Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
o
v | | v
u B
K
u
C C g T T g
y
u
x
p
y
u
v
t
u '
'
'
' ' + ' ' +
' c
' c
+
' c
' c
=
' c
' c
' +
' c
' c
2
0 *
2
2
) ( ) (
1
(2)
2
2
2
1
|
|
.
|
\
|
' c
' c
+
(
' c
' c
' c
' c
=
' c
' c
' +
' c
' c
y
u
c y
q
k y
T
y
T
v
t
T
p
v
o (3)
0 16 3
3
1
* 2
1
2
2
=
' c
' c
' '
' c
' c
y
T
T q
y
q
o o o (4)
( )
' '
'
=
'
=
'
=
'
= , , ,
2
0
0
v
V t
t
U
u
U
p
p
'
=
'
=
' '
' '
=
T T
T T
w
u ,
2
2
0
2
0
, ,
v
V K
K
V
v n
n
C C
C C
C
w
'
=
'
=
' '
' '
=
,
, Pr
o
v
v
= =
k
C
p
(8)
,
D
Sc
v
=
2
0
2
0
V
B
M
v o
=
2
0 0
*
2
0 0
) (
,
) (
V U
C C g
Gm
V U
T T g
Gr
w w
' '
=
' '
=
v| | v
,
) (
2
0
' '
=
T T c
U
Ec
w p
,
2
0
2
1 2
) (
kU c
T T
R
p
w
o
' '
= ,
2
0
V
K
K
r
r
v '
=
The governing equations (2) to (5) can be rewritten in the non-dimensional form as follows
) ( ) 1 (
2
2
u U N C Gm Gr
y
u
t d
U d
y
u
e A
t
u
nt
+ + +
c
c
+ =
c
c
+
c
c
u c (9)
y
e A
t
nt
c
c
+
c
c u
c
u
) 1 ( =
2
2
2
2
Pr
1
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
(
c
c
y
u
Ec R
y
u
(10)
C K
y
C
Sc y
C
e A
t
C
r
nt
c
c
=
c
c
+
c
c
2
2
1
) 1 ( c (11)
where ) / 1 ( K M N + = and Gr, Gm, Pr, R, Ec
,
Sc and
r
K are the thermal Grashof number, solutal Grashof
Number, Prandtl Number, radiation parameter, Eckert number, Schmidt number and chemical reaction parameter
respectively.
The corresponding dimensionless boundary conditions are
0 1 , 1 , = + = + = = y at e C e U u
nt nt
p
c c u
+ =
y as C e U U
nt
0 , 0 , 1 u c (12)
3. Solution Methodology
When the amplitude of oscillations (<<1) is very small. We can assume the solutions of flow velocity u,
temperature and concentration C in the neighbourhood of the plate is:
... ) ( ) ( ) ( ) , (
2
1 0
+ + + = c c o y u e y u t y u
nt
... ) ( ) ( ) ( ) , (
2
1 0
+ + + = c u c u u o y e y t y
nt
(13)
... ) ( ) ( ) ( ) , (
2
1 0
+ + + = c c o y C e y C t y C
nt
Substituting (13) in Equations (9) - (11) and equating the harmonic and non- harmonic terms, and neglecting the
higher-order terms of o(c
2
), we obtain
0 0 0 0 0
C Gm Gr N Nu u u = ' + ' ' u (14)
1 1 0 1 1 1
) ( ) ( C Gm Gr u A n N u n N u u ' + = + ' + ' ' u (15)
October Issue Page 89 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
( )
2
0 0 0 0
Pr Pr u Ec R ' = ' + ' ' u u u (16)
1 0 0 1 1 1
Pr 2 Pr Pr) ( Pr u u Ec A n R ' ' ' = + ' + ' ' u u u u (17)
0
0 0 0
= ' + ' ' C Sc K C Sc C
r
(18)
( )
0 1 1 1
C Sc A C Sc n K C Sc C
r
' = + ' + ' ' (19)
Where prime denotes ordinary differentiation with respect to y
The corresponding boundary conditions can be written as
0 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 0 ,
1 0 1 0 1 0
= = = = = = = y at C C u U u
p
u u (20)
= = y as C C u u 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 1
1 0 1 0 1 0
u u
The Equations (14) - (19) are still coupled and non-linear, whose exact solutions are not possible. So we expand
1 0 1 0 1 0
, , , , , C C u u u u
in terms of Ec in the following form, as the Eckert number is very small for incompressible
flows.
