0.480 0.480
Arc Flash Ratings

Equip. Type Open Air MCC MCC MCC MCC MCC Cable Bus Cable Bus 153 153 102 25 25 13 13 0.973 0.973 0.973 1.641 1.641 2.000 2.000 Gap (mm) X Factor Exp. Movable 3.353 3.048 3.048 3.048 3.048 3.048 3.048 3.048
Limited Approach Boundary (m)

Fixed Circuit 3.048 1.524 1.524 1.524 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 Restricted 1.091 0.658 0.658 0.658 0.305 0.305 0.305 0.305 Prohibited 0.939 0.183 0.183 0.183 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030
Avail. Protection cal/cm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
The Gap and X-Factors are not utilized if the theoretically derived Lee method was used to determine the incident energy and flash protection boundary. equations. The Lee method is used if the bus voltage and/or short-circuit parameters are outside the range covered by the IEEE 1584 empirical
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
5 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Line/Cable Input Data

Ohms or Siemens/1000 m per Conductor (Cable) or per Phase (Line) Line/Cable
ID CABO-1 CABO-2 CABO-3 CABO-4 Library 15NCUS3 1,0NCUS3 0,6NCUS1 0,6NCUS1 Size 240 300 35 35 Length Adj. (m) 20.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 % Tol. 0 0 0 0 #/Phase 2 2 1 1 T (C) 0 0 0 0 R 0.07212 0.05868 0.48490 0.48490 X 0.10700 0.08360 0.11000 0.11000 Y 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
Line / Cable resistances are listed at the specified temperatures.
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
6 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
2-Winding Transformer Input Data
Transformer
ID T1 T2 T3 MVA 40.000 5.000 1.500 Prim. kV 138.000 13.800 13.800
Rating
Sec. kV 13.800 4.160 0.480 %Z 12.00 6.00 5.00 X/R 25.00 12.50 7.50 + 5% 0 0 0
Z Variation
- 5% 0 0 0 % Tol. 0 0 0
% Tap Setting
Prim. 0 0 0 Sec. 0 0 0
Adjusted
%Z 12.0000 6.0000 5.0000
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
7 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Branch Connections
CKT/Branch
ID T1 T2 T3 CABO-1 CABO-2 CABO-3 CABO-4 Type 2W XFMR 2W XFMR 2W XFMR Cable Cable Cable Cable B1-SE B3-QD2 B3-QD2 B2-QD1 B5-QD3 B6-CCM2 B6-CCM2 From Bus B2-QD1 B4-CCM1 B5-QD3 B3-QD2 B6-CCM2 CX-M4 CX-M3
Connected Bus ID
To Bus R
% Impedance, Pos. Seq., 100 MVAb

X 29.98 119.62 330.41 0.06 54.43 143.23 143.23 Z 30.00 120.00 333.33 0.07 66.50 647.42 672.84 Y
1.20 9.57 44.05 0.04 38.20 631.38 657.42
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
8 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Power Grid Input Data

% Impedance 100 MVA Base
kV 138.000 X/R 19.21 R 0.51980 X 9.98648
Power Grid
ID PAC B1-SE
Connected Bus
ID
Rating
MVASC 1000.000
Total Connected Power Grids (= 1 ): 1000.000 MVA
Synchronous Generator Input Data

% Impedance in Machine Base Synchronous Generator
ID G1 Turbo Type B2-QD1
Connected Bus
ID MVA 30.000
Rating
kV 13.800 RPM 600
X/R Ratio
X"/R 40.00 X'/R 55.56 R 0.450 Adj.
Xd" Tol. 0.0 Xd' 25.00
18.00
Total Connected Synchronous Generators ( = 1 ): 30.000 MVA
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
9 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Induction Machine Input Data

