0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
53 visualizzazioni7 pagine
Psychopathy is a disorder, deIined by Hare's Psychopathy Checklist #evised (PCL# and characterised in part by a diminished capacity Ior remorse and poor behavioural controls. A striking Ieature oI much oI the antisocial behaviour shown by individuals with psychopathy is that it is mostly instrumental in nature.
Psychopathy is a disorder, deIined by Hare's Psychopathy Checklist #evised (PCL# and characterised in part by a diminished capacity Ior remorse and poor behavioural controls. A striking Ieature oI much oI the antisocial behaviour shown by individuals with psychopathy is that it is mostly instrumental in nature.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOCX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Psychopathy is a disorder, deIined by Hare's Psychopathy Checklist #evised (PCL# and characterised in part by a diminished capacity Ior remorse and poor behavioural controls. A striking Ieature oI much oI the antisocial behaviour shown by individuals with psychopathy is that it is mostly instrumental in nature.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOCX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Author AIIiliations 1. Unit on Affective Cognitive Neuroscience, Mood and Anxiety Program, National Institute of Mental Health, 15K North Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Next Section To understand a psychiatric disorder we need to know why the pathology causes the behavioural disturbance, the neural structures implicated in the pathology and the cause oI the dysIunction in the neural structures. With regard to psychopathy, we have clear indications regarding why the pathology gives rise to the emotional and behavioural disturbance and important insights into the neural systems implicated in this pathology. What remains unclear is why these neural systems are dysIunctional. Previous SectionNext Section WHAT IS PSYCHOPATHY? Psychopathy is a disorder, deIined by Hare's Psychopathy Checklist #evised (PCL# and characterised in part by a diminished capacity Ior remorse and poor behavioural controls ( Hare, 1991. ClassiIications oI psychopathy are not synonymous with diagnoses oI conduct disorder or antisocial personality disorder ( American Psychiatric Association, 1994 but represent an extension. These psychiatric diagnoses are poorly speciIied and concentrate on the antisocial behaviour. Because oI this imprecision, the diagnostic rate oI conduct disorder is 16 oI boys in mainstream education ( American Psychiatric Association, 1994 and over 80 Ior antisocial personality disorder in adult Iorensic institutions ( Hart & Hare, 1996. In contrast, psychopathy is deIined not only by antisocial behaviour but also by emotional impairment such as the lack oI guilt. Only onethird oI those who are diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder meet criteria Ior psychopathy ( Hart & Hare, 1996. Moreover, a diagnosis oI psychopathy, unlike antisocial personality disorder, is inIormative regarding a patient's Iuture risk ( Hare, 1991. A striking Ieature oI much oI the antisocial behaviour shown by individuals with psychopathy is that it is mostly instrumental in nature, i.e. goal-directed towards achieving money, sexual opportunities or increased status ( Cornell et al, 1996. This suggests that the pathology associated with psychopathy interIeres with socialisation. It is well known that empathy- inducing, positive parenting practices give rise to less antisocial behaviour than punishment- based, negative parenting practices. This relationship is shown in healthy developing children as well as in children with conduct disorder who do not present with the emotional dysIunction oI psychopathy. However, Ior children with conduct disorder who do present with emotional dysIunction, there is no relationship between parenting behaviours and level oI antisocial behaviour ( Wootton et al, 1997. In other