Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

WFL Publisher

Science and Technology


Meri-Rastilantie 3 B, FI-00980 Helsinki, Finland e-mail: info@world-food.net

Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol.8 (3&4): 1280-1284. 2010

www.world-food.net

Heavy metal contamination of sediments in mangrove forests of the Persian Gulf


Ali Davari *, Afshin Danehkar, Nematolah Khorasani and Hadi Poorbagher
Department of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111, Sh Chamran Ave, Karaj, Tehran, Iran. e-mail: adavarei@gmail.com

Received 18 July 2010, accepted 30 October 2010.

Abstract
Mangroves are sensitive ecosystems with prominent ecological value that have unfortunately lost much of their areas across the world, partly because of pollution. The present study investigated heavy metal contaminations in three mangrove forests of southern Iran. Surface sediments (0-10 cm) were collected from the mangroves in northern Persian Gulf in April 2009. Also, biometric features of trees were measured. Metal concentration ranges were as follows: Al 1795-30240, Fe 6425-51530, Cd 0.6-3.45, Cu 14.1-98.28, Ni 14.1-204.54, Pb 34.15-191.6, V 57.38-825.26 and Zn 44.91306.15 g g-1 dry weight. Principal component analysis on heavy metal concentration of sediments suggested three sources of pollution, industry, natural mineralogy of soils and oil, and industrial activities were the most important source. There was no significant difference among the three mangrove forests in heavy metal concentrations of sediments indicating that the pollution source was the same. There was little correlation between biometric characteristics of mangrove trees and heavy metal concentrations of sediment suggesting that pollution had no effect on mangrove trees. In conclusion, the overall average concentrations of above metals exceed the primary standard criteria but meet the secondary standard criteria of the Chinese National Standard of Marine Sediment Quality and also United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Standard. Key words: Heavy metals, contamination, Persian Gulf, mangrove, sediment.

Introduction Mangrove forests, the intertidal wetlands of the tropics and subtropics, are key ecological habitats and sensitive ecosystems that link terrestrial and marine environments. Heavy metals can be delivered to intertidal zones from the catchment via fluvial transport, atmospheric deposition and local wastewater discharge 8, 25, 35. Pollution by heavy metals in natural environments has become a global problem 15. Mangrove forests and adjacent mudflats are increasingly being impacted by pollution originated from multiple sources including municipal waste, mariculture, shipping, industries and run-off from urban centers 5, 14. Sediments that accumulate in mangroves are potential repositories of anthropogenic pollution because of high total organic carbon content, anaerobic properties and rapid turnover and burial 19. Elevated concentrations of heavy metals have been recorded in mangrove sediments all over the world, which often reflects the long-term pollution caused by human activities 11, 33. The Persian Gulf is one of the oldest water passages in the world rich in biodiversity with mangrove forests and coral reefs, particularly, along the Iranian coast. About 57-66% of the known oil and 45% of natural gas reserves of the world lie in the vicinity or beneath the sea bed of the Persian Gulf 21. Consequently, oil transport, urbanization and other industrial activities increase the environmental threats to coastal ecosystems. Also the Persian Gulf experienced three major wars: The Iraq-Iran war and the first and second Gulf wars. During these wars many oil tankers were attacked and sank, or oil fields were set on fire by Iraqi forces (during the first Gulf war) causing massive oil spills into the Gulf21.
1280

In addition, the Persian Gulf is a major point of oil industry. As a result, the marine life of the Persian Gulf has experienced overwhelming stress during the past three decades. There are many studies on heavy metals in mangrove sediments19, 24, 27, 28, 33, however, little information is available for mangroves of the subtropical regions, especially, northern Persian Gulf and the Iranian coasts 17. Presence of highly-pollutant human activities in the Gulf region, such as the oil industry and occurrence of environmental disasters like sinking of oil tankers, make it necessary to evaluate valuable coastal ecosystems in terms of heavy metal contamination. The necessity of such a study becomes more obvious with regard to the fact that mangrove forests are used to provide animals feedstuff and also leaves of mangrove trees are used as medicine for humans in southern Iran (personal observation). Consequently, pollution can be absorbed by trees and finally transferred to humans. This study thus aimed to investigate heavy metals concentrations in intertidal sediments of mangroves of the Gulf (Bushehr province), in particular, the sources and the extent of contamination providing an update of information that can be useful for environmental managers. Materials and Methods The present study was conducted in April 2009 in three mangrove swamps of northern Persian Gulf, i.e. Bidekhun, Basatin and Melegonze (Fig. 1). Bidekhun mangrove swamp has an area of 80 ha, which is heavily disturbed by human activities resulted from discharges of industrial wastewaters. Basatin swamp has an area
Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Vol.8 (3&4), July-October 2010

