PPAP 3rd Edition Check List

Supplier: Date: Submission Level:

Part #: Eng. Chg. Level: Reviewed By:
Yes No N/A Comments
1. Design Records / Drawings
Correct Eng. Chg. Level
2. Eng. Chg. Documents
On file / with Package
3.Engineering Approval
Customer Eng. Approval
4. DFMEA, Design Responsible
DFMEA present
Format to 3rd or latest edition
5. Process Flow Diagram
Production Process Flow Diagram
6. PFMEA
High RPN's Addressed
Corrective Actions in Place
Format to 3rd or latest edition
Includes entire process(receiving to shipping)
Complete
7. Dimensional Results
Correct Eng. Chg. Level
Dimensions Verified
Complete and Acceptable
8. Material / Performance
See Drawing notes
Material Certificates Included
Complete and Acceptable
9. Initial Process Study
Initial Study Ppk / Cpk > 1.67
Complete
10. MSA Studies
GR&R Studies completed
Acceptable
11. Qualified Lab Documents
Scope and Accreditation
Certificate to ISO/IEC 17025
12. Control Plan
Correct Eng. Chg. Level
Matches process flow
Acceptable
13. Part Submission Warrant
Correct Part Name & Number
Correct Eng. Chg. Level
Purchase Order Number
Signed and Dated
14. AAR
Appearance Items
15.Bulk Material Checklist
Specific Requirements / List
16. Sample Product
Sample provided if applicable
17. Master Sample
Retained w/ Approval Date
Correctly Identified by Part #
18. Checking Aids
Checking aids Required
GR&R App'd
19. Customer Specific
See Drawing notes section and supplier manual for specific requirements
Are there any customer specific requirements?
Are Parts identified properly? (correct label)

PPAPKIT_F01 Rev. A (May_03)

Dana Corp., Part Submission Warrant
Part Name ______________________________________ Part Number _______________________________________
Government and/or Safety Regulation Yes No Engineering Drawing Change Level__________ Dated___________
Additional Engineering Changes _____________________________________________________________Dated___________
Shown on Drawing Number_____________________ Purchase Order Number______________________ Weight_________kg
Checking Aid No.___________________________ Engineering Change Level_______________________ Dated___________

SUPPLIER MANUFACTURING INFORMATION SUBMISSION INFORMATION

__________________________________________________ Dimensional Materials/Functional Appearance

Supplier Name Supplier Code

__________________________________________________ Customer Name/Division___________________________

Street Address
Buyer/Buyer Code________________________________
__________________________________________________
City State/Province Postal Code Application______________________________________

REASON FOR SUBMISSION

Initial Submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change Sub-Supplier of Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Other – please specify____________________________________

REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one)

Level 1 - Dana Warrant, Appearance Approval Report (for designated appearance items only)
Level 2 - Dana Warrant, Parts, Drawings, Inspection Results, Laboratory and Functional Results, Appearance Approval Report.
Level 3 - Dana Warrant, Parts, Drawings, Inspection Results, Laboratory Results, and Appearance Approval Report, Process Capability Results,
Capability Study, Process Control Plan, Gage Study, FMEA.
Level 4 - Per Level 3, but without parts.
Level 5 - At Supplier Location – Warrant, Parts, Drawings, Inspection Results, Laboratory and Functional Results, Appearance Approval Report, Process
Capability Results, Capability Study, Process Control Plan, Gage Study, FMEA.

SUBMISSION RESULTS
Submitting: dimensional measurements material & functional tests appearance criteria ? statistical process package
These results meet all drawing and specification requirements: YES NO (if “NO” – Explanation required)
DECLARATION
I hereby affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, have been made to the applicable Production Part Approval
Process Manual 3 rd Edition Requirements. I further warrant these samples were produced at the production rate of ______ / 8 hours.
IMDS DECLARATION
We affirm that details of the materials used in these parts have been entered onto the IMDS and that the samples conform to all applicable government and
safety requirements on restricted materials. YES NO (if “NO” – Explanation required)
IMDS Number:

I have noted any deviations from this declaration below:

EXPLANATION / COMMENTS _______________________________________________________________________________________

Print Name ___________________________________________ Title_______________________________ Phone No.___________________

Supplier Authorized Signature__________________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________

FOR DANA USE ONLY – Part Disposition: Approved Rejected Other __________________________________________

Representative_____________________________________Signature_______________________________________Date_________________

PPAP KIT Rev. B (March 04)

 Production Part Approval Process—
Feasibility Commitment
Dana Locaton: Date:

Part # Part description:

Feasibility Considerations
The following questions are not intended to be all-includsive in performing a feasibility evaluation.
Drawings and/or specifications provided are for analysing your ability to meet specified requirements.
All NO answers need to be supported with attached explanations, including proposed changes to meet specifications.

Please respond to all questions.

Yes No Consideration
Is product adequately designed (application requirements, etc.) to evaluate feasiblity?
Can Engineering Performance Specifications be met as written?
Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on the drawing?
Can product be manufactured with Cpk's that meet requirements?
Is there adequate capacity to product product?
Does the design allow for the use of efficent material handling techniques?

Can the product be manufactured without incurring any unusual:

Cost fo capital equipment?
Cost for tooling?
Alternative manufacturing methods?

Is statistical process control required on this product?

Are you using statistical process control on similar products?
Where statistical process control is used on similar products:
Are the processes in control and stable?
Are Cpk's greater than 1.33?

Conclusion (check one)

Feasible: Product can be produced as specified with no revisions.
Feasible: Changes recommened (see attached.)
Not Feasible: Design revision required to produce produce within the specified requirements

Supplier Sign-Off
List all team members
Name Title Date

PPAP KIT Rev. B (March 04)

 Production Part Approval Process—
Dimensional Test Results Page_____of____
SUPPLIER PART NUMBER

NAME/LOCATION OF INSPECTION FACILITY PART NAME

ITEM DIMENSION/ SUPPLIER OK NOT COMMENTS

SPECIFICATION MEASUREMENTS OK (Dana use only)

Submitted by:
NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

PPAPKIT_F03 Rev. A (May_03)

Production Part Approval Process—
Material Test Results Page_____of____
SUPPLIER PART NUMBER

NAME/LOCATION OF LABORATORY PART NAME

TYPE OF MATERIAL SPEC. NO./ SUPPLIER OK NOT COMMENTS

TEST DATE/ TEST RESULTS OK (Dana use only)
SPECIFICATION

Submitted by:
NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

PPAPKIT_F04 Rev. A (May_03)

Production Part Approval Process—
Performance Test Results Page_____of____

SUPPLIER PART NUMBER

NAME/LOCATION OF LABORATORY PART NAME

REF. NO. REQUIREMENTS TEST TEST SUPPLIER TEST OK NOT COMMENTS

FREQ QTY. RESULTS AND OK (Dana use only)
TEST CONDITIONS

Submitted by:
NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

PPAPKIT_F05 Rev. A (May_03)