words, the emotional impairment Iound in individuals with psychopathy interIeres with socialisation such that the individual does not learn to avoid antisocial behaviour. Socialisation involves aversive conditioning and instrumental learning. In order to learn that hitting another is bad, this thought must be associated with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (e.g. the distress oI the victim. Similarly, learning to avoid committing moral transgressions involves committing a moral transgression and then being punished` by the aversive response oI the victim's distress ( Blair, 1995. Individuals with psychopathy present with severe diIIiculties in both aversive conditioning and instrumental learning ( Patrick, 1994; Blair, 2001. Moreover, they have particular diIIiculties processing the IearIulness and sadness oI others ( Blair, 2001. Previous SectionNext Section THE NEURAL BASIS OF PSYCHOPATHY The amygdala is involved in aversive conditioning and instrumental learning ( LeDoux, 1998. It is also involved in the response to IearIul and sad Iacial expressions ( Blair et al, 1999. The amygdala is thus involved in all the processes that, when impaired, give rise to the Iunctional impairments shown by individuals with psychopathy. It is thereIore suggested that amygdala dysIunction is one oI the core neural systems implicated in the pathology oI psychopathy ( Patrick, 1994; Blair et al, 1999. Interestingly, two recent neuroimaging studies have conIirmed that amygdala dysIunction is associated with psychopathy ( Tiihonen et al, 2000; Kiehl et al, 2001. Thus, Tiihonen et al ( 2000 used volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (M#I to explore the relationship between amygdaloid volume and degree oI psychopathy in violent oIIenders as measured by the PCL-#. They Iound that high levels oI psychopathy were associated with reduced amygdaloid volume. Kiehl et al ( 2001 used Iunctional M#I to examine neural responses in individuals with high (~28/40 and low (23/40 scores on the PCL-# during an emotional memory task where the participant processed words oI neutral and negative valence. Kiehl et al Iound a reduced amygdala response in the high-scoring group, relative to the low-scoring group, during the processing oI words oI negative valence. There have been suggestions that other neural systems are dysIunctional in individuals with psychopathy. Thus, on the basis oI neuropsychological and neuroimaging Iindings Ior violent oIIenders, it has been argued that the Irontal cortex could be dysIunctional ( Morgan & LilienIield, 2000; Soderstrom et al, 2000. However, all oI these studies, with the exception oI one by ( #aine et al, 2000, have been with violent oIIenders rather than individuals with psychopathy. This is noteworthy as there are crucial diIIerences between the general population oI violent oIIenders and these individuals. Indeed, neuropsychological work with individuals with psychopathy, unlike work with individuals who are violent, has repeatedly Iound Irontal Iunctioning to be intact ( Kandel & Freed, 1989. The volumetric M#I study conducted by #aine et al ( 2000 did assess individuals scoring highly on the PCL-#. This study reported reduced preIrontal grey, but not white, matter volume in these individuals. However, #aine et al were unable to diIIerentiate between grey matter Irom diIIerent regions oI the Irontal cortex. This is unIortunate, as although it appears clear that there is no generalised Irontal cortical dysIunction in individuals with psychopathy there is one region oI the Irontal cortex that could be impaired, i.e. the orbitoIrontal cortex (OFC. The OFC, especially the medial OFC, receives extensive projections Irom, and sends extensive projections to, the amygdala. Moreover, the medial OFC is involved in instrumental learning and response reversal both oI which Iunctions are impaired in individuals with psychopathy ( LaPierre et al, 1995. In addition, there have been attempts to link