) ( ) ( ) (
02 01 0
y Ecu y u y u + =
) ( ) ( ) (
12 11 1
y u Ec y u y u + =
) ( ) ( ) (
02 01 0
y Ec y y u u u + = (21)
) ( ) ( ) (
12 11 1
y Ec y y u u u + =
) ( ) ( ) (
02 01 0
y C Ec y C y C + =
) ( ) ( ) (
12 11 1
y C Ec y C y C + =
Substituting (21) in Equations (14) - (19), equating the coefficients of Ec to zero and neglecting the terms in Ec
2
and higher order, we get the following equations.
The zeroth order equations are
01 01 01 01 01
C Gm Gr N Nu u u = ' + ' ' u (22)
02 02 02 02 02
C Gm Gr u N u u = ' + ' ' u (23)
0 Pr
01
2
01 01
= ' + ' ' u u u R (24)
Pr Pr
02
2
02 02
= ' + ' ' u u u R
2
01
u' (25)
0
01 01 01
= ' + ' ' C K C Sc C
r
(26)
0
02 02 02
= ' + ' ' C K C Sc C
r
(27)
and the respective boundary conditions are
0 , 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 ,
02 01 02 01 02 01
= = = = = = C C u U u
p
u u at 0 = y
(28)
0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1
02 01 02 01 02 01
C C u u u u as y
The first order equations are
01 11 11 11 11 1
) ( ) ( u A C Gm Gr n N u n N u u ' + = + ' + ' ' u (29)
02 12 12 12 12 12
) ( u A C Gm Gr u n N u u ' = + ' + ' ' u (30)
01 11 11 11
Pr Pr u u u u ' = ' + ' ' A pr n (31)
11 01 02 12 1 12 12
Pr 2 Pr Pr u u A N ' ' ' = ' + ' ' u u u u (32)
( )
01 11 11 11
C ASc C Sc n K C Sc C
r
' = + ' + ' ' (33)
( )
02 12 12 12
C ASc C Sc n K C Sc C
r
' = + ' + ' ' (34)
Where N1
= R
2
+ nPr
October Issue Page 90 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
and the respective boundary conditions are
0 , 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0
12 11 12 11 12 11
= = = = = = C C u u u u at 0 = y
(35)
0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1
12 11 12 11 12 11
C C u u u u as y
Solving Equations (22) - (27) under the boundary conditions (28), and Equations (29)-(34) under the boundary
conditions (35), and using Equations (13) and (21), we obtain the velocity, temperature and concentration
distributions in the boundary layer as
) , ( t y u =
3
B
y m
e
4
+
1
B
y m
e
3
+
2
B
y m
e
1
+1+ Ec {
10
J
y m
e
4
+
1
J
y m
e
3
+
2
J
y m
e
4
2
+J
3
y m
e
3
2
+
4
J
y m
e
1
2
+
5
J +
6
J
( )y m m
e
1 3
+
+
7
J
( )y m m
e
1 4
+
}
+
nt
e c [{
10
G
( ) y m
e
6
+
1
G
y m
e
4
+
2
G
y m
e
3
+ G
3
y m
e
1
+
4
G
y m
e
1
+
5
G
y m
e
4
+1}
+ Ec {
20
Z
y m
e
6
+Z
1
y m
e
4
+
2
Z
y m
e
4
2
+
3
Z
y m
e
3
2
+ Z
4
y m
e
2
2
+
5
Z
y m
e
1
2
+
6
Z
( )y m m
e
4 3
+
+Z
7
( )y m m
e
1 3
+
+
8
Z
( )y m m
e
1 6
+
+
9
Z
( )y m m
e
3 5
+
+
10
Z
( )y m m
e
4 3
+
+
11
Z
( )y m m
e
1 5
+
+
12
Z
( )y m m
e
1 3
+
+ Z
13
( )y m m
e
1 6
+
+ Z
14
( )y m m
e
)
4 5
+
+
15
Z
( )y m m
e
2 4
+
+
16
Z
( )y m m
e
3 4
+
+
17
Z
y m
e
4