% Impedance Machine Base
R X" X'
Induction Machine
ID Qty
Connected Bus
ID HP/kW
Rating
kVA kV RPM
X/R Ratio
X"/R X'/R
Motors
MOTOR-1 MOTOR-2 MOTOR-3 MOTOR-4 1 1 1 1 B4-CCM1 B4-CCM1 CX-M3 CX-M4 500.00 500.00 105.00 105.00 494.23 494.23 103.89 103.89 4.160 4.160 0.480 0.480 1800 1800 1800 1800 35.00 35.00 7.98 6.37 52.50 52.50 19.95 15.86 0.44 0.44 2.51 3.16 15.38 15.38 20.00 20.15 23.08 23.08 50.00 50.15
Total Connected Induction Motors ( = 4 ): 1196.3 kVA
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
10 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Arc Flash Analysis Fault Current Decay Calculation Method

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV B1-SE Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 4.661 Ibf' = 4.563 Ibf = 4.480 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 4.661 Ia' = 4.563 Ia = 4.480 Fault Clearing Time = 4.0 0,067 Total Incident Energy = 6,643 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Individual Contribution to Bus Arc Fault
Type HV CB Bolted (kA) 0.477 0.379 0.296 Arcing (kA) 0.477 0.379 0.296 FCT (cycles) 3.0 4.5 7.4 Arcing (kA) 4.661 4.563 4.480 FCT = CB1 3Ph HV CB 4.184 4.184 4.184 4.184 4.184 4.184 4.0 5.5 8.4 Cannot be Determined FCT (cycles) 4.0 26.0 55,8 85,8 52-3 Total =
= 138.000 = 138.000
System Grounding Working Distance
= =
Ungrounded 183 cm
Fault Clearing Time (cycles) (Seconds) FCT1 = FCT2 = 4.0 0.0 0,067 0,001 Incident Energy 1 = Incident Energy 2 =
(cal/cm) 6,567 0,076
For Protective Device: CB1@ Ia = 4,184 kA Relay: F-D60/52-1 Arc Fault at Device
ID 52-1 Phase Type 3Ph
= =
2 4.31 m
Type: Overcurrent
Incident Energy
Protective Device ID for FCT Incident E (cal/cm) 6.567 41.784 88,049 136,399 64.09 >Max. FPB (m) Hazard/Risk Level*
* NFPA 70E 2009 Table 130.7(C)(11), Protective Clothing Characteristics, is used to determine the Hazard/Risk Level. Arcing current variation was applied at this location.
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
11 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV B2-QD1 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 17.719 Ibf' = 15.665 Ibf = 14.223 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 17.031 Ia' = 15.057 Ia = 13.671 FCT1 = FCT2 = FCT3 = Fault Clearing Time (cycles) (Seconds) 4.0 26.0 55.8 85.8 0,067 0,433 0,930 Incident Energy 1 = Incident Energy 2 = Incident Energy 3 = = (cal/cm) 2,934 16,695 32,278 51,908 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Individual Contribution to Bus Arc Fault
Type HV CB Bolted (kA) 10.459 10.459 10.459 Arcing (kA) 10.053 10.053 10.053 FCT (cycles) 80.8 80.8 80.8 Arcing (kA) 17.031 15.057 13.671 FCT = 52-3 3Ph HV CB 6.971 5.020 3.765 52-4 3Ph HV CB 0.290 0.187 0.000 6.700 4.825 3.619 0.279 0.180 0.000 85.8 85.8 85.8 17.031 15.057 13.671 FCT = 4.0 26.0 55,8 85,8 52-3 Total = Cannot be Determined 2.934 16.695 32,278 51,908 29.27 >Max. FCT (cycles) 4.0 26.0 70,3 100,3 52-1 Total =
= 13.800 = 13.800
= =
Ungrounded 61 cm
Fault Clearing Time =
1,430 Total Incident Energy
For Protective Device: 52-3@ Ia = 3,619 kA Relay: F-489/52-3 Arc Fault at Device
= =
Exceeds Maximum PPE Arc Rating 29.27 m
Type: Overcurrent
Incident Energy
Protective Device ID for FCT Incident E (cal/cm) 2.934 16.695 40,645 60,275 111.97 >Max. FPB (m) Hazard/Risk Level*
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
