Sei sulla pagina 1di 50

GEOL 755, Spring 2011

Sequence Stratigraphy 1
A genetic approach to largescale stratigraphic problems

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

1
1

Resources at the DeLamare Library:

Van Wagoner, et al, 1990, Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well Logs, Cores, and Outcrops, AAPG Methods in Exploration Series No. 7. Chapter 1 in Loucks and Sarg, 1992, Carbonate Sequence Stratigraphy, AAPG Memoir #57

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

2
2

resources on line:

two university sites seem to be the best and include tutorials


Univ. of South Carolinas site at: http://
strata.geol.sc.edu/index.html University of Georgias site at: http:// www.uga.edu/~strata/sequence/ seqStrat.html

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

3
3

the depositional sequence

term has a long history of use,


e.g. Larry Sloss landmark North American sequence scheme

redened as a seismic stratigraphic unit by Exxon Production Research (now ExxonMobil) in 1970s
4th order scale (~500,000 yr) Sloss sequences promoted to supersequences

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

4
4

the Sloss supersequences (2nd order)

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

5
5

sequence presently dened:

a conformable succession of genetically related strata, bounded at base and top by unconformities or their correlative conformable surfaces
Van Wagoner et. al., 1990

note* this supersedes and preempts all other uses

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

6
6

precedent: allostratigraphy

North American Stratigraphic Code (1983): An allostratigraphic unit is a mappable stratiform body of sedimentary rock that is dened and identied on the basis of its bounding disconformities
laterally and vertically variable a geomorphic surface can be a boundary

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

7
7

implicit in the denition (1)

deposition of a sequence occurs during a time of


generation of accommodation space
keep up vs. catch up?

delivery of sediment into a depositional system


to be known as a systems tract

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

8
8

implicit in the denition (2)

sequence deposition ends...


when sediment delivery stops, because ... accommodation space moves elsewhere

area is then in hiatus until things change again creates a boundary unconformity/ disconformity that is an isochron

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

9
9

the link to chronostratigraphy

a) seismic section,

x = distance (all) y = depth


b) chronostrat. correlation,

Wheeler diagram

y = linear time
c) sea-level driver,

y = linear time
10
10

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Wheeler diagram exercise

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

11
11

The process: sea level change drives accommodation space

s.l. rise and s.l. fall - control of sedimentation


where how much

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

12
12

when introduced, this was controversial! why? 1. originally based on seismic sections depositional systems tracts were not documented with rocks geophysicists were trying to do sedimentology? (how dare they!) 2. authors tried to make the case that they could use the technique to develop a global sea-level curve.

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

13
13

Why did the scheme come from seismic stratigraphy?

its a matter of scale! seismic sections are thick seismic sections are long You can see big relationships

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

depth

distance

14
14

What are we looking at?


raw data 2-way time Variable area plot

distance
(difficult to see acoustic events)
- fill in half the wave forms to show acoustic events more clearly
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

15
15

visualizing scale (Miall, 1984)

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

16
16

consensus now?

1. The genetic concept is valid, and eld work has shown it works based on outcrop data. 2. The global sea-level curve is still controversial, but most of us think that the fundamental idea of sequence stratigraphy is sound without global correlation aspect.

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

17
17

Cycles and sequences

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

18
18

notice ordering inconsistencies

Boggs textbook

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

19
19

Where do sequences t? parasequences?

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

20
20

Compare scales

Boggs, from Einsele et al.

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

21
21

sequence dened again:

a conformable succession of genetically related strata, bounded at base and top by unconformities or their correlative conformable surfaces Why do sequences form?

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

22
22

Why do sequences form?

In response to processes that make accommodation space


sea-level rise (relative or eustatic) subsidence

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

23
23

facies shift with sea-level (review)

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Chris Kendall

24
24

sedimentary record of sea-level is complex, even when the signal is simple

where is the strand line?


sed. supply real s.l. change

Sea level

progradation
= shallowing up = s.l. fall

deposition
Sea level

retrogradation
= deepening up
deposition
25
25

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

normal regression

prograding facies as sea level rises

After Catuneanu, 2002


JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

26
26

forced regression

erosion and reworking as sea-level falls

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

27
27

transgression

ooding and reworking, facies shift landward

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

After Catuneanu, 2002

28
28

some terminology

how/where do sequence boundaries end?

