Sei sulla pagina 1di 31

EUROTrough Progress and NEXTrough Opportunities for an Euro-American Trough Alliance

Trough Meeting SUNLAB Madison, June 18, 2000


Michael Geyer DLR Deutsches Zentrum fr Luft- und Raumfahrt Plataforma Solar de Almeria

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Parabolic Trough Market Cost Reduction Perspectives


0,18 Subsidized Introductory Markets Green Power Markets Initial Competetive Markets Sustained Global Markets

0,16

Euro/kWh

0,12
GEF & Prefered Financing

0,08

Green Pricing

0,04

Competetive Price Range for Grid- Connected Intermediate Load Power

0,04 Euro/kWh

0,00 2000
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

2005

2010 Year

2015

2020

Parabolic Trough Cost Reduction Perspective


Cost Reduction Potentials of Parabolic Trough Technology Cost Reduction Potentials of Parabolic Trough Technology
0,12 EURO/kWh

Improvement of Current Collector Design

Euro/kWh

Increase Plant Size 80 to 200 MW

Change from HTF to DSG

Build Multiple Plants per Year

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Today

Year 2020

Market Competition

0,04 Euro/kWh

EUROTrough I+II Objectives


2x6 Segment EUROTrough II 150m-Collector 2x4 Segment EUROTrough I 100m Collector

End Pylon

12m Segment

Central Drive Pylon

Interconnecting Pylon

EUROTrough Phase I
1.8.1998 - 31.1.2001 Cost: 3 Mio Euro (40%Partners, 40%EU, 20%BMWi) Develop 100m/8segment EUROTrough Collector Design Deliverable: Manufacturing Dwgs Build one half EUROTrough at Plataforma Solar Deliverable: 50m Prototype Test in PSAs HTF Loop Deliverable: Qualification Tests Partners: Inabensa, Pilkington, SBP, Fichtner, Ciemat, CRES, DLR
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Phase II
1.10.2000 - 31.12.2002 Cost: 2 Mio Euro (50%Partners, 50%EU) Develop 150m/12segment EUROTrough Collector Design Deliverable: Manufacturing Dwgs Add 2 segments to EUROTrough prototype at Plataforma Solar Deliverable: 50+25m Prototype Test in PSAs HTF Loop Deliverable: Qualification Tests Partners: Inabensa, Iberdrola, Pilkington, SBP, Solel, Ciemat, DLR

LS-3 State of the Art


100 Meter

Flexible Hose

Central Oil Pipe & Temperature Sensor

Absorber Tube (HCE)

Mirror Panels

Absorber Tube (HCE)

Mirror Panels

V-Truss
Local Controller Drive Pylon Intermediate Pylon

Hydraulic Drive System

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

LS-3 State of the Art: Weights


100 Meter

LS-3 Collector V-Truss Weight Drive Pylon Typical Pylon Degree of Material Use (Survival/Stow) Maximum Wind Bending Maximum Wind Torsion Surface Maximum Wind Torsion Axis
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Strong 1350 kg 315 kg 135 kg 93% 6.9mm 5.4mrad 5.3mrad

Regular 1068 kg 265 kg 92 kg 99% 10.2mm 5.5mrad 7.7mrad

Design Options

LS-3 Space Frame LS-2 Torque Tube

ET Torque Box

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Design Procedure Elaboration of conceptual design criteria Elaboration of design options Layout of three different structures FEM - analysis of the various structures Comparison of design options concerning
overall collector mass, deformation in operation, stress under survival loads

Comparison of design options with LS-3 collector Consideration of manufacturing, assembly, transportation and erection cost
2000-06-18

Decision on design options

Trough Workshop Madison

Why the Torque Box Design?


Summary of the FEM Optimizations
Axis C

Weight Use of Sections (Survival /Stow) Maximum Wind Bending Distortion Point A Maximum Wind Bending Distortion surface Maximum Wind Torsion Distortion surface Maximum Wind Torsion Distortion Axis C
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

LSS-3 Space Frame Design 1045 kg 32% 10,5 mm 4,15 mrad 4,2 mrad 4,4 mrad

LS-2 Torque Tube Design 895 kg 55,5 35,0 mm 1,6 mrad 1,9 mrad 2,0 mrad

ET Torque Box Design 915 kg 48% 7,08 mm 1,6 mrad 1,7 mrad 1,69 mrad

FEM Optimization: Wind Bending and Torsion


LS-3 Space Frame LS-2 Torque Tube Maximum Wind Bending ET Torque Box

Maximum Wind Torsion

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Wind Tunnel Tests


Measuring Segment

3 different wind directions 5 different positions in the field (front, 3 in front, 5 in front and single)

