Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Welfare of Masses
SEMINAR On
CRANKLESS ENGINE
By
HOLKAR GAURAV PANDURANG
Under the Guidance Of
Prof. L.R.BHANDARKAR
Toward the fulfillment of Third Year Mechanical Engineering, Semester-I
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Holkar Gaurav Pandurang Roll No. TM-140. A student of T.E. (Mechanical Engineering Department) Batch 2010-11, has satisfactorily completed a seminar report on Crankless Engine under the guidance of Prof. L.R.Bhandarkar towards the partial fulfillmeent of the Third Year Mechanical Engineering, Semester I of the Pune University.
Prof. L.R.Bhandarkar
(Seminar Guide) (Examiner)
Date:Place
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take up the opportunity to express our gratitude towards all those who have been instrumental in the completion of this seminar. I am extremely thankful to the seminar guide Prof. L.R.Bhandarkar for his precious guidance and encouragement throughout the development of the seminar. I also express our sincere thanks to Mrs. R. R. Desai, Head of Department and also the staff of Mechanical Department.
3.Need of work
3.1 Inability to utilize entire gas force 3.1A Inertia Forces 3.2Unbalanced Forces on the Engine components 3.2A Side Thurst
4.Cam Engine
4.1Construction 4.2Cam Design
Page No 6 7 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 17 18 19 20 20 21 22 Page No
8 10 11 12 12 14 17 18 18 19
Abstract:
The conventional engine that we have been using for over a century suffers from certain inherent drawbacks. These shortfalls are a major reason why these engines operate on very low thermal efficiencies (typically 30 %). In the present scenario, it is of prime importance that the efficiency of these engines is improved upon to give better fuel economy with lower emissions. However there is limited scope for development of the engine in its present configuration, since the drawbacks that these engines suffer from, are resulting from the mechanism these engines use to transfer force and motion. In this seminar, an attempt as been made to point out these drawbacks and a modification has been suggested, which has the potential to solve these drawbacks and much more, provided that extensive research and development goes into the optimization of the proposed design.
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
The distinctive feature of our civilization today, one that makes it different from all others, is the fact that we are capable of sustained generation and wide use of mechanical power. One of the major reasons for our rapid development has been due to improvements in transportation. While power from mans muscles and that from animals were harnessed before, the boost to development came when man learnt the art to convert energy from one form to other. [1] The machine which does this job of energy conversion is called an Engine. Normally most of the engines convert thermal energy into mechanical energy and hence they are called Heat Engines. The heat engine basically converts the chemical energy of fuel into thermal energy by a process called combustion and utilizes this thermal energy to do useful work. Heat engines can be broadly classified as Internal Combustion Engines (I. C. Engines) External Combustion Engines (E. C Engines)
Internal or External combustion engines are classified by the fact that in I. C. engines, combustion takes place inside the engine while in E. C. Engines the combustion takes place outside the engine and only the heat energy developed by the combustion process is utilized in the engine. The use of E. C. Engines in transportation is questionable since they require bulky apparatus and operate on much lower thermal efficiencies than the I. C. Engines. As a result, I. C. Engines are widely used for motive applications.
Chapter2
BASIC ENGINE COMPONENTS AND NOMENCLATURE
Even though the reciprocating internal combustion engine looks quite simple, they are highly complex machines. There are hundreds of components which have to perform satisfactorily to produce power.
2.1
ENGINE COMPONENTS
A cross-section of the single cylinder spark ignition engine with overhead valves is shown in fig. 3. The major components of the engine and their functions are briefly described below.[1,2]
Engine mechanism) is itself inefficient in converting the reciprocating motion of the piston to the rotary motion of the crankshaft. As we see in fig 4. a, the crank moment obtained by the connecting rod at TDC is necessarily nil as the connecting rod and the crank arms are in line with each other and there is no effective moment arm. As the piston moves away from TDC, a very small crank moment is obtained (fig 4. b). This moment is not enough to efficiently transfer motion to the crank. As we move further down the stroke the crank moment increases, however it is not substantial until 30 deg ATDC and reaches its maximum value only after 40% of the piston stroke is completed, i.e. at about 60 deg ATDC (fig 4. c) and then drops at a rapid rate which mirrors its rise. Thus it is very evident that the (combustion characteristics of the fuel) has nothing to do with the mechanism by which power is transmitted from the piston to the drive line, in a conventional engine.[3,4,6]
A)INERTIA FORCES
The con rod gives rise to considerable inertia forces. The path of motion of the connecting rod is not along or about the cylinder axis, but it pulsates on either side of it. The weight of the con rod is also not uniformly distributed, but concentrated at its ends. The con rod has to be robust rigid and tough to withstand the
10
effects of these unbalanced forces and also to transmit the high compressive stresses at the start of the expansion stroke.[4] The large inertia forces due to the mass of the con rod and the components of the other forces due to the angularity of the con rod causes increase in piston side thrust and also loads the bearings heavily(fig. 9). This causes increased friction losses and reduces thermal efficiency and also increases noise and vibration in the engine.