After Catuneanu, 2002


JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

29
29

when does deposition occur?


subsidence

(subsidence always down, s.l. up and down)

relative s.l.

time
time when accommodation space is being generated
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

30
30

more possibilities: (subsidence always


down, s.l. up and down)
subsidence

relative s.l.

time
time when accommodation space is being generated
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

31
31

more possibilities: (subsidence always


down, s.l. up or down)
subsidence

relative s.l.

time
time when accommodation space is being provided
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

32
32

compare tectonic subsidence and orbitally forced s.l. rise rates


passive margin (thermal) subsidence ~ 2mm/100yrs cont. interior basins ~ 1mm/100yrs foreland basins - 1mm/70yrs strike-slip basins ~ 3mm/10yrs orbitally forced s.l. rise ~ 2mm/5yrs

*1) note that orbital forcing assumes signicant ice formation to control ocean volume. 2) the range of orbitally forced s.l. change is 10s of meters, while tectonic range may be kilometers.
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

33
33

building the sequence: thesystems tract concept

sediments deposited as a depositional system in response to a sea level position


low stand systems tract (LST) transgressive systems tract (TST) high stand systems tract (HST)
*note that little or no deposition is expected during sea-level fall in this scheme.

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

34
34

sequences are built from systems tracts


lowstand systems tract (LST) lies on basal boundary, mainly in distal areas during proximal erosion transgressive systems tract (TST) forms during s.l. rise, shifts progressively inland highstand systems tract (HST) completes sequence, lls in proximal areas to sea level, beach moves seaward

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

35
35

relating the sedimentation to sea-level


resume

review
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

36
36

two, stacked sequences


HST TST LST
incised valley fill

older HST

Van Wagoner et al, 1990


JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

37
37

two kinds of sequences:


Type 1 - subsidence less than s.l. drop rates


boundaries are erosional unconformities

Type 2 - subsidence exceeds s.l. drop rates


boundaries are not erosional, deposition continues even during s.l. drop

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

38
38

two type 1 sequences (again)


HST TST LST

older HST

Van Wagoner et al, 1990


JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

39
39

Sequence boundary denitions

Type 1 boundary - unconformity with


erosion associated with rejuvenation of streams, incising older sediments basinward shift in facies (deeper) related to base-level shift downward/outward shift in coastal onlap

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

40
40

two, type 2 sequences- what are the differences?


HST TST SMST*

older HST

*SMST - shelf margin systems tract (no LST for type 2 systems) Van Wagoner et al, 1990
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

41
41

Sequence boundary denitions

Type 2 boundary - like #1 except


lacks signicant erosion lacks lowstand reworking

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

42
42

what are the lighting bolts? parasequences

the higher-order responses to base-level changes


sequence boundary parasequence boundary

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

43
43

parasequence dened
a relatively conformable succession of genetically related beds, bounded by a marine ooding surface or a correlative surface an outcrop-scale concept! landward shift in facies

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

44
44

examples of parasequence cycles


onshore ooding surface

ooding surface
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

offshore
45
45

Steven Holland

parasequence key ideas:


a single cycle of response to creation of accommodation space (4th or 5th order) usually (but not necessarily) ~1-20 meters thick shallowing-up character Van Wagoner predictable vertical facies associations et al, 1990

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

46
46

what about sediment delivery rate?


D = delivery rate A = accommodation rate

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

D/A > 1

D/A < 1

D/A = 1
JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

47
47

applications of sequence stratigraphy


local/regional chrono-correlation based on depositional facies world-wide correlation based on global eustasy?

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

48
48

getting to more realistic correlation:


Datum = wellhead elevation
Van Wagoner et al, 1990

Datum = top of sandstone

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

49
49

chronocorrelation shows true lateral relationships


Datum = time

Datum = top of sandstone

JT, '11
Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Van Wagoner et al, 1990

50
50

Potrebbero piacerti anche