12 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV B3-QD2 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 17.678 Ibf' = 15.632 Ibf = 14.195 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 16.992 Ia' = 15.026 Ia = 13.645 Fault Clearing Time = 26.8 0,446 Total Incident Energy = 17,519 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Individual Contribution to Bus Arc Fault
Type HV CB Bolted (kA) 0.249 0.170 0.000 52-7 3Ph HV CB 0.041 0.017 0.000 Arcing (kA) 0.240 0.164 0.000 0.039 0.016 0.000 16.992 15.026 13.645 FCT = 26,8 4.0 22.8 52-4 Total = 17,519 9.59 3 Cannot be Determined 2.927 14.592 FCT (cycles) Arcing (kA) FCT (cycles)
= 13.800 = 13.800
= =
Ungrounded 61 cm
(cal/cm) 2,927 14,592
For Protective Device: 52-4@ Ia = 14,846 kA Relay: F-B30/52-4 Arc Fault at Device
= =
3 9.59 m
Type: Overcurrent
Incident Energy
Protective Device ID for FCT Incident E (cal/cm) FPB (m) Hazard/Risk Level*
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
13 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV B4-CCM1 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 10.529 Ibf' = 10.032 Ibf = 9.286 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 10.210 Ia' = 9.729 Ia = 9.005 Fault Clearing Time = 3.3 0,055 Total Incident Energy = 1,614 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Individual Contribution to Bus Arc Fault
Type HV CB Bolted (kA) 9.639 9.439 9.286 Arcing (kA) 9.347 9.153 9.005 FCT (cycles) 3.3 3.3 3.4 Arcing (kA) 10.210 9.729 9.005 FCT = 52-9 3Ph HV CB 0.446 0.297 0.000 0.432 0.288 0.000 10.210 9.729 9.005 FCT = FU-2 3Ph Fuse 0.446 0.297 0.000 0.432 0.288 0.000 10.210 9.729 9.005 FCT = 3,3 52-6 Total = 1,614 0.62 1 3,3 3.3 52-6 Total = 1,614 1.614 0.62 1 1,8 3.3 52-5 Total = 0,883 1.614 1.09 0 FCT (cycles) 1.8
= 4.160 = 4.160
= =
Ungrounded 46 cm
Fault Clearing Time (cycles) (Seconds) FCT1 = 3.3 0,055 Incident Energy 1 =
(cal/cm) 1,614
For Protective Device: 52-6@ Ia = 9,347 kA Relay: F-745-3/52-6 Arc Fault at Device
= =
1 0.62 m
Type: Overcurrent
Incident Energy
Protective Device ID for FCT Incident E (cal/cm) 0.883 FPB (m) Hazard/Risk Level*
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
14 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV B5-QD3 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 34.905 Ibf' = 33.905 Ibf = 33.165 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 19.076 Ia' = 18.530 Ia = 18.125 Fault Clearing Time = 19.4 0,324 Total Incident Energy = 21,094 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Arc Fault at Device
ID 52-10 Phase Type 3Ph Type LV CB
= 0.480 = 0.480
= =
Grounded 46 cm
(cal/cm) 4,450 16,644
For Protective Device: 52-8@ Ia = 18,259 kA
= =
3 2.62 m
Individual Contribution to Bus Arc Fault

Bolted (kA) 1.210 0.495 0.000 Arcing (kA) 0.661 0.271 0.000 FCT (cycles) Arcing (kA) 19.076 18.530 18.125 FCT = 19,4 4.0 26.0 67,0 97,0 52-7 FCT (cycles) 4.0 15.4 52-8
Incident Energy
Protective Device ID for FCT Incident E (cal/cm) 4.450 16.644 FPB (m) Hazard/Risk Level*
Total =
21,094 3.733 23.512 59,149
2.62
52-8
3Ph
LV CB
33.697 33.411 33.165
18.416 18.259 18.125
19.4 19.4 19.4
16.215 15.750 15.406 FCT =
Total =
86,394
6.19
>Max.
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
15 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV B6-CCM2 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 30.067 Ibf' = 29.135 Ibf = 28.463 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 16.794 Ia' = 16.273 Ia = 15.898 Fault Clearing Time = 3.6 0,060 Total Incident Energy = 3,489 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Arc Fault at Device
ID 52-11 Phase Type 3Ph Type LV CB
= 0.480 = 0.480
= =
Grounded 46 cm
(cal/cm) 3,489
= =
1 0.88 m