the disorder oI psychopathy with the neurological condition oI acquired sociopathy` Iollowing lesions oI the OFC ( Anderson et al, 1999. Patients with acquired sociopathy` can present with socially inappropriate behaviour and aggression Iollowing their lesion. However, iI aggression is seen it is almost exclusively reactive (i.e. Irustration/threat-induced in nature and not the instrumental goal-directed aggression shown by individuals with psychopathy. Indeed, it has been argued that the extensive damage seen in those patients with acquired sociopathy` who present with reactive aggression includes regions oI the lateral OFC that are implicated in modulating basic brain-stem mechanisms that mediate the Iight-Ilight response to threat ( Blair, 2001. This modulatory Iunction, and by implication this region, oI the OFC is not thought to be dysIunctional in individuals with psychopathy. Thus, it is suggested that the neural structures implicated in psychopathic pathology include the amygdala and OFC. The basic causes oI the pathology remain unclear; however, there are interesting possibilities. One is that pathology in the noradrenergic system can lead to the observed amygdala dysIunction. Certainly, administration oI the -adrenergic blocker propranolol, as well as amygdala damage, blocks the improvement in episodic memory Ior emotionally arousing events, as well as disrupting the processing oI sad Iacial expressions ( Harmer et al, 2001. A second possibility concerns the potential value oI genetic inIormation and mouse models. Many mouse models oI aggression concentrate on a heightened reactively aggressive response to an intruder. However, a recent mouse model has been developed without a Iunctional tailless` protein. The gene tailless is a member oI the super-Iamily oI genes that encode transcription Iactors oI the ligand-activated nuclear receptor type, and is expressed in the invertebrate and vertebrate brain. Interestingly, mice lacking a Iunctional tailless protein show reduced amygdaloid volume. Moreover, they show heightened aggression even to litter-mates and the Iemales lack normal maternal instincts ( Monaghan et al, 1997. Although it is diIIicult currently to extrapolate Irom these data to an understanding oI psychopathy, the study oI such animals should allow a molecular approach to understanding the genetic architecture oI the Iorebrain. These data will undoubtedly be invaluable in Iurthering our understanding oI psychopathy. It is important to make one Iinal point. The liIestyle oI the individual with psychopathy may exacerbate any neurobiological impairments. One Ieature associated with psychopathy is substance misuse. This could be contributing to apparent impairments. For example chronic amphetamine misuse has been shown to lead to disturbance in Iunctions mediated by the OFC ( #ogers et al, 1999. In this context, it is interesting to note that although perIormance on measures thought to require amygdala involvement is impaired substantially in both adults with psychopathy and children with psychopathic tendencies, perIormance on measures thought to require the OFC is impaired substantially only in the adults ( Blair et al, 2001. This, oI course, could reIlect the developmental course oI the disorder. However, alternatively, it could reIlect the liIestyle oI the individual with psychopathy where substance misuse has interacted with the Iundamental pathology to produce additional OFC pathology. Previous SectionNext Section CONCLUSIONS The suggestion is that the pathology oI individuals with psychopathy detrimentally aIIects two processes that are required Ior socialisation, i.e. aversive conditioning and instrumental learning. This is thought to result Irom amygdala dysIunction potentially compounded by OFC dysIunction. However, the reasons Ior this dysIunction remain unknown. The noradrenergic system could be implicated but why this system should be dysIunctional is, again, unknown. An answer is likely to