N 2815

3 N 2745 1 N 2715 2

Persian Gulf
N 2645

N 5145

N 5245

N 5345

Figure 1. Three mangrove forests in the northern Persian Gulf: Bidekhun (1), Basatin (2) and Melegonze (3).

of 30 ha, located in adjacent to the Bidekhun. Mangrove swamp in Melgonze is small with an area 10 ha, which is away from human activities and, therefore, less disturbed than the two other swamps. Twenty two quadrats (10 m10 m) were chosen in all sampling sites. Wooden stakes were placed at the corner of each quadrate and measuring tape was used to delineate the boundaries. Within each quadrate, three surface sediment samples (0-10 cm) were collected using a clean, acid-washed plastic scoop. Samples were stored in clean acid-washed plastic containers and transported to the laboratory. In the laboratory, first sediment samples were dried at room temperature (202C [Mean SD]) and then oven dried at 105C for 24 h. Dry samples were ground using a pestle and mortar and sieved (2 mm mesh size) to remove coarse particles. The sediment samples were stored in polyethylene bags for further analysis. Dry samples were analyzed using the USEPA Methods 3050 20 for measuring Al, Fe, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, V and Zn. In this method heavy metals are extracted by digestion of samples using a boiling water bath for 2 h and a mixture of hot concentrated nitric and hydrochloric acids 20. The concentrations of metals were determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy 20: . Total organic carbon (TOC) concentration was determined by digestion of 1 g dry sample using dichromate according to the method of Walkley and Black 23. Sediment texture was determined using a hydrometer and the percentages of sand, silt and clay was calculated following Carter 1993 (50 g per litre of suspension at 68F (= 20C)) 22. Three 1 m2 plots were established in all 22 quadrates (for each sampling site) and within each micro plot, several parameters, including seedling density, tree density, pneumatophore density, crab hole density, tree height and tree projective foliage cover, were recorded with counting and measuring tape 1. Statistical analysis: Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to find relationship among sediment features and also differences in contamination of sediments among the three sampling sites. Variables had very different variance, hence, a correlation matrix was used 26 and cases with missing values were omitted. The variables included in PCA were TOC (%) and Al, Fe, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, V and Zn concentrations. Prior to the analysis, normality of
Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Vol.8 (3&4), July-October 2010

