Chi-square Analysis Results for Respondents and Sex

No. of Cases = 30
Chi-square =

30.000 with D.F. = 29. Prob. > value =

Liklihood Ratio =

0.414

40.381 with prob. > value = 0.0779

phi correlation = 1.0000

Pearson Correlation r = -0.2751
Mantel-Haenszel Test of Linear Association =
value = 0.1384
The coefficient of contingency =
Cramer's V =

2.195 with probability >

0.707

1.000

Chi-square Analysis Results for Respondents and Age

No. of Cases = 30
Chi-square =

60.000 with D.F. = 58. Prob. > value =

Liklihood Ratio =

0.403

65.293 with prob. > value = 0.2382

phi correlation = 1.4142

Pearson Correlation r = 0.1829
Mantel-Haenszel Test of Linear Association =
value = 0.3246
The coefficient of contingency =
Cramer's V =

0.970 with probability >

0.816

1.000

Chi-square Analysis Results for Respondents and Que 1

No. of Cases = 30
Chi-square =

30.000 with D.F. = 29. Prob. > value =

Liklihood Ratio =

0.414

34.795 with prob. > value = 0.2114

phi correlation = 1.0000

Pearson Correlation r = 0.1480
Mantel-Haenszel Test of Linear Association =
value = 0.4253

0.636 with probability >

The coefficient of contingency =

Cramer's V =

0.707

1.000

Chi-square Analysis Results for Respondents and Que 2

No. of Cases = 30
Chi-square =

30.000 with D.F. = 29. Prob. > value =

Liklihood Ratio =

0.414

39.429 with prob. > value = 0.0937

phi correlation = 1.0000

Pearson Correlation r = 0.2517
Mantel-Haenszel Test of Linear Association =
value = 0.1752
The coefficient of contingency =
Cramer's V =

1.838 with probability >

0.707

1.000

Chi-square Analysis Results for Respondents and Que 3

No. of Cases = 30
Chi-square =

30.000 with D.F. = 29. Prob. > value =

Liklihood Ratio =

0.414

32.596 with prob. > value = 0.2943

phi correlation = 1.0000

Pearson Correlation r = -0.2777
Mantel-Haenszel Test of Linear Association =
value = 0.1348
The coefficient of contingency =
Cramer's V =

2.237 with probability >

0.707

1.000

Chi-square Analysis Results for Respondents and Que 4

No. of Cases = 30
Chi-square =

30.000 with D.F. = 29. Prob. > value =

Liklihood Ratio =

30.024 with prob. > value = 0.4128

phi correlation = 1.0000

Pearson Correlation r = -0.2214

0.414

Mantel-Haenszel Test of Linear Association =

value = 0.2331
The coefficient of contingency =
Cramer's V =

1.422 with probability >

0.707

1.000

Two Way Analysis of Variance

Variable analyzed: Respondents
Factor A (rows) variable: Sex (Fixed Levels)
Factor B (columns) variable: Age (Fixed Levels)
SOURCE
Squared
Among Rows
Among Columns
Interaction
Within Groups
Total

D.F.
1
2
2
24
29

SS
170.139
82.909
195.835
1798.617
2247.500

MS
170.139
41.455
97.918
74.942
77.500

Omega squared for combined effects =

F
2.270
0.553
1.307

PROB.> F
0.145
0.582
0.289

Omega
0.041
0.000
0.020

0.032

Note: Denominator of F ratio is MSErr

ONE WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE RESULTS
Dependent variable is: Respondents, Independent variable is: Que 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------SOURCE
D.F.
SS
MS
F
PROB.>F
OMEGA SQR.
--------------------------------------------------------------------BETWEEN
1
49.26
49.26
0.63
0.43
-0.01
WITHIN
28
2198.24
78.51
TOTAL
29
2247.50
--------------------------------------------------------------------MEANS AND VARIABILITY OF THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE FOR LEVELS OF THE
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------GROUP
MEAN
VARIANCE STD.DEV. N
--------------------------------------------------------------------1
13.38
81.12
9.01
8
2
16.27
77.64
8.81 22
--------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL
15.50
77.50
8.80 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1
1.1

Background of the Study:................................................................................................. 1

1.2

Statement of the Problem ................................................................................................. 2

1.3

Objectives of the Study .................................................................................................... 2

1.4

Research Hypotheses........................................................................................................ 3

1.5

Significance of the study .................................................................................................. 3

1.6

Scope and Limitation of the study.................................................................................... 4

1.7

Definition of Terms .......................................................................................................... 4

1.8

Historical Background of Study Area .............................................................................. 5

a)

The functions of the Commission .................................................................................... 5

b)

Structure of the Commission ............................................................................................ 6

c)

The 4 - point reform agenda ............................................................................................. 6

2.2

Definitions of Management System (MIS) ...................................................................... 9

2.3

Types of Management Information System ................................................................... 10

Transaction Processing System (TPS);.................................................................................. 10

Management Reporting System (MRS); ............................................................................... 10
Decision Support System (DSS); .......................................................................................... 10
Office Automation System (OAS); ....................................................................................... 11
Executive Information System (EIS);.................................................................................... 11
Expert System (ES); .............................................................................................................. 11
2.4

Level of MIS .................................................................................................................. 11

1.

Strategic planning:.......................................................................................................... 11

2.

Management control:...................................................................................................... 12

3.

Operation control: .......................................................................................................... 12

2.5

Benefits of MIS .............................................................................................................. 12

2.7

The Role of a Management Information System in an Organization ............................ 13

2.8

The impact of Management Information System on organizations ............................... 16

2.9

Recent development at the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) ............................... 17

3.1

Introduction .................................................................................................................... 18

3.2

Research Design ............................................................................................................. 18

3.3

Population of the Study .................................................................................................. 18

3.4

Sampling Size and Sampling Techniques ...................................................................... 19

3.5

Data Sources ................................................................................................................... 19

CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION .......... 21

4.0

INTRODUCTION: ........................................................................................................... 21

4.1

Data Presentation and Analysis ...................................................................................... 21

4.2

Characteristics of Respondents ...................................................................................... 21

4.4

Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................... 34

CHAPTER 5 ................................................................................................................................. 35
5.0

Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 35

5.1

Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 35