}] (36)
) , ( t y u =
y m
e
2
+ Ec {
10
S
y m
e
3
+
1
S
y m
e
4
2
+S
2
y m
e
3
2
+S
3
y m
e
1
2
+ S
4
( )y m m
e
3 4
+
+S
5
( )y m m
e
1 3
+
+
6
S
( )y m m
e
1 4
+
} +
nt
e c [{
2
D
y m
e
5
+
1
D
y m
e
3
} + Ec {R
1
y m
e
3
+R
2
y m
e
4
2
+R
3
y m
e
1
2
+
4
R
( )y m m
e
3 4
+
+
5
R
( )y m m
e
1 3
+
+R
6
( )y m m
e
1 4
+
+R
7
y m
e
3
2
+R
8
( )y m m
e
5 3
+
+
9
R
( )y m m
e
1 2
+
+
10
R
( )y m m
e
3 6
+
+
11
R
( )y m m
e
1 5
+
+
12
R
( )y m m
e
1 12
+
+
13
R
( )y m m
e
1 6
+
+
14
R
( )y m m
e
2 4
+
+
15
R
( )y m m
e
2 4
+
+
16
R
( )y m m
e
6 4
+
+
20
R
y m
e
4
}] (37)
) , ( t y C =
y m
e
1
+
nt
e c [(1+
n
Am
1
)
y m
e
2
y m
e
n
Am
1
1
] (38)
4. Skin Friction And Heat And Mass Flux
The skin-friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood number are important physical parameters for this type of
boundary layer flow. Knowing the velocity field, the skin-friction at the plate can be obtained, which in non-
dimensional form is given by
f
C
=
0 0
V U
w
t '
=
0 =
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
y
y
u
=
0
1 0
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
c
c
y
nt
y
u
e
y
u
c
=
1 4 3 3 4 2 3 1 4 10 1 2 3 1 4 3
2 2 2 { m J m J m J m J m J Ec m B m B m B +
1 3 3 2 4 1 6 10 1 4 7 1 3 6 4 3 5
[ )} ( ) ( ) ( m G m G m G m G e m m J m m J m m J
nt
+ + + + c
) ( 2 2 2 { }
4 3 6 1 5 3 4 4 3 4 1 6 20 5 5 2 4
m m Z m Z m Z m Z m Z m Z Ec m G m G + +
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
1 5 11 4 3 10 3 5 9 1 6 8 1 3 7
m m Z m m Z m m Z m m Z m m Z + + + + +
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
3 4 16 2 4 15 5 4 14 1 6 13 1 3 12
m m Z m m Z m m Z m m Z m m Z + + + + +
}]
4 17
m Z
( )y m m
e
4 3
+
October Issue Page 91 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
Knowing the temperature field, the rate of heat transfer coefficient can be obtained, which in the non-dimensional
form, in terms of the Nusselt number, is given by
Nu
=
= '
' '
|
.
|
\
|
' c
c
T T
y
T
x
w
y 0
0
1
Re
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
=
y
x
y
Nu
u
=
0
1 0
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
c
c
y
nt
y
e
y
u
c
u
= ) ( ) ( 2 2 2 { (
1 3 5 3 4 4 1 3 3 2 4 1 3 10 2
m m S m m S m S m S m S m S Ec m + + +
1 3 4 2 3 1 3 1 5 2 1 4 6
2 2 { } [{ )} ( m R m R m R Ec m D m D e m m S
nt
+ + + c
) ( 2 ) ( ) ( ) (
5 3 8 3 7 1 4 6 1 3 5 3 4 4
m m R m R m m R m m R m m R + + + +
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
1 6 13 1 2 12 1 5 11 3 6 10 3 2 9
m m R m m R m m R m m R m m R + + + + +
}] ) ( ) ( ) (
4 20 6 4 16 2 4 15 5 4 14
m R m m R m m R m m R + + +
Where Re
x
=
v
x V
0
is the local Reynolds number.