data was examined using one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Reid and Spencer 27 showed that reducing effects of grain size had significant influence on PCA outputs, and effects of other factors affecting metal variability were identified more clearly. Therefore, we normalized the TOC percentage and metal concentrations through dividing them by percentage of particles <0.63 m. The principal components (PC) with eigenvalues over one were selected 7. Preliminary PCA indicated that TOC had a low communality and was thus dropped from the analysis. Some variables had large loadings on more than one component and hence a Varimax rotation was applied. The PC loadings were considered significant when they were >0.6 27. ANOVA was used to find a significant difference in PC scores among the three sampling sites 26, followed by a Duncan test when ANOVA detected a significant difference. ANOVA assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were examined by the Shapiro-Wilk and the Levene tests, respectively. Data were transformed using the function (x+3)3 to meet the homogeneity assumption. To find correlation between the mangrove plants specifications (i.e. seedling density, tree density, pneumatorphore density, mean tree height and percent of foliage cover) with TOC percentage and metal concentration, a Pearsons correlation coefficient was used. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc.). Results Samples had a high percent of grains with a diameter less than 0.63 m ranging from 21.00-85.00% (Fig. 2). In contrast, the percent of TOC was fairly low (0.29-3.01%). Fe and Al had the highest concentration among the measured metals (Fe 6425.00-51530.00, Al 1795.00-30240.00 g g-1 [range]). Cd had the lowest concentration among the metals (range 0.6-3.45 g g-1), after that, Ni, Pb, Zn and V had a higher concentration, respectively. The three sampling sites had a similar tree density. The Melegonze sampling site had the highest density of seedlings and pneumatophore and tallest trees with the greatest percent of foliage cover (Fig. 3). PC1, PC2 and PC3 explained 49.82, 24.24 and 10.74% of variance, respectively. Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn had the greatest loading with PC1, Al and Fe with PC2 and Ni and V with PC3 (Table 1). The same pattern was obtained for PC score coefficients (Table 2). Thus, higher scores for PC1 indicate greater concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn. Al and Fe had their highest coefficients with PC2 and hence their higher scores with PC2 show their higher concentration. Similarly, Ni and V had their highest coefficient with PC3 and their higher scores with PC3 indicate their greater concentrations. No inverse relationship between any of two variables could be inferred based on PC loadings or coefficients. Since, negative loading or coefficients were quite small and did not thus contrast strongly with higher positive coefficients. ANOVA indicated that there was only a significant difference among sites in PC2 scores (df = 2, F = 4.664, P = 0.022). A Duncan test showed that the samples from the site Bidekhon had significantly a greater mean PC2 scores than those from Basatin and Melegonze indicating that sediments from Bidekhon tended to have greater concentration of Al and Fe. Concentrations of Al and Fe were positively correlated with percent of clay-silt fraction (particles <63 m), TOC and crab hole
1281

700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

Bidekhun Basatin Melegonze

Cu (g g-1)

Al (x1000 g g-1)

Fe (x1000 g g-1)

Cd (x1000 g g-1)

Ni (g g-1)

Pb (g g-1)

V (g g-1)

Figure 2. Percent of clay and silt, TOC and heavy metal concentrations measured of sediments from three mangrove forests (Bidekhun, Basatin and Melegonze) of the northern Persian Gulf.
450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Seedling density (#x10-2 m-2) Pneumatophon density (# m-2) Crab hole density (# m-2) Tree density (#x10-2 m-2) Mean tree height (cm)

Clay and silt (%)

Bidekhun Basatin Melegonze

Figure 3. The crab-hole density and charactersitics of mangrove trees measured in mangrove forests (Bidekhun, Basatin and Melegonze) of the northern Persian Gulf . Table 1. The PC loadings obtained from a PCA performed on TOC and metal concentrations divided by percentage of particles < 0.63 m. A Varimax rotation was applied. The values greater than 0.6 shown in bold.
Variables Al Fe Cd Cu Ni Pb V Zn Eigenvalue % of variance PC Component loadings 1 2 -0.055 0.957 0.121 0.964 -0.005 0.840 0.064 0.931 -0.037 0.299 -0.047 0.955 -0.215 -0.087 0.099 0.953 3.672 2.196 45.906 27.453 3 0.178 -0.004 -0.019 -0.091 0.912 -0.162 0.936 -0.135 1.340 16.754

Table 2. The PC scores obtained from a PCA performed on TOC and metal concentrations divided by percentage of particles < 0.63 m. A Varimax rotation was applied. For each variable, the largest values among the three components shown in bold.
Variables Al Fe Cd Cu Ni Pb V Zn 1 -0.043 -0.010 0.261 0.278 0.083 0.282 0.049 0.278 PC Component scores 2 0.495 0.512 -0.042 -0.001 0.052 -0.053 -0.149 0.022 3 -0.012 -0.105 0.089 0.047 0.528 0.019 0.568 0.018

1282

Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Vol.8 (3&4), July-October 2010

Foliage cover (%)

Zn (g g-1)