Tests performed by: Wind Tunnel Facility: Model scale: Test conditions: Cost:
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Wacker Ingenieure, Birkenfeld, Germany Wind Tunnel University of Karlsruhe 1 : 86 Atmospheric boundary layer 40000 EURO

EUROTrough Design Selection


Torque box design allows weight reduction compared with existing collector design Torque box design has the lowest deformations under dead and wind loads Torque box design will allow additional collector elements per drive Higher structural stiffness will improve collector performance Necessary assembly jigs will be more simple and less costly compared with the LS-3 collector

Torque box selected


2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Final Wind Load Assumptions for EuroTrough


Operation Wind Wop: Definition: Wind speed: 0 m/s 14,3 m/s Criteria No design criteria Position: any Economic Design Wind W90%: Definition: Wind speed: 7 m/s Criteria: Transient Wind Wtrans: Definition: Wind speed: 21 m/s Criteria: Survival Wind Wsurv: Definition: Windspeed: 31,3 m/s Criteria: Stress within tolerances Position: Stow Position: any Stress within tolerances + maximum drive power Deformations (energetic losses) within tolerances Position: any

Loading and Material Safety Coefficients Safety coefficients were reduced compared to EURO-CODE for structural engineering
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Design Tolerances


Deformation Tolerances for 12 Segment Collector
Load Max. Global Torsion mrad 5 Avg. Surface Distortion mrad 2 3 Maximum Displacement mm 4 6

Dead Load Dead Load + Design Wind Load

Manufacturing and Installation Tolerances


Reflector Error: Position of Absorber tube x,y Lateral deviation of the outer reflector edge Tracking error
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

average < 3 mrad 10mm, 10mm 5mm < 3 mrad

Bending at 120

Gravity, No Wind
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Gravity, 7m/s Wind

Collector Length vs Torque and Torsion


M Torque

Torsion

Increase of torque and deformation due to wind forces for EUROTROUGH with 8 segments per drive

Drive Pylon
Torque Torsion M

Increase of torque and deformation due to wind forces for EUROTrough with 12 segments per drive

Drive Pylon
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Mirror Stress Reduction by 50% vs LS2/LS3


Optimization of Mirror Fixation

Mirror stress level under survival conditions Position: Stow; Wind: 31,5 m/s
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Design Innovations


150 Meter

3% Land Slope North-South

Torque box with less bending/torsion and reduced weight Increase of Collector length up to 150m/12segments 50% reduced mirror stress by new pad fixations Installation on 3% ground slope with new bearings Suitable for HTF and DSG Structural part items minimized to reduce transport cost Rig cost and assembly cost reduced New tracking control
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Prototype Test at PSA


2 Segment EUROTrough II Extension at PSA 4 Segment EUROTrough I at PSA

DI SS

Te st

Lo

op

CESA-I

Half of 100m EUROTrough Collector Half of 150m EUROTrough Collector

EU RO

Dis h

ACUREX ConTESt

DISTAL II
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Prototype Testloop at PSA


New hardware and measurement equipment in EUROTrough II: Parallel comparative testing of EUROTrough II and LS-3 Torque, bending, twisting, stress, acceleration and vibration measurement on 4 existing and the additional EuroTrough II collector segments
VENTING VALVE
VE4

El. drive

VE3

ET I TE E1 TE E2

ET I TE E3
P

ET I TE E4

ET I TE E5

ET II TE E6

ET II TE E7

DRAINING VALVE
DAS

DAS

DAS

DAS

DAS

DAS

DAS

DAS

TE 01
DAS

PDT E2
El. drive

VENTING VALVE
VE2

VE1

V1 DRAINING VALVE

LS-3

LS-3
DAS

LS-3 TE 02
HAND VALVES
(22 bar)

