Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
3. internal links; a. tech, key to heg b. space weapons key to tactic and dip high ground= heg 4. hard power
5. heg key to global stability 6. even if heg decline is inevitable, plan key 4 smooth transition 7. intervensionism inev. Plan prevents backlash PLAN: USFG increase deployment LEO space weapons SOLVENCY- 1. space dominance possible 2. space weapons tech viable 3. US LEO dominance key
countries wouldn't want us to weaponize nuke war, 2. US because leadership countries key 2 prvnt will want to china war weaponize no 3. countries garauntee want other alliances 1. countries'll with heg heg=tension be cool with USA , not coop it we don't need space 4. ASATS weapons for not in space heg 5. comp everything glitches, under missiles comp human could be glitches not control HACKED big enough very propable that militar. impact OW, 6. computer Taken wrong nuke war, glitches non way, nuke we gonna unique war die
OFF CASE DA #1 1. EX intervensioni 1. impacts sm inev inev. China card. If already we're heg, pushing for no one will space attack 1. obama pushing space policy 2. EX us signaled we wanted to 2. non militize, unique, US someone already would have declared no threat of attacked already 2. weaponization =destroy perception of new obama weap. space china war s.p 3. we must react to impact= china 3. space wpzt=attacks on US, global war, china global weapons 4 threatened heg 3. fiat solves conflict 1. china 4. impacts could attack will occur US, as well unless US as other gets heg w/ asians plan 5. heg= no china coop 5. DEFENSIVE, not offensive TOPICALITY 1. counter interp, develop=mo ving tech from proto to working system counter interp Developing, not exploring, good enough
OFF CASE
we have not militarized, no weapons EX #2 for in space last neg China doesn't war if not threatened
SPACE DOMINANCE
not all heg will be lost will escalate to nuke war, extinction