TOC (%)

levels in clay and silt than other soil components 3. Our results agree with Seidemann 31 who obtained a strong correlation between percent of organic materials and heavy metal contamination. Such a correlation may be related to the high specific surface area that fine grain sediments have and thus Discussion absorb a higher concentration of heavy metals 33. Fe and Al are This study investigated the heavy metal contamination in three the most important terrestrial metals that are found at higher levels mangrove forests (Bidekhun, Basatin and Melegonze) of the in clay and silt than other soil components 3. The correlation of Persian Gulf. Principal component analysis suggested that three fine grain sediment with total organic carbon may also indicate factors shaped the distribution of heavy metal concentrations in the high specific surface area of fine grains. TOC had a significant the coasts of the Persian Gulf. The first principal component correlation with Fe, Al, Ni and V that can be due to the high (PC1) loaded strongly with Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd suggesting that complexity of heavy metals with organic materials. this PC represents the influence of industrial activities, which are The positive correlation of crab-hole density with percent of the main source of these metals. PC2 loaded mainly with Al and fine particles (<0.63 m) was in agreement with other studies 12, 13, 36 Fe indicating that this PC represents the mineralogy of sediments . Such correlation may indicate that soils with finer texture may as the second source of pollution. PC3 loaded strongly with Ni provide a higher food and thus increase the biomass of macro and V suggesting that this PC represents oil pollution. benthos. The crab-hole density was positively correlated with There was a significant difference in Al and Fe concentrations Fe and Al concentrations. This was due to absorption of those among the three sampling sites with the sampling site Bidekhun metals by fine grain sediment rather than a direct effect on crabs. showing the highest concentrations. No difference was detected Seedling and tree densities were negatively correlated with Cd between the sampling sites in the rest of the metals. While concentration. This result was expected as it is well documented sediments of Bidekhun had a higher concentration of Fe and Al, that Cd interferes with nutrient absorption 29, nitrogen-related it is unlikely that vicinity of Bidekhun to the major mechanisms 2 and function of chlorophyll leading to cessation of petrochemical plant of Iran is the responsible factor for higher growth 9. Al and Fe loads in sediments. Since Al and Fe are terrestrial The present study indicated that there are three sources of indices 18, 30, 32, their concentrations are related to the soil properties heavy metal pollution in mangrove forest of the Persian Gulf, i.e. rather than anthropogenic activities. Also, in the present study, industry, natural mineralogy of soils and oil, and of them, lack of a significant difference between all studied sampling sites industrial activities have the main effect on mangrove forests. in heavy metal concentrations may indicate that the studied creeks The Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni and Zn concentrations in sediments, in the have a common source of pollution: The Persian Gulf. The Persian present study, were higher than those of most previous Gulf has turned into the biggest water way for oil transport and, studies5,6, 10, 28 and also higher than the primary and secondary consequently, oil is a probable source of pollution. In addition, standards in the Chinese National Standard of Marine Sediment many industries have been raised in the region that introduced a Quality 4, although lower than the secondary standard of the high concentration of heavy metals into the Gulf due to lack of United State Environmental Protection Agency 34 indicating that 16 purification plants and control of air pollution . mangroves in northern coasts of the Persian Gulf are in serious There were significant correlations between percent of particles status. Such high pollution levels in the region, in spite of (<63 m) and concentrations of Al, Fe, Ni, V and Zn. Fe and Al are continuous efforts of organizations like ROMPE and the Iranian most important of terrestrial silicates that are found at higher Department of Environment and occurrence of comprehensive laws regarding wastewater control, indicate the large extent of pollution sources in the Table 3. Pearsons correlations between TOC and mangrove trees features, and region. The industrial plants of the countries -1 concentration of heavy metals (g g ) in sedimens. Significant P-values around the Persian Gulf are mainly related to are shown in bold. oil industry, on which their economy is PneumaCrab Mean Particles Seedling Tree Foliage based. Therefore, efforts to decrease TOC tophore hole Tree density density cover Variables < 0.63 pollution level will not lead to adequate (%) density density Height mm (%) (# m-2) (# m-2) (%) results without international cooperation. (# m-2) (# m-2) (m) density, Ni with clay and silt fraction of sediment and Zn and Pb with mean tree height, V with clay and silt fraction and TOC and Zn with clay and silt fraction, crab hole density and mean tree height (Table 3).
Al Fe Cd Cu Ni Pb V Zn r P r P r P r P r P r P r P r P 0.848 < 0.001 0.862 < 0.001 0.199 0.375 0.333 0.130 0.605 0.003 0.363 0.097 0.571 0.005 0.442 0.040 0.559 0.007 0.580 0.005 -0.041 0.856 0.350 0.110 0.533 0.011 0.136 0.545 0.466 0.029 0.237 0.287 -0.108 0.631 -0.123 0.586 -0.155 0.490 -0.371 0.090 -0.102 0.650 -0.420 0.051 0.086 0.705 -0.287 0.195 0.025 0.911 0.060 0.789 0.344 0.117 -0.042 0.851 0.014 0.951 0.133 0.556 0.038 0.867 0.157 0.487 -0.132 0.557 -0.186 0.407 -0.018 0.938 -0.323 0.142 -0.086 0.705 -0.400 0.065 0.001 0.996 -0.339 0.123 0.480 0.024 0.440 0.040 0.074 0.743 0.288 0.194 0.323 0.143 0.369 0.091 0.204 0.364 0.425 0.049 -0.340 0.122 -0.341 0.120 -0.416 0.054 -0.305 0.167 -0.383 0.079 -0.451 0.035 -0.207 0.355 -0.517 0.014 -0.303 0.170 -0.347 0.113 -0.099 0.660 -0.347 0.113 -0.163 0.468 -0.392 0.071 0.021 0.926 -0.294 0.183