(a)
(b)
(c)
11
The connecting rod (con rod) is one of the components of the engine that is a major source of unbalanced forces in the engine. In fig 4.a we can see that at TDC or BDC, the con rod is in line with the crank and the entire gas force is transmitted along the axis of the con rod. Hence this would not give any effective moment arm to the crank and would only load the bearings. However at any other position of the piston, the angularity of the connecting rod causes it to press the piston against the cylinder wall and the cylinder wall to react against the piston. This is called piston side thrust.[3,6]
12
B)
To accommodate the entire assembly and also to damp some of the vibrations caused due to the reciprocating parts, the engine block becomes tough, heavy and bulky. As a result the weight of the engine further increases and power to weight ratio of the engine is considerably lowered. This further increase the load on the drive and ultimately lesser tractive force is available to the driver. Thus we can see that due to various drawbacks in the configuration of the basic conventional engine, about 15% of the power generated by the engine is lost as frictional losses. Also about 25% of the usable heat is lost to the exhaust because the engine is not able to convert the gas force into usable work
13
14
We have seen how insufficient the conventional engine is in converting the gas forces into usable force. The movement if the piston in a conventional engine is the function of crank rotation. However since the piston is acting as the follower in the modified engine, we can control the displacement, velocity and acceleration of the piston by controlling the cam profile. In the conventional engine, one of the major hurdles facing the of force was the fact that mechanical advantage is obtained at around 60 deg. ATDC, i.e. after the piston has covered about 40% of its travel, thus losing valuable cylinder pressure. This problem is overcome using the cam of suitable profile which would give maximum mechanical advantage at around 20 deg ATDC (i.e. app. 10 % of the piston travel). The cam profile is also customized to give maximum torque lever over a greater no. of degrees of rotation which transfers the torque to the output shaft more efficiently over the entire operating range. One thing that has to be considered in the modified design is that, the cranking distance is determined by the length from the point of contact of the bearing with the cam to the centre of the output shaft. The cam can be designed to provide the same max torque lever as that of the conventional engine over a larger no. of degrees of rotation. Another drawback of the conventional engine, we have seen is that the piston displacement, velocity and acceleration is a function of crank position. However this is a major drawback as the motion of the piston should compliment the rate of expansion of the burnt gases so as to fully utilize the potentially available gas force without shock and vibration. However in case of the cam engine we can customize the piston acceleration and alter it to suit a particular fuel and / or torque application, so as to attain better control over the combustion. It is also seen that the force Ps generated due to the angularity of the con rod causes side thrust on the piston during major part of the stoke. This increases wear and thus lubrication requirement of the assembly. In the cam engine the piston rod is made integral to the piston and two roller bearings are mounted on either side of it. Since the gas force is transmitted along the axis of the piston rod to the roller bearings. For the entire stoke, side thrust is considerable reduced. Some side thrust, however, will 15
still be present due to the reaction from the bearings. But this is much lesser than what exists in a conventional engine. This eliminates the need for large piston skirts as in the case of conventional engine. Also since the side thrust is reduced the effective gas force available at the lever arm is increased and more torque is generated on the output shaft. This result in more power and increase in the thermal efficiency of the engine. Eliminating the connecting rod gives the cam engine two major advantages over the conventional engine. a. The con. Rod is an irregularly reciprocating member and gives rise to unbalanced inertia forces which reduces the effective crank movement (fig.) available to the crank and also increases friction losses by inducing piston side thrust. Due to its pulsating motion causes vibration in the engine. b. To have optimum mechanical advantage the length of the con. Rod is usually kept 4 times the length of the crank arm. (n=l/r=4). This increases the size f the engine and hence its weight. In the cam engine the same mechanical advantage is provided by the cam in a much smaller space. Hence the cam engine would be much smaller in sixe than a comparable conventional engine.
The weight of the cam is comparable to the weight of the crank arm with the balancing weight. Hence there would not be much change in the overall weight of the engine due to the cam. Since the cam engine has fewer moving parts than the conventional engine, friction losses would be substantially reduced. Since parts like the gudgeon pin and the crank pin are eliminated, there are no friction losses due to these parts.