The Sherwood number, is given by
Sh
=
= '
' '
|
.
|
\
|
' c
' c
C C
y
C
x
w
y 0
0
1
Re
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
=
y
x
y
C
Sh =
0
1 0
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
c
c
y
nt
y
C
e
y
C
c
= }] ) 1 ( { [
2
1
1
2 1
Am
n
Am
m e m
nt
+ + + c
5. Results And Discussion
The formulation of the problem that accounts for the effects of radiation and viscous dissipation on the flow
of an incompressible viscous chemically reacting fluid along a semi-infinite, vertical moving porous plate embedded
in a porous medium in the presence of transverse magnetic field was accomplished in the preceding sections.
Following Cogley et al. [20] approximation for the radiative heat flux in the optically thin environment, the
governing equations of the flow field were solved analytically, using a perturbation method, and the expressions for
the velocity, temperature, concentration, skin-friction, Nusselt number and Sherwood number were obtained. In
order to get a physical insight of the problem, the above physical quantities are computed numerically for different
values of the governing parameters viz., thermal Grashof number Gr, the solutal Grashof number Gm, Prandtl
number Pr, Schmidt number Sc, the plate velocity U
p
, the radiation parameter R and the Eckert number Ec.
In order to assess the accuracy of this method, we have compared our results with accepted data for the
velocity and temperature profiles for a stationary vertical porous plate corresponding to the case computed by
Helmy [7] and to the case of moving vertical porous plate as computed by Kim [16]. The results of these
comparisons are found to be in very good agreement.
Fig.1 presents the typical velocity profiles in the boundary layer for various values of the thermal Grashof
number. It is observed that an increase in Gr, leads to a rise in the values of velocity due to enhancement in buoyancy
force. Here, the positive values of Gr correspond to cooling of the plate. In addition, it is observed that the velocity
increases rapidly near the wall of the porous plate as Grashof number increases and then decays to the free stream
velocity.
For the case of different values of the solutal Grashof number, the velocity profiles in the boundary layer are
shown in Fig.2.The velocity distribution attains a distinctive maximum value in the vicinity of the plate and then
decreases properly to approach a free stream value. As expected, the fluid velocity increases and the peak value
becomes more distinctive due to increase in the buoyancy force represented by Gm.
For different values of the radiation parameter R, the velocity and temperature profiles are plotted in Figs.3
(a) and 3 (b). It is noticed that an increase in the radiation parameter results a decrease in the velocity and temperature
within the boundary layer, as well as decreased the thickness of the velocity and temperature boundary layers.
October Issue Page 92 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) display the effects of Schmidt number on the velocity and concentration respectively.
As the Schmidt number increases, the concentration decreases. This causes the concentration buoyancy effects to
decrease yielding a reduction in the fluid velocity. Reductions in the velocity and concentration distributions are
accompanied by simultaneous reductions in the velocity and concentration boundary layers.
The effects of the viscous dissipation parameter i.e., the Eckert number on the velocity and temperature are
shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b). Greater viscous dissipative heat causes a rise in the temperature as well as the velocity.
Figs.6 (a) and 6(b) illustrate the behaviour velocity and temperature for different values of Prandtl number.
The numerical results show that the effect of increasing values of Prandtl number results in a decreasing velocity.
From Fig.6 (b), it is observed that an increase in the Prandtl number results a decrease of the thermal boundary layer
thickness and in general lower average temperature within the boundary layer. The reason is that smaller values of Pr
are equivalent to increase in the thermal conductivity of the fluid and therefore heat is able to diffuse away from the
heated surface more rapidly for higher values of Pr. Hence in the case of smaller Prandtl numbers as the thermal
boundary layer is thicker and the rate of heat transfer is reduced.
The effects of the chemical reaction parameter Kr on the velocity and concentration are shown in Figs. 7(a)
and 7(b). It is noticed that an increase in the chemical reaction parameter results a decrease in the velocity and
concentration within the boundary layer.