Acknowledgements This investigation is a part of a project funded by National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company (NIOPDC). The authors would like to thank Dr. Habibi soil lab for analysis of samples for heavy metals and also all researchers of Environment and Fishery Department, University of Tehran, for the valuable and contractive collaboration and support for this study.

Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Vol.8 (3&4), July-October 2010

1283

References
1

Andersen, L. E., Melville, F. and Jolley, D. 2008. An assessment of an oil spill in Gladstone, Australia. Impacts on intertidal areas at one month post-spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin 57:607-615. 2 Boussama, N., Quariti, O. and Ghorbal, M. H. 1999. Changes in growth and nitrogen assimilation in barley seedlings under cadmium stress. J. Plant Nutr. 22:731-752. 3 Clark, M. W., McConchie, D., Lewis, D. W. and Saenger, P. 1998. Redox stratification and heavy metal partitioning in Avicennia-dominated mangrove sediments: A geochemical model. Chemical Geology 149:147171. 4 CSBTS (China State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision) 2002. Marine Sediment Quality. Standards Press of China, Beijing, China, 10 pp. 5 Cuong, D. T., Bayen, S., Wurl, O., Subramanian, K., Wong, K. K. S., Sivasothi, N. and Obbard, G. P. H. 2005. Heavy metal contamination in mangrove habitats of Singapore. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50:1713-1744. 6 Defew, L. H., Mair, J. M. and Guzman, H. M. 2005. An assessment of metal contamination in mangrove sediments and leaves from Punta Mala Bay, Pacific Panama. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50:547-552. 7 Everitt, B. S. and Dunn G. 1999. Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Edward Arnold, London, 304 p. 8 Feng, H., Han, X., Zhang, W. and Yu, L. 2004. A preliminary study of heavy metal contamination in Yangtze River intertidal zone due to urbanization. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49:910-915. 9 Gadallah, M. A. 1995. Effects of cadmium and kinetin on chlorophyll content, saccharides and dry matter accumulation in sunflower plants. Biol. Plant. 37:233-240. 10 Guzman, H. M. and Jimenez, C. E. 1992. Contamination of coral reefs by heavy metals along the Caribbean coast of Central America (Costa Rica and Panama). Marine Pollution Bulletin 24:554-561. 11 Harris, R. R. and Santos, M. C. F. 2000. Heavy metal contamination and physiological variability in the Brazilian mangrove crabs, Ucides cordatus and Callinectes danoe (Crustacea: Decapoda). Marine Biology 137:691703. 12 Hatje, V., Barros, D., Magalhaes, W., Riatto, V. B., Amorim, F. N., Figueiredo, M. B., Spano, S. and Cirano, M. 2008. Trace metals and benthic macrofauna distributions in Camamu Bay, Brazil: Sediment quality prior oil and gas exploration. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56:348379. 13 Hogarth, P. J. 1999. The Biology of Mangroves. Oxford University Press, New York. 14 Huang, X. P., Li, X. D., Yue, W. Z , Huang, L. M. and Li, Y. X. 2003. Accumulation of heavy metals in the sediments of Shenzhen Bay, South China. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science 24:144-149. 15 Irabien, M. J. and Velasco, F. 1999. Heavy metals in Oka Rive sediments (Urdaibai National Biosphere Reserve, Northern Spain): Lithogenic and anthropogenic effects. Environ. Geol. 37:54-63. 16 Iran-DOE 2009. Heavy metals condition in Persian Gulf. http:// www.irandoe.org/doeportal/marine. Site visited on 08.05.10. 17 Karbassi, A. R., Nabi-Bidhendi, Gh. R. and Bayati, I. 2005. Environmental geochemistry of heavy metals in a sediment core off Bushehr. Persian Gulf. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng. 2:225-260. 18 Loring, D. H. 1991. Normalization of heavy-metal data from estuarine and coastal sediments. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 48:101-115. 19 Marchand, C., Lallier-Verges, E., Baltzer, F., Alberic, P., Cossa, D. and Baillif, P. 2006. Heavy metals distribution in mangrove sediments along the mobile coastline of French Guiana. Marine Chemistry 98:1-17. 20 Melville, F., Andersen, L. E. and Jolley, D. F. 2009. The Gladstone (Australia) oil spill impacts on intertidal areas: Baseline and six months post-spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58:263-271. 21 Nadim, F., Bagtzoglou, A. and Iranmahboob, J. 2008. Coastal management in the Persian Gulf region within the framework of the ROPME programme of action. Ocean & Coastal Management 51:556565. 22 Ong Che, R. G. 1999. Concentration of 7 heavy metals in sediments and 1284