Bolted (kA) 0.605 0.248 0.000 Arcing (kA) 0.338 0.138 0.000 FCT (cycles) Arcing (kA) 16.794 16.273 15.898 FCT = 3,6 3.6 52-10 FCT (cycles) 3.6
Incident Energy
Protective Device ID for FCT Incident E (cal/cm) 3.489 FPB (m) Hazard/Risk Level*
Total =
3,489 3.489
0.88
FU-1
3Ph
Fuse
0.613 0.249 0.000
0.342 0.139 0.000
16.794 16.273 15.898 FCT =
52-10 3,6 Total = 3,489 0.88 1
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
16 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV CX-M3 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 13.550 Ibf' = 13.200 Ibf = 12.974 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 9.214 Ia' = 8.975 Ia = 8.822 Fault Clearing Time = 0.6 0,010 Total Incident Energy = 0,327 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Arc Fault at Device
ID Phase Type Type
= 0.480 = 0.480
= =
Grounded 46 cm
(cal/cm) 0,327
For Protective Device: FU-1@ Ia = 8,918 kA
= =
0 0.24 m

Bolted (kA) Arcing (kA) FCT (cycles) Arcing (kA) FCT (cycles)
Incident Energy
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
17 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:

Arc Fault at Bus: Solution Method: Nominal kV Base kV CX-M4 Fault Current Decay Prefault Voltage = 100% of nominal bus kV = 100% of base kV Bus Arc Flash Results Total Bolted (kA) Ibf" = 13.874 Ibf' = 13.505 Ibf = 13.270 Total Arcing (kA) Ia" = 9.409 Ia' = 9.159 Ia = 9.000 Fault Clearing Time = 0.9 0,015 Total Incident Energy = 0,078 Hazard/Risk Level* Flash Protection Boundary Arc Fault at Device
ID Phase Type Type
= 0.480 = 0.480
= =
Grounded 116 cm
(cal/cm) 0,078
= =
0 0.30 m

Bolted (kA) Arcing (kA) FCT (cycles) Arcing (kA) FCT (cycles)
Incident Energy
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
18 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Incident Energy Summary

Total Fault Current (kA)
Nom. kV 138.000 13.800 13.800 4.160 0.480 0.480 0.480 0.480 Type Open Air MCC MCC MCC MCC MCC Cable Bus Cable Bus Bolted 4.661 14.223 15.632 10.529 33.905 30.067 13.550 13.874 Arcing 4.661 13.671 15.026 10.210 18.530 16.794 9.214 9.409
Arc-Flash Analysis Results

FCT (cycles) 4,048 85,800 26,776 3,291 19,440 3,600 0,600 0,900 Incident E (cal/cm) 6.643 51.908 17.519 1.614 21.094 3.489 0.327 0.078 FPB (m) 4.31 29.27 9.59 0.62 2.62 0.88 0.24 0.30 Hazard/Risk Level 2 >Max. 3 1 3 1 0 0
Bus
ID # B1-SE B2-QD1 B3-QD2 B4-CCM1 B5-QD3 B6-CCM2 CX-M3 CX-M4
# The theoretically derived Lee method was used to determine the incident energy and flash protection boundary for this location since the bolted fault current or nominal voltage are outside the empirical method range. ((Ibf" < 0.7 kA or Ibf" > 106 kA) and (0.208 Nominal kV 15 kV))
ETAP
7.0.0
Page: Date: SN:
19 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal
Study Case: SC
Revision: Config.:
Summary - Arc Flash Hazard Calculations