For various values of the magnetic parameter M, the velocity profiles are plotted in Fig.8. It is obvious that
existence of the magnetic field decreases the velocity.
Fig.9 shows the velocity profiles for different values of the permeability parameter. Clearly, as K increases
the peak values of the velocity tends to increase.
Fig.10 presents the variation of the velocity distribution across the boundary layer for different values of the
plate velocity U
p
in the direction of the fluid flow. Although we have different initial plate velocities, the velocity
decreases to the constant value for given material parameters.
Tables 1-3 show the effects of the radiation parameter, Eckert number and chemical reaction parameter on
the skin-friction
f
C
, Nusselt number Nu , and Sherwood number. From Table 1, it can be seen that as the radiation
parameter increases, the skin-friction decreases and the Nusselt number increases. However, from Table 2, it is
noticed that, an increase in the chemical reaction parameter reduces the skin-friction and increases the Sherwood
number. Finally, from Table 3, it is observed that as Eckert number increases the skin-friction the skin-friction
increases, and the Nusselt number decreases.
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
y
u
Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71 Sc=0.6
M=1.0 K=0.5 n=0.1
Up=0.5 t=1.0 R=0.5
A=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Fig.1 Effect of Gr on velocity.
Gr=0.0,1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0
October Issue Page 93 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
y
u
Gm=0.0,1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0
Gr=2.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
M=1.0 K=0.5 A=0.5
Up=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Fig.2 Effect of Gm on velocity.
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
y
u
Gr=2.0 Gm=2.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
M=1.0 K=0.5 A=0.5
Up=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Fig.3(a) Effect of radiation on velocty.
R=0.0,0.5,1.0,2.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
y
u
R=0.0,0.5,1.0,2.0
Fig.3(b) Effects of radiation on temperature.
Gr=2.0 Gm=2.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
M=1.0 K=0.5 A=0.5
Up=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
October Issue Page 94 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
y
u
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
M=1.0 K=0.5 t=1.0
R=0.5 n=0.1 Up=0.5
A=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Fig.4(a) Effect of Sc on velocty.
Sc=0.3,0.6,0.78,0.94
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
y
C
Sc=0.3,0.6,0.78,0.94
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
A=0.5 t=1.0 M=1.0
K=0.5 Up=0.5 n=0.1
R=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
U
Fig.4(b) Effect of Sc on concentration.
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
y
u
Ec=0.0,0.01,0.02,0.03
Fig.5(a) Effect of Ec on velocity.
Up=0.5 Gr=2.0 Gm=2.0
Sc=0.6 R=0.5 n=0.1
A=0.5 t=1.0 M=1.0
K=0.5 Pr=0.71 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
October Issue Page 95 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0.0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
y
u
Ec=0.0,0.01,0.02,0.03
Fig.5(b) Effect of Ec on temperature.
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
M=1.0 K=0.5 A=0.5
Up=0.5 R=0.5 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
u
y
Pr=0.71,1.0,1.25,1.50
Fig.6(a) Effect of Pr on velocity.
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Sc=0.6
M=1.0 K=0.5 A=0.5
n=0.1 t=1.0 Up=0.5
R=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
y
u
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Sc=0.6
n=0.1 t=1.0 M=1.0
K=0.5 R=0.5 A=0.5
Up=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Fig.6(b) Effect of Pr on temperature.
Pr=0.71,1.0,1.25,1.50
October Issue Page 96 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
y
u
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
M=1.0 K=0.5 t=1.0
R=0.5 n=0.1 Up=0.5
A=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Fig.7(a) Effect of Kr on velocty.
Kr=0.2,0.5,0.8,1.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
y
C
Kr=0.2,0.5,0.8,1.0
Fig. 7(b) Effect of Kr on concentration
Gr=2.0 Gm=2.0 Pr=0.71
A=0.5 t=1.0 M=1.0
K=0.5 Up=0.5 n=0.1
R=0.5 Ec=0.001 Sc=0.6
c=0.001
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
y
u
Fig.8 Effect of magnetic parameter on velocity.