mangrove rootsamples from Mai Po, Hong Kong. Marine Pollution Bulletin 39:269-279. 23 Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Nelson, D. R. and Sommers, L. E. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Am. Soc. Agron., Soil Sci. Soc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 539-579. 24 Preda, M. and Cox, M. E. 2002. Trace metal occurrence and distribution in sediments and mangroves, pumicestone region, southeast Queensland, Australia. Environment International 28:433-449. 25 Qiao, S., Yang, Z., Pan, Y. and Guo, Z. 2007. Metals in suspended sediments from the Changjiang (Yangtze River) and Huanghe (Yellow River) to the sea and their comparison. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74:539-548. 26 Quinn, G. P. and Keough, M. J. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 537 p. 27 Reid, M. K. and Spencer, K. L. 2009. Use of principal components analysis (PCA) on estuarine sediment datasets: The effect of data pretreatment. Environmental Pollution 157:2275-2281. 28 Yu, R. L., Xing, Y., Zhao, Y. H., Hu, G. R. and Tu, X. L. 2008. Heavy metal pollution in intertidal sediments from Quanzhou Bay, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 20:664-669. 29 Sandalio, L. M., Dalurzo, H. C., Gomes, M., Romero-Puertas, M. and Del Rio, L. A. 2001. Cadmium-induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. J. Exp. Bot. 52:2115-2126. 30 Schropp, S. J., Lewis, F. G., Windom, H. L., Ryan, J. D., Calder, F. D. and Burney, L. C. 1990. Interpretation of metal concentrations in estuarine sediments of Florida using aluminum as a reference element. Estuaries 13:227-235. 31 Seidemann, D. E. 1991. Metal pollution in sediments of Jamaica Bay, New York, USA - an urban estuary. Environ. Manage. 15:73-81. 32 Shine, J. P., Ika, R. V. and Ford, T. E. 1995. Multivariate statistical examination of spatial and temporal pattern of heavy metal contamination in New Bedford Harbour marine sediments. Environ. Science Technology 29:1781-1788. 33 Tam, N. F. Y. and Wong, W. S. 2000. Spatial variation of heavy metals in surface sediments of Hong Kong mangrove swamps. Environmental Pollution 110:195-205. 34 USEPA 2010. Sediment Contamination Assessment Methods: Validation of Standardized and Novel Approaches. http://epa.gov/ncer/. Site visited on 08.05.10. 35 Yang, S. L., Ding, P. X. and Chen, S. L. 2001. Changes in progradation rate of the tidal flats at the mouth of the Changjiang (Yangtze) River, China. Geomorphology 38:167-180. 36 Zajac, R. N. 2008. Macrobenthic biodiversity and sea floor landscape structure. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366:198203.

Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, Vol.8 (3&4), July-October 2010

Potrebbero piacerti anche