1..

1'31-HR I

COMMUNICATION

FA' ; NO. :@761+4O7679

Nov. 24 2011 06:41PM P1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ,

NICIPAL _______ SEAT AT MADHYA PRADESI / JABALPUR,

I

1 6 /2011

r),
slAstet'l
4dIet ; cs

W P. No.

pira; itEILIJ9NER
Oft7,,i

1.

Sanjay Pachak S/o Shri S.R. Pathalc,

Age- 35 years, Occ-u. - Service, House No. 4, Shravan Estate, __ Durgesh Vihar, Bhopal-462041 (1V1Pr-

S,C

Versus

RESPONDENTS

I.

Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise 86 Customs, New Delhi-110001 Chief Comri-rissioner, (Nagpur Zone) Customs- and Central xcise, P.O. Box No. 81 Telang Khedi Road, civil "Ahem nagpur - 440001 Chief Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise C.G. State,) (M.P. 48, Administrati v e Area, Arera Hills, Bhopal-462001 (M.P.)

=.,

i< ,

., ,
1

.n."), ,- ...

.. 10 ...' ../

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION RizPETITION UNDER ARTICLE TE_

1.

PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE:

(2)

, - 1Date of order PasSed-

15.11.2011 OA No.960/2011 '


;i;Vel COMMUNICATION
**.

ofpl.
-

FA: tf.3. : 0761+40 76079 . , CASE No. 201

Nov. 24 2011 06:43PM

G011911111MIDRMS'.06

17.

...... n #96, .. .. ..... "VW,. ......

Vs.

DATE OF THE ORDER

ORDER

Writ .eetitior.kg,19S4fi/2 .,..0,11,_

Shri Akash Choudhury, for the petitioner. r ,''. None for the res pondents, despite service of advaric.e cblay. ....:. Shri Manoj Sharma, For the Caveatcrs. Heard on admission.,, I.70uo notict to ;IQ. rOlilnrIMPnri on . oav oavment of process fee , withiri a week both by registered as well as:ordinary posts. The nocc.ces shall be made returnable within six weeks.
Also heard on interim relief. / ., te.;kc. It is argued on behalf of the per that

- .r-?,. .i hOlding re.view DPC on the basis r:f office mernofanclurA l ated"' , ,.. . 10.8,2011, Annexure P3, which has already been quasii6d by- tii HigiV..
Court of Punjab & Haryana vide judgment dated 15.7..1011i 4.'

rmOdri

art !

, f.4 m P4, n DV No.13218/2009 (O&M) and an offlte meoraA

,.

exure' datect.' ' ,.;

10.8.2011 which has been quasheci, cannot be the batTS-for.,hoiding...a.`.-. _..._ ... review DPC. It has else been argued that the- Tribunal did not consider

tnis aspect of the matter in proper perspective. other. hand, has argued that the 'respondents are holding the

1,. ..1
review

Shri Manoj Shqma; learned J.,1;r!se f for the Caveators, on they

DPC pursuant to the ord er passed:1)y the Central Administg4

, .. . Tribunal, Mumbai, which has been tiph.ld by the Bombay. High,Court . , the judgment of the High , Court Ofvide order dated 8.11.2011 and

. Punjab & Haryana is under 1 challenge before the SupreMe CoUrt . ' ' As or. toda y , office memorandum dated 10.8.2011__sOnds quashed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana and there is no stay
order of the Supreme Court against thc judgment of the

High Court of

Punjab Q. Haryana. We also find teat although the judgment of the High BombayCourt of Punjab & Haryana was brought to the notice of the Hign Cour; hi. no reason whatsoever nas beel assigned IN thP__ ;5
:' .

,-. , . ,

=-,
tailLid...IME-7-1111111111111111 '

; HFil,13HP I COMPIL I CATION

FH' NJ. :0761+4076075

Nov. 24 2011 0E: 44PM

P6

;GH COUR OriViADHYA PRADESH ,

. T

ORDER SHEET

Vs.

DATE OF THE ORDER,

/nnIllINn

ORDER
.1 10...11nn

nnn

Bombay sigh Court for disagraeing with

We, therefore, deem it

proper to grant interim reef to ta ydur the petitioaer. We accordingly direct that respondents shall not hold the review
DPC.ori the basis cf rh:rnoi'anclurn dated 10.8.2011 and if the same has

, already been held, its recommendation shall 'not be 9iven efftct to till
:tfie next date. of hearing, We also, make it dear. that the, Central

AtirrrinhArdev-e Jdinilpur, Jabalpur, will rake every endeavour to decide the O.A. No.960/201:
oil rtie -iLi Fi s expeditiously as

possible.

Certified copy as per rules.

( (AIIT sfftIGH )J JUDGE

(ALOK ARA )1-rg. JUDGE

c./C

Hod Vii} ,
Mitt Ciourtat 3/4131011%
Ird

ant it !MINI

1:111 :IjaLrar..