M=0.0,1.0,2.0,3.0
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
K=0.5 Up=0.5 Ec=0.001
A=0.5 R=0.5 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
October Issue Page 97 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
Table 1
Effects of radiation on
f
C
and
1
Re
x
Nu . Reference values as in Fig.3 (a) and 3(b).
Table 2
Effects of Sc on
f
C
and
1
Re
x
Sh . Reference values as in Fig.4 (a) and 4(b).
kr
f
C
1
Re
x
Sh
0.20
0.50
0.80
1.0
2.5088
2.4123
2.3677
2.2340
0.3106
0.5010
0.6513
0.9416
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0.5
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
y
u
K=0.1,0.5,1.0,2.0
Fig.9 Effect of permeability on velocity.
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
Up=0.5 A=0.5 M=1.0
Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5 c=0.001
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
5
10
15
20
y
u
Fig.10 Effect of Up on velocity.
Gr=2.0 Gm=1.0 Pr=0.71
Sc=0.6 n=0.1 t=1.0
M=1.0 K=0.5 R=0.5
A=0.5 Ec=0.001 Kr=0.5
c=0.001
Up=20
Up=15
Up=10
Up=5
Up=0
R
f
C
1
Re
x
Nu
0
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5451
2.4122
2.3326
2.2426
0.5818
1.1234
1.2538
1.6581
October Issue Page 98 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
Table 3
Effects of Ec on
f
C
and
1
Re
x
Nu . Reference values as in Fig.5 (a) and 5(b).
References
[1] A. Bejan and K.R. Khair, Heat and mass transfer by natural convection in a
porous medium, Int. J Heat Mass Transfer, Vol .28, pp.909-918, 1985,.
[2] F.C. Lai and F.A. Kulacki, Coupled heat and mass transfer from a sphere buried in an infinite porous
medium, Int.J Heat Mass transfer, Vol.33, pp.209-215, 1990.
[3] A. Raptis , G. Tzivanidis and N. Kafousias, Free convection and mass transfer flow through a porous
medium bounded by an infinite vertical limiting surface with constant suction, Lett. Heat and Mass
Transfer, Vol. 8, pp.417-424, 1981.
[4] F.C. Lai and F.A. Kulacki, Coupled heat and mass transfer by natural convection from vertical surfaces in
a porous medium,Int J Heat Mass Transfer,Vol. 34 , pp.1189-1194, 1991.
[5] A. Raptis, A. Massalas and G. Tzivanidis, Hydromagnetic free convection flow through a porous medium
between two parallel plates, Phys Lett., Vol 90A, pp.288-289, 1982.
[6] R.J. Gribben, the magneto hydrodynamic boundary layer in the presence of a pressure gradient
Proc.Royal.Soc London, Vol .A 287, pp.123-141, 1965.
[7] K.A. Helmy, MHD unsteady free convection flow past a vertical porous plate, ZAMM, Vol. 78, pp.255-
270, 1998.
[8] V.M. Soundalgekar, S.K. Gupta and N.S. Birajdar, Effects of mass transfer and free convection effects on
MHD Stokes problem for a vertical plate, Nucl.Eng.Design, Vol .53, pp.309-346, 1979.
[9] G.A. Gregantopoulos, J. Koullias, C.L. Goudas, and C. Courogenis, Free convection and mass transfer
effects on the hydromagnetic oscillatory flow past an infinite vertical porous plate, Astrophysics and
space science, Vol .74, pp. 357-389, 1981.
[10] R. Dekha, U.N. Das and V.M. Soundalgekar, Effects on mass transfer on flow past an impulsively started
infinite vertical plate with constant heat flux and chemical reaction, Forschungim Ingenieurwesen, Vol.
60, pp. 284-209, 1994.
[11] A.J. Chamkha, MHD flow of a numerical of uniformly stretched vertical permeable surface in the presence
heat generation\ absorption and a chemical reaction, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 30, pp. 413-
422, 2003.
[12] R. Muthecumaraswamy, Effects of a chemical reaction on a moving isothermal surface with suction, Acta
Mechanica, Vol. 155, pp. 65-72, 2002.
