yij = + i+ j+ij i Treatment effect j Block effect 2 ij~N(0, )

Two-way ANOVA: Tensile_Strength versus Chemical(treatme, Bolt(Block)

Source Chemical(treatme Bolt(Block) Error Total S = 1.348 DF 3 4 12 19 SS 12.95 157.00 21.80 191.75 MS 4.3167 39.2500 1.8167 F 2.38 21.61 P 0.121 0.000

R-Sq = 88.63%

R-Sq(adj) = 82.00%

H0 : i=0 vs H1: i0 for at least one i Since p-value(0.121) >0.05 do not reject H0 5% level of significance.i.e we have no enough evidence to conclude that chemical affects response. H0 : j =0 vs H1: j i0 for at least one j Since p-value(0.000) <0.05 reject H0 5% level of significance.i.e block(bolt) affects the response.

Probability Plot of Tensile_Strength(Response)

Normal
99 Mean StDev N AD P-Value 71.75 3.177 20 0.470 0.221

95 90 80

Percent

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5

65.0

67.5

70.0 72.5 75.0 Tensile_Strength(Response)

77.5

80.0

Since p-value (0.221)>0.05 do not reject H0: Errors are normally distributed at 5% level
of significance.

Residuals Versus the Fitted Values

(response is Tensile_Strength(Response)) 2.0 1.5 1.0

Residual

0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 66 68 70 72 Fitted Value 74 76

Since the residuals are ramdomly distributed around zero within a constant band it can be said that there is a constant variance for all factor levels.

Residuals Versus the Order of the Data

(response is Tensile_Strength(Response)) 2.0 1.5 1.0

Residual

0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 2 4 6 8 10 12 Observation Order 14 16 18 20

(ii) Analysis of the data with estimated missing value Minitab output Two-way ANOVA: Tensile_Strength versus Chemical(treatme, Bolt(Block)_1
Source Chemical(treatme Bolt(Block)_1 Error Total S = 1.347 DF 3 4 12 19 SS 12.784 158.888 21.763 193.434 MS 4.2615 39.7219 1.8135 F 2.35 21.90 P 0.124 0.000

R-Sq = 88.75%

R-Sq(adj) = 82.19%

Corrected Minitab output

Error DF=12-1=11 MSE=21.763/11= F=MSR/MSE=2.154 Source Chemical(treatme Bolt(Block)_1 Error Total DF 3 4 11 18 SS 12.784 158.888 21.763 193.434 MS 4.2615 39.7219 1.9785 F 2.154