4.2CAM DESIGN
The cam for the model was designed to simulate the same piston motion as that of the conventional engine for the purpose of
16
comparing and analyzing the two configurations. The variation of piston displacement with respect to crank rotation is given in the graph. (fig.4.2),.
17
(b)
Of course the cam provides lesser and lesser torque lever as the piston advances in its stroke but cylinder pressure also decreases as the stroke advances. The basic advantage of the cam engine is that we can make the cam give the maximum mechanical advantage when there is maximum gas pressure in the cylinder. Thus we can get more power output from the engine with the same quantity of fuel burnt. This would also help in keeping the idle speed of the engine lower.[6]
18
the ramps of the cams spreading them apart ending the stroke. The point of maximum mechanical advantage or transfer is around 20-30deg ATDC (when the piston moves approximately 10% of its travel) making the most of the high cylinder pressure. This compares to a conventional engine that reaches maximum mechanical advantage around 60-70deg ATDC. (after the piston has moved through just over 40% of its travel, losing approximately half of the cylinder pressure). The effective cranking distance is determined by the length from the point of bearing contact to the centre of the output shaft (not the stroke). A conventional engine's turning distance is half of the piston stroke. The piston acceleration throughout the stroke is controlled by the cam grind which can be altered to suit a wide variety of fuels, torque requirements and/or rev range. The piston assembly slides rigidly through the block via an oil pressure fed guiding system eliminating piston to cylinder-bore contact.
This reduces wear and lubrication requirements in the cylinder, and also reduces piston side shock making ceramic technology suitable. One module can either comprise of two trilobate cams and either two, or four pistons in an X configuration. The counter rotation is performed by a reverse gear set at a 1:3 ratio shaft providing two strokes of a piston to 360 degrees of output shaft rotation. The same as a conventional engine.
6) ADVANTAGES
On comparing with the conventional engine the cam engine has the following advantages.[5]
Approximately one half the size and weight of a conventional engine (for
similar applications) combined with improved output substantially increases power/weight and torque/weight ratio. Fewer moving and total components. As a result of fewer components,
more easily manufactured than conventional engines. Identical cylinder head assembly (top end) to conventional engines.
21
natural of forced aspiration. Eliminated irregularly reciprocating components such as connecting rods.
7)Drawbacks
Developing the optimum cam profile would require extensive testing and research.
The cam follower mechanism may suffer from the jump phenomenon at high speeds. However it can be over come by using two pistons in an opposed cylinder configuration.
The engine would suffer from balancing problems as the cam is not a symmetrical member. This can be overcome by mounting a counter-rotating balancer shaft on the output shaft.
8)Conclusions:
1.Many alternative internal combustion engine designs are proposed every year. However a very few of them are developed commercially. Most designs would require substantial development and manufacturing investment to enable them to fully realize their advantages.
22
2.However automobile manufacturers prefer to invest on the tried and tested technology of the conventional engine that is well known and well provided for in the automotive sphere design, manufacturing investment to use and disposal. 3.However recent restriction on emissions and the looming shortage of fossil fuel has forced manufacturers to look for alternative technology that would give more power, more efficiency and more mileage.
4.The S.I. Engine has been developed for more then a century and carries a vast knowledge base with it. The CAM Engine can use this extensive development to enhance its performance even further. It can use the advancements in ignition control, air-fuel mixture preparation control etc. It still needs a lot of development, but its basic configuration provides a promising answer to a lot of questions.
9)Future Scope
C.F.D. analysis and F.E.M. analysis could be done on the engine components to obtain optimum design of the components. The cam profile can be perfected upon by model testing and PRO-E analysis. I have simulated the motion of the piston with the model to show that motion transfer is possible. Further I would like to modify an actual engine to the proposed configuration to actually visualize its effects and feasibility. 23
10)References
1.
FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE by W GILL, JAMES H SMITH, EUGENE J ZIURYS,FOURTH ED, OXFORD & IBH PUB., p: p- 1.1 1.6 2. INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE by V GANESHAN
PAUL
02-2006) 5. ALTERNATIVE ENGINE TECHNOLOGY by C F TAYLOR p: p- 5-6,153 6. COMBUSTION ENGINES by P M HELDT, p:p- 29,34,38-39,123 7. AUTOMOTIVE ENGINES by S SRINIVASAN, FIRST ED,THIRD REPRINT TATA MCGRAW HILL PUB, Page No. 13 8. THEORY OF MACHINES by R S KHURMI, J K GUPTA REV. MULTICOLOUR ED, S CHAND PUB, p: p- 523-525, 530, 780782,799-800 9. DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF FOURSTROKE ENGINE by GORDON P BLAIR
24
25