[13] R. Muthucumaraswamy and S. Meenakshisundaram, Theoretical study of chemical reaction effects on
vertical oscillating plate with variable temperature, Theoret. Appl. Mech., Vol. 33(3), pp. 245-257, 2006.
[14] M.A. Hossain and H.S. Takhar Radiation effect on mixed convection along a vertical plate with uniform
surface temperature, Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 31, pp.243-248, 1996.
[15] A.Y. Bakier and R.S.R. Gorla, Thermal radiation effects on horizontal surfaces in saturated porous media,
Transport in porous media, Vol. 23, pp.357-361, 1996.
[16] Y.J. Kim and A.G. Fedorov, Transient mixed radiative convection flow of a micro polar fluid past a
moving, semi-infinite vertical porous plate, Int. J.Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 46, pp.1751-1758, 2003.
[17] A.R. Bestman and S.K. Adjepong, unsteady hydromagnetic free convection flow with radiative transfer in a
rotating fluid. Astrophysics. Space. Sci., Vol.143, pp73-80, 1998.
Ec
f
C
1
Re
x
Nu
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
2.4060
2.4563
2.5334
2.5860
1.1376
0.8652
0.5429
0.2546
October Issue Page 99 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology,
Vol. 3, No.4, 2011
[18] B. Gebharat, Effects of viscous dissipation in natural convection, J. Fluid Mech, Vol. 14, pp.225-232, 1962.
[19] B. Gebharat J. Mollendorf, Viscous dissipation in external natural convection flows, J. Fluid. Mech.,
Vol.38, pp. 97-107, 1969.
[20] V.M. Soundalgekar, Viscous dissipation effects on unsteady free convective flow past an infinite, vertical
porous plate with constant suction, Int. J.Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 15, pp.1253-1261, 1972.
[21] C. Israel-Cookey, A. Ogulu and V.B. Omubo-Pepple, Influence of viscous dissipation on unsteady MHD
free-convection floe past an infinite heated vertical plate in porous medium with time-dependent suction,
Int. J. Heat Mass transfer, Vol.46, pp.2305-2311, 2003.
[22] K.S. Balamurugan , S.V.K. Varma, K. Rama Krishna Prasad and N. Ch. S.N Iyengar, Thermo-diffusion
and Chemical reaction effects on a three dimensional MHD mixed convective flow along an infinite
vertical porous plate with viscous and joules dissipation. International Journal of Advances in Science and
Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1 pp.73-84, 2011.
Authors Profile
Y. Sudarshan Reddy is a Principal at Sri Rajeswari College of Education, Kadapa, A.P. He
obtained M.Sc. & M.Phil., in Mathematics from S.V.University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
His research interests are Fluid Dynamics.
K. S. Balamurugan (M.Sc., M.Phil.) is a Assistant Professor in the Department of Mathematics &
Humanities in RVR & JC College of Engineering, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. He is having
teaching experience of 16 years including Professional colleges. His research interests are Ring
theory, Fluid Dynamics and Heat & Mass Transfer in fluid flows.
Dr. S.Vijaya Kumar Varma: M.Sc., Ph.D., is currently working as Professor in the Department
of Mathematics, S.V.University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. He has 24 years of experience
with various levels and 30 years of research experience. Fluid Dynamics, Heat & Mass Transfer in
fluid flows and Magneto-Hydro dynamics are the areas of research of his interest. He published 65
papers in National and International Journals. Under his guidance 8 students awarded PhDs and 20
students awarded M.Phil. He has attended several national and international conferences and
workshops.
Dr. N. Ch. S. N. Iyengar (M.Sc., M.E., Ph.D.) is a Senior Professor at the school of Computing
Science & Engineering at VIT University, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India. His research interests
include Agent based Distributed Computing, Data Mining, Privacy, Hiding, Security,
Cryptography, Intelligent Computational methods and Bioinformatics. He has authored several text
books and had nearly 115 research publications in International Journals. He chaired many
International Conferences and delivered invited/technical lectures/key note addresses besides being
International Programmer committee member.
October Issue Page 100 of 105 ISSN 2229 5216