Faulted Bus
ID # B1-SE B2-QD1 B3-QD2 B4-CCM1 B5-QD3 B6-CCM2 CX-M3 CX-M4 Nom. kV 138.000 13.800 13.800 4.160 0.480 0.480 0.480 0.480 Equip. Type Open Air MCC MCC MCC MCC MCC Cable Bus Cable Bus 153 153 102 25 25 13 13 Gap (mm)
Fault Current
Bolted Fault (kA) Bus PD 4.661 14.223 15.632 10.529 33.905 30.067 13.550 13.874 4.184 3.765 15.445 9.639 33.411 28.850 13.116 13.424 PD Arc Fault (kA) 4.184 3.619 14.846 9.347 18.259 16.114 8.918 9.105
Trip Device
Source Trip Device ID CB1 52-3 52-4 52-6 52-8 52-10 FU-1 52-11 Trip (cycle) 2.43 85.20 26.18 2.69 19.44 3.60 0.60 0.90 Open (cycle) 1.62 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FCT (cycle) 4.05 85.80 26.78 3.29 19.44 3.60 0.60 0.90
Flash Boundary (m) 4.3 29.3 9.6 0.6 2.6 0.9 0.2 0.3
Incident Energy (cal/cm) 6.6 51.9 17.5 1.6 21.1 3.5 0.3 0.1
Working Distance (cm) 183 61 61 46 46 46 46 116
Hazard/Risk Level 2 >Max. 3 1 3 1 0 0
# The theoretically derived Lee method was used to determine the incident energy and flash protection boundary for this location since the bolted fault current or nominal voltage are outside the empirical method range. ((Ibf" < 0.7 kA or Ibf" > 106 kA) and (0.208 Nominal kV 15 kV))

Relatorio Arcflash Final

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Relatorio Arcflash Final

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Grupo de Estudos em Qualidade da Energia Eltrica GQEE Instituto de Sistemas Eltricos e Energia ISEE Universidade Federal de Itajub

PROTEO DE SISTEMAS ELTRICOS II ESTUDO DE ARC-FLASH

Itajub 01 de dezembro de 2011

Figura 1 Diagrama de Proteo

4 Dados do estudo de Curto circuito

Figura 2 Resultados da anlise de Arc-Flash mostrados no diagrama unifilar pelo ETAP

Tabela 2 Resultados da anlise de Arc-Flash

Figura 3 Esquema de proteo com o rel de arco

Figura 4 Etiquetas modelos 3,5x7 Perigo Barras

Figura 5 Etiqueta modelo 3x6 Perigo - Barra

Figura 6 Etiqueta modelo 4x4 Ateno - Barra

Figura 6 Etiqueta modelo Avery 6579 Ateno - Barra

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

1 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

Swing Number of Buses: 2

XFMR2 Number of Branches: 3

Synchronous Generator Number of Machines: 1

System Frequency: Unit System: Project Filename: Output Filename:

60 Hz Metric trabalho_prot C:\ETAP 700\trabalho_prot\Untitled.AAF

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

2 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

Apply Temperature Correction Transmission Line Resistance: Cable Resistance: Adjustments

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

3 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

Bus Input Data

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

4 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

Bus Arc Flash Input Data

Arc Flash Ratings

Limited Approach Boundary (m)

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

5 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

Line/Cable Input Data

Line / Cable resistances are listed at the specified temperatures.

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

6 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

2-Winding Transformer Input Data

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG

Page: Date: SN:

7 04-12-2011 12345678 Base Normal

ARTHUR MEDEIROS/ THIAGO GALVO trabalho_prot

% Impedance, Pos. Seq., 100 MVAb

1.20 9.57 44.05 0.04 38.20 631.38 657.42

Project: Location: Contract: Engineer: Filename:

PROJETO PLANTA IND ITAJUBA-MG