LS-3
MAGNETIC CHECK VALVES
DAS

TE 03

V2

LC

TE 17 TE 16
DAS

RELIEF VALVE

PT E1

LC

PI 04 TE 07

TT 05
DAS

DAS LC

PT 02

LC

TE 04
V3

N2-Station

DAS

TE 08

N2

OILTANK
15 m^3

DAS

V15

TE 15
V14

DAS

TE 06

LC

LI 01

V4 V5

OILHEATER
40 kW DAS

TDE 01
DAS

TE 12

V13

TE 14
F

PI Doubling of 01 03 Pump Capacity


DAS LC

PT

LC

TE 11

DAS

TE 10
V8

DAS

TE 09

V11

V10

FILTER

FILTER

Doubling of Cooling Capacity


V7 OILCOOLER
225 kW VE6 VE5

DAS

TE 13

DAS

FT E1

DAS

FT 01
OILPUMP V9

V12

OILCOOLER
??? kW

Drain

Tank

MANUAL

METEO DATA
I Dir T Amb v Wind alpha Wind

PUMP NOTES DAS - DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM LC - LOGIC CONTROL INSTALLATIONS OF ET- MEASUREMENTCOMPONENTS IN LS-3 CIRCUIT ADDITIONAL INSTALLATIONS FOR THE ET II

V6

LS-3 & EUROTrough II HTF TEST LOOP P&I DIAGRAM


02/11/99 AUTHOR: CHR. SPITTA

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Consortium Agreement Marketing Strategy International Cooperation

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

AndaSol32: 1st Project with EUROTrough & DSG


Collectors with Direct Steam Generation Solar Field with Thermal Oil Solar Superheater Steam Turbine

Boiler (optional)

Condenser

Fuel

Steam Generator Solar Preheater Deaerator Solar Reheater Expansion Vessel

Low Pressure Preheater

AndaSol32 Partners: Gamesa, Iberdrola, Agrosol, Pilkington/Flabeg, Solar Millennium AG, DLR, Ciemat
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

AndaSol32: 235000m EUROTrough & 16000m DSG


16350m in 5 parallel loops with direct steam absorbers

Power Block 32 MW Rankine Cycle

832 m

Headers

235440m Solar Field: 432 EUROTrough collectors in 54 loops

945 m
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Solar Thermal Market Problems

Solar Thermal (like all Renewables) is not competitive with least cost conventional alternatives needs financial subsidies (grants, kWh premiums, tax credits, soft loans, credit warranties, ) needs political support from national, multinational (I.e EU) or multilateral organisations to achieve market introduction

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Solar Thermal Market Problems National Governments dont like subsidize with their national taxes foreign suppliers (1cent/kWh premium fo a 50MW solar plant is 1 Mio USD subsidy per year) want to earn merits and votes with creation of jobs, local hitec, etc. dont support any not invented here Multinational Donors (like EU) want involvement of their members Multilateral Institutions (like World Bank, GEF) fair competition
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Solar Thermal Market Problems In this phase, solar thermal industrial developers must avoid create a broad jealousy of the non-profiting companies in the renewable scene, who will intervene against subsidy and support at the national level

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

EUROTrough Approach Based on these lessons learnt in Spain and in Brussels, the EUROTrough partners have committed themselves in their consortium agreement to open the EUROTrough platform (as the PC platform) intend to distribute the design widely by giving every partner the right to license the design to any client (even the competitors of other partners) in order to give a broad community the chance to make money with solar thermal thru EUROTrough Example: ANDASOL proposal
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

How Can the Partners Nevertheless Make Money? The EUROTrough Consortium follows the principle: Give Away Kerosene Lamps and Sell Kerosene Give Away Cell-Phones for 1$ and Profit from the Calls Open the Trough Platform like in the PC Business to competition and gain a market Make EUROTrough national anywhere Make EUROTrough invented there Involve from the beginning other national and international players to gain their lobbying support
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Consortium Agreement
The EUROTrough Consortium does not want to make the money with the EUROTrough design itself, but wants to sell equipment (mirrors, structures, absorbers, trackers) and to sell services (project development, engineering, management, operation, construction, ) Like in the PC business, where nobody wants to invent himself a costly operating system or hardware bus, power project developers dont want to spend their money in reinventing and requalifying the parabolic trough. They want to spend minimum money in that and would rather use standard solutions. (Only within the solar thermal community we all have the desire to invent our own collector and solar concept)
2000-06-18 Trough Workshop Madison

Offer of EUROTrough to US Firms


In view of the limited resources for solar thermal, the EUROTrough Consortium advocates to join forces between Europe and US avoid duplication of efforts The EUROTrough Consortium offers to fully share the EUROTrough Design with interested US partners bring it into a joint NEXTrough US-European effort The EUROTrough Consortium proposes prequalify the EUROTrough in a prototype test at PSA demonstrate a loop of 8 Collectors at Kramer Junction jointly develop commercial scale projects

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Solar Thermal Market Problems

2000-06-18

Trough Workshop Madison

Potrebbero piacerti anche