Iollow an understanding oI the genetic architecture and morphogenesis oI the Iorebrain. O 4mericon Psychiotric 4ssociotion {1994)uloqoostlc ooJ 5totlstlcol Mooool of Meotol ulsotJets (4tb eJo) (u5Mlv) wosbloqtoo uc AlA O 9 4nderson 5 w 8echoro 4 uomosio n et o/ {1999) lmpoltmeot of soclol ooJ motol bebovloot teloteJ to eotly Jomoqe lo bomoo pteftootol cottex Notote Neotoscleoce 2 10J2 10J7 Cross8efMedllne O 9 8/oir k l k {1995) A coqoltlve Jevelopmeotol opptoocb to mottollty lovestlqotloq tbe psycbopotby coqoltloo 57 1 29 Cross8efMedllne O 9 8/oir k l k {2001) Neotocoqoltlve moJels of oqqtessloo tbe Aotlsoclol letsooollty ulsotJets ooJ lsycbopotby Iootool of Neotoloqy Neotosotqety ooJ lsycblotty 71 727 7J1 AbsLracL/l8LL lull 1exL O 9 8/oir k l k Morris l 5 lrith c u et o/ {1999) ulssocloble oeotol tespooses to foclol exptessloos of soJoess ooJ ooqet 8tolo 122 88J 89J AbsLracL/l8LL lull 1exL O 9 8/oir k l k co//edqe Mitche// u {2001) 5omotlc motkets ooJ tespoose tevetsol ls tbete otbltoftootol cottex Jysfooctloo lo boys wltb psycbopotblc teoJeocles? Iootool of Abootmol cbllJ lsycboloqy 29 499 511 Cross8efMedllne O 9 corne// u 6 worren l nowk 6 et o/ {1996) lsycbopotby lo losttomeotol ooJ teoctlve vloleot offeoJets Iootool of coosoltloq ooJ cllolcol lsycboloqy 64 78J 790 Cross8efMedllne O 9 nore k u {1991)1be note lsycbopotby cbeckllst kevlseJ 1otooto Oototlo Moltlneoltb 5ystems O 9 normer c l Perrett u l cowen P l et o/ {2001) AJmlolsttotloo of tbe betooJteooceptot blocket ptoptooolol lmpolts tbe ptocessloq of foclol exptessloos of soJoess lsycbopbotmocoloqy (8etllo) 154 J8J J89 Cross8efMedllne O 9 nort 5 u nore k u {1996) lsycbopotby ooJ ootlsoclol petsooollty JlsotJet cotteot Oploloo lo lsycblotty 9 129 1J2 Cross8ef O 9 onde/ lreed u {1989) ltootol lobe Jysfooctloo ooJ ootlsoclol bebovlot o tevlew Iootool of cllolcol lsycboloqy 45 404 41J Medllne O 9 ieh/ 4 5mith 4 M nore k u et o/ {2001) llmblc obootmolltles lo offectlve ptocessloq by ctlmlool psycbopotbs os teveoleJ by fooctloool moqoetlc tesooooce lmoqloq 8loloqlcol lsycblotty 50 677 684 Cross8efMedllne O 9 oPierre u 8roun c M l nodqins 5 {1995) veottol ftootol Jeflclts lo psycbopotby Neotopsycboloqlcol test floJloqs Neotopsycboloqlo JJ 1J9 151 Cross8efMedllne O 9 euoux l {1998)1be motloool 8tolo New otk welJeofelJ Nlcolsoo O 9 Monoqhon 4 P 8ock u 6oss P et o/ {1997) uefectlve llmblc system lo mlce lockloq tbe tollless qeoe Notote J90 515 517 Cross8efMedllne O 9 Morqon 4 8 i/ienfie/d 5 O {2000) A metoooolytlc tevlew of tbe telotloo betweeo ootlsoclol bebovlot ooJ oeotopsycboloqlcol meosotes of execotlve fooctloo cllolcol lsycboloqy kevlew 20 11J 1J6 Cross8efMedllne O 9 Potrick c l {1994) motloo ooJ psycbopotby stottlloq oew loslqbts lsycbopbysloloqy J1 J19 JJ0 Medllne O 9 koine 4 enct 1 8ihr/e 5 et o/ {2000) keJoceJ pteftootol qtoy mottet volome ooJ teJoceJ ootooomlc octlvlty lo ootlsoclol petsooollty JlsotJet Atcblves of Ceoetol lsycblotty 57 119 127 AbsLracL/l8LL lull 1exL O 9 koqers k u veritt 8 l 8o/docchino 4 et o/ {1999) ulssocloble Jeflclts lo tbe Jeclsloomokloq coqoltloo of cbtoolc ompbetomloe obosets oplote obosets potleots wltb focol Jomoqe to pteftootol cottex ooJ ttyptopbooJepleteJ ootmol volooteets evlJeoce fot moooomloetqlc mecboolsms Neotopsycbopbotmocoloqy 20 J22 JJ9 Cross8efMedllne O 9 5oderstrom n 1u//berq M wikke/so c et o/ {2000) keJoceJ teqloool cetebtol blooJ flow lo ooo psycbotlc vloleot offeoJets lsycblotty keseotcb 98 2941 Medllne O 9 1iihonen l nodqins 5 vourio O et o/ {2000) AmyqJololJ volome loss lo psycbopotby 5oclety fot Neotoscleoce Absttocts 2017 O 9 wootton l M lrick P l 5he/ton et o/ {1997) loeffectlve poteotloq ooJ cbllJbooJ cooJoct ptoblems tbe moJetotloq tole of colloosooemotloool ttolts Iootool of coosoltloq ooJ cllolcol lsycboloqy 65 292 J00 Cross8efMedllne
Trull, T. J., & Widiger, T. A. (2013) - Dimensional Models of Personality The Five-Factor Model and The DSM-5. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15 (2), 135-146